Heart failure (HF) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Breathing instability and exaggerated chemoreflex activation contribute to adverse HF outcomes, yet the central mechanisms linking respiratory control to cardiac dysfunction remain poorly defined. The retrotrapezoid nucleus (RTN) is a key brainstem chemosensory region regulating ventilatory and autonomic output, but whether glial dysfunction within this circuit contributes to HF pathophysiology is unknown. We hypothesized that loss of astrocytic glutamate transporter 1 (GLT-1) in the RTN disrupts glutamate homeostasis, producing chemoreflex hyperactivity and cardiorespiratory dysfunction in HF. In a rat model of nonischemic HF, reduced astrocytic GLT-1 expression in the RTN was accompanied by extracellular glutamate accumulation and heightened excitability of chemosensitive neurons. These changes were associated with exaggerated central chemoreflex responses, breathing instability, autonomic imbalance, and impaired cardiac function. Astrocyte-specific GLT-1 restoration normalized RTN glutamate levels, reduced central chemoreceptor neuron hyperexcitability, stabilized breathing, and improved cardiac performance. Systemic riluzole, an FDA-approved glutamate-modulating drug, similarly reduced RTN glutamate accumulation and attenuated chemoreflex-driven respiratory instability. These findings identify loss of astrocytic GLT-1-mediated glutamate homeostasis in the RTN as a mechanism contributing to cardiorespiratory dysfunction in HF and support pharmacological targeting of brainstem glutamate homeostasis as a therapeutic strategy requiring further investigation.
Esteban Diaz-Jara, Sinay C. Vicencio, Katherin V. Pereyra, Karla G. Schwarz, Fernando C. Ortiz, Camilo Toledo, Ignacio Bernal-Santander, Sandeep Kaur, Bisan El Dakkak, Rodrigo Del Rio
Usage data is cumulative from October 2026 through October 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 214 | 0 |
| 112 | 0 | |
| Supplemental data | 28 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 38 | 0 |
| Totals | 392 | 0 |
| Total Views | 392 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.