Although mammals generally demonstrate limited regenerative capacity compared with amphibians, the digit tip retains remarkable regenerative potential, providing a useful model to study successful mammalian regeneration. This process involves coordinated immune cell activity, vascular remodeling, and tissue reconstruction, yet the molecular checkpoints controlling regenerative versus fibrotic outcomes remain poorly understood. In mammals, regeneration of the digit tip (P3) proceeds through myeloid cell migration, early osteoclast-mediated osteolysis of the distal bone, and subsequent blastema-mediated regeneration. Here we test the hypothesis that lymphatic vessels regulate regenerative capacity by modulating local immune cell dynamics and osteoclast function. Using a lymphatic system–specific reporter line, we discovered that lymphatic vessels grow toward the nail region from the ventral side of the digit during quiescence and after amputation. These lymphatics closely surround, but do not invade, the native or regenerated bone. Unexpectedly, genetic, pharmacological, and surgical inhibition of lymphangiogenesis accelerated early osteolysis through enhanced transition of myeloid cells to osteoclasts, resulting in faster and more robust regeneration. These findings reveal a mechanism linking lymphatic vessel, immune regulation, and bone remodeling, suggesting that targeted manipulation of lymphatics dynamics may enhance regenerative outcomes after musculoskeletal injury.
Neda Vishlaghi, Trisha K. Ghotra, Monisha Mittal, Ji Hae L. Choi, Sneha Korlakunta, Mingquan Yan, Janna L. Crossley, Danielle Griswold-Wheeler, Elnaz Ghotbi, Conan Juan, Shiri Gur-Cohen, Babak Mehrara, David A. Brown, Michael T. Dellinger, Lindsay A. Dawson, Benjamin Levi
Usage data is cumulative from February 2026 through August 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 3,917 | 570 |
| 815 | 138 | |
| Figure | 1,084 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 487 | 43 |
| Citation downloads | 260 | 0 |
| Totals | 6,563 | 751 |
| Total Views | 7,314 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.