Non–small cell lung cancer exhibits the highest rates of brain metastases (BMs) among all solid tumors, presenting a major clinical challenge. The development of novel therapeutic strategies targeting BMs is clearly needed. We identified a significant enrichment of MET amplification in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) BMs compared with primary LUAD and extracranial metastases in oncogene driver–negative patients. Of note, MET-amplified BMs were responsive to MET inhibitors in vivo, including models with acquired MET amplification at the time of metastasis. MET alterations (amplifications and/or mutations) were also more frequently detected in circulating tumor DNA from patients with LUAD BMs than in those without BMs. MET-altered BMs also demonstrated unique genomic features compared with non–MET-altered BMs. Transcriptomic analyses revealed that in contrast to MET WT BMs, MET-amplified BMs exhibited a more inflamed tumor microenvironment and displayed evidence of metabolic adaptation, particularly a reliance on glycolysis in contrast to OXPHOS in MET WT BMs. Furthermore, MET-amplified BMs demonstrated evidence of epithelial-mesenchymal transition signaling, including increased expression of TWIST1. Patients with MET-amplified BMs had significantly shorter overall survival. These findings highlight MET amplification as a critical driver of LUAD BMs, emphasizing its potential as a therapeutic target.
Timothy F. Burns, Sanja Dacic, Anish Chakka, Ethan Miller, Maria A. Velez, Ashwin Somasundaram, Saveri Bhattacharya, Autumn Gaither-Davis, Princey Devadassan, Jingxiao Jin, Vinod Kumar, Arjun Pennathur, Joanne Xiu, Matthew Oberley, Michael J. Glantz, Sonikpreet Aulakh, Uma R. Chandran, Riyue Bao, Curtis Tatsuoka, Laura P. Stabile
Usage data is cumulative from December 2025 through November 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 3,909 | 614 |
| 1,115 | 160 | |
| Figure | 1,382 | 0 |
| Table | 507 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 831 | 69 |
| Citation downloads | 376 | 0 |
| Totals | 8,120 | 843 |
| Total Views | 8,963 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.