Advertisement
Review Series Free access | 10.1172/JCI26274
La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, Department of Cellular Immunology, San Diego, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: Donald D. Newmeyer, La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, Department of Cellular Immunology, 10355 Science Center Drive, San Diego, California 92121, USA. Phone: (858) 558-3539; Fax: (858) 558-3526; E-mail: don@liai.org.
Find articles by Bouchier-Hayes, L. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, Department of Cellular Immunology, San Diego, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: Donald D. Newmeyer, La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, Department of Cellular Immunology, 10355 Science Center Drive, San Diego, California 92121, USA. Phone: (858) 558-3539; Fax: (858) 558-3526; E-mail: don@liai.org.
Find articles by Lartigue, L. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, Department of Cellular Immunology, San Diego, California, USA.
Address correspondence to: Donald D. Newmeyer, La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, Department of Cellular Immunology, 10355 Science Center Drive, San Diego, California 92121, USA. Phone: (858) 558-3539; Fax: (858) 558-3526; E-mail: don@liai.org.
Find articles by Newmeyer, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Published October 3, 2005 - More info
Cell death by apoptosis or necrosis is often important in the etiology and treatment of disease. Since mitochondria play important roles in cell death pathways, these organelles are potentially prime targets for therapeutic intervention. Here we discuss the mechanisms through which mitochondria participate in the cell death process and also survey some of the pharmacological approaches that target mitochondria in various ways.
Mitochondria are involved in many processes essential for cell survival, including energy production, redox control, calcium homeostasis, and certain metabolic and biosynthetic pathways. In addition, mitochondria often play an essential role in physiological cell death mechanisms. These genetically controlled mitochondrial pathways are often subject to dysfunction. Hence mitochondria can be central players in pathological conditions as diverse as cancer, diabetes, obesity, ischemia/reperfusion injury, and neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson and Alzheimer diseases. Research aimed at elucidating the role of mitochondria in cell death has become one of the fastest growing disciplines in biomedicine (1).
The caspases are an apoptosis-related family of proteases that, upon activation, cleave specific substrates, leading to the demise of the cell (2). Although the signaling events upstream of caspases often remain obscure, in general, apoptotic stimuli engage caspases either through death receptor stimulation or through mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP) (Figure 1). With rare exceptions, MOMP leads to cell death even if caspases are inhibited (3). MOMP results in the release of multiple proteins from the mitochondrial intermembrane space (IMS) into the cytosol. This leads to caspase activation in the cytosol, loss of ΔΨm (mitochondrial membrane potential), cellular ATP depletion, and free radical production (3). One of the released IMS proteins is cytochrome c, an important component of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. When translocated into the cytoplasm, cytochrome c stimulates the assembly of a multiprotein complex known as the Apaf-1 apoptosome. Caspase-9 is recruited to the apoptosome and activated, initiating a cascade of effector caspase activation (4). Other proteins released from the mitochondria during apoptosis include Smac/DIABLO, endonuclease G (Endo G), apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF), and HtrA2/Omi. Smac promotes caspase activation indirectly by neutralizing the effects of XIAP, a natural caspase inhibitor (5, 6). The apoptotic roles of some IMS proteins remain controversial; a complicating issue is that these proteins may have essential functions in mitochondria whose dysregulation could affect cell survival through action upstream of MOMP (7, 8). Moreover, the release of Endo G and AIF from the mitochondria may require further caspase-independent events subsequent to MOMP (9, 10), such as cleavage of AIF by calpain (11).
Molecular mechanisms of MOMP. The proposed models of MOMP leading to cytochrome c release are represented. (i) Bax pore. Bax or Bak forms a pore in the MOM after activation by a BH3-only protein such as Bid. (ii) PT pore opening. Opening of the PT pore allows an influx of water and ions into the matrix, causing matrix swelling; this leads to rupture of the MOM, releasing IMS proteins such as cytochrome c. MIM, mitochondrial inner membrane; PBR, peripheral benzodiazepine receptor.
MOMP is thought to be a “point of no return” in the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway (12). As mitochondria are a potential therapeutic target for disorders connected with apoptosis dysregulation, it will be important to gain a detailed understanding of MOMP and its regulation. The mechanisms of MOMP have been controversial (12–19), and there are 2 principal hypotheses: in the first, MOMP is regulated by the Bcl-2 family of proteins, and in the second, by the permeability transition pore (PTP) (Figure 1). The first model considers MOMP as a process that is essentially intrinsic to the outer membrane and requires members of the Bcl-2 family of proteins to promote or prevent the formation of pores. Studies using vesicles formed from isolated mitochondrial outer membranes (MOMs) have shown that Bcl-2–family proteins can regulate the permeability of the MOM in the absence of interior structures of the mitochondria; moreover, many features of this process of membrane permeabilization can be reproduced using defined liposomes and recombinant Bcl-2–family proteins (20). However, these cell-free systems probably do not represent all the complexity of the permeabilization process as it occurs in the native MOM; other proteins of the MOM could modulate or potentiate the function of Bax and Bak. Moreover, the release of specific IMS proteins into the cytoplasm could be influenced by anchorage of these proteins to internal structures or entrapment in mitochondrial cristae (21). Proteins normally involved in mitochondrial fission and fusion may participate in MOMP (reviewed in refs. 3, 13, 2–24). However, this is a controversial topic, made especially challenging by the complex network of protein interactions involved in mitochondrial dynamics. The disruption of any element of this system could have pleiotropic and indirect effects that are difficult to interpret.
The second prominent model for MOMP is based on a phenomenon known as the mitochondrial permeability transition (PT). PT involves the rapid permeabilization of the inner mitochondrial membrane to solutes smaller than 1.5 kDa, through formation of the PT pore (PTP). The PTP complex is a “megapore” thought to span the contact sites between the inner and outer mitochondrial membranes and is presumably composed of at least 3 proteins, namely the voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC) in the outer membrane, the soluble matrix protein cyclophilin D (Cyp D), and the adenine nucleotide translocase (ANT) in the inner membrane (18), although the requirement for ANT is controversial (25, 26).
Under normal calcium homeostasis, the PTP exists in a state of low conductance; however, when excess Ca2+ is released from the endoplasmic reticulum and overloads the mitochondria, the pore transitions to a high-conductance state. This passage from low to high conductance is irreversible and strictly depends on the saturation of the calcium-binding sites of the PTP (27). The high-conductance conformation allows free diffusion of water and ions between the cytosol and the matrix, causing collapse of ΔΨm (the inner membrane gradient), uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation, and swelling of the mitochondrial matrix. This leads to rupture of the MOM and consequent release of IMS proteins.
A few proapoptotic stimuli, such as calcium overload, oxidative stress, or ischemia/reperfusion, seem to mediate cytochrome c release directly through the PT (28). However, the generality of PT as a primary mechanism for MOMP and apoptosis has been questioned, as mitochondrial matrix swelling is not always observed in apoptotic cells (29, 30); moreover, mitochondrial depolarization does not always precede the release of cytochrome c and is often blocked by caspase inhibition (31–33). Indeed, in such cases the loss of ΔΨm does not result from PT, but rather from the caspase-dependent cleavage of at least 1 substrate in the respiratory chain: p75, a subunit of complex I (34). Cleavage of p75 disrupts oxygen consumption, increases ROS production, and is 1 of several events that may preclude recovery for the cell (35).
Fortunately, a clear resolution to this controversy over mechanisms of MOMP may be at hand. Two recent papers (36, 37) reported use of a genetic approach to determine how important PT is for cell death in vivo (for critical commentaries see refs. 38, 39). These groups produced mice defective in the gene encoding cyclophilin D (Cyp D) and observed that isolated mitochondria from these animals were defective in the PT response, except to extremely high concentrations of Ca2+, consistent with observations that the drug cyclosporin A (CsA) also blocks PT only at lower Ca2+ concentrations. Strikingly, apoptotic cell death in these animals was entirely normal. On the other hand, some forms of cell death, such as those induced by oxygen radicals and Ca2+ overload, were defective. Thus, apoptotic death involving the actions of Bcl-2 family members at mitochondria does not involve Cyp D–dependent PT, whereas other forms of death expected to involve the PT response do depend on Cyp D. Despite the lack of evidence for PT as a mechanism of apoptotic death in general, it remains important to consider therapeutic strategies for inducing PT-mediated cell death selectively in certain cell types, as discussed below.
The Bcl-2 family of proteins (Table 1) includes both proapoptotic and antiapoptotic members, each containing 1 or more Bcl-2 homology domains (BH1 through BH4) (40). Antiapoptotic members such as Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Mcl-1 contain all 4 BH domains. The proapoptotic members are divided into 2 subgroups. One of these consists of Bax, Bak, and Bok, which possess domains BH1, BH2, and BH3; the other group consists of the more numerous BH3-only proteins, which include Bid, Bad, Puma, and several others (40).
While several Bcl-2–family proteins possess ion channel activity in lipid bilayers, only the multidomain proapoptotic proteins Bax and Bak can render membranes permeable to cytochrome c or larger macromolecules (15, 20). These 2 proteins exhibit a degree of functional redundancy in the mouse, as the ablation of both bax and bak genes results in a much more dramatic apoptotic phenotype than single bax or bak knockouts. Indeed, tissues and cells deficient in both genes are resistant to most stimuli that proceed through mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum–dependent pathways (41–44). The 2 proteins do not behave identically, however, since in nonapoptotic cells Bax is mostly free in the cytosol while Bak is constitutively localized in membranes of the mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum (45).
Regardless of localization, Bax and Bak both seem to be in an inactive state in nonapoptotic cells. An activation process, which is not completely understood, is required for Bax to oligomerize and insert stably into the membrane (20, 46, 47). The tertiary structure of the antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family member Bcl-xL shows that its helical domains form a hydrophobic groove where the BH3-only proteins bind. Bax has a similar structural fold; however, in unactivated, soluble Bax, the C-terminal helix α9 occupies the BH3-binding groove (48), and helix α8 is also positioned to interfere with potential binding of BH3 domains (49). Thus, in order to interact with BH3 domains in other proteins, Bax must undergo a conformational alteration. Indeed, a Bax conformational change is commonly detected through the binding of conformation-sensitive antibodies (50), and the interaction of Bax with membranes is sufficient to enable a conformational change but not membrane insertion or pore formation (51). Bax oligomerization does not occur in solution (20), except in the presence of certain detergents (46), consistent with the idea that interaction with a hydrophobic environment is necessary to destabilize the Bax molecule and allow activation and oligomerization.
In what is commonly known as the “rheostat” model, cell survival is determined by the balance between antiapoptotic Bcl-2–family proteins such as Mcl-1, Bcl-xL, or Bcl-2, and proapoptotic BH3-only proteins. Based on recent findings, we can now consider a more complex “switched rheostat” model (Figure 2) with several additional elements: First, Bax and Bak are the positive effector molecules, based on the biochemical and genetic studies mentioned above. Second, the antiapoptotic relatives act as inhibitors of this permeabilization process, not effectors of an independent survival mechanism, at least with regard to direct effects on MOMP. Third, MOMP mediated by Bax and Bak must be triggered by “direct activator” proteins, such as the BH3-only proteins Bim or Bid; indeed, synthetic peptides corresponding to the BH3 domains of these proteins are able to activate Bax (20, 47). The p53 protein can also directly induce Bax-mediated membrane permeabilization in cells and liposomes, although it lacks a clearly identifiable BH3 domain (52, 53). Fourth, the antiapoptotic family members can oppose Bax and Bak as well as the BH3-only proteins (20). Fifth, BH3-only proteins fall into 2 functional classes: the direct activators Bim and Bid mentioned above, and the others, which act as “derepressors” by binding competitively to the antiapoptotic family members and thus freeing up the direct activator proteins to induce Bax/Bak–mediated MOMP (47, 54, 55). Finally, interactions between various BH3-only proteins and the antiapoptotic Bcl-2–family proteins exhibit a pattern of overlapping specificities that was previously unappreciated. Recent studies have shown that some of the BH3-only proteins bind to only a subset of the antiapoptotic proteins, and conversely the antiapoptotic proteins each bind to a subset of the BH3-only proteins (47, 56). For example, the BH3-only protein Noxa binds specifically to Mcl-1 and A1. In contrast, Puma, another BH3-only protein, binds to at least 5 different antiapoptotic relatives (56). Moreover, Bak is differentially inhibited by antiapoptotic Bcl-2–family proteins, further illustrating the intricacy of this protein network (57).
Models of Bcl-2–family function at the mitochondrion during apoptosis. (A) The traditional simple rheostat model assumes that the antiapoptotic Bcl-2–family proteins antagonize the BH3-only proteins, in an equal and opposite manner. (B) Recent results suggest a more inclusive and detailed model, which we term the “switched rheostat.” Bax and Bak are the effectors of MOMP. Certain BH3-only proteins (“direct activators”) and p53 switch on Bax (and possibly Bak) directly and are antagonized by antiapoptotic Bcl-2–family proteins. Other BH3-only proteins (“derepressors”) do not activate Bax directly but act by antagonizing the antiapoptotic family members, thereby freeing the direct activators to trigger Bax/Bak–induced MOMP. The dashed lines indicate that the derepressor BH3-only proteins have differing specificities for antiapoptotic family members.
Adding to this complexity, a number of proteins unrelated to the Bcl-2 family interact with Bax and either inhibit (58–61) or enhance (58, 62) its activation. Bak has been reported to associate with VDAC2 at the mitochondrial membrane, and this inhibits the oligomerization and proapoptotic activity of Bak (63). Although their roles in cell death are not well understood, these proteins that modulate Bax or Bak activation could be important therapeutic targets (64).
As MOMP is a crucial step for many pathways that induce apoptosis, disruption of this event would likely affect cell fate. For example, certain viruses kill the host cell by causing MOMP, while others prevent MOMP to allow propagation of the virus. The HIV protein Vpr (viral accessory protein R) induces MOMP; a mutation in this protein (R77Q) confers resistance to MOMP and is associated with a reduced risk of developing AIDS (65). In contrast, the cytomegalovirus vMIA protein blocks MOMP by forming inactive complexes with Bax in the MOM (66, 67). Ischemia/reperfusion–mediated injury results from excessive redox stress and mitochondrial uptake of Ca2+, leading to the induction of PT. Some neurodegenerative diseases may involve typical apoptotic pathways and specifically MOMP (68). Manganese has been observed to cause CNS injury resulting in symptoms of Parkinson disease and hepatic encephalopathy leading to chronic liver failure. This involves manganese-induced oxidative stress, leading to MOMP and ultimately apoptosis or necrosis (69).
Mutations in mitochondrial DNA result in a number of metabolic disorders that are mostly due to impairment of oxidative phosphorylation, causing reductions in ΔΨm and the rate of ATP synthesis (70). Tumorigenesis can be aided by defects in apoptotic pathways enhancing cell survival and transformation, giving cells time to accumulate genetic alterations that deregulate proliferation and differentiation and also favor angiogenesis and cell migration (71). Furthermore, neoplastic cells can evade immune surveillance because their destruction by CTLs and NK cells depends on the integrity of the apoptotic machinery (72). As MOMP plays such a prominent role in these diseases, the components of this pathway are the targets of currently used and potential therapies.
A goal in treating cancer is to target tumor cells without harming healthy cells. Traditional treatment regimens mainly target rapidly dividing cells, among which tumor cells are the most predominant. However, some normal cell populations have high proliferation rates and are thus vulnerable to such treatments. Compounding this problem, many tumor cells have mutations in key components of the apoptotic machinery, such as p53, allowing them to become resistant to apoptosis. Currently there are a number of drugs in clinical development that are hoped to induce apoptosis only in neoplastic cells by targeting components of the mitochondrial pathway to induce MOMP (Table 2).
Summary of the literature concerning various compounds that act on mitochondria and their experimental or clinical stages of development
It will be advantageous for new therapeutic strategies to bypass the survival adaptations, or take advantage of the distinguishing features, of tumor cells.
Tumor cells in general have higher plasma and mitochondrial membrane potentials compared with normal epithelial cells (73). As a consequence, certain compounds known as cationic lipophilic toxins can preferentially accumulate in the mitochondrial matrix of cancer cells. Malignant cells tend to possess higher numbers of mitochondria, perhaps further enhancing the specificity of these drugs for tumor cells (73, 74). MKT-077, a cationic rhodacyanine dye (75), selectively kills malignant cells, in part because of its ability to inhibit mitochondrial respiration, and is the basis of pharmacological studies and phase I clinical trials in chemoresistant solid tumors (76, 77).
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) (78) is a therapeutic approach that similarly makes use of the ability of lipophilic cations to target tumor cells preferentially. In PDT, a photosensitizer is irradiated in the presence of molecular oxygen. The resulting ROS production causes cell death. Cationic photosensitizers, such as rhodamine-123, krypto/phthalocyanines, and cationic porphyrins, preferentially accumulate in mitochondria in proportion to ΔΨm; many of these compounds show tumor-destructive activity in vivo. Anionic photosensitizers often have specific affinity for mitochondrial proteins or lipids; for example, verteporfin targets ANT (79). Clinical trials are in progress to evaluate similar drugs for the treatment of several types of tumors (80). Other “mitochondriotoxic” molecules, such as arsenic trioxide (ATO), used to treat acute promyelocytic leukemia (81), work through ROS production. The combination of ATO with ascorbic acid, a substrate of cytochrome c oxidase (82), was successful in treating myeloma cells and phorbol ester–differentiated leukemic cells resistant to classical treatment (83).
The antineoplastic drug lonidamine may induce PT through direct action on ANT (84). This compound was shown to be safe and effective in clinical trials for the treatment of solid tumors (85), as well as in phase II–III trials for the treatment of advanced breast, ovarian, and lung cancer. The combination of lonidamine with diazepam also increased the therapeutic index in the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (86). Many other anticancer drugs also directly target components of the PTP. The thiol cross-linker 4-[N-(S-glutathionylacetyl)amino] phenylarsenoxide (GSAO) works similarly to lonidamine, binding to ANT to induce PT. Its killing activity seems to exclusively target proliferating, but not growth-quiescent, endothelial cells in vitro and prevents angiogenesis in solid tumors in mice (87). Betulinic acid (88), a natural pentacyclic triterpenoid, also acts via the PTP (89) and was shown to be effective against neuroectodermal (90) and malignant head and neck tumors (91) among others. Betulinic acid may also cooperate with TRAIL to induce apoptosis in different tumor cell lines and in primary tumor cells, without affecting normal human fibroblasts (92). PK11195 and RO5-4864, 2 ligands for the mitochondrial benzodiazepine receptor, a PTP regulator, are able to resensitize tumor cells to etoposide, doxorubicin, and γ-irradiation (93–95).
In contrast to cancer, some disease states arise from an excess of apoptosis, and in these cases MOMP is also a potential therapeutic target. The use of antioxidants is an effective method of counteracting the effects of excess ROS production and shows promise for prevention of ischemia/reperfusion injury (96). Manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD), a mitochondrial antioxidant enzyme that can inhibit apoptosis, is a survival factor for cancer cells and, when present in small amounts, mediates resistance to inflammatory stimuli and anticancer drugs. MnSOD can be beneficial in reperfusion-induced injury, as it protects mitochondria and thus limits ROS-induced cell death (97).
The Cyp D–deficient mouse was shown to have significant resistance to ischemia/reperfusion–induced cardiac injury, which suggests that Cyp D is a useful drug target for treatment of stroke or myocardial infarction (36, 37). Indeed the undecapeptide CsA, which through binding to Cyp D can prevent PTP assembly, has protective properties with respect to ischemic injury. In a model of transient focal cerebral ischemia, CsA is neuroprotective when administered before or immediately after ischemia, resulting in a smaller infarct (98, 99). CsA is widely used as an immunosuppressant to prevent organ rejection following transplantation. This immunosuppressant function of CsA is due not to its effects on Cyp D, but rather to its ability to inhibit the calcineurin-mediated upregulation of a number of inflammatory cytokines. NIM811, an analog of CsA, retains the neuroprotective but not the immunosuppressive function, suggesting that the ability of CsA to protect cells from ischemic injury results from the neutralization of Cyp D and hence PT (100). Although CsA has protective effects in ischemia/reperfusion models, this drug also caused neurotoxicity in up to 60% of transplants (101). Indeed, studies have shown that CsA can be both neurotoxic to normal cells and neuroprotective, in similar dose ranges, to cells that have received an ischemic injury (102). Thus, although CsA is a prototype drug for the prevention or treatment of ischemia/reperfusion injury, its functions and effects are still not fully understood.
The ability of viruses to induce apoptosis also provides potential targets for drugs that can be used in the treatment of certain viral infections. The HIV-encoded protein Vpr, for example, induces apoptosis by causing MOMP and is thought to do so through interaction with ANT, as Vpr fails to kill ANT-deficient cells (103). HIV protease inhibitors can inhibit Vpr-induced PT and MOMP, and inhibitors of Vpr or the Vpr/ANT interaction may have benefits in the clinic (104).
Often, tumors overexpress Bcl-2 or related antiapoptotic proteins and as a result are resistant to apoptosis induced by many chemotherapeutic agents. Therefore, there is interest in developing small molecules and peptides that mimic proapoptotic BH3-only proteins to overcome Bcl-2–associated resistance. The nonpeptidic compound HA14-1 was identified using a computer screening approach exploiting the 3D structure of Bcl-2 (105). HA14-1 can bind to the BH3-binding site of Bcl-2, thus mimicking a BH3-only protein, and can induce apoptosis in tumor cells. Chemical screens for molecules that can inhibit the antiapoptotic activity of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL have identified antimycin A (coincidentally, already known as an inhibitor of respiratory complex III) and inhibitors known as BH3Is (106, 107). Antimycin A, like HA14-1 and the BH3Is, binds the BH3-binding pocket to induce apoptosis in cells that overexpress Bcl-2 or Bcl-xL. While these compounds serve as a proof of principle for this approach, compounds with improved affinities for Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL must be identified if they are to be considered for use in a clinical setting. Indeed, very recently, ABT-737, a novel inhibitor of Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, and Bcl-w, was reported to bind to these molecules with an affinity orders of magnitude higher than that of previously described Bcl-2 antagonist compounds (108). ABT-737 can sensitize cells to killing by other apoptosis-inducing stimuli but also showed significant efficacy as a single agent against lymphoma and small-cell lung carcinoma cell lines and primary cells derived from patients, and in animal models. The inability of ABT-737 to antagonize Mcl-1 (another antiapoptotic relative of Bcl-2) will likely limit the effectiveness of this compound against tumors in which Mcl-1 is elevated or stabilized.
Synthetic BH3 peptides can also function as antagonists of Bcl-xL, sensitizing cells to proapoptotic stimuli such as anti-Fas treatment (109). However, peptides tend to be degraded and lose their secondary structure easily, severely limiting their efficacy. Korsmeyer and colleagues recently described a method of overcoming these problems called hydrocarbon stapling (110). A stapled Bid BH3 peptide was found to be both cell permeable and more stable than the unmodified peptide and showed efficacy in a mouse leukemic model.
The Nur77 protein induces apoptosis by binding to Bcl-2. Nur77 binds not to the BH3-binding pocket but rather to the loop region between the BH4 and BH3 domains (111). Deletion of this loop blocks paclitaxel-induced death, and thus the loop may be required for certain anticancer drugs to be effective (112). Also, deamidation of residues in this loop in Bcl-xL reduces its protective activity (113). Therefore, drugs that target this region may be effective inhibitors of Bcl-2. The use of antisense Bcl-2 oligonucleotides is another potential method of inhibiting Bcl-2 in treatment of cancer. However, studies have shown that when used alone to treat lymphoma, antisense Bcl-2 has dose-limiting toxicities (114). But when used in combination with existing chemotherapeutic drugs (e.g., mitoxantrone in the treatment of prostate cancer [ref. 115]), lower doses may be effective, thus reducing toxic side effects.
A question arises, however: How can compounds targeting Bcl-2 and related proteins selectively kill cancer cells? The unified model shown in Figure 2 reflects a greater flexibility for cell type–specific regulation of apoptosis by the Bcl-2 family than previously assumed. As a corollary, we can envision therapeutic applications in which a certain cell type is targeted selectively based on the subsets of BH3-only proteins and antiapoptotic Bcl-2 relatives it expresses. In particular, the model in Figure 2 predicts that cells lacking expression of direct activator BH3-only proteins should not undergo apoptosis when the antiapoptotic proteins are downregulated. In contrast, tumor cells, which may be under constant oncogenic stress, may constitutively express a direct Bax/Bak activator protein such as Bim (116), which then is presumably held in check by antiapoptotic proteins such as Bcl-2 (117). If this turns out to be true generally, the introduction of a cell-permeable derepressor-type peptide or a small-compound inhibitor of antiapoptotic Bcl-2–family proteins might induce apoptosis selectively in a variety of tumors (108).
Mitochondria hold great promise as targets for therapeutic intervention. However, only a fraction of this potential has so far been realized. Ironically, it may turn out that some therapies succeed by unintentionally affecting MOMP, despite being directed at other biochemical targets. Indeed, a recent study showed that a promising proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib, restored paclitaxel sensitivity to Ras-transformed cells by protecting the BH3-only protein, Bim, from proteasomal degradation (118). Although we are certainly glad for such serendipity, there is hope that, in time, a variety of mitochondria-directed therapies, such as more potent inhibitors of Bcl-2 and related proteins (108), will be put into common use.
Nonstandard abbreviations used: AIF, apoptosis-inducing factor; ANT, adenine nucleotide translocase; BH, Bcl-2 homology (domain); CsA, cyclosporin A; Cyp D, cyclophilin D; Endo G, endonuclease G; IMS, intermembrane space; MnSOD, manganese superoxide dismutase; MOM, mitochondrial outer membrane; MOMP, MOM permeabilization; PT, permeability transition; PTP, PT pore; VDAC, voltage-dependent anion channel.
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Lisa Bouchier-Hayes and Lydia Lartigue contributed equally to this work.
Pharmacological manipulation of Bcl-2 family members to control cell deathAnthony Letai
Reawakening the cellular death program in neoplasia through the therapeutic blockade of IAP functionCasey W. Wright et al.
Caspases: pharmacological manipulation of cell deathInna N. Lavrik et al.
The survival kinases Akt and Pim as potential pharmacological targetsRavi Amaravadi et al.
Mitochondria: pharmacological manipulation of cell deathLisa Bouchier-Hayes et al.
Pharmacological manipulation of cell death: clinical applications in sight?Douglas R. Green et al.
IKK/NF-κB signaling: balancing life and death – a new approach to cancer therapyJun-Li Luo et al.
Autophagy in cell death: an innocent convict?Beth Levine et al.
Endoplasmic reticulum stress: cell life and death decisionsChunyan Xu et al.
Death versus survival: functional interaction between the apoptotic and stress-inducible heat shock protein pathwaysHelen M. Beere
Mitochondria and apoptosis
Heikki Savolainen