PTEN deficiency confers sensitivity to ATR inhibitor–based treatment in high-grade serous ovarian cancer
Jie Hao, Bose Kochupurakkal, Timothy B. Branigan, Ozge Sezin Somuncu, Renyan Liu, Heta Jadhav, Alexandre André B. A. da Costa, Yuqing Jiao, Jenny Z. Yu, David B. Martignetti, Golbahar Sadatrezaei, Sirisha Mukkavalli, Prafulla C. Gokhale, Su-Chun Cheng, Steven J. Skates, Dimitrios Nasioudis, Panagiotis A. Konstantinopoulos, Joyce F. Liu, Stephanie Gaillard, Robert L. Giuntoli II, Lainie Martin, Janos Tanyi, Nawar Latif, Ian Heller, Fiona Simpkins, Kalindi Parmar, Alan D. D’Andrea, Geoffrey I. Shapiro
Jie Hao, Bose Kochupurakkal, Timothy B. Branigan, Ozge Sezin Somuncu, Renyan Liu, Heta Jadhav, Alexandre André B. A. da Costa, Yuqing Jiao, Jenny Z. Yu, David B. Martignetti, Golbahar Sadatrezaei, Sirisha Mukkavalli, Prafulla C. Gokhale, Su-Chun Cheng, Steven J. Skates, Dimitrios Nasioudis, Panagiotis A. Konstantinopoulos, Joyce F. Liu, Stephanie Gaillard, Robert L. Giuntoli II, Lainie Martin, Janos Tanyi, Nawar Latif, Ian Heller, Fiona Simpkins, Kalindi Parmar, Alan D. D’Andrea, Geoffrey I. Shapiro
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cell biology Clinical Research Oncology

PTEN deficiency confers sensitivity to ATR inhibitor–based treatment in high-grade serous ovarian cancer

Abstract

Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related (ATR) inhibition is under evaluation for the treatment of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) to reverse acquired resistance to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibition and to exacerbate chemotherapy-induced replicative stress. Here, we define PTEN deficiency as a predictive biomarker for the response to ATR inhibition, as monotherapy and in combination with PARP inhibition or gemcitabine. In response to ATR inhibition and compared with PTEN-proficient cells, PTEN-deficient cells are prone to (a) uncoupling of DNA polymerase and helicase activities, leading to excessive ssDNA and replication stress; (b) cytoplasmic sequestration of checkpoint kinase 1 (CHK1), compromising cell-cycle checkpoint control with reduced compensatory effects by ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and DNA–dependent proteinase K (DNA-PK), leading to mitotic catastrophe; and (c) reduced DNA repair protein RAD51 homolog 1 (RAD51) recruitment, exacerbating replication fork instability, also leading to lethality. Retrospective analyses revealed that patients with HGSOC who expressed low PTEN levels experienced greater clinical benefit on ATR inhibitor–based trials than did those with high PTEN levels. These results justify prospective trials evaluating ATR inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for PTEN-deficient tumors.

Authors

Jie Hao, Bose Kochupurakkal, Timothy B. Branigan, Ozge Sezin Somuncu, Renyan Liu, Heta Jadhav, Alexandre André B. A. da Costa, Yuqing Jiao, Jenny Z. Yu, David B. Martignetti, Golbahar Sadatrezaei, Sirisha Mukkavalli, Prafulla C. Gokhale, Su-Chun Cheng, Steven J. Skates, Dimitrios Nasioudis, Panagiotis A. Konstantinopoulos, Joyce F. Liu, Stephanie Gaillard, Robert L. Giuntoli II, Lainie Martin, Janos Tanyi, Nawar Latif, Ian Heller, Fiona Simpkins, Kalindi Parmar, Alan D. D’Andrea, Geoffrey I. Shapiro

×

Figure 5

PTEN loss increases cell death and impairs cellular proliferation after combined ATR and PARP inhibition.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
PTEN loss increases cell death and impairs cellular proliferation after ...
(A and B) Bliss synergy plots of niraparib and tuvusertib in PDXO models and OVCAR8 cells. (C) Caspase activation assay quantifying apoptosis in OVCAR8 PTEN WT and PTEN-KO cells treated with tuvusertib (0, 1.2, 3.7 nM) with or without niraparib (0.37 μM). Luminescence intensity reflects caspase activity. Data represent the mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (*P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01). (D) Washout experiment in PTEN-proficient and PTEN-deficient cells. After 9 days of treatment, drugs were washed off, and cell regrowth was monitored until day 25. Cell numbers were counted at each time point. Data represent the mean ± SD. Statistical significance was determined by 1-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001).