The role of non-resolving inflammation in atherosclerosis

Non-resolving inflammation drives the development of clinically dangerous atherosclerotic lesions by promoting sustained plaque inflammation, large necrotic cores, thin fibrous caps, and thrombosis. Resolution of inflammation is not merely a passive return to homeostasis, but rather an active process mediated by specific molecules, including fatty acid–derived specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs). In advanced atherosclerosis, there is an imbalance between levels of SPMs and proinflammatory lipid mediators, which results in sustained leukocyte influx into lesions, inflammatory macrophage polarization, and impaired efferocytosis. In animal models of advanced atherosclerosis, restoration of SPMs limits plaque progression by suppressing inflammation, enhancing efferocytosis, and promoting an increase in collagen cap thickness. This Review discusses the roles of non-resolving inflammation in atherosclerosis and highlights the unique therapeutic potential of SPMs in blocking the progression of clinically dangerous plaques.

Acute inflammation evolved as a physiological host defense response against both microbial and sterile pathogens (16). When acute inflammation cannot be controlled or resolved, chronic inflammation develops, which can result in organ dysfunction (17). Examples include autoimmune disease, asthma, Alzheimer’s disease, diabetes, obesity, and cardiovascular disease (12, 18–22). The acute inflammatory response is divided into two phases: initiation and resolution. During the initiation phase, chemical messengers including cytokines, chemokines, and lipid-derived mediators, e.g., prostaglandins and leukotrienes, recruit immune cells to the site of injury (17). Polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs) arrive first and begin to phagocytose and neutralize pathogens. Simultaneously, monocytes are recruited to the area of inflammation and differentiate into macrophages that help to further clear pathogens as well as begin to orchestrate the next stage, the resolution of inflammation (23). This stage is characterized by quelling of the inflammatory response but with the continued clearance of pathogens; phagocytic removal of apoptotic cells in a process known as efferocytosis; and repair of damaged tissue. Resolution is characterized by a switch in the production of lipid mediators from proinflammatory mediators, e.g., leukotrienes, toward specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs), e.g., resolvins and lipoxins (24–26).

Proinflammatory lipid mediators, consisting of prostaglandins and leukotrienes, are formed from the n-6 fatty acid precursor arachidonic acid (AA). These mediators increase blood flow, endothelial cell permeability, and extravasation of PMNs (27). Lipid mediators that participate in resolution were identified using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry–based analysis of resolving inflammatory exudates from in vivo animal models and human cell culture systems (28). SPMs consist of at least four distinct families: lipoxins, resolvins, protectins, and maresins (25, 26, 29, 30). Like prostaglandins and leukotrienes, lipoxins are produced from n-6 fatty acid–derived AA (26). The other families of SPMs, including resolvins, protectins, and maresins, are generated from n-3 fatty acid–derived eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), or docosapentaenoic acid (DPA) (25, 29). Interestingly proinflammatory lipid mediators are able to trigger the synthesis of the SPMs, suggesting a direct cell biological link between the inflammatory and resolving phases of the inflammatory response (24).

In response to an inflammatory stimulus, polyunsaturated fatty acids including AA, EPA, DHA, and DPA are released from phospholipids by phospholipase enzymes and then catalyzed by a series of lipoxygenases, namely, 5-lipoxygenase (5-LOX), 12-lipoxygenase (12-LOX), and 15-lipoxygenase (15-LOX), to produce lipid mediators of inflammation and resolution (27). Proinflammatory leukotrienes such as leukotriene B₄ (LTB₄) and leukotriene C₄ (LTC₄) are derived from AA by 5-LOX and act on GPCRs such as leukotriene B₄ receptor 1/2 (BLT1/2) and cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1/2 (CysLT1/2). Activation of these receptors leads to increased expression of inflammatory pathway enzymes, e.g., 5-LOX and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and inflammatory cytokines, e.g., IL-6 and IL-8, which then promote the recruitment of neutrophils. Similarly to leukotrienes, SPMs also bind and act on their cognate GPCRs, which leads to the induction of pro-resolving cellular processes (31). These processes include apoptosis and decreased recruitment of leukocytes; efferocytosis; macrophage phenotypic shift from proinflammatory to pro-resolving; and tissue repair processes, including reconstitution of cells, matrix, and blood and lymph vessels (32, 33).

An imbalance of pro-resolving to proinflammatory lipid mediators has recently been identified as a key feature of advanced atherosclerosis in human and murine plaques (14, 15). Recent work has shown that regions of human atherosclerotic plaques characterized by large necrotic cores and thin fibrous caps had low levels of the pro-resolving mediator resolvin D1 (RvD1) and high levels of the proinflammatory mediator LTB₄ (14). Conversely, plaque regions containing less necrosis and thicker fibrous caps demonstrated high levels of RvD1 and relatively lower levels of LTB₄ (14). Thus, the ratio of RvD1 to LTB₄ correlated strongly with plaque severity. Consistent with these findings, advanced aortic root plaques of Ldlr^–/– mice fed a high-fat diet for 17 weeks showed a lower ratio of lesional RvD1 to LTB₄ than did early atherosclerotic lesions from Ldlr^–/– mice fed a high-fat diet for 8 weeks (14). Another study showed that the ratio of the SPMs maresin-1 (MaR1) and RvD2 to the proinflammatory mediators LTB₄, prostaglandin A₁, prostaglandin D₂, and prostaglandin E₂ was lower in Apoe^–/– mice fed a high-fat diet for 16 weeks as compared with mice fed the diet for 4 or 8 weeks (15). An important area of future research will be understanding how the plaque environment affects mediator synthesis and/or degradation. Nonetheless, as reviewed in the following sections, evidence is now accumulating that this imbalance is causal in the development of features of clinically significant plaques, including continuous Ly6c^hi monocyte influx; inflammatory macrophage polarization; defective efferocytosis; and thinning of the stabilizing collagenous fibrous cap overlying lesions (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Imbalance of SPMs and leukotrienes (LTs) promotes instability of atherosclerotic plaques. When the SPM/LT ratio is low (A), resolution of inflammation is impaired, leading to sustained inflammatory Ly6c^hi monocyte influx, platelet aggregation, proinflammatory macrophage polarization, impaired efferocytosis, large necrotic cores, and thin fibrous caps. Conversely, an increase in the SPM/LT ratio (B) promotes resolution, characterized by attenuated Ly6^hi monocyte influx, pro-resolving macrophage polarization, enhanced efferocytosis, decreased necrotic core formation, and thicker fibrous caps.

Lipoxygenases play a critical role in the biosynthesis of both proinflammatory and pro-resolving mediators and thus can be critical regulators of their balance. Two key enzymes, 5-LOX and 12/15-LOX, have been studied in this context. Notably, humans express three related forms of this enzyme, 12-LOX, 15-LOX type 1, and 15-LOX type 2, while mice express only one form, which is usually referred to as 12/15-LOX because it catalyzes both 12- and 15-LOX reactions (34). 5-LOX plays a role in the formation of both proinflammatory leukotrienes and pro-resolving lipoxins, and the determination of which product is generated in a given setting is dependent on 5-LOX subcellular localization (34). Nuclear 5-LOX is located near leukotriene A₄ (LTA₄) hydrolase, which converts the product of 5-LOX, LTA₄, to LTB₄. In contrast, when 5-LOX is cytoplasmic, LTA₄ is converted to lipoxin A₄ (LXA₄) by cytoplasmic 12/15-LOX. In macrophages, the nuclear localization of 5-LOX is mediated by MAPKAPK2-mediated (MK2-mediated) 5-LOX phosphorylation, and thus when MK2 is activated in macrophages, the inflammation/resolution balance is shifted toward inflammation (35–37).

Expression analysis of lipoxygenases has demonstrated that 5-LOX is significantly higher in human carotid atherosclerotic lesions compared with healthy arteries, where it has been found to have a predominantly nuclear localization (38, 39). Moreover, 5-LOX expression in atherosclerotic plaques correlated with patients’ clinical symptoms, including transient ischemic attack, stroke, and amaurosis fugax (38). The concept that 5-LOX is involved in atherosclerosis is also supported by human genetic findings. In a cohort of patients from the Los Angeles Atherosclerosis Study, Dwyer and colleagues identified a variant allele of ALOX5 that was associated with increased carotid intima-media thickness. Further, they observed that increased dietary intake of AA enhanced the atherogenic effect of the variant genotype, whereas increased dietary intake of n-3 fatty acids diminished its effect (40). These data are consistent with the concept that an increase in the ratio of AA-derived LTB₄ to n-3 fatty acid–derived LXA₄ promotes plaque progression. Supportive of a proinflammatory role for 5-LOX in atherogenesis, murine studies have demonstrated that the absence of 5-LOX in Apoe^–/– mice dramatically decreased atherosclerotic lesion size (41). In contrast to 5-LOX, human studies have suggested that 15-LOX may be atheroprotective. In a case-control study, a polymorphism in ALOX15 that was associated with higher enzyme activity was enriched in a population of control subjects without coronary artery disease (CAD) versus patients with CAD (42). Consistent with this finding, the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study found that a SNP in the coding region of ALOX15 was associated with both a 20-fold reduction in 15-LOX activity in vitro and a 1.6-fold increased risk of CAD (43). In a hypercholesterolemic rabbit model, overexpression of 15-LOX in macrophages was protective against early atherogenesis (44). Similarly, transgenic mice overexpressing 12/15-LOX on the Apoe^–/– background and fed a chow diet showed attenuated atherosclerosis progression, which was thought to be due to increased 12/15-LOX–mediated synthesis of LXA₄ (12). However, Merched and colleagues demonstrated that the role of 12/15-LOX in atherosclerosis is not straightforward. These authors found that although 12/15-LOX–transgenic Apoe^–/– mice on a chow diet had reduced atherosclerotic lesion area compared with control Apoe^–/– mice, lesion size was similar between 12/15-LOX–transgenic Apoe^–/– and control Apoe^–/– mice when Western diet feeding was used (12, 45). Consistent with these results, they showed that hyperlipidemia decreased 12/15-LOX–derived LXA₄ in the plasma of Western diet–fed 12/15-LOX–transgenic Apoe^–/– mice and that LDL-supplemented medium blocked LXA₄-induced efferocytosis in cultured macrophages. The mechanisms linking high-fat diet or LDL to decreased SPM plasma level and impaired SPM-mediated functions remain to be elucidated (45).

To identify a potential direct effect of SPMs on the progression of atherosclerosis, recent studies examined the effect of treating established lesions in atherosclerosis-prone mice with lipid mediators, including RvE1, RvD1, RvD2, RvD5_{n-3 DPA}, MaR1, or aspirin-triggered LXA₄ (ATL) (Table 1). Administration of RvE1, an E-series resolvin derived from EPA, to ApoE*3 Leiden transgenic mice fed a high-fat/high-cholesterol diet showed a significant reduction in lesion progression, accompanied by decreased expression of genes involved in atherogenesis, including those encoding ADAM17, TNF, and IFN-γ (46). The ADAM17 effect is particularly interesting given that Mer proto-oncogene tyrosine kinase (MerTK), a key macrophage efferocytosis receptor in atherosclerotic lesions, is cleaved by this protease, resulting in defective lesional efferocytosis (47). Additionally, because TNF-α and IFN-γ modulate macrophage polarization toward a more proinflammatory phenotype, a decrease in the expression of these cytokines may promote a pro-resolving macrophage phenotype and thereby favorably affect the resolution process (48). In cholesterol-fed rabbits with periodontitis, administration of RvE1 to the gums led to decreases in periodontal inflammation, atherosclerotic lesional inflammation, and necrotic core area (49). The D-series resolvin RvD1 led to smaller necrotic cores, enhanced rates of lesional efferocytosis, and thicker collagen caps when administered to high-fat-fed Ldlr^–/– mice (14). Similarly, administration of RvD5_{n-3 DPA} (derived from n-3 docosapentaenoic acid) to high-fat-fed Apoe^–/– mice decreased atherosclerotic lesion size and reduced leukocyte and platelet activation (50). Treatment of Apoe^–/– mice with RvD2 and MaR1 also promoted plaque stability by decreasing lesional macrophage numbers, halting expansion of necrotic cores, and thickening collagen caps (15). ATL treatment was shown to block atherosclerosis progression in high-fat-fed Apoe^–/– mice by reducing lesional macrophage infiltration and apoptotic cell accumulation, and this protective effect required its cognate receptor, formyl peptide receptor 2 (FPR2/ALX) (51). In addition to SPMs, the proteins annexin A1 and IL-10 have shown pro-resolving effects in the setting of experimental inflammation (52–56). Drechsler et al. demonstrated that the absence of annexin A1 in high-fat-fed Apoe^–/– mice led to increased arterial myeloid cell recruitment and atherosclerotic lesion size. Further, the intravenous delivery of the annexin A1–derived peptide fragment Ac2-26 to Apoe^–/– mice led to a reduction in arterial macrophage accumulation and plaque size (57). Moreover, when Western diet–fed Ldlr^–/– mice with pre-established atherosclerotic lesions were treated with atherosclerosis-targeting nanoparticles containing Ac2-26, the plaques showed decreases in overall plaque area, necrotic core size, and lesional oxidative stress and increases in fibrous cap thickness and IL-10 expression (58). In another study, treatment of Ldlr^–/– mice with nanoparticles containing IL-10 led to similar improvements in advanced plaques (59). Together, these studies demonstrate that atherosclerosis progression and vulnerable plaque features can be ameliorated by treatment with exogenous SPMs or pro-resolving proteins. Although the these pro-resolving mediators act on distinct receptors, they appear to induce similar atheroprotective mechanisms, including enhanced efferocytosis, pro-resolving macrophage polarization, decreased necrotic core formation, and increased collagen synthesis with thickened fibrous cap development. Despite these important studies, the precise mechanisms of the atheroprotective effects of SPMs remain incompletely understood.

Table 1

The effect of lipoxygenase and SPM receptor genetic engineering and SPM and pro-resolving protein administration on atherosclerosis in animal models of atherosclerosis

Recent studies have also shown that the biosynthesis of SPMs is regulated by circadian rhythm. Using lipid mediator profiling of healthy volunteers, Colas et al. demonstrated that plasma concentrations of the DPA-derived D-series resolvins (RvD_{n-3 DPA}) are diurnally regulated. Further, the pattern of regulation was significantly impaired in patients with cardiovascular disease (50). These patients were also found to have increased leukocyte activation and higher levels of circulating platelet-leukocyte aggregates, which have been shown to be a marker of inflammation (50). These findings are particularly interesting given previous work showing that proinflammatory Ly6c^hi monocytes and the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α are also regulated by circadian rhythm (60, 61). These mechanisms may contribute to the development of increased atherosclerosis in mice with disruptions in components of the circadian clock (62, 63). Together, these findings suggest that diurnal regulation of SPM production may be important in their cardioprotective effects.

Along with the lipid mediators themselves, the role of their receptors in atherosclerosis has also been examined, though progress has been hindered by the complex and sometimes nonspecific relationship between resolving mediators and their receptors (Table 2). In addition, mechanistic studies have been limited in some cases by the lack of a murine homolog for human receptors. For example, human GPR32, an RvD1 receptor, does not exist in mice, which instead appear to largely utilize the FPR2/ALX receptor for RvD1 as well as for LXA₄ (64). Interestingly, although genetic targeting of the FPR2/ALX receptor in mice prevented atherosclerosis progression as predicted, it actually decreased plaque stability in high-fat-fed Ldlr^–/– mice, which may be due to non-SPM ligands for FPR2/ALX, such as serum amyloid A, that are proinflammatory (65). Notably, the targeting strategy used by these authors led to the deletion of both Fpr2 and Fpr3, which are the murine homologs of human FPR2/ALX (66, 67). The findings from this study are consistent with those of prior studies showing that the FPR2/ALX receptor induces both proinflammatory and pro-resolution actions depending on the activating ligand. For example, activation of FPR2/ALX by prokaryotic peptides induces leukocyte chemotaxis, while annexin 1 and its related N-terminal peptides cause a decrease in neutrophil migration (67–69). Deletion of BLT1, the receptor for LTB₄, decreased formation of early lesions in Apoe^–/– mice fed the Western diet for 4–8 weeks, but it did not lead to any change in lesion size after 19 weeks of high-fat-diet feeding (70). In a related study, treatment of short-term Western diet–fed Ldlr^–/– mice or chow diet–fed Apoe^–/– mice with a BLT1 antagonist led to reduced lesion area and decreased lesional CD11b expression (71). These combined data suggest that BLT1 signaling is important in early atherogenesis but that other proatherogenic processes become dominant in more advanced atherosclerosis. Finally, a recent study demonstrated that deficiency of the receptor for RvE1, ChemR23/ERV1, in Apoe^–/– mice or in the hematopoietic cells of Ldlr^–/– mice leads to increased lesion size and larger necrotic cores (72). Further, the loss of ChemR23/ERV1 was associated with decreased phagocytosis in vitro, decreased expression of genes involved in phagocytosis, and increased expression of genes relevant to macrophage lipoprotein uptake. Together, these data suggest an atheroprotective role for ChemR23/ERV1.

Table 2

SPM receptors and their atherorelevant downstream effects

Macrophages show a high degree of plasticity and can perform either proatherogenic or antiatherogenic activities in response to environmental stimuli (73). As mentioned above, proinflammatory macrophages are prominent in unstable regions of plaques, whereas abundant pro-resolving macrophages are present in stable regions of plaques (74). Further, atherosclerotic plaques undergoing regression demonstrate increased numbers of pro-resolving macrophages, which presumably promote tissue repair. In this context, SPMs are capable of promoting phenotypic skewing in macrophages. For example, the administration of RvD2 and MaR1 to atheroprone mice promotes polarization of macrophages toward a pro-resolving phenotype (15). Interestingly, pro-resolving macrophages have been shown to synthesize higher levels of SPMs than proinflammatory macrophages (75), suggesting a resolution-amplification cycle. Pro-resolving macrophages have also been shown to have a higher efferocytic capacity than proinflammatory macrophages. Moreover, the pro-resolving protein IL-10 also induces polarization of macrophages toward a pro-resolving phenotype with enhanced efferocytosis (76, 77).

Efferocytosis, the receptor-mediated clearance of apoptotic cells, has a critically important role in successful resolution responses, and its impairment has been highlighted in many non-resolving chronic inflammatory diseases, including atherosclerosis. Failure to clear apoptotic cells from atherosclerotic plaques in a timely fashion leads to secondary necrosis, which generates heightened inflammation owing to the release of inflammatory damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) from the necrotic cells (4, 78–80). Therefore, efferocytosis is a crucial step in the resolution of lesional inflammation in chronic non-resolving inflammatory diseases. Interestingly, SPMs are able to increase the efferocytic capacity of macrophages (25, 81–83), and efferocytosis, in turn, promotes SPM production by macrophages, including LXA₄, RvE1, and PD1 (75, 81, 84). SPMs, in particular the lipoxins, also act as chemoattractants that recruit monocytes that, after differentiating into macrophages, enhance the overall efferocytic capacity of resolving lesions (82, 85, 86). Thus, similar to the situation mentioned above with resolving macrophages, there is a positive resolution feedback cycle involving SPMs and efferocytosis.

Specific phagocytic receptors binding to phosphatidylserine on apoptotic cells have been implicated in the regulation of efferocytosis in atherosclerotic lesions. For example, genetic targeting of Mertk in fat-fed Apoe^–/– or Ldlr^–/– mice led to impaired efferocytosis, accumulation of apoptotic cells, and enlarged necrotic cores (87, 88). MerTK deficiency also leads to impaired SPM production by macrophages, exemplifying the aforementioned efferocytosis/resolution–amplification loop that, when disrupted, can cause devastating consequences (89). As mentioned above, the MerTK receptor can be inactivated by the metalloproteinase ADAM17, which cleaves the receptor and causes it to shed its soluble extracellular domain (47). Interestingly, high levels of soluble MerTK have been detected in both human and murine atherosclerotic lesions, suggesting that in advanced atherosclerosis, inactivation of the MerTK receptor in this fashion is one mechanism by which efferocytosis is impaired (89). In further support of this idea, analysis of human carotid plaques revealed that expression of ADAM17 is increased while that of MerTK is decreased in macrophages surrounding the necrotic cores as compared with macrophages in peripheral regions of the plaques (90). In addition, extracts obtained from the regions around necrotic cores induced cleavage of MerTK and upregulated expression of ADAM17 in cultured THP-1 macrophages (90).

Our group has demonstrated recently that intact MerTK controls the subcellular localization of 5-LOX, which, as mentioned in the previous section, favors production of SPMs (91). Under inflammatory conditions, 5-LOX is phosphorylated by MK2 and translocated to the nucleus, where it promotes the generation of LTB₄ (36, 37). MerTK signaling inhibits MK2 and thereby leads to cytosolic localization of 5-LOX and the generation of LXA₄ in macrophages. When MerTK is cleaved or genetically deleted, 5-LOX localizes to the nuclear membrane, and there is an increase in leukotrienes (91). Moreover, the atherosclerotic lesions of mice engineered to express a cleavage-resistant version of MerTK (MerTK^CR) and crossed onto the Ldlr^–/– background demonstrate attenuated nuclear localization of 5-LOX in macrophages, enhanced SPMs, increased rates of efferocytosis, smaller necrotic cores, and thicker fibrous caps compared with the lesions of Ldlr^–/– mice with wild-type MerTK (89, 91). SPMs themselves are able to augment and therefore amplify this pathway. For example, RvD1, which is also induced by successful efferocytosis, can promote cytosolic localization of 5-LOX to favor the generation of LXA₄ (37).

The mechanism by which MerTK signaling and RvD1 promote cytoplasmic 5-LOX and subsequent SPM generation in macrophages has recently been revealed (Figure 2). RvD1, by activating its receptor FPR2/ALX, lowers cytosolic calcium, which suppresses activity of the calcium-sensitive kinase calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II-γ (CaMKIIγ). CaMKII, which is activated in macrophages of advanced, but not early, mouse and human atherosclerotic lesions (92), activates MK2. Thus, the RvD1-mediated decrease in CaMKII activity lowers MK2 activity, which in turn leads to decreased phosphorylation and increased cytoplasmic localization of 5-LOX (68). Activation of the MerTK receptor by its ligands Gas6 and protein S or by apoptotic cells that have Gas6 or protein S on their surface also suppresses MK2 activity; decreases nuclear phospho–5-LOX, which is the form that leads to LTB₄ synthesis; and increases SPMs (91). Recent evidence suggests that suppression of CaMKII activity is upstream of this effect, as it is with the RvD1–FPR2/ALX pathway. Finally, as yet another example of feedback and amplification in the resolution response, suppression of CaMKII activity has another pro-resolving role in macrophages, i.e., in addition to increasing SPM biosynthesis: its inactivation leads to an increase in Mertk transcription and MerTK-mediated efferocytosis via a pathway involving the transcription factors ATF6 and LXRα (92). In vivo, genetic deletion of CaMKIIγ from myeloid cells in Ldlr^–/– mice enhances the efferocytic capacity of macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques and decreases plaque necrosis and inflammation (92). Thus, CaMKII activity in lesional macrophages represents an important hub orchestrating defective efferocytosis and impaired resolution. For this reason, its therapeutic inhibition may be considered as a new strategy to block advanced plaque progression.

Figure 2

RvD1 and MerTK signaling promote pro-resolving pathways in macrophages. Activation of signaling through the FPR2/ALX receptor by RvD1 or through the MerTK receptor by Gas6, protein S, or apoptotic cells (with Gas6 or protein S on the surface of the apoptotic cells) lowers cytoplasmic calcium and thereby decreases the activity of CaMKII. The decrease in CaMKII activity triggers at least two pro-resolving processes. First, it lowers MK2 activity, which increases nonphosphorylated 5-LOX and promotes its nuclear-to-cytoplasmic translocation. In the cytoplasm, 5-LOX mediates the synthesis of SPMs, e.g., LTB₄ in the presence of AA and RvD1 in the presence of DHA, and in the nucleus, 5-LOX causes a concomitant decrease in LT synthesis. The resulting increase in the SPM/LT ratio suppresses plaque progression. Second, suppression of CaMKII activity induces an ATF6-LXRα-MerTK pathway that increases the synthesis of MerTK and thus amplifies the pro-resolving program. Not shown here is that ADAM17-mediated MerTK cleavage, which occurs in advanced lesional macrophages, suppresses both efferocytosis and resolution in macrophages in vitro and in advanced atherosclerotic lesions.

In addition to efferocytosis, SPMs play a role in the apoptosis of neutrophils after they have engulfed pathogens, which is a critical step in resolution. For example, in a model of acute lung injury, RvE1, through its receptor BLT1, promoted apoptosis of neutrophils after their ingestion of opsonized E. coli by increasing caspase-3 and caspase-8 activation and by suppressing ERK- and Akt-dependent prosurvival signaling pathways (93). Similarly, aspirin-triggered lipoxins signal via FPR2/ALX, ERK, and Akt to block prosurvival signaling in neutrophils (94). Further, annexin A1 has also been shown to promote neutrophil apoptosis by a pathway involving L-selectin shedding from neutrophils, inhibition of PMN adhesion to endothelial cells, and activation of caspase-3. This pathway also leads to the externalization of annexin A1 on the PMNs, which promotes efficient efferocytosis of the cells (95–97). Finally, SPMs, including 15-epi-LXA₄ and RvD1, promote autophagy and survival pathways in macrophages, which enhances efferocytosis and tissue resolution (98).

In view of the evidence suggesting that chronic inflammation plays an important role in plaque progression, therapeutic targeting of inflammation has been considered as a complementary strategy to LDL reduction for lowering the risk of atherosclerotic vascular disease. This idea recently made a quantum leap in plausibility with the publication of the Canakinumab Anti-inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS) trial, which examined approximately 10,000 post–myocardial infarction patients to determine whether inhibition of IL-1β with canakinumab, a monoclonal antibody directed against the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1β, could decrease cardiovascular events in patients with a history of myocardial infarction and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (99). More than 90% of the subjects were on concomitant statin therapy. In animal and preclinical models, IL-1β has been shown to promote inflammation in atherosclerosis by inducing the expression of leukocyte adhesion proteins, e.g., ICAM-1, E-selectin, and VCAM-1, that contribute to the accumulation of leukocytes in lesions (100, 101). The CANTOS investigators demonstrated that 150 mg of canakinumab administered every 3 months led to a statistically significant reduction in the primary composite endpoint of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death (hazard ratio 0.85 vs. placebo, P = 0.021) (102). This effect was associated with a decrease in CRP but no significant changes in LDL or HDL in the plasma. Thus, the CANTOS trial showed a beneficial effect of blocking inflammation independently of the role of lipids, highlighting the promise of therapy directed toward inflammation in cardiovascular disease. A second trial exploring the potential benefit of low-dose methotrexate for cardiovascular disease is the Cardiovascular Inflammation Reduction Trial, whose results are expected in 2020 (103). Methotrexate, which has long been a mainstay of therapy for autoimmune disease, including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and psoriatic arthritis, has been shown to attenuate levels of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α as well as CRP in the plasma of these patients (104).

A concern with the use of antiinflammatory drug therapy is the potential to compromise of host defense (105–107), and in CANTOS there was a significant increase in the number of fatal infections associated with canakinumab therapy (incidence rate 0.31 vs. 0.18 events per 100 person-years, combined dose groups vs. placebo, P = 0.02) (102). In this context, translational cardiovascular researchers are beginning to consider the alternative strategy of boosting resolution to lower risk of cardiovascular disease, because this strategy would attack one of the root causes of advanced plaque progression while having the capacity to actually boost host defense rather than suppress it (108, 109). One possibility would be to increase the precursors of SPMs through dietary supplementation of n-3 fatty acids. This idea would be valid only if these precursors were rate-limiting for SPM biosynthesis in a manner that could increase the level of lesional SPMs. Conversely, if a major cause of low SPMs in lesions were a defect in a biosynthetic pathway distal to the step where n-3 fatty acids enter the pathway, e.g., excessive phosphorylation of 5-LOX (above), this strategy would not be expected to be effective. Indeed, when the outcomes of a number of n-3 fatty acid trials are considered together, the results have been rather disappointing. While observational population-based studies have suggested that a n-3 fatty acid–rich diet is associated with lower incidence of cardiovascular disease (110, 111), subsequent randomized clinical trials of n-3 fatty acid supplementation yielded mixed results, with only some suggesting a beneficial effect in preventing cardiovascular events (112–115). There have been questions related to the dose and types of n-3 fatty acids used in these trials, and two new cardiovascular outcome studies comparing statin therapy alone with statins plus either high-dose EPA or combined DHA/EPA are currently under way.

In view of the imbalance in SPMs versus leukotrienes in advanced atherosclerotic plaques (116, 117), investigators have tested the effect of atreleuton, a 5-LOX inhibitor, to lower leukotrienes. However, this enzyme is also involved in the synthesis of lipoxins and resolvins (above). Phase II studies conducted in patients with acute coronary syndromes demonstrated that while leukotriene production was decreased in patients given atreleuton, vascular inflammation within the ascending aorta and carotids as measured by fludeoxyglucose (FDG) PET did not show any significant change (118, 119). This lack of efficacy in this early attempt at resolution-targeting therapy may have been due to the dual role of this enzyme in SPM synthesis.

The most direct way to implement resolution mediator therapy is to administer exogenous mediators. Examples summarized in Table 1 and discussed above illustrate the concept that exogenous administration of SPMs provides a protective effect in animal models of atherosclerosis. These preclinical studies, together with the theoretical advantages of pro-resolution versus antiinflammatory therapy outlined above; the fact that SPMs are already being tested in clinical trials for other chronic inflammatory diseases (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00799552 and NCT00941018); and the new opportunities for plaque therapy in humans in the wake of CANTOS support further research into using resolution mediators to block plaque progression in humans.

Despite years of steady progress in the treatment and prevention of cardiovascular disease, death rates attributed to heart attack and stroke are again rising in the United States, presumably owing to the epidemic of obesity and diabetes (2). Aggressive lipid lowering remains the mainstay of therapy for atherosclerosis, but there is room for the development of complementary therapeutics. Although the recent CANTOS trial has demonstrated that targeting inflammation can successfully reduce cardiac mortality in high-risk populations, it has also confirmed that antiinflammatory therapies run the risk of compromising host defense. Our understanding of the etiology of atherosclerosis has recently evolved to include failed resolution as a prominent causal feature for the most clinically relevant advanced plaques, opening up the exciting possibility that clinical plaque progression could be targeted in a manner that would lessen immunosuppression. Moreover, in the context that obesity and type 2 diabetes are major risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease — and a major reason why cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death (2) — a role for chronic inflammation and failed resolution in metabolic diseases is also emerging (120). Thus, resolution therapy may represent a novel avenue for the integrated treatment of cardiometabolic disease. Although we know that there is an imbalance of proinflammatory versus pro-resolving mediators in advanced atherosclerosis, we do not yet fully understand why the resolution process fails in this setting. On the one hand, we can consider the direct approach of administering exogenous SPMs, as discussed above. However, more mechanistic strategies must also be considered, and this will require a deeper understanding of how SPMs are synthesized and catabolized and how they work on effector cells to carry out various resolution processes. Finally, with the increasing availability of large genetic data sets, incorporating a functional genomic approach to the identification of gene signatures associated with defective inflammation resolution may help identify new targets as well as provide a strategy for the tailoring of therapy to specific individuals.

This work was supported by American Heart Association Fellow-to-Faculty award 17FTF33660643 (to ACD) and Post-Doctoral Fellowship grant 15POST25620024 (to BC) as well as by NIH grants T32 HL120826-05 (to CK) and HL075662, HL127464, and HL132412 (to IT). The authors thank Gabrielle Fredman for her inspiration and insight related to many topics covered in this Review.

Address correspondence to: Amanda C. Doran or Ira Tabas, Department of Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, 630 West 168th Street, New York, New York 10956, USA. Phone: 212.305.5669; Email: acd2154@cumc.columbia.edu (A.C. Doran). Phone: 212.305.9430; Email: iat1@columbia.edu (I. Tabas).

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2018;128(7):2713–2723.https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI97950.

1. Lusis AJ. Atherosclerosis. Nature. 2000;407(6801):233–241.
   View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
2. Behn A, Ur E. The obesity epidemic and its cardiovascular consequences. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2006;21(4):353–360.
   View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
3. Williams KJ, Tabas I. The response-to-retention hypothesis of atherogenesis reinforced. Curr Opin Lipidol. 1998;9(5):471–474.
   View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
4. Moore KJ, Tabas I. Macrophages in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Cell. 2011;145(3):341–355.
   View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
5. Libby P, Lichtman AH, Hansson GK. Immune effector mechanisms implicated in atherosclerosis: from mice to humans. Immunity. 2013;38(6):1092–1104.
   View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
6. Hansson GK, Hermansson A. The immune system in atherosclerosis. Nat Immunol. 2011;12(3):204–212.
   View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
7. Kolodgie FD, et al. Pathologic assessment of the vulnerable human coronary plaque. Heart. 2004;90(12):1385–1391.
   View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
8. Ball RY, Stowers EC, Burton JH, Cary NR, Skepper JN, Mitchinson MJ. Evidence that the death of macrophage foam cells contributes to the lipid core of atheroma. Atherosclerosis. 1995;114(1):45–54.
   View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
9. Hansson GK, Libby P, Tabas I. Inflammation and plaque vulnerability. J Intern Med. 2015;278(5):483–493.
   View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
10. Bentzon JF, Otsuka F, Virmani R, Falk E. Mechanisms of plaque formation and rupture. Circ Res. 2014;114(12):1852–1866.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
11. Libby P. The molecular mechanisms of the thrombotic complications of atherosclerosis. J Intern Med. 2008;263(5):517–527.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
12. Merched AJ, Ko K, Gotlinger KH, Serhan CN, Chan L. Atherosclerosis: evidence for impairment of resolution of vascular inflammation governed by specific lipid mediators. FASEB J. 2008;22(10):3595–3606.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
13. Tabas I. Macrophage death and defective inflammation resolution in atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10(1):36–46.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
14. Fredman G, et al. An imbalance between specialized pro-resolving lipid mediators and pro-inflammatory leukotrienes promotes instability of atherosclerotic plaques. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12859.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
15. Viola JR, et al. Resolving lipid mediators maresin 1 and resolvin D2 prevent atheroprogression in mice. Circ Res. 2016;119(9):1030–1038.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
16. Geering B, Stoeckle C, Conus S, Simon HU. Living and dying for inflammation: neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils. Trends Immunol. 2013;34(8):398–409.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
17. Serhan CN. Novel lipid mediators and resolution mechanisms in acute inflammation: to resolve or not? Am J Pathol. 2010;177(4):1576–1591.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
18. White PJ, Arita M, Taguchi R, Kang JX, Marette A. Transgenic restoration of long-chain n-3 fatty acids in insulin target tissues improves resolution capacity and alleviates obesity-linked inflammation and insulin resistance in high-fat-fed mice. Diabetes. 2010;59(12):3066–3073.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
19. Titos E, et al. Resolvin D1 and its precursor docosahexaenoic acid promote resolution of adipose tissue inflammation by eliciting macrophage polarization toward an M2-like phenotype. J Immunol. 2011;187(10):5408–5418.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
20. Medeiros R, et al. Aspirin-triggered lipoxin A4 stimulates alternative activation of microglia and reduces Alzheimer disease-like pathology in mice. Am J Pathol. 2013;182(5):1780–1789.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
21. Planagumà A, et al. Airway lipoxin A4 generation and lipoxin A4 receptor expression are decreased in severe asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178(6):574–582.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
22. Giera M, et al. Lipid and lipid mediator profiling of human synovial fluid in rheumatoid arthritis patients by means of LC-MS/MS. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1821(11):1415–1424.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
23. Serhan CN. Resolution phase of inflammation: novel endogenous anti-inflammatory and proresolving lipid mediators and pathways. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25:101–137.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
24. Levy BD, Clish CB, Schmidt B, Gronert K, Serhan CN. Lipid mediator class switching during acute inflammation: signals in resolution. Nat Immunol. 2001;2(7):612–619.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
25. Serhan CN, et al. Resolvins: a family of bioactive products of omega-3 fatty acid transformation circuits initiated by aspirin treatment that counter proinflammation signals. J Exp Med. 2002;196(8):1025–1037.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
26. Clària J, Serhan CN. Aspirin triggers previously undescribed bioactive eicosanoids by human endothelial cell-leukocyte interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(21):9475–9479.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
27. Serhan CN, Chiang N, Dalli J. The resolution code of acute inflammation: Novel pro-resolving lipid mediators in resolution. Semin Immunol. 2015;27(3):200–215.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
28. Serhan CN, Clish CB, Brannon J, Colgan SP, Chiang N, Gronert K. Novel functional sets of lipid-derived mediators with antiinflammatory actions generated from omega-3 fatty acids via cyclooxygenase 2-nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and transcellular processing. J Exp Med. 2000;192(8):1197–1204.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
29. Serhan CN, et al. Maresins: novel macrophage mediators with potent antiinflammatory and proresolving actions. J Exp Med. 2009;206(1):15–23.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
30. Bannenberg GL, et al. Molecular circuits of resolution: formation and actions of resolvins and protectins. J Immunol. 2005;174(7):4345–4355.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
31. Serhan CN, Krishnamoorthy S, Recchiuti A, Chiang N. Novel anti-inflammatory–pro-resolving mediators and their receptors. Curr Top Med Chem. 2011;11(6):629–647.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
32. Dalli J, et al. The novel 13S,14S-epoxy-maresin is converted by human macrophages to maresin 1 (MaR1), inhibits leukotriene A4 hydrolase (LTA4H), and shifts macrophage phenotype. FASEB J. 2013;27(7):2573–2583.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
33. Mitchell S, et al. Lipoxins, aspirin-triggered epi-lipoxins, lipoxin stable analogues, and the resolution of inflammation: stimulation of macrophage phagocytosis of apoptotic neutrophils in vivo. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002;13(10):2497–2507.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
34. Haeggström JZ, Funk CD. Lipoxygenase and leukotriene pathways: biochemistry, biology, and roles in disease. Chem Rev. 2011;111(10):5866–5898.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
35. Wong A, Cook MN, Foley JJ, Sarau HM, Marshall P, Hwang SM. Influx of extracellular calcium is required for the membrane translocation of 5-lipoxygenase and leukotriene synthesis. Biochemistry. 1991;30(38):9346–9354.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
36. Woods JW, et al. 5-Lipoxygenase and 5-lipoxygenase-activating protein are localized in the nuclear envelope of activated human leukocytes. J Exp Med. 1993;178(6):1935–1946.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
37. Fredman G, et al. Resolvin D1 limits 5-lipoxygenase nuclear localization and leukotriene B4 synthesis by inhibiting a calcium-activated kinase pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(40):14530–14535.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
38. Qiu H, et al. Expression of 5-lipoxygenase and leukotriene A4 hydrolase in human atherosclerotic lesions correlates with symptoms of plaque instability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(21):8161–8166.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
39. Spanbroek R, et al. Expanding expression of the 5-lipoxygenase pathway within the arterial wall during human atherogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(3):1238–1243.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
40. Dwyer JH, et al. Arachidonate 5-lipoxygenase promoter genotype, dietary arachidonic acid, and atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(1):29–37.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
41. Mehrabian M, et al. Identification of 5-lipoxygenase as a major gene contributing to atherosclerosis susceptibility in mice. Circ Res. 2002;91(2):120–126.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
42. Wittwer J, Bayer M, Mosandl A, Muntwyler J, Hersberger M. The c.-292C>T promoter polymorphism increases reticulocyte-type 15-lipoxygenase-1 activity and could be atheroprotective. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45(4):487–492.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
43. Assimes TL, et al. A near null variant of 12/15-LOX encoded by a novel SNP in ALOX15 and the risk of coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis. 2008;198(1):136–144.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
44. Shen J, et al. Macrophage-mediated 15-lipoxygenase expression protects against atherosclerosis development. J Clin Invest. 1996;98(10):2201–2208.
    View this article via: JCI PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
45. Merched AJ, Serhan CN, Chan L. Nutrigenetic disruption of inflammation-resolution homeostasis and atherogenesis. J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics. 2011;4(1):12–24.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
46. Salic K, et al. Resolvin E1 attenuates atherosclerosis in absence of cholesterol-lowering effects and on top of atorvastatin. Atherosclerosis. 2016;250:158–165.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
47. Thorp E, Vaisar T, Subramanian M, Mautner L, Blobel C, Tabas I. Shedding of the Mer tyrosine kinase receptor is mediated by ADAM17 protein through a pathway involving reactive oxygen species, protein kinase Cδ, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK). J Biol Chem. 2011;286(38):33335–33344.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
48. Martinez FO, Gordon S. The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: time for reassessment. F1000Prime Rep. 2014;6:13.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
49. Hasturk H, et al. Resolvin E1 (RvE1) attenuates atherosclerotic plaque formation in diet and inflammation-induced atherogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2015;35(5):1123–1133.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
50. Colas RA, et al. Impaired production and diurnal regulation of vascular RvD_{n-3 DPA} increase systemic inflammation and cardiovascular disease. Circ Res. 2018;122(6):855–863.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
51. Petri MH, et al. Aspirin-triggered lipoxin A4 inhibits atherosclerosis progression in apolipoprotein E^–/– mice. Br J Pharmacol. 2017;174(22):4043–4054.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
52. Chatterjee BE, et al. Annexin 1-deficient neutrophils exhibit enhanced transmigration in vivo and increased responsiveness in vitro. J Leukoc Biol. 2005;78(3):639–646.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
53. Babbin BA, et al. Annexin A1 regulates intestinal mucosal injury, inflammation, and repair. J Immunol. 2008;181(7):5035–5044.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
54. Ouyang N, et al. MC-12, an annexin A1-based peptide, is effective in the treatment of experimental colitis. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41585.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
55. Siqueira Mietto B, Kroner A, Girolami EI, Santos-Nogueira E, Zhang J, David S. Role of IL-10 in resolution of inflammation and functional recovery after peripheral nerve injury. J Neurosci. 2015;35(50):16431–16442.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
56. Kearley J, Barker JE, Robinson DS, Lloyd CM. Resolution of airway inflammation and hyperreactivity after in vivo transfer of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells is interleukin 10 dependent. J Exp Med. 2005;202(11):1539–1547.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
57. Drechsler M, et al. Annexin A1 counteracts chemokine-induced arterial myeloid cell recruitment. Circ Res. 2015;116(5):827–835.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
58. Fredman G, et al. Targeted nanoparticles containing the proresolving peptide Ac2-26 protect against advanced atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic mice. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(275):275ra20.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
59. Kamaly N, et al. Targeted interleukin-10 nanotherapeutics developed with a microfluidic chip enhance resolution of inflammation in advanced atherosclerosis. ACS Nano. 2016;10(5):5280–5292.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
60. Nguyen KD, Fentress SJ, Qiu Y, Yun K, Cox JS, Chawla A. Circadian gene Bmal1 regulates diurnal oscillations of Ly6C(hi) inflammatory monocytes. Science. 2013;341(6153):1483–1488.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
61. Keller M, et al. A circadian clock in macrophages controls inflammatory immune responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(50):21407–21412.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
62. Yang L, et al. Overexpression of CRY1 protects against the development of atherosclerosis via the TLR/NF-κB pathway. Int Immunopharmacol. 2015;28(1):525–530.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
63. Pan X, Jiang XC, Hussain MM. Impaired cholesterol metabolism and enhanced atherosclerosis in clock mutant mice. Circulation. 2013;128(16):1758–1769.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
64. Krishnamoorthy S, et al. Resolvin D1 binds human phagocytes with evidence for proresolving receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(4):1660–1665.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
65. Petri MH, Laguna-Fernández A, Gonzalez-Diez M, Paulsson-Berne G, Hansson GK, Bäck M. The role of the FPR2/ALX receptor in atherosclerosis development and plaque stability. Cardiovasc Res. 2015;105(1):65–74.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
66. Dufton N, et al. Anti-inflammatory role of the murine formyl-peptide receptor 2: ligand-specific effects on leukocyte responses and experimental inflammation. J Immunol. 2010;184(5):2611–2619.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
67. Ye RD, et al. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXIII. Nomenclature for the formyl peptide receptor (FPR) family. Pharmacol Rev. 2009;61(2):119–161.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
68. Norling LV, Dalli J, Flower RJ, Serhan CN, Perretti M. Resolvin D1 limits polymorphonuclear leukocyte recruitment to inflammatory loci: receptor-dependent actions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012;32(8):1970–1978.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
69. Hayhoe RP, Kamal AM, Solito E, Flower RJ, Cooper D, Perretti M. Annexin 1 and its bioactive peptide inhibit neutrophil-endothelium interactions under flow: indication of distinct receptor involvement. Blood. 2006;107(5):2123–2130.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
70. Subbarao K, et al. Role of leukotriene B4 receptors in the development of atherosclerosis: potential mechanisms. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24(2):369–375.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
71. Aiello RJ, Bourassa PA, Lindsey S, Weng W, Freeman A, Showell HJ. Leukotriene B4 receptor antagonism reduces monocytic foam cells in mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2002;22(3):443–449.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
72. Laguna-Fernandez A, et al. ERV1/ChemR23 signaling protects from atherosclerosis by modifying oxLDL uptake and phagocytosis in macrophages. [published online ahead of print May 8, 2018]. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032801.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
73. Li S, et al. Defective phagocytosis of apoptotic cells by macrophages in atherosclerotic lesions of ob/ob mice and reversal by a fish oil diet. Circ Res. 2009;105(11):1072–1082.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
74. Chistiakov DA, Bobryshev YV, Nikiforov NG, Elizova NV, Sobenin IA, Orekhov AN. Macrophage phenotypic plasticity in atherosclerosis: the associated features and the peculiarities of the expression of inflammatory genes. Int J Cardiol. 2015;184:436–445.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
75. Dalli J, Serhan CN. Specific lipid mediator signatures of human phagocytes: microparticles stimulate macrophage efferocytosis and pro-resolving mediators. Blood. 2012;120(15):e60–e72.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
76. De Paoli F, Staels B, Chinetti-Gbaguidi G. Macrophage phenotypes and their modulation in atherosclerosis. Circ J. 2014;78(8):1775–1781.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
77. Martinez FO, Helming L, Gordon S. Alternative activation of macrophages: an immunologic functional perspective. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27:451–483.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
78. Schrijvers DM, De Meyer GR, Kockx MM, Herman AG, Martinet W. Phagocytosis of apoptotic cells by macrophages is impaired in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25(6):1256–1261.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
79. Linton MF, Babaev VR, Huang J, Linton EF, Tao H, Yancey PG. Macrophage apoptosis and efferocytosis in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Circ J. 2016;80(11):2259–2268.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
80. Thorp E, Tabas I. Mechanisms and consequences of efferocytosis in advanced atherosclerosis. J Leukoc Biol. 2009;86(5):1089–1095.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
81. Schwab JM, Chiang N, Arita M, Serhan CN. Resolvin E1 and protectin D1 activate inflammation-resolution programmes. Nature. 2007;447(7146):869–874.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
82. Godson C, Mitchell S, Harvey K, Petasis NA, Hogg N, Brady HR. Cutting edge: lipoxins rapidly stimulate nonphlogistic phagocytosis of apoptotic neutrophils by monocyte-derived macrophages. J Immunol. 2000;164(4):1663–1667.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
83. Chiang N, Dalli J, Colas RA, Serhan CN. Identification of resolvin D2 receptor mediating resolution of infections and organ protection. J Exp Med. 2015;212(8):1203–1217.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
84. Ohira T, Arita M, Omori K, Recchiuti A, Van Dyke TE, Serhan CN. Resolvin E1 receptor activation signals phosphorylation and phagocytosis. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(5):3451–3461.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
85. Maddox JF, Serhan CN. Lipoxin A4 and B4 are potent stimuli for human monocyte migration and adhesion: selective inactivation by dehydrogenation and reduction. J Exp Med. 1996;183(1):137–146.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
86. Maddox JF, Hachicha M, Takano T, Petasis NA, Fokin VV, Serhan CN. Lipoxin A4 stable analogs are potent mimetics that stimulate human monocytes and THP-1 cells via a G-protein-linked lipoxin A4 receptor. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(11):6972–6978.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
87. Ait-Oufella H, et al. Defective mer receptor tyrosine kinase signaling in bone marrow cells promotes apoptotic cell accumulation and accelerates atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008;28(8):1429–1431.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
88. Thorp E, Cui D, Schrijvers DM, Kuriakose G, Tabas I. Mertk receptor mutation reduces efferocytosis efficiency and promotes apoptotic cell accumulation and plaque necrosis in atherosclerotic lesions of apoe^–/– mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2008;28(8):1421–1428.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
89. Cai B, et al. MerTK receptor cleavage promotes plaque necrosis and defective resolution in atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(2):564–568.
    View this article via: JCI PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
90. Garbin U, et al. Expansion of necrotic core and shedding of Mertk receptor in human carotid plaques: a role for oxidized polyunsaturated fatty acids? Cardiovasc Res. 2013;97(1):125–133.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
91. Cai B, et al. MerTK cleavage limits proresolving mediator biosynthesis and exacerbates tissue inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113(23):6526–6531.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
92. Doran AC, et al. CAMKIIγ suppresses an efferocytosis pathway in macrophages and promotes atherosclerotic plaque necrosis. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(11):4075–4089.
    View this article via: JCI PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
93. El Kebir D, Gjorstrup P, Filep JG. Resolvin E1 promotes phagocytosis-induced neutrophil apoptosis and accelerates resolution of pulmonary inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(37):14983–14988.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
94. El Kebir D, et al. Aspirin-triggered lipoxins override the apoptosis-delaying action of serum amyloid A in human neutrophils: a novel mechanism for resolution of inflammation. J Immunol. 2007;179(1):616–622.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
95. Zouki C, Ouellet S, Filep JG. The anti-inflammatory peptides, antiflammins, regulate the expression of adhesion molecules on human leukocytes and prevent neutrophil adhesion to endothelial cells. FASEB J. 2000;14(3):572–580.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
96. Watson RW, Rotstein OD, Nathens AB, Parodo J, Marshall JC. Neutrophil apoptosis is modulated by endothelial transmigration and adhesion molecule engagement. J Immunol. 1997;158(2):945–953.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
97. Walther A, Riehemann K, Gerke V. A novel ligand of the formyl peptide receptor: annexin I regulates neutrophil extravasation by interacting with the FPR. Mol Cell. 2000;5(5):831–840.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
98. Prieto P, et al. Activation of autophagy in macrophages by pro-resolving lipid mediators. Autophagy. 2015;11(10):1729–1744.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
99. Ridker PM, Thuren T, Zalewski A, Libby P. Interleukin-1β inhibition and the prevention of recurrent cardiovascular events: rationale and design of the Canakinumab Anti-inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS). Am Heart J. 2011;162(4):597–605.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
100. Qamar A, Rader DJ. Effect of interleukin 1β inhibition in cardiovascular disease. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2012;23(6):548–553.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
101. Welsh P, Grassia G, Botha S, Sattar N, Maffia P. Targeting inflammation to reduce cardiovascular disease risk: a realistic clinical prospect? Br J Pharmacol. 2017;174(22):3898–3913.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
102. Ridker PM, et al. Antiinflammatory therapy with canakinumab for atherosclerotic disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(12):1119–1131.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
103. Everett BM, et al. Rationale and design of the Cardiovascular Inflammation Reduction Trial: a test of the inflammatory hypothesis of atherothrombosis. Am Heart J. 2013;166(2):199–207.e15.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
104. Chan ES, Cronstein BN. Molecular action of methotrexate in inflammatory diseases. Arthritis Res. 2002;4(4):266–273.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
105. Fallahi-Sichani M, Flynn JL, Linderman JJ, Kirschner DE. Differential risk of tuberculosis reactivation among anti-TNF therapies is due to drug binding kinetics and permeability. J Immunol. 2012;188(7):3169–3178.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
106. St Clair EW, et al. Combination of infliximab and methotrexate therapy for early rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized, controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50(11):3432–3443.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
107. Breedveld FC, et al. The PREMIER study: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial of combination therapy with adalimumab plus methotrexate versus methotrexate alone or adalimumab alone in patients with early, aggressive rheumatoid arthritis who had not had previous methotrexate treatment. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(1):26–37.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
108. Spite M, et al. Resolvin D2 is a potent regulator of leukocytes and controls microbial sepsis. Nature. 2009;461(7268):1287–1291.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
109. Chiang N, et al. Infection regulates pro-resolving mediators that lower antibiotic requirements. Nature. 2012;484(7395):524–528.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
110. de Oliveira Otto MC, et al. Circulating and dietary omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids and incidence of CVD in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2(6):e000506.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
111. Sperling LS, Nelson JR. History and future of omega-3 fatty acids in cardiovascular disease. Curr Med Res Opin. 2016;32(2):301–311.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
112. No authors listed. Dietary supplementation with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids vitamin E after myocardial infarction: results of the GISSI-Prevenzione trial. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell’Infarto miocardico. Lancet. 1999;354(9177):447–455.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
113. Oikawa S, et al. Suppressive effect of EPA on the incidence of coronary events in hypercholesterolemia with impaired glucose metabolism: sub-analysis of the Japan EPA Lipid Intervention Study (JELIS). Atherosclerosis. 2009;206(2):535–539.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
114. ORIGIN Trial Investigators , et al. n-3 fatty acids and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with dysglycemia. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(4):309–318.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
115. Risk Prevention Study Collaborative Group, et al. n-3 fatty acids in patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(19):1800–1808.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
116. De Caterina R, Zampolli A. From asthma to atherosclerosis — 5-lipoxygenase, leukotrienes, and inflammation. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(1):4–7.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
117. Bäck M. Leukotriene signaling in atherosclerosis and ischemia. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2009;23(1):41–48.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
118. Tardif JC, et al. Treatment with 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor VIA-2291 (Atreleuton) in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(3):298–307.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
119. Gaztanaga J, et al. A phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the effect of VIA-2291, a 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor, on vascular inflammation in patients after an acute coronary syndrome. Atherosclerosis. 2015;240(1):53–60.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
120. Spite M, Clària J, Serhan CN. Resolvins, specialized proresolving lipid mediators, and their potential roles in metabolic diseases. Cell Metab. 2014;19(1):21–36.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
121. Ariel A, Chiang N, Arita M, Petasis NA, Serhan CN. Aspirin-triggered lipoxin A4 and B4 analogs block extracellular signal-regulated kinase-dependent TNF-α secretion from human T cells. J Immunol. 2003;170(12):6266–6272.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
122. Hachicha M, Pouliot M, Petasis NA, Serhan CN. Lipoxin (LX)A4 and aspirin-triggered 15-epi-LXA4 inhibit tumor necrosis factor 1alpha-initiated neutrophil responses and trafficking: regulators of a cytokine-chemokine axis. J Exp Med. 1999;189(12):1923–1930.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
123. Chiang N, Fierro IM, Gronert K, Serhan CN. Activation of lipoxin A(4) receptors by aspirin-triggered lipoxins and select peptides evokes ligand-specific responses in inflammation. J Exp Med. 2000;191(7):1197–1208.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
124. Sun YP, et al. Resolvin D1 and its aspirin-triggered 17R epimer. Stereochemical assignments, anti-inflammatory properties, and enzymatic inactivation. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(13):9323–9334.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
125. Scannell M, et al. Annexin-1 and peptide derivatives are released by apoptotic cells and stimulate phagocytosis of apoptotic neutrophils by macrophages. J Immunol. 2007;178(7):4595–4605.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
126. Arita M, Ohira T, Sun YP, Elangovan S, Chiang N, Serhan CN. Resolvin E1 selectively interacts with leukotriene B4 receptor BLT1 and ChemR23 to regulate inflammation. J Immunol. 2007;178(6):3912–3917.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
127. Arita M, et al. Stereochemical assignment, antiinflammatory properties, and receptor for the omega-3 lipid mediator resolvin E1. J Exp Med. 2005;201(5):713–722.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
128. Oh SF, Pillai PS, Recchiuti A, Yang R, Serhan CN. Pro-resolving actions and stereoselective biosynthesis of 18S E-series resolvins in human leukocytes and murine inflammation. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(2):569–581.
     View this article via: JCI PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
129. Oh SF, Dona M, Fredman G, Krishnamoorthy S, Irimia D, Serhan CN. Resolvin E2 formation and impact in inflammation resolution. J Immunol. 2012;188(9):4527–4534.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
130. Fredman G, Van Dyke TE, Serhan CN. Resolvin E1 regulates adenosine diphosphate activation of human platelets. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30(10):2005–2013.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
131. Perretti M, D’Acquisto F. Annexin A1 and glucocorticoids as effectors of the resolution of inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9(1):62–70.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
132. Dalli J, et al. Resolvin D3 and aspirin-triggered resolvin D3 are potent immunoresolvents. Chem Biol. 2013;20(2):188–201.
     View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar