Trauma-related neuropsychiatric disorders are commonly treated with exposure-based therapy, an approach based on fear extinction, in which fear memory and expression are suppressed by repeated exposure to the inciting fear stimulus. Fear extinction–focused research often investigates mechanisms of fear inhibition, but positive affect may also contribute to facilitating extinction. In this issue of the JCI, Lin et al. used activity-dependent neuronal labeling in a model of fear extinction to tag extinction-activated medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) ensembles, identifying functionally distinct projections to the zona incerta (ZI) and supramamillary nucleus (SuM). While mPFC-ZI projections governed extinction retrieval, mPFC-SuM projections encoded positive affect and reinforced fear extinction persistence. Additionally, Lin et al. discovered that SIRT1-expressing mPFC-SuM extinction-recruited projections control extinction relapse vulnerability, showing that SIRT1 overexpression can be leveraged to reduce fear relapse. Overall, this study shows that key cortico-hypothalamic projections manage extinction retrieval and positive affect to promote fear extinction.
Quan-Son Eric Le, Luis E. Rosas-Vidal
Usage data is cumulative from October 2026 through November 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 1,138 | 0 |
| 485 | 0 | |
| Figure | 440 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 158 | 0 |
| Totals | 2,221 | 0 |
| Total Views | 2,221 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.