Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • The cGAS-STING pathway: DNA sensing in health and disease (Jun 2026)
    • Neurodegeneration (Mar 2026)
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
KRAS: the Achilles’ heel of pancreas cancer biology
Kristina Drizyte-Miller, Taiwo Talabi, Ashwin Somasundaram, Adrienne D. Cox, Channing J. Der
Kristina Drizyte-Miller, Taiwo Talabi, Ashwin Somasundaram, Adrienne D. Cox, Channing J. Der
View: Text | PDF
Review Series

KRAS: the Achilles’ heel of pancreas cancer biology

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The genetic landscape of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is well-established and dominated by four key genetic driver mutations. Mutational activation of the KRAS oncogene is the initiating genetic event, followed by genetic loss of function of the CDKN2A, TP53, and SMAD4 tumor suppressor genes. Disappointingly, this information has not been leveraged to develop clinically effective targeted therapies for PDAC treatment, where current standards of care remain cocktails of conventional cytotoxic drugs. Nearly all (~95%) PDAC harbors KRAS mutations, and experimental studies have validated the essential role of KRAS mutation in PDAC tumorigenic and metastatic growth. Identified in 1982 as the first gene shown to be aberrantly activated in human cancer, KRAS has been the focus of intensive drug discovery efforts. Widely considered “undruggable,” KRAS has been the elephant in the room for PDAC treatment. This perception was shattered recently with the approval of two KRAS inhibitors for the treatment of KRASG12C-mutant lung and colorectal cancer, fueling hope that KRAS inhibitors will lead to a breakthrough in PDAC therapy. In this Review, we summarize the key role of aberrant KRAS signaling in the biology of pancreatic cancer; provide an overview of past, current, and emerging anti-KRAS treatment strategies; and discuss current challenges that limit the clinical efficacy of directly targeting KRAS for pancreatic cancer treatment.

Authors

Kristina Drizyte-Miller, Taiwo Talabi, Ashwin Somasundaram, Adrienne D. Cox, Channing J. Der

×

Figure 4

Resistance mechanisms to KRASG12C inhibitors and combination strategies.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Resistance mechanisms to KRASG12C inhibitors and combination strategies....
(A) Sequencing of circulating tumor DNA from patients who relapsed on adagrasib, sotorasib, divarasib, or LY3537982 treatment demonstrated that genetic alterations occurred at the level of RAS or in the upstream and downstream components of RAS signaling. RAS-level alterations included mutations and/or amplifications in KRAS and NRAS and mutations in NF1. Upstream signaling alterations included mutations, amplifications, and fusions in RTKs. Downstream signaling alterations included mutational activation of downstream ERK MAPK and PI3K effector signaling components, amplification of MYC, etc. No genetic mutations were found in 50% of patients who relapsed on KRASG12C treatment. (B) Most combination strategies with KRAS inhibitors are based on resistance mechanisms that have been identified in relapsed patients and in preclinical studies that include signal transduction and kinase inhibitors, among others (Tables 3 and 4). (C) Nongenetic mechanisms driving resistance to KRAS inhibitors may include transcriptional reprogramming, changes in cellular states (epithelial to mesenchymal [EMT], adeno-to-squamous carcinoma, or adenocarcinoma to mucinous differentiation), and/or changes in molecular subtypes. MET,mesenchymal to epithelial transition; RASi, RAS inhibitor.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts