Submit a comment

RSK1-driven TRIM28/E2F1 feedback loop promotes castration-resistant prostate cancer progression
Miyeong Kim, Jinpeng Liu, Yanquan Zhang, Ruixin Wang, Ryan Goettl, Jennifer Grasso, Derek B. Allison, Chi Wang, Tianyan Gao, Xiaoqi Liu, Ka-Wing Fong
Miyeong Kim, Jinpeng Liu, Yanquan Zhang, Ruixin Wang, Ryan Goettl, Jennifer Grasso, Derek B. Allison, Chi Wang, Tianyan Gao, Xiaoqi Liu, Ka-Wing Fong
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cell biology Endocrinology

RSK1-driven TRIM28/E2F1 feedback loop promotes castration-resistant prostate cancer progression

Abstract

Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) marks the advanced and lethal stage of prostate cancer (PCa). TRIM28, also known as KAP1, is a transcriptional regulator recently shown to promote CRPC cell proliferation and xenograft tumor growth. Nonetheless, knowledge gaps persist regarding the mechanisms underlying TRIM28 upregulation in CRPC as well as the genomic targets regulated by TRIM28. Here, we report that TRIM28 is a E2F1 target in CRPC. Using an integrated genomic approach, we have demonstrated that TRIM28 forms a positive feedback loop to promote the transcriptional activation and genomic function of E2F1 independent of retinoblastoma (Rb) status. Furthermore, we identified RSK1 as a kinase that directly phosphorylates TRIM28 at S473, and, as such, RSK1 drives the TRIM28/E2F1 feedback loop. Accordingly, pS473-TRIM28 promotes CRPC progression, which is mitigated by RSK inhibition. In summary, our study reveals a critical role of the RSK1–TRIM28–E2F1 axis in CRPC progression, which may be exploited as a vulnerability in treating Rb-deficient CRPC.

Authors

Miyeong Kim, Jinpeng Liu, Yanquan Zhang, Ruixin Wang, Ryan Goettl, Jennifer Grasso, Derek B. Allison, Chi Wang, Tianyan Gao, Xiaoqi Liu, Ka-Wing Fong

×

Guidelines

The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.

  • Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
  • Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
  • The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
  • No appeals will be considered.
  • Comments are not indexed in PubMed.

Specific requirements

  • Maximum length, 400 words
  • Entered as plain text or HTML
  • Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
  • Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
  • Comments may not include figures
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required