Metabolic–inflammatory crosstalk orchestrates muscle repair. Although pyroptosis typically aggravates sterile injury, we demonstrated that GSDME-dependent pyroptotic signaling associated with recruited myeloid cells paradoxically supported regeneration. GSDME expression was induced in postsurgical human muscle injury and murine damage models. Gsdme deficiency delayed functional recovery and exacerbated injury-induced myosteatosis, a pathological form of intramuscular ectopic fat deposition. Time-series and scRNA-seq analyses revealed that GSDME loss shifted the transcriptional program from oxidative metabolism to lipid storage and adipogenesis. Lipidomics confirmed aberrant accumulation of triacylglycerols (TAGs) and sphingolipids in Gsdme-deficient muscle. Single-cell profiling further identified divergent fibro-adipogenic progenitor (FAP) states skewed toward adipogenesis, accompanied by impaired expansion of restorative Lyve1+Cd163+Txnip+ tissue-resident macrophages (TRMs), as validated by multiplex flow cytometry. Blocking CCR2-dependent monocyte recruitment produced regenerative defects comparable with those caused by Gsdme deficiency. Myeloid-specific Gsdme reintroduction rescued TRM expansion and function and curbed FAP adipogenic reprogramming, whereas FAP-specific expression proved ineffective. Mechanistically, IL-18 downstream of GSDME-dependent signaling engaged KLF4/JUN signaling in TRMs, sustaining their reparative and lipid-clearing capacity. This GSDME–IL-18–TRM axis was compromised in aged muscle, yet exogenous IL-18 reversed myosteatosis and accelerated regeneration. Together, these findings suggest that GSDME-dependent pyroptotic signaling can act as a metabolic checkpoint that sustains TRM-driven lipid homeostasis to support muscle regeneration.
Qi Cao, Jian Liu, Gang Huang, Su-Yuan Wang, Guo-Dong Lu, Yong Huang, Yi-Ting Chen, Zhen Zhang, Jiang-Tao Fu, Si-Jia Sun, Xiao-Fei Chen, Chunlin Zhuang, Chunquan Sheng, Fu-Ming Shen, Dong-Jie Li, Pei Wang
Usage data is cumulative from February 2026 through August 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,900 | 32 |
| 986 | 8 | |
| Figure | 1,045 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 806 | 3 |
| Citation downloads | 304 | 0 |
| Totals | 6,041 | 43 |
| Total Views | 6,084 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.