Despite growing recognition of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) as a biologically and clinically distinct subtype of breast cancer, ILC remains understudied. Most contemporary therapeutic trials continue to enroll patients predominantly with invasive ductal carcinoma/invasive carcinoma of no special type and rarely stratify by histology. As a result, ILC’s unique disease biology, characteristic loss of E-cadherin function, diffuse growth pattern, and distinct metastatic tropism remain underrepresented in evidence that guides systemic therapy recommendations. In this Review, we examine key molecular alterations and emerging therapeutic targets in ILC, emphasizing recent preclinical discoveries that identify subtype-specific therapeutic vulnerabilities and guide the development of histology-specific treatment approaches for this unique disease. In combination with endocrine therapies, effective targeting in ILC may require a multilayered strategy that extends beyond genomic alterations to leverage ILC’s specific estrogen receptor–associated proteins, metabolism, and tumor microenvironment. Future clinical trial frameworks incorporating prespecified ILC cohorts, tailored endpoints, and coclinical approaches enabling parallel testing in patients and patient-derived models could help accelerate the development and evaluation of ILC-targeted therapeutics.
Kristina A. Fanucci, Shaymaa Bahnassy, Arya Mariam Roy, Anna Sokolova, Daniel G. Stover, Peter T. Simpson, Rebecca B. Riggins, Rinath Jeselsohn
Usage data is cumulative from October 2026 through October 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,002 | 0 |
| 352 | 0 | |
| Figure | 312 | 0 |
| Table | 46 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 43 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 91 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,846 | 0 |
| Total Views | 1,846 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.