Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • The cGAS-STING pathway: DNA sensing in health and disease (Jun 2026)
    • Neurodegeneration (Mar 2026)
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Multiomic analyses delineate human neuroendocrine tumor cell states in relation to normal enteroendocrine cell ontogeny
Pratik N.P. Singh, Elsa Hadj Bachir, James R. Howe, Andrew M. Bellizzi, Paloma Cejas, Shariq Madha-Krause, Charles B. Epstein, Jennifer A. Chan, Bradley Bernstein, Matthew H. Kulke, Qiao Zhou, Ramesh A. Shivdasani
Pratik N.P. Singh, Elsa Hadj Bachir, James R. Howe, Andrew M. Bellizzi, Paloma Cejas, Shariq Madha-Krause, Charles B. Epstein, Jennifer A. Chan, Bradley Bernstein, Matthew H. Kulke, Qiao Zhou, Ramesh A. Shivdasani
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Development Gastroenterology Oncology

Multiomic analyses delineate human neuroendocrine tumor cell states in relation to normal enteroendocrine cell ontogeny

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Cancers reflect aberrant growth and differentiation of normal cell populations. Biological understanding of small intestine neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs) is hampered because their closest normal counterparts, enteroendocrine cells (EECs), constitute tiny fractions of intestinal epithelium. Recent characterization of adult human EEC ontogeny from intestinal stem cells can help overcome that limitation. Transient expression of the transcription factor gene ASCL1 normally ensures proper timing and fidelity of well-differentiated EECs, which express NEUROD1. Here, we report that SI-NETs resembled mature enterochromaffin cells; however, individual tumor cells coexpressed stem/progenitor genes, harboring each differentiation state along the EEC trajectory except ASCL1+ precursors. We found that enhancers normally active, and others inactive, during EEC differentiation underlie aberrant SI-NET gene activity. SI-NETs uniformly expressed NEUROD1 but lacked ASCL1, owing to inaccessible chromatin and repressive H3K27me3 marking at the ASCL1 locus. Multiple cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (CDKi) genes were similarly silenced, other than CDKN1B, the only gene recurrently mutated in SI-NETs. Deletion of CDKN1B altered cell cycle kinetics during human EEC differentiation, and deletions of ASCL1 or CDKN1B activated certain genes that are expressed in SI-NETs but not in the normal EEC trajectory. We propose that a limited CDKi repertoire and absence of ASCL1-dependent constraints on EEC maturation together explain unique SI-NET characteristics.

Authors

Pratik N.P. Singh, Elsa Hadj Bachir, James R. Howe, Andrew M. Bellizzi, Paloma Cejas, Shariq Madha-Krause, Charles B. Epstein, Jennifer A. Chan, Bradley Bernstein, Matthew H. Kulke, Qiao Zhou, Ramesh A. Shivdasani

×

Figure 2

Individual SI-NET cells coexpress stem/progenitor and differentiated EC cell markers and selected non-EC genes.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Individual SI-NET cells coexpress stem/progenitor and differentiated EC ...
See also Supplemental Figures 2 and 3. (A) UMAP representation of integrated scRNA data from SI-NETs (7,100 epithelial cells from 3 individuals) (29, 30) and from EEC differentiation 24 hours (n = 3,240 cells), 72 hours (n = 1,497), 96 hours (n = 2,727), 120 hours (n = 3,449), and 144 hours (n = 1,402) after Neurog3 activation. Normal cell states (left, colored; right, days after Tam) were described previously (18). SI-NET clusters, designated by source (left) or in blue (right), most resemble mature EE, especially EC, cells. (B) CHGA was expressed in all mature normal EECs, while TPH1 was restricted to mature ECs. Levels of both markers were comparable in primary and metastatic SI-NET single cells. (C) Left: illustrative ISC markers TMC5 (65.9% of ISCs) and CHGA (94.7% of terminal EECs) were mutually exclusive (0.02% coexpression) in normal EECs, but coexpressed (>1 arbitrary unit) in >21% of SI-NET cells; top, distribution; bottom, feature plots. Right: illustrative Sec-pro marker SERPINA1 (33.6% of early precursors) and CHGA coexpress infrequently (12.4% of EECs) in normal differentiation but commonly (> 81% of cells) in SI-NETs. (D) Cumulative distributions of ISC-restricted (left) and Sec-pro (right) markers that coexpress with CHGA in variable fractions of SI-NET cells. Most CHGA+ cells in SI-NETs expressed at least one — usually many — ISC (>83%) and Sec-pro (>96%) markers. (E) PDLIM1 in situ hybridization (red fluorescence) on SI-NET tissue microarrays subsequently immunostained for CHGA (diffuse perinuclear green fluorescence). In 33 of 44 specimens from 10 individuals, nearly all CHGA+ cells showed PDLIM1 puncta that varied in intensity and numbers across samples. Scale bars: 100 μm. Boxed areas magnified in insets. (F) SERPINA1 (pink) and INSM1 (a NE TF; brown) immunostaining in SI-NET microarrays, reflecting uniform coexpression in 42 of 43 specimens from 10 individuals. Scale bar: 50 µm. (G) Group A SI-NETs are not mixtures of cells at different stages of EEC maturity. Rather, phenotypically uniform mature cells retain elements of EEC progenitor states.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts