Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • The cGAS-STING pathway: DNA sensing in health and disease (Jun 2026)
    • Neurodegeneration (Mar 2026)
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Conflict of interest
  • Funding support
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Clinical Research and Public HealthCardiologyInflammationMetabolism Open Access | 10.1172/JCI201862

Pulmonary arterial hypertension induces a metabolic and inflammatory hepatopathy

Madelyn J. Blake,1 Sally E. Prins,1 Jeffrey Blake,2 Lynn M. Hartweck,2 Jenna B. Mendelson,3 Steeve Provencher,4 Sandra Breuils-Bonnet,4 Sebastien Bonnet,4,5 and Kurt W. Prins1

1Gazes Cardiac Research Institute, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

2Cardiovascular Division, Lillehei Heart Institute, and

3Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

4PAH Research Group, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et Pneumologie de Québec Research Center, Department of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

5Institute for Lung Health, German Center for Lung Research, Cardio-Pulmonary Institute, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Kurt W. Prins, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 30 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425. Email: prins@musc.edu.

Find articles by Blake, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Gazes Cardiac Research Institute, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

2Cardiovascular Division, Lillehei Heart Institute, and

3Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

4PAH Research Group, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et Pneumologie de Québec Research Center, Department of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

5Institute for Lung Health, German Center for Lung Research, Cardio-Pulmonary Institute, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Kurt W. Prins, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 30 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425. Email: prins@musc.edu.

Find articles by Prins, S. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Gazes Cardiac Research Institute, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

2Cardiovascular Division, Lillehei Heart Institute, and

3Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

4PAH Research Group, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et Pneumologie de Québec Research Center, Department of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

5Institute for Lung Health, German Center for Lung Research, Cardio-Pulmonary Institute, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Kurt W. Prins, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 30 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425. Email: prins@musc.edu.

Find articles by Blake, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Gazes Cardiac Research Institute, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

2Cardiovascular Division, Lillehei Heart Institute, and

3Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

4PAH Research Group, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et Pneumologie de Québec Research Center, Department of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

5Institute for Lung Health, German Center for Lung Research, Cardio-Pulmonary Institute, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Kurt W. Prins, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 30 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425. Email: prins@musc.edu.

Find articles by Hartweck, L. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Gazes Cardiac Research Institute, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

2Cardiovascular Division, Lillehei Heart Institute, and

3Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

4PAH Research Group, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et Pneumologie de Québec Research Center, Department of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

5Institute for Lung Health, German Center for Lung Research, Cardio-Pulmonary Institute, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Kurt W. Prins, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 30 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425. Email: prins@musc.edu.

Find articles by Mendelson, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Gazes Cardiac Research Institute, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

2Cardiovascular Division, Lillehei Heart Institute, and

3Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

4PAH Research Group, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et Pneumologie de Québec Research Center, Department of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

5Institute for Lung Health, German Center for Lung Research, Cardio-Pulmonary Institute, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Kurt W. Prins, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 30 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425. Email: prins@musc.edu.

Find articles by Provencher, S. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Gazes Cardiac Research Institute, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

2Cardiovascular Division, Lillehei Heart Institute, and

3Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

4PAH Research Group, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et Pneumologie de Québec Research Center, Department of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

5Institute for Lung Health, German Center for Lung Research, Cardio-Pulmonary Institute, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Kurt W. Prins, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 30 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425. Email: prins@musc.edu.

Find articles by Breuils-Bonnet, S. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Gazes Cardiac Research Institute, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

2Cardiovascular Division, Lillehei Heart Institute, and

3Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

4PAH Research Group, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et Pneumologie de Québec Research Center, Department of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

5Institute for Lung Health, German Center for Lung Research, Cardio-Pulmonary Institute, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Kurt W. Prins, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 30 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425. Email: prins@musc.edu.

Find articles by Bonnet, S. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

1Gazes Cardiac Research Institute, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.

2Cardiovascular Division, Lillehei Heart Institute, and

3Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

4PAH Research Group, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et Pneumologie de Québec Research Center, Department of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

5Institute for Lung Health, German Center for Lung Research, Cardio-Pulmonary Institute, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Address correspondence to: Kurt W. Prins, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 30 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425. Email: prins@musc.edu.

Find articles by Prins, K. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published May 28, 2026 - More info

Published in Volume 136, Issue 13 on July 1, 2026
J Clin Invest. 2026;136(13):e201862. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI201862.
© 2026 Blake et al. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Published May 28, 2026 - Version history
Received: October 28, 2025; Accepted: May 20, 2026
View PDF
Abstract

BACKGROUND. Right ventricular failure (RVF) is a major determinant of mortality in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), and hepatic dysfunction predicts adverse outcomes. However, the cell-specific effects of PAH/RVF on the human liver remain poorly defined.

METHODS. We performed single-nucleus RNA-seq (snRNA-seq) of autopsy-derived liver tissue from 5 patients with PAH and 4 healthy individuals (non-PAH) treated as controls and compared these findings with publicly available snRNA-seq datasets from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and Fontan-associated liver disease (FALD). Transcriptomic analyses were integrated with histologic assessment, mitochondrion-enriched proteomics, and correlations with clinical markers of PAH/RVF severity.

RESULTS. PAH livers showed cell-specific metabolic, inflammatory, and fibrotic remodeling distinct from NASH and FALD. PAH hepatocytes exhibited a hypoxia-adapted, Warburg-like metabolic phenotype with reduced fatty acid metabolism, gluconeogenesis, cytochrome P450 activity, and ketone metabolism. PAH endothelial cells demonstrated increased glycolytic pathway activity and altered adhesion/barrier signaling. PAH hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) displayed HIF-1 and PI3K/Akt pathway activation, increased IL-6 expression, and histologic evidence of perivascular fibrotic remodeling. PAH macrophages showed complement activation with reduced JAK/STAT signaling. HSC HIF-1 activity correlated with clinical markers of PAH/RVF severity.

CONCLUSION. PAH induces a distinct metabolic and inflammatory hepatopathy characterized by hepatocyte metabolic reprogramming, HSC activation, macrophage complement signaling, and suppressed ketone metabolism. These findings support PAH-associated hepatopathy as a disease-specific end-organ phenotype linked to RVF severity.

FUNDING. NIH grants F31 HL170585, R01 HL158795, and R01 HL162927.

Graphical Abstract
graphical abstract
Introduction

Right ventricular failure (RVF) is the leading cause of death in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) (1). RVF remains difficult to treat because it results in widespread end-organ compromise as demonstrated by alterations in brain, skeletal muscle, gastrointestinal tract, kidney, and liver function (2). Thus, defining and understanding how RVF impacts each of these important organs are key steps toward improving patient outcomes.

Recent clinical data in PAH are defining the detrimental consequences of RVF on hepatic structure and function, and demonstrating liver dysfunction robustly predicts outcomes. Patients with PAH exhibit elevated liver fibrosis (3) and heightened liver stiffness (4), both of which correlate with RVF severity. Additionally, changes in liver function are highly prognostic in PAH, as even minor perturbations in serum liver enzymes (5) (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase) or liver functional assessments (bilirubin, albumin, and international normalized ratio (INR) (6) are strongly associated with adverse outcomes. Clearly, hepatic dysfunction is a robust and sensitive marker of RVF, but the cellular and molecular derangements present in PAH livers are undefined.

The prevailing theory in PAH is that hepatopathy is caused by chronic venous stasis from RVF (2); however, patients with PAH frequently exhibit systemic metabolic derangements that could also contribute. At present, a comparison of PAH hepatopathy with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), a metabolically driven liver disease, and Fontan-associated liver disease (FALD), a hepatopathy defined by chronic venous stasis, is lacking. To address this critical knowledge gap, we generated a single-cell transcriptomic atlas of PAH hepatopathy by performing single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) of control (n = 4 patients, 53,057 nuclei) and PAH (n = 5 patients, 71,792 nuclei) liver samples. We then compared our findings with publicly available snRNA-seq datasets from patients with NASH and FALD to delineate phenotypic similarities and differences between PAH-associated liver disease and hepatopathies driven by systemic metabolic alterations and chronic venous stasis.

Results

snRNA-seq identified specific alterations in liver cellular composition among PAH, NASH, and FALD. After processing and removal of low-quality data, we compared 53,057 control nuclei with 71,792 PAH nuclei (Figure 1A). Unsupervised clustering identified 8 cell types: hepatocytes, endothelial cells (ECs), hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), macrophages, lymphocytes, B cells, plasma cells, and cholangiocytes. PAH livers had an increased relative abundance of hepatocytes (control: 41.1%, PAH: 60.6%), ECs (control: 9.9%, PAH: 13.4%), plasma cells (control: 0.1%, PAH: 2.0%), and macrophages (control: 4.0%, PAH: 5.5%). However, HSCs (control: 27.7%, PAH: 13.5%), lymphocytes (control: 10.8%, PAH: 3.4%), and cholangiocytes (control: 5.9%, PAH: 1.0%) were reduced.

snRNA-seq identified alterations in the cellular landscape in PAH, NASH, anFigure 1

snRNA-seq identified alterations in the cellular landscape in PAH, NASH, and FALD livers. (A) UMAP visualization of 8 cell types identified in PAH livers with unsupervised clustering. Validated marker genes used to identify cell types in PAH. UMAP and relative abundances of each cell type in control and PAH livers, with arrows indicating relative abundance change in PAH relative to control. (B) UMAP visualization of 6 cell types identified in NASH livers with unsupervised clustering. Validated marker genes used to identify cell types in NASH. UMAP and relative abundances of each cell type in control and NASH livers, with arrows indicating relative abundance change in NASH relative to control. (C) UMAP visualization of 6 cell types identified in FALD livers with unsupervised clustering. Validated marker genes used to identify cell types in FALD. UMAP and relative abundances of each cell type in control and FALD livers, with arrows indicating relative abundance change in FALD relative to control.

Next, we compared our results with publicly available data from 2 distinct triggers of human hepatopathy: NASH (metabolically driven) and FALD (chronic venous stasis driven). The NASH dataset consisted of nuclei from 3 non-NASH controls (42,544 nuclei) and 4 NASH patients (55,996 nuclei) (Figure 1B). Control and NASH livers possessed 6 unique cell types, and NASH livers displayed heightened relative abundances of ECs (control: 9.2%, NASH: 14.7%), macrophages (control: 7.3%, NASH: 7.7%), HSCs (control: 4.1%, NASH: 5.6%), and cholangiocytes (control: 1.6%, NASH: 6.3%), but hepatocytes (control: 70.3%, NASH: 60.1%) and lymphocytes (control: 7.5%, NASH: 5.7%) were decreased. We then probed data from 2 non-FALD control (20,186 nuclei) and 4 FALD (24,911 nuclei) patients (Figure 1C). In the FALD dataset, 6 distinct cell types were identified: hepatocytes, ECs, HSCs, macrophages, lymphocytes, and cholangiocytes. FALD livers displayed greater relative abundances of ECs (control: 4.7%, FALD: 13.6%), macrophages (control: 8.3%, FALD: 9.1%), HSCs (control: 1.5%, FALD: 2.5%), cholangiocytes (control: 1.0%, FALD: 3.1%), and lymphocytes (control: 2.0%, FALD: 4.7%), with fewer hepatocytes (control: 82.0%, FALD: 66.9%). Bar plots depicting sample-specific, cell type relative abundances across the 3 datasets are provided in Supplemental Figure 3, A–C (supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI201862DS1).

PAH hepatocytes exhibited metabolic reprogramming and altered cellular adhesion and extracellular matrix engagement distinct from NASH and FALD. Unsupervised clustering revealed unique hepatocyte populations in PAH, NASH, and FALD livers relative to their controls (Figure 2A). In PAH hepatocytes, transcripts associated with hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) signaling, carbon metabolism, and glucose metabolism were enriched, whereas those involved in fatty acid metabolism and cytochrome P450 oxidation were reduced (Supplemental Figure 4A). NASH hepatocytes enriched fatty acid metabolism transcripts but downregulated cytochrome P450 oxidation (Supplemental Figure 4B). FALD hepatocytes demonstrated upregulation of fatty acid and amino acid metabolism, while oxidative phosphorylation transcripts were reduced (Supplemental Figure 4C).

PAH hepatocyte metabolic alterations, pro-proliferative phenotype, and suppFigure 2

PAH hepatocyte metabolic alterations, pro-proliferative phenotype, and suppressed cell adhesion signaling were distinct from NASH and FALD. (A) UMAP visualization of PAH, NASH, and FALD hepatocyte clusters and respective controls. (B) Relative pathway activity displayed by violin plots of module scores calculated from relevant enriched/suppressed pathways in PAH, NASH, and FALD hepatocytes. Median values with interquartile range are displayed, and P values were calculated by either Student’s t test or Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test, as appropriate. (C) Top 5 most dysregulated cellular communication pathways based on total signaling strength across PAH, NASH, and FALD hepatocytes. Cell signaling pathways are ranked based on magnitude of the log2FC in PAH, with red bars indicating increased pathway signaling in PAH relative to control hepatocytes and blue bars indicating decreased pathways. No statistical test was applied; pathways are ranked by absolute log2FC. (D) Normalized protein abundances in control and PAH human livers across the WikiPathways aerobic glycolysis pathway and the KEGG fatty acid metabolism, oxidation by cytochrome P450, and HIF-1 signaling pathways. Median values with range are displayed, and P values were calculated using Mann-Whitney tests.

To more precisely probe hepatic metabolism, we calculated module scores to assess engagement in 2 key metabolic domains: ATP-generating pathways and the cytochrome P450 pathway. In PAH, hepatocytes exhibited heightened aerobic glycolysis and preserved oxidative phosphorylation activity but reduced gluconeogenesis and fatty acid metabolism (Figure 2B). NASH hepatocytes displayed enhanced aerobic glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, fatty acid metabolism, and oxidative phosphorylation activity compared with controls (Figure 2B). Conversely, FALD hepatocytes showed increased fatty acid metabolism but diminished aerobic glycolysis, gluconeogenesis, and oxidative phosphorylation (Figure 2B). Next, we assessed activity in the cytochrome P450 pathway. Cytochrome P450 activity was suppressed in PAH and NASH but increased in FALD hepatocytes, indicating disease-specific alterations. Finally, while HIF-1 signaling activity was elevated in all 3 disease states, the divergent metabolic profiles observed among PAH, NASH, and FALD hepatocytes suggested that HIF-1 activation alone did not account for the full spectrum of metabolic reprogramming (Figure 2B).

We then identified the 5 most dysregulated signaling pathways in hepatocytes across each disease state using CellChat (7) (Figure 2C). In PAH hepatocytes, ECM signaling via collagen and laminin was elevated. In contrast, cell adhesion molecule, amyloid precursor protein, and adhesion G protein–coupled receptor L signaling was reduced, suggesting suppression of adhesion-related programs (Figure 2C). In NASH hepatocytes, ephrin receptor A signaling, which regulates cell positioning and inflammatory responses (8), was increased alongside cadherin-mediated adhesion and adhesion G protein–coupled receptor E signaling, which is involved in macrophage-hepatocyte communication. Conversely, signaling through amyloid precursor protein, a mediator of cellular stress responses, and neuregulin, a hepatoprotective growth factor, was reduced (Figure 2C). In FALD, hepatocytes showed signs of structural remodeling, with increased cell adhesion molecule M, adhesion G protein–coupled receptor G, cadherin, collagen, and laminin signaling (Figure 2C). Interestingly, although hepatocyte remodeling through heightened ECM signaling was present in both PAH and FALD hepatocytes, only FALD displayed activation of adhesion molecules. However, NASH hepatocytes exhibited immune and adhesion-related signaling changes, with less engagement of structural signaling pathways.

Finally, we analyzed proteomic data from mitochondrion-enriched fractions of a subset of the same control and PAH livers (n = 4 control, n = 3 PAH) to determine whether these metabolic alterations were present at the protein level. Consistent with our transcriptomic findings, normalized protein abundances in the aerobic glycolysis and HIF-1 signaling pathways were nonsignificantly increased in PAH livers, whereas proteins involved in the fatty acid metabolism and cytochrome P450 oxidation pathways were nonsignificantly reduced relative to controls (Figure 2D).

PAH ECs demonstrated glycolytic bias and altered barrier function. Next, we evaluated EC reprogramming in PAH, NASH, and FALD livers (Figure 3A). In PAH, ECs demonstrated hypoxia-associated metabolic remodeling as HIF-1 signaling, glycolysis, PI3K/Akt, and pentose phosphate pathways were enriched (Supplemental Figure 5A). In contrast, transcripts related to the innate immune system, type I interferon signaling, and FoxO signaling were suppressed (Supplemental Figure 5A). NASH ECs showed heightened ribosome, fatty acid metabolism, and complement pathway transcripts but downregulation of one-carbon metabolism and AMPK signaling (Supplemental Figure 5B). FALD ECs upregulated Ras, focal adhesion, and B cell receptor signaling, while oxidative phosphorylation and complement signaling transcripts were reduced (Supplemental Figure 5C).

PAH ECs exhibited Warburg-like metabolism and alterations in cell adhesionFigure 3

PAH ECs exhibited Warburg-like metabolism and alterations in cell adhesion and barrier function pathways. (A) UMAP visualization of PAH, NASH, and FALD EC clusters and respective controls. (B) Relative pathway activity displayed by violin plots of module scores calculated from relevant enriched/suppressed pathways in PAH, NASH, and FALD ECs. Median values with interquartile range are displayed, and P values were calculated by either Student’s t test or Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test, as appropriate. (C) Top 5 most dysregulated cellular communication pathways based on total signaling strength across PAH, NASH, and FALD ECs. Cell signaling pathways are ranked based on magnitude of the log2FC in PAH, with red bars indicating increased pathway signaling in PAH relative to control ECs and blue bars indicating decreased pathways. No statistical test was applied; pathways are ranked by absolute log2FC.

We then calculated module scores to assess engagement in core glycolytic and growth/survival signaling pathways across the disease states (Figure 3B). In PAH, ECs showed elevated activity in the aerobic glycolysis and pentose phosphate pathways but reduced oxidative phosphorylation. NASH ECs displayed increased aerobic glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation with preserved pentose phosphate pathway activity. In contrast, FALD ECs had comparable aerobic glycolysis and pentose phosphate activity relative to controls but suppressed oxidative phosphorylation (Figure 3B). We next assessed PI3K/Akt and ECM-receptor interaction activity. PAH ECs demonstrated increased PI3K/Akt signaling with minimally altered ECM-receptor interaction activity relative to control ECs. NASH ECs augmented ECM-receptor interaction activity and preserved PI3K/Akt signaling, while FALD ECs upregulated both pathways (Figure 3B).

To probe how these cellular changes were predicted to modulate cell–cell interactions, we identified the 5 most dysregulated EC cellular communication pathways in each disease state. In PAH ECs, cell adhesion signaling via adhesion G protein–coupled receptor G and fibronectin-1 was increased, while signaling related to cadherin, protease-activated receptor, and amyloid precursor protein was reduced (Figure 3C), suggesting EC barrier function may be compromised as both cadherin and protease-activated receptor are central to endothelial barrier integrity and vascular permeability (9, 10). In NASH ECs, neuregulin, which promotes vascular homeostasis, was elevated along with claudin, a regulator of tight junction integrity (11), and androsterone signaling. In contrast, signaling via adhesion G protein–coupled receptor L and cadherins was reduced (Figure 3C). In FALD, ECs displayed increased matrix and angiogenic signaling, including elevated adhesion G protein–coupled receptor G, cholesterol, collagen, and VEGF signaling, while 27-hydroxycholesterol signaling was reduced (Figure 3C). Thus, EC signaling appeared to be distinct across diseases. PAH had alterations in cell adhesion and barrier function; FALD ECs exhibited structural and angiogenic remodeling, and NASH ECs showed heightened steroid signaling with dysregulation of vascular homeostasis pathways.

Divergent metabolic and fibrotic signaling profiles distinguished HSCs in PAH, NASH, and FALD. We next examined transcriptional alterations in HSCs (Figure 4A). In PAH, HSCs demonstrated increased HIF-1 and PI3K/Akt transcripts, with concurrent enrichment of carbon, glucose, and amino acid metabolism. Conversely, transcripts involved in innate immune sensing, TGF-β, and fatty acid metabolism were suppressed (Supplemental Figure 6A). NASH HSCs exhibited upregulation of ECM-receptor interaction, PI3K/Akt, and focal adhesion transcripts, accompanied by downregulation of WNT signaling and dysregulated metabolism (Supplemental Figure 6B). In FALD, HSCs displayed enhancement of TGF-β and WNT signaling transcripts, while oxidative phosphorylation was reduced (Supplemental Figure 6C).

Upregulated HIF-1 and PI3K/Akt signaling characterized HSC signaling in PAHFigure 4

Upregulated HIF-1 and PI3K/Akt signaling characterized HSC signaling in PAH. (A) UMAP visualization of PAH, NASH, and FALD HSC clusters and controls. (B) Relative pathway activity displayed by violin plots of module scores calculated from relevant enriched/suppressed pathways in PAH, NASH, and FALD HSCs. Median values with interquartile range are displayed, and P values were calculated by either Student’s t test or Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test, as appropriate. (C) Top 5 most dysregulated cellular communication pathways based on total signaling strength across PAH, NASH, and FALD HSCs. Cell signaling pathways are ranked based on magnitude of the log2FC in PAH, with red bars indicating increased pathway signaling in PAH relative to control HSCs and blue bars indicating decreased pathways. Pathways are ranked by absolute log2FC. (D) Representative images and quantification of median perivascular fibrosis (%) surrounding the central vein (CV) in control (n = 4) and PAH (n = 5) livers using trichrome staining (blue indicates fibrosis). 4–5 central veins were quantified per patient. Data are presented as median values with range, and P values were calculated using Mann-Whitney tests. Arrows indicate perivascular fibrosis. Scale bar: 50 μm. (E) Representative images and quantification of median α-smooth muscle actin (%) surrounding the central vein in control (n = 4) and PAH (n = 5) livers. 4–5 central veins were quantified per patient. Yellow indicates α-smooth muscle actin staining, and blue indicates DAPI-stained nuclei. Data are presented as median values with range, and P values were calculated using Mann-Whitney tests. Arrows highlight α-smooth muscle actin+ HSCs. Scale bar: 20 μm. (F) Linear regression analyses showing associations between HSC HIF-1 activation and median perivascular fibrosis (top) and mean α-smooth muscle actin (bottom) in control (black) and PAH (red) patients. R2 and P values were calculated using linear regression. Dotted lines indicate 95% confidence intervals.

We then evaluated metabolic and profibrotic pathways in HSCs from PAH, NASH, and FALD livers (Figure 4B). There were divergent metabolic alterations with regards to glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation. NASH HSCs exhibited heightened metabolic regulation with increased glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation, while these pathways were minimally altered or suppressed in PAH and FALD (Figure 4B). We then assessed PI3K/Akt, ECM-receptor interaction, and TGF-β signaling due to their roles in hepatic fibrosis. ECM-receptor interaction transcript expression was increased in all 3 disease states, but PI3K/Akt and TGF-β pathways were reduced in PAH despite being elevated in both NASH and FALD (Figure 4B). Interestingly, HIF-1 activity, which regulates fibrogenic activation under hypoxic stress, was consistently elevated in HSCs across disease states (Figure 4B).

Next, we identified the 5 most altered HSC cellular communication pathways in each disease state (Figure 4C). In PAH, HSCs showed reduced signaling via several cell adhesion molecules and growth factors, including fibronectin-1, amyloid precursor protein, adhesion G protein–coupled receptor L, receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase M, and platelet-derived growth factor (Figure 4C). NASH HSCs displayed enriched inflammation-related steroid hormone signaling, evidenced by elevated dihydrotestosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate activity, as well as increased claudin activity, while adhesion G protein–coupled receptor L and neuregulin signaling was suppressed (Figure 4C). In FALD, HSCs had heightened structural remodeling and profibrotic communication via increased collagen, adhesion G protein–coupled receptor G, laminin, and VEGF signaling (Figure 4C). Together, these data demonstrate distinct, disease-specific reprogramming of cellular signaling in HSCs from PAH, NASH, and FALD livers.

Finally, we examined whether transcriptomic changes in PAH HSCs were accompanied by histologic evidence of HSC activation and fibrotic remodeling. PAH livers displayed increased total fibrosis relative to controls, although this change did not reach statistical significance (Supplemental Figure 7A). However, sample-specific HIF-1 signaling in HSCs was positively and significantly correlated with total fibrosis in liver specimens (Supplemental Figure 7B). When we examined perivascular fibrosis surrounding hepatic central veins, we found a significant elevation in PAH livers (Figure 4D). In addition, α-smooth muscle actin immunoreactivity, an indicator of activated HSCs (12), was also significantly heightened in PAH livers compared with controls (Figure 4E, Supplemental Videos 1 and 2). Both median perivascular fibrosis and mean α-smooth muscle actin positive area were positively and significantly associated with sample-specific HIF-1 signaling in HSCs (Figure 4F).

PAH macrophages exhibited complement activation, oxidative metabolism, and immune signaling that are distinct from NASH and FALD macrophages. We then examined transcriptional changes in hepatic macrophages from PAH, NASH, and FALD livers (Figure 5A). In PAH, macrophages upregulated complement and coagulation transcripts, while JAK/STAT signaling and fatty acid metabolism were suppressed (Supplemental Figure 8A). NASH macrophages showed elevated transcripts in the complement, ferroptosis, and ribosome pathways but downregulation of PDGFR-β and WNT signaling (Supplemental Figure 8B). In FALD, macrophages exhibited increased platelet activation, IL-3, and chemokine signaling transcripts, alongside diminished oxidative phosphorylation (Supplemental Figure 8C).

Proinflammatory complement signaling with suppressed JAK/STAT signaling andFigure 5

Proinflammatory complement signaling with suppressed JAK/STAT signaling and cell–cell communication defined PAH macrophages. (A) UMAP visualization of PAH, NASH, and FALD macrophage clusters and respective controls. (B) Relative pathway activity displayed by violin plots of module scores calculated from relevant enriched/suppressed pathways in PAH, NASH, and FALD macrophages. Median values with interquartile range are displayed, and P values were calculated by either Student’s t test or Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test, as appropriate. (C) Top 5 most dysregulated cellular communication pathways based on total signaling strength across PAH, NASH, and FALD macrophages. Cell signaling pathways are ranked based on magnitude of the log2FC in PAH, with red bars indicating increased pathway signaling in PAH relative to control macrophages and blue bars indicating decreased pathways. No statistical test was applied; pathways are ranked by absolute log2FC. (D) Representative images and quantification of median CD206+ cells per area in control (n = 4) and PAH (n = 5) livers. 4 discrete images were quantified per section. Orange indicates CD206 staining, gray indicates wheat germ agglutinin, and blue indicates DAPI-stained nuclei. Data are presented as median values with range, and P values were calculated using Mann-Whitney tests. Scale bar: 20 μm.

Next, we assessed whether hepatic macrophages from PAH, NASH, and FALD livers demonstrated disease-specific regulation of immune, metabolic, and fibrogenic pathways (Figure 5B). PAH and NASH macrophages had elevated complement activity and reduced JAK/STAT signaling, while FALD macrophages maintained complement activity and upregulated JAK/STAT signaling (Figure 5B). Metabolically, PAH macrophages retained fatty acid metabolism activity but showed diminished oxidative phosphorylation (Figure 5B). NASH macrophages had increased activity in both pathways, whereas FALD macrophages displayed elevated fatty acid metabolism but suppressed oxidative phosphorylation (Figure 5B). Analysis of the TGF-β pathway revealed minimally altered TGF-β activity in PAH but increased signaling in NASH and FALD macrophages (Figure 5B).

We then identified the 5 most dysregulated macrophage cellular communication pathways in PAH, NASH, and FALD livers (Figure 5C). In PAH, macrophages exhibited enhanced signaling in pathways related to leukocyte migration (13) and immune activation (adhesion G protein–coupled receptor G, platelet-derived growth factor, and CD45) (14, 15), while amyloid precursor protein and collagen signaling was reduced (Figure 5C). NASH macrophages showed upregulation of cell adhesion molecule signaling as well as elevated VEGF and dihydrotestosterone signaling, both of which are implicated in angiogenesis and immune activation. In contrast, signaling through dehydroepiandrosterone, an antiinflammatory steroid precursor, and protein tyrosine receptor type M was suppressed (Figure 5C). In FALD, macrophages displayed elevated cholesterol signaling, along with enrichment of receptor-type tyrosine-protein phosphatase M, collagen, adhesion G protein–coupled receptor G, and laminin signaling (Figure 5C). In summary, these data suggest that PAH macrophage signaling is marked by immune activation, NASH by proinflammatory steroid hormone signaling, and FALD by profibrotic and metabolic cues.

Finally, we assessed whether the increased macrophage relative abundances observed transcriptionally in PAH livers were reflected histologically. Immunohistochemical staining for CD206 (MRC1), a well-established macrophage marker (16), demonstrated heightened CD206+ cells in PAH livers compared with controls (Figure 5D), but the difference did not reach statistical significance.

Potential systemic implications of PAH hepatopathy. Given the liver’s role in regulating systemic physiology through secretion of vasoactive peptides, inflammatory cytokines, and metabolic messengers (17, 18), we analyzed changes in each of these respective pathways. Fms-related receptor tyrosine kinase 1 (FLT1), a key VEGF receptor involved in angiogenesis (19), was significantly upregulated in PAH hepatocytes and ECs (Figure 6A). GDF15, a pro-proliferative cytokine (20), was also increased in PAH hepatocytes. PAH HSCs had elevated expression of ENG, which encodes vasoconstrictive protein endoglin (21). In contrast, GDF2, the precursor to the vasodilatory protein BMP9 (22), was decreased in PAH hepatocytes and HSCs (Figure 6A). IL-6, a prognostic biomarker in PAH (23), was the most differentially regulated transcript in PAH HSCs. Elevated IL-6 expression was observed in PAH HSCs, macrophages, and hepatocytes, but statistical significance was only reached in HSCs (Figure 6B). Finally, we evaluated ketone metabolism in PAH livers and found the ketone pathway was significantly reduced in PAH hepatocytes (Figure 6C). Collectively, these findings suggested that PAH hepatopathy may exacerbate pulmonary vascular disease and other systemic processes through dysregulated vasoactive signaling, heightened expression of the inflammatory cytokine IL-6, and suppression of ketone body synthesis.

PAH altered the expression of vasoactive peptides in multiple cell types, hFigure 6

PAH altered the expression of vasoactive peptides in multiple cell types, heightened IL-6 production in HSCs, and suppressed ketone metabolism in hepatocytes. (A) Relative log2FC in expression between control and PAH for relevant pro-proliferative and vasoactive genes across hepatocytes, ECs, and HSCs. P values were calculated using a Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test. Graphical representation of predicted consequences stemming from dysregulated expression of selected vasoactive genes in the liver on pulmonary vascular remodeling in PAH. (B) Relative log2FC in expression between control and PAH for IL-6 production across all liver cell types. P values were calculated using a Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test. (C) Relative ketone metabolism activity displayed by a violin plot of the hepatocyte module scores for the ketone metabolism pathway. Median values with interquartile range are displayed, and significance was assessed using a Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test.

Discussion

Here, we present a comprehensive single-cell transcriptomic atlas of PAH hepatopathy that identifies cell-specific alterations in liver composition, metabolism, and intercellular signaling. By comparing PAH with NASH and FALD, we define key molecular features that distinguish PAH hepatopathy from other human liver diseases with metabolic or venous stasis triggers. Our snRNA-seq analysis demonstrates that PAH most prominently alters hepatocyte metabolism, promoting a pro-proliferative, hypoxia-adapted, Warburg-like (24) metabolic phenotype. In contrast, NASH hepatocytes exhibit a hypermetabolic state, whereas FALD hepatocytes selectively suppress oxidative phosphorylation without enhancing glycolysis. Transcripts associated with the cytochrome P450 pathway decrease in PAH and NASH hepatocytes but increase in FALD. Although hepatocytes from all 3 diseases activate ECM signaling programs, only PAH broadly suppresses cell adhesion pathways. Notably, whole-liver proteomic data from a subset of the same control and PAH patients recapitulate the hepatocyte metabolic alterations observed in our transcriptomic analysis, providing orthogonal support for these findings.

Our comparative analysis suggests PAH, NASH, and FALD have cell type–specific alterations that distinguish the 3 diseased states. In HSCs, PAH and NASH enrich PI3K/Akt signaling transcripts, whereas NASH and FALD coactivate PI3K/Akt and TGF-β signaling pathways. Consistent with these transcriptional changes, PAH livers exhibit prominent perivascular fibrosis with increased α-smooth muscle actin immunoreactivity and a greater abundance of activated HSCs surrounding the central vein. Macrophage programs also differ across diseases: PAH and NASH macrophages both induce proinflammatory complement signaling, but only PAH macrophages show reduced predicted cell–cell interactions alongside amplified immune signaling. In contrast, FALD macrophages downregulate complement signaling but uniquely upregulate JAK/STAT signaling. Across multiple liver cell types, PAH also modulates the expression of vasoactive genes, increases IL-6 production in HSCs, and suppresses the hepatocyte ketone metabolism program. Together, these findings implicate the liver as an active contributor to PAH pathobiology and identify disease-specific pathways that may be targeted to improve hepatic function.

To begin proposing a mechanistic model of how PAH alters hepatic function, we examined whether HIF-1 activity in hepatocytes, ECs, and HSCs correlates with clinical markers of PAH severity. HIF-1 signaling in all 3 cell types positively correlates with mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), pulmonary vascular resistance, and right atrial pressure (Supplemental Figure 9A). Among these populations, HIF-1 activation in HSCs, the principal drivers of hepatic fibrosis (25), shows the strongest association with RVF/PAH severity and significantly correlates with mPAP (Supplemental Figure 9B). We next explored a potential molecular mechanism linking hemodynamic disturbances to altered transcriptional programs in HSCs and hepatocytes. Because hepatic congestion and regurgitant flow resulting from tricuspid regurgitation may impose mechanical stress on the liver, we examined the expression of Piezo mechanosensitive ion channels (26) in HSCs. Piezo1, but not Piezo2, is significantly elevated in PAH HSCs and correlates with perivascular fibrosis (Supplemental Figure 10A). As increased Piezo1 activity promotes HIF-1 activation and IL-6 secretion in other cell types (27, 28), we assessed relationships among Piezo1, HIF-1, and IL-6 in HSCs. Indeed, HSC Piezo1 expression positively correlated with both HIF-1 activity and IL-6 expression (Supplemental Figure 10B). These findings suggest a potential pathway whereby hemodynamic stress increases Piezo1 signaling in HSCs, triggering HIF-1 activation and IL-6 production. Because IL-6 can induce HIF-1 activation in hepatocytes (29), we hypothesize that HSC-derived IL-6 acts as a paracrine signal to promote the Warburg-like metabolic reprogramming observed in PAH hepatocytes. In summary, this working model links altered hemodynamics in PAH to Piezo1-dependent activation of HSCs, which then restructures hepatocyte metabolism through IL-6–mediated HIF-1 signaling (Supplemental Figure 10C). Although this hypothesis is supported by our correlative analyses, experimental validation will undoubtedly be required to establish causality.

We found that PAH hepatocytes exhibit increased HIF-1 signaling, which may have important systemic metabolic consequences in PAH. Hypoxia and HIF-1 can suppress cytochrome P450–mediated oxidation (30), potentially impairing drug metabolism, lipid processing, bile acid synthesis, and detoxification of reactive metabolites. Reduced cytochrome P450 activity may also contribute to PAH-associated dyslipidemia (31) by limiting cholesterol hydroxylation and fatty acid oxidation. In addition, HIF-1 activation may disrupt ketone body synthesis, as constitutive HIF-1 signaling suppresses ketogenesis in experimental models (32). Because ketone bodies are an energetically efficient fuel source with antiinflammatory properties (18), impaired ketone production could exacerbate systemic energy deficits and promote inflammatory signaling. This mechanism may help explain why compensatory ketosis is often absent in patients with PAH with severe right ventricular dysfunction (33). Modulating hepatocyte HIF-1 signaling may therefore represent a potential therapeutic strategy to restore drug metabolism, improve ketone production, and alleviate systemic metabolic dysfunction in PAH.

Endothelial dysfunction in the pulmonary vasculature defines PAH (34), and our data suggest that related endothelial transcriptional changes occur in the liver. Warburg-like metabolic reprogramming, characterized by a shift from oxidative phosphorylation to aerobic glycolysis, is an established feature of PAH pulmonary artery ECs (35). Hepatic ECs in our dataset displayed a similar hypoxia-adapted transcriptomic signature, with increased glycolysis and HIF-1 signaling (24), and EC HIF-1 activation showed the second strongest correlation with markers of RVF/PAH severity after HSCs. Because liver sinusoidal ECs are highly responsive to shear stress and sinusoidal flow (36), congestion-induced hemodynamic disturbances may contribute to HIF-1–associated metabolic transcriptional changes in hepatic ECs, paralleling the responses observed in HSCs. However, direct measurement of glycolytic flux and HIF-1 protein expression in liver sinusoidal ECs from patients with PAH is required to confirm these transcriptomic observations.

Finally, our data suggest PAH macrophages upregulate complement signaling. Locally, complement deposition can damage hepatocytes and other liver cells by triggering innate immune responses that lead to fibrosis and scarring (37). Although selective suppression of JAK/STAT signaling may dampen proinflammatory cytokine secretion and attenuate fibrogenesis, reduced STAT3 activity could be deleterious as it may also impair efferocytosis-mediated liver regeneration (38). Therefore, downregulation of JAK/STAT signaling in PAH macrophages may limit fibrosis but impair efferocytosis and regeneration.

Limitations. Our study has several important limitations. First, nuclei isolation methods differed across the PAH, NASH, and FALD datasets; to improve comparability, we reanalyzed raw NASH and FALD data using the same Seurat pipeline as the PAH dataset. Second, as a snRNA-seq study, our data lack spatial resolution and cannot capture zonal heterogeneity within the hepatic lobule, highlighting the need for future spatial transcriptomic approaches. Third, the modest sample size inherent to rare human tissue studies limits statistical power and increases susceptibility to type I and type II error, necessitating cautious interpretation of association-based findings. Lastly, the PAH and NASH samples were autopsy derived and therefore likely reflect end-stage disease, which may limit generalizability to earlier disease stages. Consistent with this interpretation, mitochondrial proteomic analysis of monocrotaline-treated rodent livers demonstrated similar reductions in fatty acid metabolism and oxidative phosphorylation, supporting cross-species metabolic convergence (Supplemental Figure 11). However, HIF-1 signaling was not increased in the rodents, which may reflect differences in disease chronicity or end-stage disease. Future studies should directly validate these findings using immunofluorescence-based assessment of HIF-1 activation, glycolytic enzyme expression, and barrier-function markers in liver sinusoidal ECs from patients with PAH, along with protein-level confirmation of HIF-1 and PI3K/Akt activation in HSCs.

Methods

Sex as a biological variable. Regarding biological sex of the non-PAH control samples, 3 female and 1 male patient were included. PAH samples consisted of 2 male and 3 female patients. For the PAH samples, warm autopsies performed by Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et Pneumologie de Québec Research Center pathology department confirmed PAH as the cause of death. Thus, our study included both male and female patients, and similar findings were reported for both sexes. Clinical metadata for these patients, including biological sex, are provided in Supplemental Table 1. Biological sex was obtained from available clinical metadata. Additional demographic information, including race and ethnicity, was not available for all autopsy-derived samples and therefore was not analyzed.

Human tissue collection. Human control and PAH liver tissue samples were collected at Laval University (CER 20773). All tissues were autopsy derived and stored at –80°C prior to analysis.

Evaluation of total and perivascular fibrosis. 10 μm paraffin-embedded liver sections were stained with Masson’s trichrome by the Medical University of South Carolina Histology and Immunohistochemistry Lab. The whole section image was collected on a Zeiss Airyscan microscope, and total section fibrosis was blindly quantified with ImageJ (NIH). For perivascular fibrosis, central veins from the sections were cropped and the percentage of area positive for fibrosis was blindly determined using ImageJ.

Immunohistochemical assessment of smooth muscle actin and CD206. To evaluate smooth muscle actin immunoreactivity and CD206+ macrophage abundance, liver sections were deparaffinized using xylene and subsequent incubations with 100% ethanol, 95% ethanol, and 70% ethanol. Slides were then placed in a water bath with 10% decloaking solution. Slides were then blocked with 5% goat serum before incubation with α-smooth muscle actin antibody (1A4) (Invitrogen, 53-9760-82) and CD206/MRC1 (E2L9N) rabbit monoclonal antibody (Cell Signaling, 91992) overnight at 4°C. Following primary antibody incubation, sections were blocked with 5% goat serum. Secondary antibody and 0.1% Hoechst stain incubation was performed for 30 minutes at 37°C. Sections were washed with PBS before treatment with an autofluorescence quenching kit and mounted in antifade reagent. Confocal micrographs were obtained on a Zeiss LSM900 Airyscan 2 confocal microscope under identical conditions. Quantification of total α-smooth muscle actin area in 4–5 central veins per patient sample was blindly quantified using FIJI. The median α-smooth muscle actin-positive area was used as a single data point per patient. The number of CD206+ cells was blindly determined from 4 discrete images per section. Each sample was assigned a median number of macrophages per section.

Nuclei isolation. Nuclei were extracted from 5 non-PAH controls and 5 PAH patients using the Singulator S200 system (S2 Genomics) with a modified low-volume nuclear dissociation protocol (39). Per sample, 2 NIC+ cartridges were used with approximately 20 mg of tissue/cartridge. Following isolation, nuclei suspensions were cleaned twice using density sucrose gradient centrifugations (Sigma Nuc201) and pelleted in 1% BSA (Miltenyi, 130091376). Additional purification steps were performed with propidium iodide staining and subsequent fluorescence-activated cell sorting at the University of Minnesota Flow Cytometry Resource. To prevent RNA degradation, all solutions were supplemented with RNase inhibitor (0.2 U/L, Millipore Sigma, 03335402001). 10x Genomics library preparation, sequencing, and alignment to the human genome (GRCh38) were completed by the University of Minnesota Genomics Center.

snRNA-seq of PAH, NASH, and FALD datasets. snRNA-seq analysis was performed using RStudio v4.4. Raw data for the NASH (Gene Expression Omnibus [GEO]: GSE212837) (40) and FALD (GEO: GSE223843) (41) datasets were obtained from the NIH Gene Expression Omnibus. Matrix files from CellRanger were converted into Seurat objects and subsequently processed using Seurat v5 (42). For the PAH dataset, nuclei containing between 200 and 8,500 genes (200 < nFeature_RNA < 8,500) and <5% mitochondrial DNA were included for downstream analysis. One control sample from the PAH dataset was removed following preprocessing due to low nuclei counts (n = 437). For the NASH dataset, nuclei containing between 200 and 8,000 genes (200 < nFeature_RNA < 8,000) and <10% mitochondrial DNA were included for downstream analysis. For the FALD dataset, nuclei containing between 800 and 20,000 genes (800 < nFeature_RNA < 20,000) and <10% mitochondrial DNA were used for downstream analysis. Identification and removal of potential doublets within each sample were performed using DoubletFinder (43). The resulting Seurat objects were then subjected to additional processing consisting of normalization, feature selection, scaling, dimensionality reduction, and clustering, in accordance with the standard Seurat workflow (42). Azimuth was used to ensure independent clustering of different cell types without overresolution (44). We initially identified 23, 13, and 14 unique clusters in the PAH, NASH, and FALD datasets, respectively, before determining cell types at the cluster level. Cell type annotations were assigned by identifying the highly expressed genes in each cluster via the FindConservedMarkers function in Seurat. Cellular annotations were cross-validated using the Human Protein Atlas (45), a database of established cell marker genes, for up to 20 of the most highly expressed genes in each cluster. A complete list of the cell marker genes used for cluster annotation across the 3 datasets is provided in Supplemental Table 2. Notably, 2 clusters in the PAH dataset and 1 cluster in each of the NASH and FALD datasets did not contain genes highly expressed in any cell type and thus were subsequently excluded from further analysis. A full schematic representation of the snRNA-seq workflow is provided in Supplemental Figure 1. In addition, violin plots quantifying RNA counts, number of genes identified, percent mitochondrial DNA, and percent ribosomal DNA for each dataset are shown in Supplemental Figure 2.

Differential gene expression and pathway enrichment analysis. Due to observed differences in nuclei quality among the PAH, NASH, and FALD datasets, different approaches for differentially expressed gene (DEG) analysis were applied. For the PAH dataset, the processed nuclei were pseudobulked for DEG analysis using DESeq2 (46). Genes were considered differentially expressed if the |log2fold change| (log2FC) ≥ 0.25 and adjusted P value was <0.05. For the NASH and FALD datasets, DEG analysis was performed on processed, but not pseudobulked, nuclei via the FindMarkers function in Seurat using Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test. Genes were considered differentially expressed if |log2FC| ≥ 0.25 and adjusted P value was <0.05. We then performed a pathway analysis for statistically significant DEGs from each cell type using ShinyGO (https://bioinformatics.sdstate.edu/go/), and pathways were shown if 2 or more pathways were enriched (47).

Calculation of module scores. Module scores were computed via the AddModuleScore function in Seurat to assess relative pathway activity at the single-cell level. Predefined gene sets representing specific biological pathways were compiled using either the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) or WikiPathways databases and subsequently used as input. Resulting scores were extracted from the Seurat objects and then compared within and across disease groups. Group comparisons were evaluated for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test, followed by either the Student’s t test or Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test, as appropriate. P values and medians with interquartile range were used to annotate module score violin plots.

CellChat analysis. The CellChat v2 package was used to assess predicted cell–cell communication, in accordance with their standard workflow (7). For the cell type–specific CellChat pathway analysis, total signaling strength for each pathway was calculated per cell type by summing outgoing (sender) and incoming (receiver) communication probabilities from the CellChat probability array (@netP$prob). Fold changes in pathway signaling strength were computed for each cell type between disease and control conditions using log2 transformation with a pseudocount of 0.001 to accommodate pathways absent in 1 condition. Pathways were ranked by absolute fold change magnitude, and the top 5 most altered pathways were selected; no statistical test was applied to CellChat pathway comparisons. Results were visualized as horizontal bar plots displaying log2FCs for each disease state relative to their respective controls.

Human proteomics pathway scores. Proteomic analysis of mitochondrion-enriched fractions from human liver samples was performed as previously described (48). Relative pathway scores were calculated by summing protein abundances of all detectable proteins per sample for each KEGG or WikiPathways pathway. Control samples were averaged, and all samples were then normalized to the control average to generate pathway scores. Data are presented as median with range, and P values were calculated using Mann-Whitney tests.

Rodent proteomics pathway scores. Proteomic analysis of male Sprague-Dawley rats (Charles River) treated with monocrotaline and untreated controls was performed as previously described (48). Pathway scores were calculated using the same approach applied to the human proteomic datasets described above.

Correlation of HIF-1 activation with clinical markers of RVF/PAH severity. To assess associations between HIF-1 signaling and clinical severity, we calculated HIF-1 pathway module scores for each cell type using Seurat’s AddModuleScore. Scores were then pseudobulked at the patient level using AggregateExpression, yielding 1 HIF-1 module score per cell type per patient. These cell type–specific scores were then evaluated for associations with clinical markers of RVF/PAH severity in PAH patients (n = 5), including hemodynamics (mPAP, right atrial pressure, cardiac index, cardiac output, pulmonary vascular resistance, right ventricular systolic pressure, and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion) and hepatic/systemic biomarkers (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, γ-glutamyl transferase, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide). Pearson’s correlation coefficients were computed for all variable pairs using pairwise complete observations to accommodate missing clinical data; the effective n per variable pair ranged from 4 to 5 depending on data availability. Correlations were visualized as a hierarchically clustered heatmap (Python seaborn clustermap) and as bar plots showing each cell type–specific HIF-1 score versus individual clinical parameters.

Figure preparation. All figures were prepared in Adobe Illustrator 2025.

Statistics. Group comparisons of module scores were evaluated for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test, followed by a 2-tailed Student’s t test or Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test, as appropriate. Proteomic pathway score comparisons and histologic quantifications were analyzed using 2-tailed Mann-Whitney U tests. Single-gene expression comparisons across cell types were assessed using Wilcoxon’s rank-sum tests. Associations between HSC HIF-1 module scores and histologic measurements were evaluated by simple linear regression; R2 and P values were calculated accordingly. Pearson’s correlation coefficients were used to assess relationships between pseudobulked HIF-1 module scores and clinical variables. For DEG analysis of the PAH dataset, DESeq2 Wald tests with Benjamini-Hochberg correction were applied to pseudobulked counts; genes were considered differentially expressed at |log2FC| ≥ 0.25 and adjusted P < 0.05. For the NASH and FALD datasets, Wilcoxon’s rank-sum tests implemented via the Seurat FindMarkers function were used; the same fold change and adjusted P value thresholds were applied. CellChat pathway comparisons are based on log2FC in total signaling strength and were not subject to formal statistical testing. A P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant for all applicable analyses.

Study approval. Human liver tissue use adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, and all experimental procedures were approved by the institutional review boards at the Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et Pneumologie de Québec Research Center (CER 20773). Written informed consent for tissue collection was obtained from all patients prior to death or, where this was not possible, from next of kin. All animal studies were approved by the University of Minnesota Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Data availability. All relevant analytic code for this work is available within this repository: https://github.com/blake561/Pulmonary-Arterial-Hypertension-Induces-a-Metabolic-and-Inflammatory-Hepatopathy- (commit ID 1183393001). All supporting data for the manuscript figures are provided in the Supporting Data Values file. Uploaded sequencing data are available in the GEO under accession number GSE300202.

Author contributions

MJB and KWP designed the research studies, conducted experiments, acquired data, and wrote the manuscript. MJB and SEP analyzed experiment data. JB, JBM, and LMH conducted experiments. SP, SBB, and SB acquired data and provided the human tissue samples.

Conflict of interest

KWP served as a consultant to Merck.

Funding support

This work is the result of NIH funding, in whole or in part, and is subject to the NIH Public Access Policy. Through acceptance of this federal funding, the NIH has been given a right to make the work publicly available in PubMed Central.

  • NIH grant F31 HL170585 (to JBM).
  • NIH grants R01 HL158795 and R01 HL162927 (to KWP).
Supplemental material

View Supplemental data

View ICMJE disclosure forms

View Supplemental table 1

View Supplemental table 2

View Supplemental video 1

View Supplemental video 2

View Supporting data values

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Shuang Wang and Po Hu for their assistance in obtaining the NASH and FALD datasets, respectively. We thank the University of Minnesota Genomics Center for performing the sequencing for the snRNA-seq experiment.

Address correspondence to: Kurt W. Prins, Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 30 Courtenay Dr, Charleston, SC 29425. Email: prins@musc.edu.

Footnotes

Copyright: © 2026, Blake et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2026;136(13):e201862.https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI201862.

References
  1. Prisco SZ, et al. Treatment targets for right ventricular dysfunction in pulmonary arterial hypertension. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2020;5(12):1244–1260.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Rosenkranz S, et al. Systemic consequences of pulmonary hypertension and right-sided heart failure. Circulation. 2020;141(8):678–693.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Furukawa A, et al. Liver fibrosis index as a novel prognostic factor in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Heart Vessels. 2022;37(4):601–608.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Rako ZA, et al. Liver stiffness is associated with right heart dysfunction, cardiohepatic syndrome, and prognosis in pulmonary hypertension. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024;43(7):1105–1115.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Yogeswaran A, et al. Hepatorenal dysfunction in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10:1207474.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Scott JV, et al. Novel liver injury phenotypes and outcomes in clinical trial participants with pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024;210(8):1045–1056.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Jin S, et al. CellChat for systematic analysis of cell–cell communication from single-cell transcriptomics. Nat Protoc. 2025;20(1):180–219.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Kullander K, Klein R. Mechanisms and functions of Eph and ephrin signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2022;3(7):475–486.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Gavard J, Gutkind JS. VE-cadherin and claudin-5: it takes two to tango. Nat Cell Biol. 2008;10(8):883–885.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Grimsey NJ, Trejo J. Integration of endothelial protease-activated receptor-1 inflammatory signaling by ubiquitin. Curr Opin Hematol. 2016;23(3):274–279.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Gupta IR, Ryan AK. Claudins: unlocking the code to tight junction function during embryogenesis and in disease. Clin Genet. 2010;77(4):314–325.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Carpino G, et al. Alpha-SMA expression in hepatic stellate cells and quantitative analysis of hepatic fibrosis in cirrhosis and in recurrent chronic hepatitis after liver transplantation. Dig Liver Dis. 2005;37(5):349–356.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Muller WA. Mechanisms of leukocyte transendothelial migration. Annu Rev Pathol. 2011;6:323–344.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Lala T, Hall RA. Adhesion G protein–coupled receptors: Structure, signaling, physiology, and pathophysiology. Physiol Rev. 2022;102(4):1587–1624.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Courtney AH, et al. CD45 functions as a signaling gatekeeper in T cells. Sci Signal. 2019;12(604):eaaw8151.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Nielsen MC, et al. Macrophage activation markers, CD163 and CD206, in acute-on-chronic liver failure. Cells. 2020;9(5):1175.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Li JH, et al. Regulation of systemic metabolism by tissue-resident immune cell circuits. Immunity. 2023;56(6):1168–1186.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Puchalska P, Crawford PA. Multi-dimensional roles of ketone bodies in fuel metabolism, signaling, and therapeutics. Cell Metab. 2017;25(2):262–284.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Shibuya M. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 (VEGFR-1/Flt-1): a dual regulator for angiogenesis. Angiogenesis. 2006;9(4):225–230.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Maimaiti Y, et al. Correlation between serum GDF-15 level and pulmonary vascular morphological changes and prognosis in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1085122.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Jerkic M, et al. Endoglin regulates nitric oxide-dependent vasodilatation. FASEB J. 2004;18(3):609–611.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Hodgson J, et al. Homozygous GDF2 nonsense mutations result in a loss of circulating BMP9 and BMP10 and are associated with either PAH or an “HHT-like” syndrome in children. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2021;9(12):e1685.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Prins KW, et al. Interleukin-6 is independently associated with right ventricular function in pulmonary arterial hypertension. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2018;37(3):376–384.
    View this article via: CrossRef Google Scholar
  24. Wang Y, Patti GJ. The Warburg effect: a signature of mitochondrial overload. Trends Cell Biol. 2023;33(12):1014–1020.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Tsuchida T, Friedman SL. Mechanisms of hepatic stellate cell activation. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14(7):397–411.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Syeda R, et al. Piezo1 channels are inherently mechanosensitive. Cell Rep. 2016;17(7):1739–1746.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Atcha H, et al. Mechanically activated ion channel Piezo1 modulates macrophage polarization and stiffness sensing. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):3256.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Xue Y, et al. The mechanotransducer Piezo1 coordinates metabolism and inflammation to promote skin growth. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):6876.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Kou K, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α/IL-6 axis in activated hepatic stellate cells aggravates liver fibrosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2023;653:21–30.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Legendre C, et al. Drug-metabolising enzymes are down-regulated by hypoxia in differentiated human hepatoma HepaRG cells: HIF-1alpha involvement in CYP3A4 repression. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(16):2882–2892.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Hemnes AR, et al. Human PAH is characterized by a pattern of lipid-related insulin resistance. JCI Insight. 2019;4(1):e123611.
    View this article via: JCI Insight CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  32. Wang XL, et al. Ablation of ARNT/HIF1beta in liver alters gluconeogenesis, lipogenic gene expression, and serum ketones. Cell Metab. 2009;9(5):428–439.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  33. Blake M, et al. Ketone bodies in right ventricular failure: a unique therapeutic opportunity. Heliyon. 2023;9(11):e22227.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  34. Ranchoux B, et al. Endothelial dysfunction in pulmonary arterial hypertension: an evolving landscape (2017 Grover Conference Series). Pulm Circ. 2018;8(1):2045893217752912.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  35. Caruso P, et al. Identification of MicroRNA-124 as a major regulator of enhanced endothelial cell glycolysis in pulmonary arterial hypertension via PTBP1 (polypyrimidine tract binding protein) and pyruvate kinase M2. Circulation. 2017;136(25):2451–2467.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  36. McConnell MJ, et al. The evolving role of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells in liver health and disease. Hepatology. 2023;78(2):649–669.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  37. Thorgersen EB, et al. The role of complement in liver injury, regeneration, and transplantation. Hepatology. 2019;70(2):725–736.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Campana L, et al. The STAT3-IL-10-IL-6 pathway is a novel regulator of macrophage efferocytosis and phenotypic conversion in sterile liver injury. J Immunol. 2018;200(3):1169–1187.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Stalder L, et al. A simple, quick, and partially automated protocol for the isolation of single nuclei from frozen mammalian tissues for single nucleus sequencing. J Vis Exp. 2023;197:e65611.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  40. Wang S, et al. An autocrine signaling circuit in hepatic stellate cells underlies advanced fibrosis in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Sci Transl Med. 2023;15(677):eadd3949.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Hu P, et al. Single-cell multiomics guided mechanistic understanding of Fontan-associated liver disease. Sci Transl Med. 2024;16:eadk6213.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  42. Hao Y, et al. Dictionary learning for integrative, multimodal and scalable single-cell analysis. Nat Biotechnol. 2024;42(2):293–304.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  43. McGinnis CS, et al. DoubletFinder: doublet detection in single-cell RNA sequencing data using artificial nearest neighbors. Cell Syst. 2019;8(4):329–337.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  44. Hao Y, et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell. 2021;184(13):3573–3587.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  45. Karlsson M, et al. A single-cell type transcriptomics map of human tissues. Sci Adv. 2021;7(31):eabh2169.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  46. Love MI, et al. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  47. Ge SX, et al. ShinyGO: a graphical gene-set enrichment tool for animals and plants. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(8):2628–2629.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  48. Blake MJ, et al. Impaired lung BCAA metabolism promotes ferroptosis and resultant pulmonary arterial hypertension-associated hepatopathy. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2026;11(7):101573.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (May 28, 2026): In-Press Preview
  • Version 2 (July 1, 2026): Electronic publication

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Author contributions
  • Conflict of interest
  • Funding support
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts