BACKGROUND Anti-nephrin autoantibodies have emerged as a putative pathogenic driver in a subset of patients with podocytopathies, including those with posttransplant disease recurrence.METHODS We measured anti-nephrin autoantibodies in a cohort of 65 patients with podocytopathy associated with steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (n = 39) and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (n = 26) and in 34 patients with posttransplant podocytopathy recurrence. Fourteen patients with membranous nephropathy and 20 healthy volunteers served as controls. ELISA and immunoprecipitation assays were performed to detect anti-nephrin IgG using 2 different recombinant human nephrin proteins. Immunofluorescence analysis was performed to assess gG deposition and its colocalization with nephrin in renal biopsies.RESULTS When using an ELISA based on murine cell-derived human antigen, the highest positivity was found in healthy volunteers (55%), correlating with levels of circulating natural anti–α-galactose-α-1,3-galactose antibodies. This cross-reactivity was abrogated with recombinant human nephrin expressed in human cells. In this setting, very low prevalence (<5%) of anti-nephrin antibody-positive patients was found in steroid-sensitive and -resistant nephrotic syndrome cohorts and in patients with posttransplant disease recurrence. These frequencies were comparable to healthy volunteers. Using confocal and super-resolution microscopy, only trace amounts of IgM, but no IgG, were found in the glomeruli of analyzed biopsies, which did not colocalize with nephrin.CONCLUSION With the methodology presented here, anti-nephrin reactivity was extremely rare and occurred at comparably low frequencies in healthy controls, native-kidney podocytopathies, and posttransplant disease recurrence. This suggests that these autoantibodies are not inherently disease specific and may not serve as a broad biomarker across podocytopathies.TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06334692.FUNDING The Medici di Marignano family.
Francesco Pecoraro, Luca Perico, Federica Casiraghi, Paola Rizzo, Matias Trillini, Andrea Angeletti, Manuel Alfredo Podestà, Xhuliana Kajana, Agnese Spennacchio, Marta Todeschini, Marilena Mister, Giuseppe Castellano, Ariela Benigni, Giuseppe Remuzzi
Usage data is cumulative from April 2026 through July 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,227 | 0 |
| 794 | 0 | |
| Figure | 46 | 0 |
| Table | 28 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 259 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 123 | 0 |
| Totals | 3,477 | 0 |
| Total Views | 3,477 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.