Submit a comment

CD8+ T-cell autoreactivity to an HLA-B27–restricted self-epitope correlates with ankylosing spondylitis
Maria T. Fiorillo, Monica Maragno, Richard Butler, Maria L. Dupuis, Rosa Sorrentino
Maria T. Fiorillo, Monica Maragno, Richard Butler, Maria L. Dupuis, Rosa Sorrentino
View: Text | PDF
Article

CD8+ T-cell autoreactivity to an HLA-B27–restricted self-epitope correlates with ankylosing spondylitis

Abstract

HLA-B27 is highly associated with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), but the mechanism is unknown. Among the HLA-B27 alleles, B*2709, which differs by one amino acid from the susceptible B*2705, is not associated with the disease. Here, we analyze the reactivity, in patients with AS and in healthy controls carrying the B*2709 or B*2705 alleles, to an EBV epitope derived from LMP2 (236-244) and to a sequence-related self-peptide from vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor 1 (VIP1R 400-408). We found that both B*2705+ and B*2709+ subjects possess LMP2 236-244–specific, HLA-B27–restricted T cells, whereas only the B*2705+ individuals respond significantly to VIP1R 400-408. These results prompted us to compare, by IFN-γ ELISPOT analysis, the T-cell response to VIP1R 400-408 in patients with AS versus B*2705 healthy controls. The data show that VIP1R 400-408–specific reactivity is a major feature of the patients with AS. These findings show, for the first time to our knowledge, a widespread reactivity in patients with AS against a self-epitope that exhibits some features of a putative “arthritogenic” peptide.

Authors

Maria T. Fiorillo, Monica Maragno, Richard Butler, Maria L. Dupuis, Rosa Sorrentino

×

Guidelines

The Editorial Board will only consider comments that are deemed relevant and of interest to readers. The Journal will not post data that have not been subjected to peer review; or a comment that is essentially a reiteration of another comment.

  • Comments appear on the Journal’s website and are linked from the original article’s web page.
  • Authors are notified by email if their comments are posted.
  • The Journal reserves the right to edit comments for length and clarity.
  • No appeals will be considered.
  • Comments are not indexed in PubMed.

Specific requirements

  • Maximum length, 400 words
  • Entered as plain text or HTML
  • Author’s name and email address, to be posted with the comment
  • Declaration of all potential conflicts of interest (even if these are not ultimately posted); see the Journal’s conflict-of-interest policy
  • Comments may not include figures
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required
This field is required