ATRX is one of the most frequently altered genes in sarcoma and encodes an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeler implicated in maintaining heterochromatin. However, ATRX alterations have not been leveraged for sarcoma treatment. We observed loss of ATRX protein in 14% of soft tissue leiomyosarcoma (STLMS, n =127), 53% of uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS, n = 95), 37% of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS, n = 82), and 8% of dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS, n = 84). ATRX loss was associated with significantly worse outcomes in ULMS, UPS, and DDLPS. ATRX knockout in sarcoma cells increased proliferation in cooperation with TP53 deletion, chromatin remodeling, and enrichment of PRDM4 and NFIX transcription factor motifs. PRDM4 and NFIX knockdown in ATRX-mutant sarcoma lines resulted in reduced proliferation and invasion, suggesting an epistatic relationship. Consistent with the known and re-demonstrated functional relationship between PRMD4 and YAP1, ATRX loss activated YAP1-TEAD signaling, and ATRX-deficient cells and sarcoma xenografts were more sensitive to the TEAD inhibitors VT103 and IAG933. Overall, our results identify ATRX loss as a prognostic factor of worse outcomes, implicate the ATRX-PRDM4-YAP1-TEAD axis as an underlying mechanism, and suggest use of TEAD inhibition as a potential therapeutic strategy for ATRX-deficient sarcomas.
Ryan A. Denu, Anand K. Singh, Yingda Jiang, Zhao Zheng, Davis R. Ingram, Khalida M. Wani, Rossana Lazcano, Madison P. Ginn, Kumaren Anand, Bishal K. Singh, Jackson C. Ballard, Veena Kochat, Biji Chatterjee, William Padron, Sharon M. Landers, Angela D. Bhalla, Asha S. Multani, Sharvari Dharmaiah, Prit Benny Malgulwar, Yiming Cai, Jun Yao, Heather Lin, Jason T. Huse, Haoqiang Ying, Emily Z. Keung, Wei-Lien Wang, Anthony P. Conley, Shreyaskumar Patel, Neeta Somaiah, Ahsan S. Farooqi, Alexander J. Lazar, Elise F. Nassif Haddad, Keila E. Torres, Kunal Rai
Usage data is cumulative from November 2026 through November 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 185 | 0 |
| 91 | 0 | |
| Supplemental data | 63 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 45 | 0 |
| Totals | 384 | 0 |
| Total Views | 384 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.