Radiotherapy is a key treatment modality in many malignancies, but radiation-induced immunosuppression can undermine its outcomes and diminish the efficacy of combinatorial strategies, like radioimmunotherapy. In this issue of the JCI, Deng et al. implicate cGAS/STING signaling in the recruitment of γδ T cells that drive downstream radioresistance. Radiation-induced microparticles containing double-stranded tumor DNA led to activation of the cGAS/STING pathway in macrophages, promoting γδ T cell recruitment through CCL20 signaling. In mouse models, γδ T cell–dependent recruitment of myeloid-derived suppressor cells and T cell suppression curbed radiotherapy efficacy and drove antitumor immunity. Ablation of γδ T cells improved the efficacy of radiotherapy alone and radiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in mouse models, supporting further investigation of γδ T cell targeting to improve clinical outcomes with radioimmunotherapy. The findings also add complexity to the function of the cGAS/STING pathway in setting the balance between antitumor immunity and immunosuppression.
Brooke C. Braman, David R. Raleigh
Usage data is cumulative from December 2025 through August 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,536 | 213 |
| 638 | 53 | |
| Figure | 261 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 195 | 0 |
| Totals | 3,630 | 266 |
| Total Views | 3,896 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.