Commonly viewed as a negative prognostic factor in cancer, obesity is associated with improved responses to cancer immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Although data suggest a sexual dimorphism influencing the effects of obesity on immunotherapy responses, to our knowledge, the intersection of sex and obesity on immunotherapy requires further exploration. We demonstrate, in a pan-cancer analysis stratified by sex and BMI, that obesity (BMI ≥ 30) is associated with improved survival after ICI only in male patients. In preclinical models of diet-induced obesity (DIO), we observed that only DIO male tumor-bearing mice responded better to ICI. The differential effect of sex on outcomes was associated with alterations in the tumor microenvironment where DIO female mice demonstrated increased tumor-associated macrophages skewed toward a M2 phenotype. Ovariectomy of DIO female mice reduced M2 polarization and increased anti-tumor immune responses including increases in tumor-infiltrating T cells following ICI. Metabolomic analysis of DIO mice demonstrated distinct profiles base on sex. Re-stratification of female cancer patients revealed that obesity was associated with improved outcome, but only in post-menopausal (age ≥ 55) patients. We identify that the immunotherapy “obesity paradox” is sex-dependent and that hormonal and metabolomic status modulates the influence of obesity on ICIs.
Logan V. Vick, Spencer R. Rosario, Ziming Wang, Craig Collins, Lam T. Khuat, Yatian Yang, Michael K. Sheng, Wahed A. Firoz, Ryan N. Nielsen, Yao-Hui Sun, Aryana M. Razmara, Hossein Borghaei, Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, Andrew Elliott, Nishant Gandhi, Raid Aljumaily, Sami Ibrahimi, Michael Machiorlatti, Sara K. Vesely, Shuchi Gulati, Sarbajit Mukherjee, Robert J. Canter, Sean J. Judge, Arta M. Monjazeb, William J. Murphy
Usage data is cumulative from November 2026 through November 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 75 | 0 |
| 26 | 0 | |
| Supplemental data | 8 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 19 | 0 |
| Totals | 128 | 0 |
| Total Views | 128 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.