Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • The cGAS-STING pathway: DNA sensing in health and disease (Jun 2026)
    • Neurodegeneration (Mar 2026)
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Multiomic analyses delineate human neuroendocrine tumor cell states in relation to normal enteroendocrine cell ontogeny
Pratik N.P. Singh, Elsa Hadj Bachir, James R. Howe, Andrew M. Bellizzi, Paloma Cejas, Shariq Madha-Krause, Charles B. Epstein, Jennifer A. Chan, Bradley Bernstein, Matthew H. Kulke, Qiao Zhou, Ramesh A. Shivdasani
Pratik N.P. Singh, Elsa Hadj Bachir, James R. Howe, Andrew M. Bellizzi, Paloma Cejas, Shariq Madha-Krause, Charles B. Epstein, Jennifer A. Chan, Bradley Bernstein, Matthew H. Kulke, Qiao Zhou, Ramesh A. Shivdasani
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Development Gastroenterology Oncology

Multiomic analyses delineate human neuroendocrine tumor cell states in relation to normal enteroendocrine cell ontogeny

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Cancers reflect aberrant growth and differentiation of normal cell populations. Biological understanding of small intestine neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NETs) is hampered because their closest normal counterparts, enteroendocrine cells (EECs), constitute tiny fractions of intestinal epithelium. Recent characterization of adult human EEC ontogeny from intestinal stem cells can help overcome that limitation. Transient expression of the transcription factor gene ASCL1 normally ensures proper timing and fidelity of well-differentiated EECs, which express NEUROD1. Here, we report that SI-NETs resembled mature enterochromaffin cells; however, individual tumor cells coexpressed stem/progenitor genes, harboring each differentiation state along the EEC trajectory except ASCL1+ precursors. We found that enhancers normally active, and others inactive, during EEC differentiation underlie aberrant SI-NET gene activity. SI-NETs uniformly expressed NEUROD1 but lacked ASCL1, owing to inaccessible chromatin and repressive H3K27me3 marking at the ASCL1 locus. Multiple cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (CDKi) genes were similarly silenced, other than CDKN1B, the only gene recurrently mutated in SI-NETs. Deletion of CDKN1B altered cell cycle kinetics during human EEC differentiation, and deletions of ASCL1 or CDKN1B activated certain genes that are expressed in SI-NETs but not in the normal EEC trajectory. We propose that a limited CDKi repertoire and absence of ASCL1-dependent constraints on EEC maturation together explain unique SI-NET characteristics.

Authors

Pratik N.P. Singh, Elsa Hadj Bachir, James R. Howe, Andrew M. Bellizzi, Paloma Cejas, Shariq Madha-Krause, Charles B. Epstein, Jennifer A. Chan, Bradley Bernstein, Matthew H. Kulke, Qiao Zhou, Ramesh A. Shivdasani

×

Figure 1

Correspondence of SI-NETs with stages in normal human EEC differentiation from bulk RNA-seq analysis.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Correspondence of SI-NETs with stages in normal human EEC differentiatio...
See also Supplemental Figures 1 and 2. (A) SI-NETs resemble EECs, rare differentiated progeny of ISCs. (B) Normal human EEC differentiation mapped in ISC cultures upon NEUROG3ER-T2 activation (18). Tamoxifen (Tam) induces sequential appearance of early and late EEC precursors, which express specific TFs, culminating in diverse hormone-expressing EEC types. (C) Unsupervised hierarchical clustering (Pearson’s correlation) of RNA profiles in 96 primary SI-NETs, with respect to cells along the course of EEC differentiation in vitro (Reference, left). Highly correlated samples (group A) resembled normal mature EECs (days 4 and 8 after Tam) more than progenitors or immature EECs (days 0–2 after Tam). Group B was mixed and divergent. Batch effects were excluded, and tumors did not cluster by histologic grade (where known): *grade 1, **grade 2, ***grade 3. (D) Normalized DeSeq2 counts (log10 scale) reveal expression of classic NE markers (CHGA, SYP, NCAM1) in both SI-NET groups and EC markers (TPH1, FEV) in group A. Low MKI67 levels exceed those in mature NE cells. Colors indicate institutional sources. (E) Relative expression of transcripts that appear late in normal EC (top) and non-EC (bottom) differentiation (Reference, left). Group A SI-NETs express advanced EC markers, e.g., TPH1, FEV, and DDC; both groups largely lack non-EC markers, e.g., ISL1, ARX, PAX6, and SST. (F) SI-NET expression (medians across 82 group A tumors, excluding CU204, CU176, and CU190) of genes expressed differentially during normal EEC differentiation from day 0 (D0) to D8. About one-quarter of 1,160 ISC-enriched transcripts (e.g., MYC, TMC5) and one-fifth of 1,306 genes expressed transiently between D1 and D3 (e.g., SERPINA1, RARRES3) are enriched (>2-fold, q < 0.05) in SI-NETs compared with terminal EECs. Conversely, 1,376 of 1,536 genes expressed after D4 are expressed. (G) Top: distinct waves of RNA expression mark progenitor/stem (ISC), intermediate (precursor, Inter.), and terminally mature EE cells. Bottom: SI-NETs coexpress early-stage and mature EEC markers. The box-and-whisker plots depict the minimum and maximum values (whiskers), the upper and lower quartiles, and the median.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts