Exonic variants in Apolipoprotein-L1 (G1 and G2) are linked to increased risk of kidney disease as well as kidney transplant rejection. Outside of the association of these prevalent variants with African ancestry, underpinning causal mechanisms for rejection are unknown. We investigated T-cell function using transgenic mice with physiologic expression of wild type (G0-), G1-APOL1 (G1), or G2-APOL1 (G2). Mice with either variant showed greater CD8+T-cell activation with expansion of a central memory (TCM) subset. Stimulated G1-CD8+T-cells showed enhanced proliferation and cytokine production, which reversed with APOL1 inhibition. In MHC-mismatched cardiac transplants, G1-mice demonstrated greater CD8+T-cell infiltration and reduced survival. Bulk transcriptome of G1-CD8+T-cells, and single-cell transcriptome of graft infiltrating TCMs, showed enrichment of canonical T-cell receptor (TCR) pathways including Ca2+-signaling. G1-CD8+T-cells demonstrated baseline ER-Ca2+ depletion followed by sustained increases in cytosolic-Ca2+ upon TCR stimulation. G1-CD8+T-cells were more sensitive to Ca2+ chelation, or store-operated Ca2+ entry inhibition, and were relatively resistant to calcineurin antagonism compared to G0-CD8+T-cells. Analogously, in a kidney transplant cohort, APOL1-variant recipients that had elevated peripheral TCMs before transplantation, developed rejection despite significantly higher tacrolimus levels vs G0/G0 recipients. In summary, we unravel an excitatory mechanism for APOL1 variants in T-cells that causally links them to kidney rejection.
John Pell, EM Tanvir, Zeguo Sun, Irene Chernova, Anand Reghuvaran, Soichiro Nagata, Mateus T. Guerra, John Choi, Soltan Al Chaar, Hiroki Mizuno, Ke Dong, Xin Tian, Reika Ishibe, Barbara Franchin, Paolo Cravedi, Ashwani Kumar, Gabriel Barsotti, Hongmei Shi, Bony De Kumar, Shinobu Smithson, Wenzhi Song, John Cijiang He, Anita S. Chong, Jordan S. Pober, Stefan Somlo, Ian W. Gibson, Waldemar Popik, Zhongyang Zhang, Joseph Craft, Jamil Azzi, Naoka Murakami, Shuta Ishibe, Peter S. Heeger, Madhav C Menon
Usage data is cumulative from June 2026 through June 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 376 | 0 |
| 128 | 0 | |
| Supplemental data | 54 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 36 | 0 |
| Totals | 594 | 0 |
| Total Views | 594 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.