Advertisement
Research ArticleGenetics Free access | 10.1172/JCI67349
1Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom. 2College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA. 3Nagasaki University Research Centre for Genomic Instability and Carcinogenesis (NRGIC), Nagasaki, Japan. 4Department of Paediatrics, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. 5Solent NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. 6Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA. 7Department of Molecular Medicine, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan. 8Centre for Immunodeficiency, Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Address correspondence to: Penny A. Jeggo, Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Science Park Road, Brighton BN1 9RQ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.273.678482; Fax: 44.273.678121; E-mail: p.a.jeggo@sussex.ac.uk. Or to: E. Graham Davies, Centre for Immunodeficiency, Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.20.7829.8834; Fax: 44.20.7813.8552; E-mail: Graham.Davies@gosh.nhs.uk. Or to: Katheryn Meek, College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, 5109 Biomedical and Physical Sciences Building, East Lansing, Michigan 48823, USA. Phone: 517.884.5361; Fax: 517.353.8957; E-mail: kmeek@msu.edu.
Find articles by Woodbine, L. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom. 2College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA. 3Nagasaki University Research Centre for Genomic Instability and Carcinogenesis (NRGIC), Nagasaki, Japan. 4Department of Paediatrics, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. 5Solent NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. 6Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA. 7Department of Molecular Medicine, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan. 8Centre for Immunodeficiency, Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Address correspondence to: Penny A. Jeggo, Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Science Park Road, Brighton BN1 9RQ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.273.678482; Fax: 44.273.678121; E-mail: p.a.jeggo@sussex.ac.uk. Or to: E. Graham Davies, Centre for Immunodeficiency, Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.20.7829.8834; Fax: 44.20.7813.8552; E-mail: Graham.Davies@gosh.nhs.uk. Or to: Katheryn Meek, College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, 5109 Biomedical and Physical Sciences Building, East Lansing, Michigan 48823, USA. Phone: 517.884.5361; Fax: 517.353.8957; E-mail: kmeek@msu.edu.
Find articles by Neal, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom. 2College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA. 3Nagasaki University Research Centre for Genomic Instability and Carcinogenesis (NRGIC), Nagasaki, Japan. 4Department of Paediatrics, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. 5Solent NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. 6Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA. 7Department of Molecular Medicine, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan. 8Centre for Immunodeficiency, Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Address correspondence to: Penny A. Jeggo, Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Science Park Road, Brighton BN1 9RQ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.273.678482; Fax: 44.273.678121; E-mail: p.a.jeggo@sussex.ac.uk. Or to: E. Graham Davies, Centre for Immunodeficiency, Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.20.7829.8834; Fax: 44.20.7813.8552; E-mail: Graham.Davies@gosh.nhs.uk. Or to: Katheryn Meek, College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, 5109 Biomedical and Physical Sciences Building, East Lansing, Michigan 48823, USA. Phone: 517.884.5361; Fax: 517.353.8957; E-mail: kmeek@msu.edu.
Find articles by Sasi, N. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom. 2College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA. 3Nagasaki University Research Centre for Genomic Instability and Carcinogenesis (NRGIC), Nagasaki, Japan. 4Department of Paediatrics, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. 5Solent NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. 6Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA. 7Department of Molecular Medicine, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan. 8Centre for Immunodeficiency, Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Address correspondence to: Penny A. Jeggo, Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Science Park Road, Brighton BN1 9RQ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.273.678482; Fax: 44.273.678121; E-mail: p.a.jeggo@sussex.ac.uk. Or to: E. Graham Davies, Centre for Immunodeficiency, Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.20.7829.8834; Fax: 44.20.7813.8552; E-mail: Graham.Davies@gosh.nhs.uk. Or to: Katheryn Meek, College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, 5109 Biomedical and Physical Sciences Building, East Lansing, Michigan 48823, USA. Phone: 517.884.5361; Fax: 517.353.8957; E-mail: kmeek@msu.edu.
Find articles by Shimada, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom. 2College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA. 3Nagasaki University Research Centre for Genomic Instability and Carcinogenesis (NRGIC), Nagasaki, Japan. 4Department of Paediatrics, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. 5Solent NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. 6Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA. 7Department of Molecular Medicine, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan. 8Centre for Immunodeficiency, Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Address correspondence to: Penny A. Jeggo, Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Science Park Road, Brighton BN1 9RQ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.273.678482; Fax: 44.273.678121; E-mail: p.a.jeggo@sussex.ac.uk. Or to: E. Graham Davies, Centre for Immunodeficiency, Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.20.7829.8834; Fax: 44.20.7813.8552; E-mail: Graham.Davies@gosh.nhs.uk. Or to: Katheryn Meek, College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, 5109 Biomedical and Physical Sciences Building, East Lansing, Michigan 48823, USA. Phone: 517.884.5361; Fax: 517.353.8957; E-mail: kmeek@msu.edu.
Find articles by Deem, K. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom. 2College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA. 3Nagasaki University Research Centre for Genomic Instability and Carcinogenesis (NRGIC), Nagasaki, Japan. 4Department of Paediatrics, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. 5Solent NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. 6Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA. 7Department of Molecular Medicine, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan. 8Centre for Immunodeficiency, Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Address correspondence to: Penny A. Jeggo, Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Science Park Road, Brighton BN1 9RQ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.273.678482; Fax: 44.273.678121; E-mail: p.a.jeggo@sussex.ac.uk. Or to: E. Graham Davies, Centre for Immunodeficiency, Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.20.7829.8834; Fax: 44.20.7813.8552; E-mail: Graham.Davies@gosh.nhs.uk. Or to: Katheryn Meek, College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, 5109 Biomedical and Physical Sciences Building, East Lansing, Michigan 48823, USA. Phone: 517.884.5361; Fax: 517.353.8957; E-mail: kmeek@msu.edu.
Find articles by Coleman, H. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom. 2College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA. 3Nagasaki University Research Centre for Genomic Instability and Carcinogenesis (NRGIC), Nagasaki, Japan. 4Department of Paediatrics, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. 5Solent NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. 6Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA. 7Department of Molecular Medicine, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan. 8Centre for Immunodeficiency, Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Address correspondence to: Penny A. Jeggo, Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Science Park Road, Brighton BN1 9RQ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.273.678482; Fax: 44.273.678121; E-mail: p.a.jeggo@sussex.ac.uk. Or to: E. Graham Davies, Centre for Immunodeficiency, Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.20.7829.8834; Fax: 44.20.7813.8552; E-mail: Graham.Davies@gosh.nhs.uk. Or to: Katheryn Meek, College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, 5109 Biomedical and Physical Sciences Building, East Lansing, Michigan 48823, USA. Phone: 517.884.5361; Fax: 517.353.8957; E-mail: kmeek@msu.edu.
Find articles by Dobyns, W. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom. 2College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA. 3Nagasaki University Research Centre for Genomic Instability and Carcinogenesis (NRGIC), Nagasaki, Japan. 4Department of Paediatrics, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. 5Solent NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. 6Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA. 7Department of Molecular Medicine, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan. 8Centre for Immunodeficiency, Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Address correspondence to: Penny A. Jeggo, Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Science Park Road, Brighton BN1 9RQ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.273.678482; Fax: 44.273.678121; E-mail: p.a.jeggo@sussex.ac.uk. Or to: E. Graham Davies, Centre for Immunodeficiency, Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.20.7829.8834; Fax: 44.20.7813.8552; E-mail: Graham.Davies@gosh.nhs.uk. Or to: Katheryn Meek, College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, 5109 Biomedical and Physical Sciences Building, East Lansing, Michigan 48823, USA. Phone: 517.884.5361; Fax: 517.353.8957; E-mail: kmeek@msu.edu.
Find articles by Ogi, T. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom. 2College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA. 3Nagasaki University Research Centre for Genomic Instability and Carcinogenesis (NRGIC), Nagasaki, Japan. 4Department of Paediatrics, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. 5Solent NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. 6Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA. 7Department of Molecular Medicine, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan. 8Centre for Immunodeficiency, Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Address correspondence to: Penny A. Jeggo, Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Science Park Road, Brighton BN1 9RQ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.273.678482; Fax: 44.273.678121; E-mail: p.a.jeggo@sussex.ac.uk. Or to: E. Graham Davies, Centre for Immunodeficiency, Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.20.7829.8834; Fax: 44.20.7813.8552; E-mail: Graham.Davies@gosh.nhs.uk. Or to: Katheryn Meek, College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, 5109 Biomedical and Physical Sciences Building, East Lansing, Michigan 48823, USA. Phone: 517.884.5361; Fax: 517.353.8957; E-mail: kmeek@msu.edu.
Find articles by Meek, K. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom. 2College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA. 3Nagasaki University Research Centre for Genomic Instability and Carcinogenesis (NRGIC), Nagasaki, Japan. 4Department of Paediatrics, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. 5Solent NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. 6Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA. 7Department of Molecular Medicine, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan. 8Centre for Immunodeficiency, Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Address correspondence to: Penny A. Jeggo, Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Science Park Road, Brighton BN1 9RQ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.273.678482; Fax: 44.273.678121; E-mail: p.a.jeggo@sussex.ac.uk. Or to: E. Graham Davies, Centre for Immunodeficiency, Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.20.7829.8834; Fax: 44.20.7813.8552; E-mail: Graham.Davies@gosh.nhs.uk. Or to: Katheryn Meek, College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, 5109 Biomedical and Physical Sciences Building, East Lansing, Michigan 48823, USA. Phone: 517.884.5361; Fax: 517.353.8957; E-mail: kmeek@msu.edu.
Find articles by Davies, E. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom. 2College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA. 3Nagasaki University Research Centre for Genomic Instability and Carcinogenesis (NRGIC), Nagasaki, Japan. 4Department of Paediatrics, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. 5Solent NHS Trust, Portsmouth, United Kingdom. 6Center for Integrative Brain Research, Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA. 7Department of Molecular Medicine, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki, Japan. 8Centre for Immunodeficiency, Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom.
Address correspondence to: Penny A. Jeggo, Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Science Park Road, Brighton BN1 9RQ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.273.678482; Fax: 44.273.678121; E-mail: p.a.jeggo@sussex.ac.uk. Or to: E. Graham Davies, Centre for Immunodeficiency, Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.20.7829.8834; Fax: 44.20.7813.8552; E-mail: Graham.Davies@gosh.nhs.uk. Or to: Katheryn Meek, College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, 5109 Biomedical and Physical Sciences Building, East Lansing, Michigan 48823, USA. Phone: 517.884.5361; Fax: 517.353.8957; E-mail: kmeek@msu.edu.
Find articles by Jeggo, P. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Published June 3, 2013 - More info
The DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs; encoded by PRKDC) functions in DNA non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), the major DNA double strand break (DSB) rejoining pathway. NHEJ also functions during lymphocyte development, joining V(D)J recombination intermediates during antigen receptor gene assembly. Here, we describe a patient with compound heterozygous mutations in PRKDC, low DNA-PKcs expression, barely detectable DNA-PK kinase activity, and impaired DSB repair. In a heterologous expression system, we found that one of the PRKDC mutations inactivated DNA-PKcs, while the other resulted in dramatically diminished but detectable residual function. The patient suffered SCID with reduced or absent T and B cells, as predicted from PRKDC-deficient animal models. Unexpectedly, the patient was also dysmorphic; showed severe growth failure, microcephaly, and seizures; and had profound, globally impaired neurological function. MRI scans revealed microcephaly-associated cortical and hippocampal dysplasia and progressive atrophy over 2 years of life. These neurological features were markedly more severe than those observed in patients with deficiencies in other NHEJ proteins. Although loss of DNA-PKcs in mice, dogs, and horses was previously shown not to impair neuronal development, our findings demonstrate a stringent requirement for DNA-PKcs during human neuronal development and suggest that high DNA-PK protein expression is required to sustain efficient pre- and postnatal neurogenesis.
DNA nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ) represents the major DNA double strand break (DSB) repair process in mammalian cells (1, 2). Thus, cells, mice, and patients defective in NHEJ proteins show markedly reduced DSB repair and radiosensitivity. NHEJ also functions during immune development due to its requisite role in V(D)J recombination (3). V(D)J recombination mediates immunoglobulin and T cell receptor gene assembly from variable (V), diversity (D), and joining (J) gene segments. Recombination is initiated by the RAG1/2 endonuclease, which introduces DSBs at recombination signal sequences (RSSs). The DNA ends, including the sequences encoding the antigen receptors (termed coding ends), have hairpinned termini; the RSSs are blunt ended. Rejoining of these recombination intermediates requires NHEJ proteins. Consequently, NHEJ defects in animals and humans causes SCID with reduced or absent T and B cells.
6 core NHEJ components assemble as 2 complexes (1). The Ku70/80 heterodimer is the DNA double-stranded (ds) end recognition protein, binding DNA ds ends with high affinity. Ku recruits the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs; encoded by PRKDC), generating the DNA-PK holoenzyme. The DNA-PK complex prevents unbridled exonuclease digestion of DNA ends, enhances appropriate end-processing, and recruits the ligation complex, which encompasses XRCC4, DNA ligase IV, and XLF (also known as cernunnos). Ionizing radiation–induced (IR-induced) DSBs are rejoined with 2 component kinetics: a fast process rejoins approximately 85% of DSBs, whereas the remaining 15% are rejoined with slower kinetics (4). Core NHEJ proteins (Ku, DNA-PKcs, DNA ligase IV, XRCC4, and XLF) are required for both processes in G0/G1 phase. However, the nuclease, Artemis, functions uniquely in the slow process. Artemis is also required to cleave hairpin coding ends during V(D)J recombination (5). DNA ligase IV and XRCC4 are essential for NHEJ, whereas XLF enhances the process, but is not essential. Similarly, DNA-PKcs is facilitating, but not essential, for the fast process (6, 7). However, there is a more stringent requirement for DNA-PKcs for the slow DSB repair process, similar to the need for Artemis (8). Although DNA-PKcs has Artemis-independent functions, an important role of DNA-PKcs lies in activating Artemis (5, 9).
The NHEJ genes have been inactivated in mice with differing consequences. Ku-defective mice are viable but have SCID, severe growth retardation, and premature aging (10). Mice lacking XRCC4 or DNA ligase IV are embryonic lethal due to increased neuronal apoptosis (11, 12). Mice lacking XLF are, in contrast, viable with mild immunodeficiency and have no marked neuronal phenotype (13). Finally, mice lacking DNA-PKcs are viable, with no overt phenotype other than SCID (14). Spontaneous mutations in PRKDC have also been described in inbred horses and dogs (15–17). Such animals have SCID, but otherwise develop normally, although DNA-PKcs deficiency in dogs causes a mild intrauterine growth delay and cellular proliferation deficits (17). Importantly, neurological development is normal. The mutational changes in these animal models confer null phenotypes in all assays used, which suggests either that DNA-PKcs is nonessential or that less than 1% activity suffices for viability and development in these animal models.
Approximately 30% of SCID patients have V(D)J recombination defects, with approximately 70% having mutations in RAG1 or RAG2 (18, 19). Less commonly, SCID can be caused by mutations in NHEJ genes. Importantly, LIGIV syndrome and XLF patients harbor hypomorphic mutations in the genes encoding DNA ligase IV or XLF, respectively, and display T and B cell lymphocytopenia, growth delay, and microcephaly (20, 21). Generally, these patients do not have profound neurodevelopmental problems, and the neuronal deficit is not progressive postnatally. A mouse model for LIGIV syndrome shows small growth and elevated apoptosis in the embryonic neuronal stem and progenitor cell compartment (22). One LIGIV patient who received radiotherapy died of radiation morbidity (23). Collectively, these findings suggest that reduced DNA ligase IV activity confers clinical radiosensitivity and additionally that NHEJ functions during embryonic neuronal development. In contrast, mutations in the gene encoding Artemis are often null and confer radiosensitive SCID (RS-SCID), but no overt reduced growth or microcephaly (24). A single patient with a homozygous missense mutation in PRKDC has been previously reported (25). The mutational change did not affect DNA–PKcs expression nor enzymatic activity, but impaired Artemis activation. Like Artemis-defective patients, this DNA-PKcs–deficient patient had SCID but was otherwise developmentally normal.
Given the occurrence of spontaneous mutations in PRKDC in dogs and horses, it is surprising that patients with mutations in PRKDC have not been more frequently reported. However, recent work has strongly suggested that the DNA-PK complex is essential in humans. Elegant work from Hendrickson and colleagues has demonstrated that homozygous loss of Ku in human cells causes loss of viability due to rapid telomere shortening (26–28). In contrast, disruption of PRKDC in the same genetic background had a more modest impact on telomere maintenance and did not preclude viability, although it did confer profound proliferation and genomic stability defects (29). It has therefore been suggested that a PRKDC null mutation would be incompatible with life in humans (16, 25, 30).
Here, we identified a SCID patient with substantially reduced DNA-PKcs protein levels, undetectable DNA-PK activity, and impaired DSB rejoining attributable to loss of DNA-PK activity. The patient had a point mutational change in 1 allele that severely impaired but did not abrogate DNA-PK activity, strongly suggesting that it represents a hymophric mutation. A cDNA product resulting from aberrant splicing was also detected. The patient’s cells had substantially reduced DNA-PKcs protein levels and impaired DSB rejoining that was attributable to loss of DNA-PK activity. The mutational change in 1 allele resulted in the loss of an exon and appeared to be inactivating; the other mutational change, however, was hypomorphic. The patient had marked neurological abnormalities, remarkably more severe than observed in hitherto described NHEJ-defective SCID patients. Strikingly, neuronal atrophy was observed postnatally. Our findings highlight an important role for DNA-PKcs during neuronal development and maintenance in humans.
Clinical features. Male patient NM720, the first child of nonconsanguineous parents, exhibited poor intrauterine growth on antenatal ultrasounds. There was prolonged rupture of the membranes and an abnormal cardiotocograph, leading to delivery by caesarean section at 37 weeks. Birth weight was 2.1 kg (0.4th–2nd percentile), and occipitofrontal circumference (OFC) was 32.2 cm (9th–25th percentile). He was admitted to the hospital at 3 weeks of age with suspected sepsis and persistent oral and perineal candidiasis. A diagnosis of SCID was made at 5 weeks with complete absence of T and B cells, normal NK cell numbers, and undetectable IgA and IgM levels (T–B–NK+). At 2 years of age, there were still no detectable circulating T cells (0.02 × 109 cells/l) and no B cells. The patient was noted to be microcephalic (OFC, 31.5 cm; <0.4th percentile) and dysmorphic with prominent forehead, wide nasal bridge, deep-set eyes, long philtrum with thin upper lip, small chin, low-set ears with overfolded helices, overlapping fingers, and postaxial polysyndactyly of the right foot. He had micropenis, but with normal descended testes and normal pituitary function. At gastrostomy insertion, the stomach was noted to be very small and nondistensible. A spleen was detectable by ultrasound. Neurologically, the patient showed little developmental progress with very poor head growth (OFC, 35.2, 36.8, 38.6, and 39.2 cm at 4, 6.5, 11, and 30 months, respectively). He developed seizures. Investigations including cerebrospinal fluid examination failed to reveal any microbial pathogens. He had bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss on brain stem–evoked responses and severe visual impairment, with electroretinograms showing markedly degraded responses and occipital flash and binocular occipital pattern visual evoked potentials showing degraded, delayed, broadened, and inconsistent responses. At 29 months of age, his neurodevelopmental level was that of a 3- to 4-month-old. He died at 31 months of age with intractable seizures.
Neurological imaging of the patient at 3 months and 2 years of age. An MRI scan undertaken at 3 months of age revealed microcephaly and an atypical cortical malformation consisting of a diffusely reduced number and depth of sulci (i.e., simplified gyral pattern), mild frontal pachygyria with the frontal cortex relatively thicker than the posterior cortex (4 mm versus 2–3 mm), and a blurred cortical–white matter border (Figure 1). The hippocampi were small and dysplastic, and the posterior pituitary bright spot was absent, suggestive of disruption of the posterior pituitary-hypothalamic axis. Additional changes included hypomyelinated white matter, mildly enlarged lateral ventricles, thin and mildly short corpus callosum, cavum septi pellucidi and cavum vergae, and moderate cerebellar vermis hypoplasia. In summary, the brain images demonstrated microcephaly-associated cortical and hippocampal dysplasia that differed from lissencephaly. The irregular or pebbled surface and microgyri that characterize typical or “coarse” polymicrogyria were not seen, although the overall immature appearance might have obscured the more subtle or “delicate” form of polymicrogyria (31). A second MRI scan at 2.4 years showed striking progressive atrophy involving all brain regions compared with the first scan (Figure 1), corresponding to one of the major microcephaly groups (group 3; microcephaly with simplified gyri and enlarged extra-axial space)Πdefined in a recent paper (32).
MRI scan images of patient NM720. Brain MRI in a normal 3-year-old child (A–E) and in patient NM720 at 3 months (F–J) and 2 years (K–O). In the patient, midline sagittal T1-weighted images (F and K) showed an absent pituitary bright spot (pit), thin and short corpus callosum (cc), and small uprotated cerebellar vermis (cbv). Parasagittal (G and L) and axial T2-weighted (H, I, M, and N) images showed reduced number of gyri, and mildly thick cortex with blurred gray-white border (ctx). Coronal images (J and O) showed the same changes in the cortex, as well as mildly small hippocampi. Striking progressive atrophy was seen involving all brain regions on the second scan (asterisks in L–N).
Defective DSB repair in patient fibroblasts. Patient fibroblasts were established to assess the possibility of a RS-SCID disorder. Poor cloning efficiency of the primary fibroblasts precluded clonogenic radiosensitivity analysis. An hTERT immortalized line, NM720 hTERT, was established, but these cells also plated poorly, precluding analysis. We have previously exploited γH2AX foci analysis to monitor DSB repair (8). This assay uses nondividing cells, avoiding complications from γH2AX formation during replication, and can be used with poorly growing cells. Enumeration of γH2AX formation and loss after 3 Gy IR revealed a pronounced DSB repair defect, which was distinct from that observed in either LIGIV syndrome or Artemis-defective patient cells (Figure 2A). LIGIV syndrome cells (lines 180BR and 495BR) displayed a pronounced DSB repair defect at 2 and 6 hours after IR. However, the mutational changes identified in patients are hypomorphic, and cells retain residual ligase activity, consistent with the findings in mice that DNA ligase IV is essential. Thus, DSB repair ensues slowly, as evidenced by the diminished levels of residual DSBs from 24 to 48 hours (see also ref. 33). Interestingly, the mutational changes in 495BR cells were more severe than those in 180BR cells, resulting in a greater DSB repair defect, which also correlates with more severe clinical features. A similar profile is observed for XLF-deficient cells (6). In contrast, the repair defect in an Artemis-null cell line, F02/385, was persistent but only evident at later times (beginning at 24 hours), since Artemis is dispensable for the fast DSB repair process but essential for the slow DSB repair component (8). In contrast to these phenotypes, patient cells displayed a small defect at 2 hours, but the defect was retained at 8 days after IR (Figure 2, A and B). 709BR cells, derived from the patient’s mother, showed normal repair; cells from the father were not available. This profile closely corresponded to, but was milder than, that observed in Prkdc–/– mouse embryonic fibroblasts (data not shown) and in control human cells treated with the DNA-PK–inhibiting drug (DNA-PKi) NU7441 (Figure 2B). Furthermore, addition of DNA-PKi to patient cells was not additive to this repair defect and was indistinguishable from DNA-PKi–treated control cells. These findings are consistent with an epistatic relationship and raise the possibility that there could be a hypomorphic defect in DNA-PKcs in patient cells. Collectively, these findings suggest that the patient is defective in an NHEJ protein and implicate DNA-PKcs as a candidate defect.
Defective DSB repair in patient fibroblasts. (A) Control (48BR), Artemis null (F02/385), LIGIV syndrome (180BR and 495BR), patient (NM720), and mother (709BR) confluent G0 phase cells were exposed to 3 Gy γ-rays, and the number of γH2AX foci was determined at the indicated times. BG, background (no irradiation). (B) 1BR3 control and patient confluent G0 phase cells were exposed to 3 Gy γ-rays in the presence or absence of 5 μM DNA-PKi, and the number of γH2AX foci was enumerated at the indicated times.
Severely reduced DNA-PKcs expression and activity in patient cells. Next, we carried out immunoblotting of the 7 core NHEJ proteins as well as LIS1, a protein frequently deficient in patients displaying lissencephaly, which was also evaluated as a causal defect (Figure 3A). Strikingly, although most NHEJ proteins were expressed at normal levels, DNA-PKcs expression was dramatically reduced in patient cells. However, residual DNA-PKcs protein was detectable and verified by comparison with M059J, a human tumor cell line that lacks DNA-PKcs expression (34). Furthermore, the patient’s mother’s cells showed approximately 50% of the level of DNA-PKcs observed in control cells (Figure 3B).
Reduced DNA-PKcs expression and activity in patient cells. (A) Western blotting analysis shows reduced DNA-PKcs protein in patient cells. Whole cell extracts (50 μg) from 1BR3 control or patient cells were processed for Western blotting using the indicated antibodies. (B) Western blotting analysis confirmed that residual DNA-PKcs protein was validated against human tumor cells, M059K and M059J. M059J cells are null for DNA-PKcs (53). (C) DNA-PK–dependent kinase activity was examined using whole cell lysates from 1BR3 control, mother, and patient immortalized primary hTERT fibroblasts.
Additionally, quantitative analysis of DNA-PKcs activity present in hTERT fibroblasts derived from control (1BR3), patient, and mother cells revealed no detectable DNA-PK activity in patient hTERT cells and approximately 50% of the level of WT activity in the mother’s hTERT cells (Figure 3C). This assay is extremely sensitive, and we estimate that 1% of the control level would be detectable. These findings confirmed a profound defect in DNA-PK activity in patient cells.
Mutational changes in PRKDC. DNA-PKcs is one of the largest known cDNAs (35). To search for mutational changes, 9 overlapping PCR fragments from DNA-PKcs cDNA were amplified and sequenced from control and patient, revealing a c.10721C>T mutational change in 1 allele of the patient creating an alanine to valine amino acid substitution at the highly conserved residue 3574 (p.A3574V) (Figure 4, A and E). The mother also carried this mutational change.
Identification of mutational changes in PRKDC cDNA. (A) Dye-terminator sequence figures illustrating the c.10721C>T mutational change in 1 allele of the patient and mother. (B) Dye-terminator sequence figures illustrating a double sequence commencing at c.1624, the bp at the boundary between exons 15 and 16. (C) RT-PCR amplification products using primers located in exons 15 and 17. Control cells yielded a single product of the size anticipated for the presence of exon 16. Patient cells yielded 2 bands, the smaller of which was the size expected for a product lacking exon 16. The greater signal could be the result of enhanced amplification of a smaller fragment. (D) mRNA transcript levels, determined using primers specific for HPRT, the WT p.A3574 allele (PRKDC c.10712C), or the mutant p.A3574V allele (PRKDC c.10712C>T). All cell lines showed equal expression of HPRT. cDNA of 48BR control cells had 2-fold greater levels of the WT allele compared with cDNA from mother or patient cells, which expressed the same level of the p.A3574 and p.A3574V mutant alleles. (E) Conservation of the A3574 residue between species and location of the identified mutational changes in PRKDC in relation to important domains.
Additionally, we observed a double sequence commencing at c.1624, which represents the boundary between exons 15 and 16, suggesting that exon 16 might be deleted in the patient (Figure 4B). To substantiate this, primers were designed in exons 15 and 17. RT-PCR using cDNA derived from control cells revealed a single product, whereas 2 discrete bands were observed using patient cells (Figure 4C). The RT-PCR amplification products were cloned, and individual clones were sequenced. Whereas all clones from the control cell line showed the anticipated sequence encompassing exon 16, approximately 50% (10 of 20) of the clones derived from the patient lacked exon 16 (the other 50% included exon 16). Importantly, this deletion did not affect the reading frame. This is consistent with the finding that 50% of the RT-PCR amplification products were derived from the exon 16–deleted cDNA, demonstrating that there was no substantial nonsense-mediated decay (NMD). To confirm normal expression of the exon 16–deleted allele, we performed quantitative RT-PCR analyses to determine the transcript levels of the full-length WT, exon 16–deleted, and mutant PRKDC alleles in the patient, the mother, and a normal control (Figure 4D). The mutant c.10721C>T allele was expressed to similar extents in the patient and mother, while no mutant cDNA was detected in the normal control. Importantly, the WT c.10721C allele was expressed nearly 2-fold higher in the normal control relative to the patient or the mother. This strongly indicates that the exon 16–deleted, c.10721C, and c.10721C>T alleles are expressed at similar levels and thus are equally stable.
Finally, we examined DNA-PKcs cDNA from 15 normal individuals and did not observe any abnormal splicing involving exon 16, which suggests that this is not a common splice variant. Sequencing of exon 16 from the patient’s genomic DNA revealed a normal sequence. Additionally, intron 16 was sequenced from the patient, and an IVS16+1510insA mutation 700 bp upstream of the splice site was identified. This change was not present in the mother’s genomic DNA (Supplemental Figure 1; available online with this article; doi: 10.1172/JCI67349DS1). However, considering the substantial distance of this change from the exon 15/16 splice site, it is unclear whether this represents the causal mutational change causing exon skipping. This change, however, was not a reported polymorphism or SNP (Supplemental Figure 1).
In summary, patient cells harbored mutational changes in PRKDC. The maternally derived allele generated a p.A3574A mutant protein. Additionally, we identified a splicing abnormality generating a cDNA lacking exon 16. The location of these mutational changes and critical domains in PRKDC are shown in Figure 4E.
PRKDC complements the DSB repair defect observed in patient cells. To test complementation, a previously constructed GFP-tagged full-length DNA-PKcs cDNA was used (36). 1BR3 control and patient hTERT fibroblasts were transfected with DNA-PKcs cDNA and exposed to 3 Gy IR 48 hours later, and γH2AX foci were enumerated 0.25, 8, and 16 hours after IR in cells staining positively for GFP. GFP staining was used to identify and analyze only transfected cells, which represented less than 10% of the cell population (expected given the size of the DNA-PKcs cDNA and use of patient fibroblasts). Strikingly, we observed almost full correction of the DSB repair defect in patient hTERT cells expressing DNA-PKcs (Figure 5). As a control, the DNA-PKcs cDNA was also transfected into 180BR LIGIV syndrome TERT cells; as expected, no complementation of the DNA repair defect was observed. Similarly, transfection of 1BR3 control hTERT cells or the patient’s mother’s hTERT cells with DNA-PKcs cDNA did not affect the cells’ rate of DSB repair. Collectively, these data provide compelling evidence that the DSB repair defect observed in patient cells is a consequence of impaired DNA-PKcs function.
DNA-PKcs cDNA complements the DSB repair defect observed in patient cells. GFP-tagged full-length DNA-PKcs cDNA (GFP FL-PK) or GFP empty vector (GFP) was transfected into 1BR3 control, patient, 180BR LIGIV syndrome, and mother hTERT cells. 24 hours after transfection, cells were irradiated with 3 Gy γ-rays, and 53BP1 foci in GFP+ cells were enumerated at 8 and 16 hours. The identification of GFP+ cells was critical, since the transfection frequency using the large DNA-PKcs cDNA and human fibroblasts was low (<1%). Substantial correction of the DSB repair defect of patient cells was observed upon expression of full-length DNA-PKcs cDNA. No correction was observed after transfection of full-length DNA-PKcs cDNA into LIGIV syndrome cells.
p.A3574V or loss of exon 16 dramatically impairs DNA-PK function and activity. A3574, which lies outside the kinase domain within the large FAT domain, is a highly conserved residue in DNA-PKcs (Figure 4E). Nonetheless, an alanine to valine substitution does not represent a dramatic change. To gain further insight into whether p.A3574V affects DNA-PKcs function, this substitution was introduced into DNA-PKcs cDNA by site-directed mutagenesis and cloning. WT and mutant PRKDC constructs were introduced into V3, a CHO cell line that lacks functional DNA-PKcs (37). Stable clones were isolated, and those that expressed equivalent levels of DNA-PKcs (as determined by immunoblotting) were selected for further study. To examine whether the p.A3574V substitution affects DNA-PKcs function in response to damage-induced DSBs, clonogenic survival assays were performed after exposure to the DSB-inducing agent zeocin (Figure 6A). Whereas WT human DNA-PKcs substantially reversed the zeocin sensitivity of V3 cells, cells expressing the p.A3574V mutant were as sensitive to zeocin as those transfected with empty vector. We conclude that A3574V DNA-PKcs substantially disrupts DNA-PKcs function in response to damage-induced DSBs.
A3574V and exon 16–deleted DNA-PKcs impair DNA-PKcs kinase activity and DNA-PKcs function in the response to DNA damage and during V(D)J recombination. (A) Full-length, A3574V, or exon 16–deleted DNA-PKcs or empty vector was transiently transfected into DNA-PKcs–defective hamster V3 cells. 48 hours after transfection, cells were exposed to zeocin as indicated, and survival was estimated 7 days later. Expression of DNA-PKcs following Western blotting is also shown. Note that the exon 16–deleted DNA-PKcs cDNA was cloned into a distinct vector (RMCE) compared with A3574V DNA-PKcs cDNA (pCMV); the former is an improved vector for large inserts and was used in later studies. Survival analyses using these 2 vectors are presented separately. (B) Estimated percent recombination of coding junctions in V3 cells after expression of full-length, A3574V, or exon 16–deleted DNA-PKcs or empty vector together with plasmids encoding the RAG recombinases and a recombination substrate that assesses coding end-joining. (C and D) Estimation of DNA-PK activity in whole cell extracts from V3 cells expressing full-length, A3574V, or exon 16–deleted DNA-PKcs or empty vector. DNA-PK was extracted using DNA–cellulose beads, and activity was assessed using a biotinylated p53 peptide as a substrate (C) or by examining autophosphorylation after Western blotting and analysis using DNA-PKcs or phospho-2056–DNA-PKcs antibodies (D).
We next tested whether A3574V DNA-PKcs could function to repair RAG-induced DSBs during V(D)J recombination. V(D)J recombination can be assessed in somatic cells using plasmid substrates introduced into cultured cells together with the RAG recombination genes (38). V3 cells were transfected with RAG expression vectors, a recombination substrate that assesses coding end-joining, as well as WT, mutant, or no DNA-PKcs cDNA. As expected, WT DNA-PKcs supported substantial levels of coding end-joining (Figure 6B). Although A3574V DNA-PKcs cDNA supported considerably less coding end-joining than WT DNA-PKcs, a low but measurable level of coding joints were recovered, which suggests that A3574V DNA-PKcs retains some functional capacity. We considered that this low level of coding end-joining might be analogous to the “leaky” joining observed in mouse or hamster cells that lack DNA-PKcs, where the leaky joints are thought to be mediated by an alternative NHEJ pathway. Characteristics of leaky joining include excessive nt loss and long P elements. To examine the junctions formed from the rejoined joints, DNA was prepared from the rejoined plasmid substrates and sequenced. Surprisingly, coding joints mediated by A3574V DNA-PKcs were indistinguishable from those formed by WT DNA-PKcs (Table 1). We conclude that although A3574V DNA-PKcs cannot support normal levels of end-joining, end processing of DNA ends is normal, consistent with the notion that the A3574V mutant supports reduced levels of classical NHEJ.
Finally, we examined whether A3574V DNA-PKcs retains enzymatic activity. DNA-PK from V3 extracts was pulled down onto DNA cellulose beads, and enzymatic activity was measured using a biotinylated p53 peptide as a substrate. Virtually no activity was detectable from cells expressing A3574V DNA-PKcs (Figure 6C). This was somewhat surprising, since kinase activity has previously been shown to be essential for the ability of DNA-PKcs to support coding end-joining. Thus, DNA-PKcs autophosphorylation was also assessed as an alternative measure of enzymatic activity, using a phosphospecific antibody to pS2056 DNA-PKcs, a well-studied DNA-PKcs autophosphorylation site (39). Immunoblotting of in vitro kinase reaction proteins (after 5 or 30 minutes) revealed that A3574V DNA-PKcs underwent autophosphorylation, albeit with slower kinetics and with less efficiency than the WT protein (Figure 6D). We conclude that A3574V DNA-PKcs has residual but substantially impaired catalytic activity.
Loss of exon 16 did not cause a frameshift, but the encoded protein lacked amino acids 541–592. Our previous studies have shown that PRKDC does not tolerate deletions (40, 41). Furthermore, the deleted region is highly conserved in vertebrate PRKDC and, from the available structural studies, is predicted to reside within the N-terminal “pincer” domain. DNA-PKcs cDNA lacking exon 16 was generated, and its function was assessed in V3 cells. DNA-PKcs expression in V3 clones expressing the exon 16 deletion was considerably lower than in cells expressing WT protein (Figure 6). Moreover, the clones did not reverse the zeocin-sensitive phenotype of V3 cells, failed to support VDJ coding end resolution, and yielded no detectable DNA-PKcs activity using the assays described above. Collectively, these findings provide strong evidence that loss of exon 16 dramatically affects function and likely represents a null mutational change. This finding is consistent with our previous DNA-PKcs mutational studies showing that small N-terminal deletions completely ablate function and that other exon-skipped DNA-PKcs variants are similarly nonfunctional (40, 41).
In summary, although cells expressing A3574V DNA-PKcs were similarly sensitive to zeocin-induced DSBs as cells expressing no DNA-PKcs, the mutant protein did retain residual catalytic activity, supporting a low level of coding end-joining. This is consistent with previous suggestions that very low levels of DNA-PKcs activity are sufficient to support V(D)J recombination but insufficient to reverse the radiosensitive phenotype caused by DNA-PKcs deficiency (30, 42). Finally, since neither the A3574V DNA-PKcs nor the exon 16 deletion increased zeocin sensitivity in cells completely lacking DNA-PKcs, we conclude that the phenotype cannot be attributed to a dominant negative effect on NHEJ but results from loss of DNA-PK activity. The lack of a dominant negative impact is further substantiated by the complementation of DSB repair in patient cells by GFP-tagged DNA-PKcs.
Here, we identified an immunodeficient patient with impaired DSB repair, affecting mutations in PRKDC, and dramatically reduced DNA-PK activity. Although a previous patient with mutations in PRKDC has been reported, the homozygous mutational change exerted a subtle impact that specifically affected Artemis activation and conferred no overt clinical features other than combined immunodeficiency (25). Thus, our findings represent the first description of a patient with substantially reduced DNA-PK activity that impairs core NHEJ. The patient displayed a marked neurological phenotype substantially more severe than that of previously described LIGIV syndrome or XLF-deficient patients, who normally show mild microcephaly (20, 21). The cortical disorganization bears some resemblance to the malformation described in a fetus carrying a balanced translocation that disrupted the gene encoding XLF (43). The fetus had posterior predominant polymicrogyria with extension to the frontal lobe, and small groups of heterotopic neurons in the white matter. While the typical changes of polymicrogyria were not seen in the patient reported here, the frontal cortex was clearly abnormal, potentially consistent with the “delicate” form of polymicrogyria. Further, the blurred cortical–white matter border was also abnormal and would be consistent with heterotopic neurons in the white matter. No mutations were identified in XLF, LIGIV, or XRCC4, however. Additionally, the MRI images and the neurological features in this patient bore similarities to those previously seen in children with PNKP mutations (44). DNA-PK, as well as ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM), phosphorylate PNKP (45), and PNKP functions during NHEJ, although it also functions in single-strand break repair. Further work is required to determine whether the overlapping clinical manifestations could have a common basis.
The DSB repair phenotypes are distinct from those of previously described RS-SCID patients. Cells from DNA ligase IV– and/or XLF-deficient patients have a hypomorphic phenotype that allows slow rejoining of all DSBs (8). Thus, they manifest a marked defect at early times after irradiation (e.g., 2–6 hours), but the defect becomes milder at later times, and finally all DSBs are rejoined. Artemis-defective cells show no defect at early times, since Artemis is dispensable for the fast DSB rejoining process, but a 10%–15% subfraction of DSBs remain unrejoined for prolonged times (8). The patient cells, in contrast, had a defect at early times after IR, although this was milder compared with DNA ligase IV–deficient cells; however, at later times, the defect remained marked and similar to that observed in Artemis-defective cells. Thus, patient cells cannot be described as being more or less defective than those of LIGIV syndrome patients — rather, the phenotype is distinct. The repair deficiency in patient cells appears less severe than that observed after treatment with DNA-PKi, potentially attributable to residual DNA-PK activity. Indeed, our functional analysis provides evidence that the change in the maternal allele (p.A3574V) confers low but detectable residual activity, predicting a hypomorphic phenotype. Nonetheless, despite residual activity, unrepaired DSBs were detectable at 8 days after 3 Gy in patient cells, which suggests that the slow component of DSB repair is almost fully inhibited. These findings are consistent with the notion that the different processes in which DNA-PKcs functions — e.g., fast versus slow DSB repair and V(D)J recombination — have different requirements for DNA-PK activity, and that the slow DSB repair process is dramatically affected by low DNA-PKcs activity.
In mice, loss of DNA ligase IV or XRCC4, both essential NHEJ proteins, is embryonic lethal, with marked apoptosis in the embryonic neuronal cells (11, 12). In humans, LIGIV syndrome and XLF-deficient patients, who harbor hypomorphic mutations in DNA ligase IV and XLF, respectively, display growth delay and microcephaly at birth, but the effect is not progressive postnatally (20, 21). A mouse model for LIGIV syndrome, LigIVY288C, which, like LIGIV syndrome patients, has a hypomorphic mutation in DNA ligase IV, also shows delayed growth, a small head, and elevated apoptosis in the embryonic neuronal stem cells (22, 46). As in humans, the effect is not progressive postnatally. These findings suggest that there is a stringent requirement for the NHEJ ligation complex during embryonic neuronal development in mice and humans. Additionally, Ku-defective mice are viable, but display impaired embryonic neurogenesis (10, 47). In contrast, the animal models for DNA-PKcs loss (mice, dogs, and horses) have no evident neurological phenotype, despite having no detectable residual DNA-PKcs function (14–16, 47). Thus, the marked neuronal abnormalities in patient NM720 were completely unexpected based on findings from these animal models. Indeed, they showed not only that there is a stringent requirement for DNA-PKcs during embryonic neuronal development in humans, but that DNA-PKcs is also required postnatally.
At least 3 possible models underlying this marked clinical impact can be considered: (a) there is a more stringent requirement for DNA-PKcs for NHEJ in humans; (b) the clinical features arise from a non-NHEJ function of DNA-PKcs in humans, such as a role in telomere maintenance; or (c) there is a greater requirement for DSB repair during neuronal embryogenesis in humans. We and others have observed that mice and humans have a similar requirement for each NHEJ protein for DSB repair (8, 22). In both mouse and human cells, loss or inhibition of DNA-PKcs has a modest effect on the fast DSB repair component, but dramatically impairs the slow process (Figure 3). One explanation for residual DSB rejoining in the absence of DNA-PKcs is that an alternative form of end-joining can occur, whereas loss of DNA ligase IV results in almost complete loss of NHEJ in G0 phase mouse and human cells (48). Importantly, however, these requirements and alternative processes appear to function at similar levels in mice and in human cells (48); thus, the first possibility appears unlikely. The DNA-PK complex has also been shown to function in telomere maintenance, with this function being more important in humans than in mice (26, 28, 29, 49). However, if the clinical effect was predominantly due to telomere shortening, one might expect developmental defects in many tissues and cell types. Furthermore, since neurons are predominantly nonreplicating, the postnatal impact cannot readily be attributed to telomere shortening. An alternative possibility is that DNA-PK activity has a distinct role in the brain, potentially activating a response distinct to its role in DSB repair or activating a response that enhances survival to endogenously arising DSBs. However, although these possibilities cannot be eliminated, we favor the explanation that the clinical features are caused predominantly by the DSB repair defect and that neuronal development and maintenance in humans places a high demand on DSB repair capacity. The lack of a postnatal effect in LIGIV syndrome or XLF-deficient patients could be a consequence of their hypomorphic mutational changes.
Importantly, a distinguishing characteristic of NHEJ in primates versus all other vertebrates is remarkably high expression levels of all 3 DNA-PK component polypeptides. Indeed, DNA-PK protein and enzymatic activity is approximately 50-fold higher in human versus mouse cells (16, 50). This, however, does not affect DSB repair rates or radioresistance, which, as discussed above, are similar in rodents and humans. DNA-PK avidly binds to DSB ends, preventing their resection by exonucleases. Examination of DNA-PK dosage in cell line models has suggested that there is an inverse correlation between DNA-PKcs expression and the use of homologous recombination (HR), an alternative process of DSB repair (30). Consistent with this model, Hendrickson and colleagues have observed that loss of telomeres in Ku- or DNA-PKcs–deficient cells is mediated by HR and is dosage dependent (e.g., haplodeficient cells have a modest telomere loss phenotype; refs. 28, 29). Similarly, targeting efficiency, which is mediated by HR, is increased in a dose-dependent manner (51). We have suggested that differing requirements for DNA-PK levels in humans may reflect a more stringent requirement to regulate HR at hyper-recombinogenic genomic regions (30, 52). Thus, the high expression of DNA-PK in primates may suggest a unique necessity to restrain HR or other DSB repair pathways, which may be particularly important during neuronal development. In this context, it is notable that our analysis of LigIVY288C embryos revealed that significant levels of DSBs arise in the embryonic neuronal stem and early progenitor cells in a manner temporally related to the stage of rapid replication (22). Although previous studies have suggested that HR repairs replication-associated DSBs, DNA ligase IV is clearly required to repair the endogenous DSBs that arise in a manner associated with rapid replication. Importantly, the demand for efficient repair in this tissue is due not only to high DSB formation, but also to a low threshold for activating apoptosis from unrepaired DBSs (22). Thus, we propose that the high expression of DNA-PK proteins in primates is due, at least in part, to ensure efficient repair by NHEJ rather than HR during neuronal development. The embryonic neuronal stem and early progenitor cells may be particularly vulnerable to DNA-PKcs loss due to the high frequency of S/G2 phase cells, the cell cycle phase where HR functions, and where resection, the initiating step of HR, occurs avidly.
In summary, we provide the first identification of a patient with a profound defect in DNA-PKcs levels and activity. In addition to the expected SCID phenotype, the patient showed dramatically impaired neurological development and progressive brain atrophy, which was not anticipated based on animal models. Our findings suggest that high expression of DNA-PK component proteins in primates is required, at least in part, to ensure efficient embryonic neuronal development, which we postulate might be necessary to avoid DSB repair by HR.
Cell culture. Primary fibroblast lines used were 48BR and 1BR3 (control), F02/385 (Artemis null), 180BR and 495BR (LIGIV syndrome), NM720 (patient), and 709BR (mother) (8). hTERT represents immortalized derivatives. MO59K and MO59J are DNA-PK–expressing or –nonexpressing, respectively, glioblastoma cell lines (53). Cells were grown in MEM with 15% FCS, penicillin/streptomycin, and l-glutamine at 37°C and 5% CO2. V3 (DNA-PKcs–deficient CHO cells) were cultured in α-MEM supplemented with 10% FCS, penicillin/streptomycin, and ciprofloxacin. DSB repair analysis was as described previously (8).
Immunofluorescence and immunoblotting. For immunofluorescence, anti-53BP1 or anti-γH2AX antibodies were from Millipore and Bethyl, respectively. Secondary antibodies were from Dako. Cells were fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde, 2% sucrose PBS, for 10 minutes at room temperature (RT) and permeabilized in 20 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 50 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 300 mM sucrose, and 0.5% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich) for 2 minutes at 4°C. Primary antibody incubations were for 40 minutes at 37°C in PBS supplemented with 2% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich). Secondary incubations with anti-mouse FITC or anti-rabbit Cy3 secondary antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich) were performed at 37°C in 2% BSA for 20 minutes. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich), and coverslips were mounted in Vectashield mounting medium (Vector Laboratories). For immunoblotting, 25 or 50 μg of whole cell extracts were resolved on 7.5% PAGE gels. After transfer to PVDF membranes and blocking with 25% skim milk powder in TTBS buffer (20 mM Tris Base–HCl, pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl; and 0.1% Tween-20), blots were incubated overnight at 4°C with anti-XLF (Eurogentec), anti-XRCC4 (Serotec), anti-KU70 (Santa Cruz), anti-KU80 (Cell Signaling), anti–DNA-LIGIV (Serotec), anti-Lis1 (Santa Cruz), or anti–DNA-PK polyclonal antibody (DPK-1; provided by S. Lees-Miller, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada). Blots were incubated with either rabbit, goat, or mouse secondary HRP antibodies (Dako).
DNA-PKcs kinase assay. DNA-PK kinase activity was measured using a pull-down assay (54). Briefly, whole-cell extracts from hTERT fibroblasts were mixed with 5 mg dsDNA cellulose (Sigma-Aldrich) and incubated on ice for 30 minutes at 4°C, followed by centrifugation. The pellets containing DNA cellulose–bound DNA-PKcs were washed, resuspended, and incubated with biotinylated peptide substrate supplied in the SigmaTECT DNA-PK kinase assay kit (Promega) in the presence of [γ-32P] ATP for 10 minutes at 30°C. Reactions were stopped by addition of CH3COOH, spotted onto 1.5 cm2 phosphocellulose paper (cationic exchange paper grade P91; Whatman) and washed 3–4 times in 200 ml 15% CH3COOH. After air drying, the signal was quantified using a STORM PhosphoImager (Molecular Dynamics/GE Healthcare).
DNA-PK sequencing. cDNA was synthesized from total RNA using random hexamer primers and SUPERSCRIPT II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). 9 overlapping fragments were PCR amplified using KOD polymerase (Merck Biosciences) as follows: 94°C for 2 minutes; 35 cycles of 94°C for 15 seconds, 54°C for 30 seconds, and 68°C for 90 seconds; and 68°C for 10 minutes. Each fragment was amplified 3 times in separate PCR reactions, gel purified, and sequenced in both directions using ABI BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit V1.1 (Applied Biosystems). To confirm the exon 16 deletion, the PCR fragment covering exons 15–17 was cloned into a pGEM-5 vector, and individual clones were sequenced. Genomic DNA was extracted using a DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen) and amplified in 3 overlapping fragments.
qPCR analysis. mRNA transcript levels of PRKDC c.10721C and c.10721T alleles in patient cells, mother cells, and 48BR control cells were quantified by the cycleave real-time PCR assay (Cycleave-qPCR; TaKaRa Co. Ltd.). HPRT1 served as a quantification control. RNaseH-sensitive 2-color-labeled fluorescent probes that selectively recognize the PRKDC c.10721C and c.10721T alleles were used. qPCR results were analyzed by the ΔΔCt method. qPCR primers and probes were as follows: PRKDC c.10721 forward, 5′-ATAAGGAGTTTGTGGCAAGG-3′; PRKDC c.10721 reverse, 5′-CCAAGGCTGCATACATTC-3′; PRKDC c.10721C WT, (Eclipse) 5′-dAdAdG(rG)dCdAdTdTdAdAdTdA-3′ (FAM); PRKDC c.10721T mutant, (Eclipse) 5′-dAdAdG(rA)dCdAdTdTdAdAdTdAdAdA-3′ (ROX); HPRT1 forward, 5′-CAGGCAGTATAATCCAAAGATG-3′; HPRT1 reverse, 5′-ACTGGCGATGTCAATAGGA-3′; HPRT1 probe, (Eclipse) 5′-dCdAdGdCdA(A)dGdCdT-3′ (FAM).
Plasmids and transfectants. WT DNA-PKcs expression plasmids were as described previously (42). A3574V was generated by synthesizing a portion of DNA-PKcs cDNA by multiplex PCR between the BglII (nt 10,455) and PmlI (nt 11,146) sites, including 3 nt changes within codons 3,574–3,475 (AATGCC>AACGTT) that introduce the A3574V substitution as well as noncoding substitutions that generate a novel AclI restriction site. This BglII-PmlI fragment was subcloned into a fragment of DNA-PKcs spanning the SalI site (nt 8,000) to the termination codon at nt 12,384. An Fse1 (nt 8,160) to Pml1 (nt 11,146) restriction fragment was subcloned into the complete DNA-PKcs.
Manipulation of DNA-PKcs cDNA is hampered by its size and instability. Recently, we developed an alternative expression strategy using a smaller, very low–copy number expression plasmid and the CAGG promoter. Briefly, GFP and a cloning cassette were assembled into the low–copy number plasmid pSM7 (gift of K. Yu, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA) between the CAGG promoter (isolated from pTriEX-2 neo; Millipore) and the bovine growth hormone poly adenylation site (isolated from PefV5His; Invitrogen). Human DNA-PKcs was cloned between unique Nhe1 and Not1 sites. cDNA was prepared from immortalized patient fibroblasts. RT-PCR was performed using primers spanning nt 1,000–2,360; 2 fragments were amplified (with and without exon 16, similar to Figure 3C). The smaller fragment was subcloned into pcr2.1 and sequenced, confirming deletion of exon 16. Plasmid DNA from this subclone as well as the CAGG-WT DNA-PKcs expression construct were prepared from bacteria lacking dcm methylase. A restriction fragment (BstZ171, nt 1,293; to SexAI, nt 1,875) spanning exon 16 was cloned from the pcr2.1 RT-PCR subclone into the CAGG-WT DNA-PKcs expression plasmid.
Complementation of primary human fibroblasts. 1BR3 control, patient, 180BR LIGIV syndrome, and mother hTERT cells were transfected with GFP-tagged full-length WT DNA-PK using Metafectine Pro Transfection Reagent (Biotex) following the manufacturer’s protocol. 24 hours after transfection, cells were untreated (background) or exposed to 3 Gy IR, harvested 8 and 16 hours later, and stained for 53BP1. Only GFP+ cells were analyzed.
Clonogenic survival assays. V3 transfectants were plated at cloning densities estimated to give scoreable colonies in the indicated dosage of zeocin. After 7 days, cell colonies were stained with 1% (w/v) crystal violet in ethanol and colony numbers were assessed. Survival was plotted as percent relative to untreated cells.
VDJ recombination assays. Extrachromosomal VDJ recombination assays were performed using the coding joint substrate pJH290 (38). V3 cells were transiently transfected with 1 μg substrate, 6 μg WT or mutant DNA-PKcs or pCMV6 vector, and 3 μg each RAG1 and RAG2 using Fugene6 transfection reagent. 48 hours later, substrate plasmids were isolated by alkaline lysis and digested with DpnI for 1 hour. Digested DNA was transformed into competent DH5α cells (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Transformed cells were spread onto LB Agar plates containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin, alone or combined with 22 μg/ml chloramphenicol. Plasmid DNA from recombined pJH290 (coding joints) was isolated and sequenced.
Immunoblotting and measurement of protein kinase activity in V3 transfectants. Cell extracts were separated using 4.5% SDS polyacrylamide gels and transferred to PVDF membranes. DNA-PKcs was detected using monoclonal antibody r42-27 (gift from T. Carter, St. Johns University, New York, New York, USA). DNA-PK activity was assessed as described previously (42). Briefly, DNA-PK was pulled down onto DNA cellulose. Phosphorylation of a biotinylated peptide was assessed by capture onto SAM2 membranes (Promega Corp). Enzymatic activity was expressed as fold P-32 incorporation (bound peptide) relative to no peptide control. To assess autophosphorylation, 100 μg whole cell extracts were incubated in kinase buffer at room temperature for 5 or 30 minutes and analyzed by immunoblotting. A phosphospecific antibody was used to detect autophosphorylation at S2056 (Abcam).
Statistics. In figures where error bars are shown, results represent mean ± SD of 3 independent experiments.
Study approval. Human studies were reviewed and approved by the University of Sussex Research Governance Committee. Written informed consent was obtained from participants or their guardians.
The P.A. Jeggo laboratory is supported by the Medical Research Council, Association for International Cancer Research, and Wellcome Research Trust. The K. Meek laboratory is supported by Public Health Service grant AI048758 (to K. Meek).
Address correspondence to: Penny A. Jeggo, Genome Damage and Stability Centre, University of Sussex, Science Park Road, Brighton BN1 9RQ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.273.678482; Fax: 44.273.678121; E-mail: p.a.jeggo@sussex.ac.uk. Or to: E. Graham Davies, Centre for Immunodeficiency, Great Ormond Street Hospital and Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.20.7829.8834; Fax: 44.20.7813.8552; E-mail: Graham.Davies@gosh.nhs.uk. Or to: Katheryn Meek, College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, and Department of Pathobiology and Diagnostic Investigation, Michigan State University, 5109 Biomedical and Physical Sciences Building, East Lansing, Michigan 48823, USA. Phone: 517.884.5361; Fax: 517.353.8957; E-mail: kmeek@msu.edu.
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2013;123(7):2969–2980. doi:10.1172/JCI67349.