Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Inciting mechanisms of cellular injury
  • Shared pathophysiology and response to injury
  • Kidney recovery
  • AKI to CKD transition
  • Future directions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Article has an altmetric score of 44

See more details

Picked up by 4 news outlets
Blogged by 1
Posted by 20 X users
Referenced by 4 Bluesky users
7 readers on Mendeley
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Review Open Access | 10.1172/JCI188358

Adding insult to injury: the spectrum of tubulointerstitial responses in acute kidney injury

Megan L. Baker and Lloyd G. Cantley

1Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, New Haven, Connecticut, USA

Address correspondence to: Megan L. Baker or Lloyd G. Cantley, P.O. Box 208029, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Email: megan.baker@yale.edu (MLB); Email: lloyd.cantley@yale.edu (LGC).

Find articles by Baker, M. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

1Yale University School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Nephrology, New Haven, Connecticut, USA

Address correspondence to: Megan L. Baker or Lloyd G. Cantley, P.O. Box 208029, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Email: megan.baker@yale.edu (MLB); Email: lloyd.cantley@yale.edu (LGC).

Find articles by Cantley, L. in: PubMed | Google Scholar |

Published March 17, 2025 - More info

Published in Volume 135, Issue 6 on March 17, 2025
J Clin Invest. 2025;135(6):e188358. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI188358.
© 2025 Baker et al. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Published March 17, 2025 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) encompasses pathophysiology ranging from glomerular hypofiltration to tubular cell injury and outflow obstruction. This Review will focus on the tubulointerstitial processes that underlie most cases of AKI. Tubular epithelial cell (TEC) injury can occur via distinct insults, including ischemia, nephrotoxins, sepsis, and primary immune-mediated processes. Following these initial insults, tubular cells can activate survival and repair responses or they can develop mitochondrial dysfunction and metabolic reprogramming, cell-cycle arrest, and programmed cell death. Developing evidence suggests that the fate of individual tubular cells to survive and proliferate or undergo cell death or senescence is frequently determined by a biphasic immune response with initial proinflammatory macrophage, neutrophil, and lymphocyte infiltration exacerbating injury and activating programmed cell death, while alternatively activated macrophages and specific lymphocyte subsets subsequently modulate inflammation and promote repair. Functional recovery requires that this reparative phase supports proteolytic degradation of tubular casts, proliferation of surviving TECs, and restoration of TEC differentiation. Incomplete resolution or persistence of inflammation can lead to failed tubular repair, fibrosis, and chronic kidney disease. Despite extensive research in animal models, translating preclinical findings to therapies remains challenging, emphasizing the need for integrated multiomic approaches to advance AKI understanding and treatment.

Introduction

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a syndromic term that is defined and stratified by changes in serum creatinine levels, reflecting reciprocal changes in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), with or without changes in urine output. This method of defining AKI is clinically useful, but encompasses countless distinct pathologic events in the glomerulus, tubules, interstitium, or ureter that result in reduced plasma filtration by the kidney and thereby complicates translation to patient-specific therapeutic intervention in clinical practice. AKI due to physiologically mediated changes in glomerular hemodynamics, such as with hypovolemia or renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor or sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor use, can rapidly recover when the cause is identified and addressed. Many of the glomerular pathologies associated with AKI, including immune-mediated glomerulonephritides, thrombotic microangiopathies, and vasculitides, have specific therapies that can slow or reverse the loss of GFR. However, the loss of GFR that accompanies intrinsic tubular injury has no specific therapy and frequently leads to prolonged AKI, the need for renal replacement therapy, and progression to chronic kidney disease (CKD), end-stage kidney disease, or death. In a study comparing animal models of decreased kidney function due to extracellular fluid volume contraction versus intrinsic kidney injury, RNA-Seq demonstrated that the thousands of induced genes between these two models comprised functionally unrelated signal transduction pathways expressed in different regions of the kidney, suggesting that these two forms of AKI induce distinct biological responses (1). The focus of this Review will be on forms of AKI in which kidney tubular epithelial cell (TEC) injury is the prominent defining feature and for which treatment strategies are lacking.

TEC injury can result from a variety of pathophysiologic processes, and animal models have been developed to recapitulate and mechanistically study the cellular responses that underlie some of the associated clinical scenarios. While serum creatinine elevation defines all instances of AKI, experimental data suggest that the molecular and cellular responses following injury caused by differing stimuli are heterogenous and reflect distinct pathophysiological pathways (2). This is partly reflected by the measurement of renal injury biomarkers that exhibit differential expression patterns in response to distinct insults and the resulting distribution of injury throughout the nephron. Because their accuracy for predicting AKI differs depending on the clinical scenario and none are entirely specific to AKI, the currently validated biomarkers have been slow to gain acceptance in medical practice (3). While clinical use of specific biomarkers can aid in correct diagnosis and early detection of AKI, an equally urgent challenge is to break apart the “syndrome” of AKI into distinct, mechanistically aligned subgroupings that share the same underlying cellular drivers and responses (Figures 1 and 2) and then target those pathways for development of much-needed therapeutic discoveries.

Patterns of epithelial cell injury in response to distinct injury stimuli.Figure 1

Patterns of epithelial cell injury in response to distinct injury stimuli. Defined classes of tubular insults can induce distinct initial mechanisms and distributions of cellular injury. From left to right, macrocirculatory insufficiency in ischemic injury results in mitochondrial dysfunction and cellular metabolic and energy disturbances. In toxin-mediated AKI, the cellular mechanisms of injury are dependent on toxin characteristics and toxin handling within the tubule (i.e., secretion or filtration and accumulation within tubular space or TEC absorption and intracellular accumulation). Septic AKI is characterized by endothelial injury and activation along with TEC injury resulting from both pattern recognition receptor activation on TECs as well as cellular energy and metabolic derangements from macro-and microcirculatory insufficiency. In immune-mediated injury such as AIN, antigens elicit a cell-mediated T cell hypersensitivity immune response either directly or after hydrolysis and processing by tubular cells to form a hapten bridge. PCT, proximal convoluted tubule; PST, proximal straight tubule.

Surviving epithelial cell responses to distinct injury stimuli.Figure 2

Surviving epithelial cell responses to distinct injury stimuli. (A) The repertoire of injury responses by tubular cells that survive the initial insult is limited and is at least in part determined by both the type and severity of injury. Primary responses such as metabolic reprogramming, inflammasome activation, and cast formation often predominate in specific types of initial injury. (B) However, many of the secondary immune responses are shared and can lead to cell-cycle arrest, PCD pathways, and recruitment of secondary immune cells.

Inciting mechanisms of cellular injury

Ischemic injury to tubular epithelium. The most common form of tubular injury in patients occurs due to renal hypoperfusion resulting in TEC ischemia. The kidneys are susceptible to ischemia in large part due to the anatomy of their microcirculation. The cortex receives almost 100% of the blood flowing through the kidneys, whereas the medulla receives only 5%–10% in order to facilitate the process of urinary concentration (4). Proximal TECs (PTECs), the most abundant cell type in the cortex, extend into the outer stripe of the medulla and reabsorb the majority of electrolytes, minerals, glucose, proteins, and other macromolecules from the glomerular filtrate to maintain volume and solute homeostasis, a highly energy-dependent function (4–7). These cells rely on fatty acid oxidation for ATP production to meet their high metabolic demands and are thus highly susceptible to injury or death following reduction in blood flow (8, 9). In the 24–48 hours after severe kidney ischemia, extensive loss of TECs occurs due to both necrotic and programmed cell death (PCD) pathway activation. It remains unknown whether this also occurs in hemodynamic AKI in which no intrinsic injury is clinically documented, although adjudicated cases of hemodynamic AKI and acute tubular injury (ATI) display indistinguishable levels of multiple tubule injury biomarkers including KIM-1, NGAL, and IL-18 (10). Impaired blood flow can also cause injury to vascular endothelium and promote thrombosis, with severely injured peritubular vessels undergoing cell death that can cause peritubular rarefaction, an important contributor in the progression from AKI to the development of CKD (11–13).

Experimental animal models of renal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) have been widely used to study the pathogenesis of ischemic AKI. These models initiate IRI through renal pedicle clamping and release, more closely approximating ischemia during kidney surgery or transplantation than renal ischemia resulting from hypotension or other causes of hypoperfusion. Transcriptional studies that have sought to characterize the validity of murine IRI as a model for human AKI showed clear differences in single-cell gene expression changes occurring during human ATI and mouse IRI, but also revealed substantial overlap for pathway-level changes that support the use of mouse IRI to identify mechanistic responses to ischemia and their cellular origin (14, 15).

It is widely accepted that the proximal straight tubule (S3) sustains the highest degree of injury after IRI (16–20), although the S1 segment is also susceptible to injury because of a lower capacity to generate ATP from glycolysis (21–23) (Figure 1). This general reliance on mitochondrial respiratory chain for sufficient ATP generation makes PTECs highly dependent on oxygen and nutrient delivery (4–7). In the absence of sufficient blood flow, PTECs can quickly develop severe ATP depletion leading to membrane disruption, nuclear shedding, calcium influx, and cell detachment (2, 19, 24). PCD pathways including apoptosis and regulated necrosis are believed to be the primary forms of cell death in AKI (24, 25). Inhibition of apoptosis protects against tubular cell death and reduces kidney function decline following AKI in animal models (25). ATP depletion, oxidative stress, secondary inflammation, and cellular hypoxia are all drivers of PCD in this setting (2, 26).

After injury, detached TECs can be cleared as nonocclusive urinary debris or can aggregate into casts that obstruct the tubule lumen and further reduce GFR (16, 27) (Figure 2). Cellular debris resulting from membrane rupture and cell death in S3, along with tubule narrowing at the S3-thin descending limb (S3-tDL) junction, makes S3 a common site of formation of occlusive casts (19, 28). As discussed below, TLRs expressed on surviving cells detect cellular debris, inducing a secondary immune response that appears to critically determine long-term outcomes for the injured tubule. Interactions between mislocalized proteins on the surface of detached cells within casts and proteins on surviving cells may also serve to anchor casts within the tubular lumen (29). Markedly increased cell detachment at S3 compared to tDL creates an expansion of the distal S3 lumen, exaggerating the bottleneck at the S3-tDL junction (19). In a murine IRI model, tracking of cast formation and movement through multiphoton imaging revealed that visually occlusive casts first appear 12 hours after IRI at the S3-tDL junction and peak at 24 hours with occlusive casts in 99% of S3 and 78% of tDL segments (19). By day 3 after IRI, while more distal nephron segments were cast free, 72% of S3 tubules and 58% of tDL tubules still contained occlusive casts (19). Clearance of these casts by phagocytosis and proteolysis, along with regeneration of the lost TECs, appears to be the tipping point that determines whether that tubule undergoes functional repair or progressive atrophy and serves as a nidus for chronic inflammation (19, 30).

Toxic injury to tubular epithelium. Nephrotoxin injury to the tubulointerstitium is another common form of AKI. The propensity for toxic injury of TECs is linked to their unique ability to reabsorb large amounts of some components of the glomerular filtrate while concentrating other components in the urinary space. This can lead to either toxic luminal concentrations of substances that are not reabsorbed (e.g., oxalate) or toxic intracellular concentrations of substances that are absorbed (e.g., lead, gentamycin) (31, 32) (Figure 1). Toxic injury is typically not limited to the proximal tubule and occurs through a combination of oxidative stress, autophagy, cell-cycle arrest, membrane-lipid peroxidation, and lumen obstruction, ultimately leading to PCD rather than cell necrosis (33). The list of exogenous compounds demonstrated to be toxic to TECs encompasses numerous therapeutic agents, intoxicants, contrast media, and environmental exposures. In recognition of this, the FDA approved a safety biomarker panel in 2018 comprising six biomarkers (cystatin-C, KIM-1, NGAL, NAG, osteopontin, clusterin) to improve detection of renal TEC injury caused by medications undergoing phase I clinical trials (34). Endogenous biomolecules represent a second category of nephrotoxins. Overproduction or excessive release of many molecules that are otherwise nontoxic can result in ATI, including uric acid in tumor lysis syndrome, myoglobin in rhabdomyolysis, and paraproteins in myeloma and other bone marrow dyscrasias. Like the responses seen with exogenous toxins, many endogenously generated toxins induce ATI via membrane injury, oxidative stress, and secondary immune activation, leading to PCD via regulated pathways such as necroptosis and ferroptosis (35, 36).

Septic injury to tubular epithelium. Sepsis is characterized by dysregulated activation of the immune system caused by the release of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) such as lipopolysaccharide by the infecting organism, and damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) including proteins, lipids, and DNA from injured cells (37). Systemically, this can lead to depressed cardiac contractility, vasodilation, and hypotension, with renal hypoperfusion and ATI as discussed above (38). The dysregulated inflammatory response can heighten the secondary immune response to this hypotensive cellular injury, but can also induce tubular injury even in the absence of hypotension. An individual patient’s resulting phenotype of septic AKI depends heavily on their underlying susceptibility, leading to a variety of syndromic endotypes that the clinical presentation cannot easily distinguish (37). This complicates the identification of sepsis-induced AKI in the absence of clinical tools, such as biomarkers, to distinguish the etiology (37). Since biopsy is not frequently performed during sepsis, most of our current understanding of sepsis-induced AKI has been extrapolated from animal models, in vitro cellular studies, and postmortem observations in septic humans (39, 40).

Three mechanisms are consistently identified across injured organ systems during sepsis: inflammation, microcirculatory dysfunction, and metabolic reprogramming (41). The inflammatory response is essential for defending the body against pathogens, but when dysregulated can lead to organ dysfunction (42). PAMPs and DAMPs bind to TLRs on immune cells and TECs, triggering a cascade of signals that produce proinflammatory molecules and renal tubular dysfunction (43, 44). In renal TECs, particularly those expressing TLR2 and TLR4, this results in increased oxidative stress and mitochondrial injury (45, 46). TLR expression was markedly upregulated in all nephron segments in response to sepsis in an animal model (47).

Experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated that even in the absence of macrohemodynamic instability, microcirculatory alterations develop during sepsis through both reduced capillary density and disrupted blood flow and likely play a key role in the development of organ injury (48, 49). Endothelial cell (EC) injury, autonomic nervous system dysregulation, shedding of the glycocalyx, and activation of the coagulation cascade all contribute to microcirculatory alterations in sepsis (50, 51). EC injury and glycocalyx shedding facilitate leukocyte and platelet adhesion, reducing blood flow velocity and increasing the risk of microthrombi formation. This can cause capillary occlusion and prolonged exposure of TECs to inflammatory mediators, leading to vasodilation, increased vascular permeability, and interstitial edema, which impairs TEC perfusion by increasing oxygen diffusion distance and altering convection (48, 51) (Figure 1). Both sluggish flow and increased expression of intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) and vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) in peritubular capillaries prolong leukocyte transit and increase paracrine signaling with kidney dendritic cells (52–54). Overall, prolonged cellular transit time may translate into longer exposure of endothelium and TECs to activated, cytokine-secreting leukocytes, PAMPs, and DAMPs, leading to amplification of the inflammatory signal and greater oxidative stress (41).

During sepsis, metabolic reprogramming in TECs shifts energy use to prioritize cell survival. This involves a mitochondrial-mediated process that optimizes energy expenditure, alters substrate utilization, and counters proapoptotic triggers (55, 56). TECs shift from oxidative phosphorylation to aerobic glycolysis to adapt to the septic environment (55, 57). Maintaining functional mitochondria through processes like mitophagy and biogenesis is critical for cell survival, as these organelles are central to energy production and metabolic reprogramming. In a study comparing high-quality microarray studies of renal gene expression of AKI in 6 different AKI disease models, AKI induced by gram-negative sepsis had the largest number of uniquely regulated genes as compared to other mechanisms of AKI, specifically in mitochondrial genes (2).

Cell-cycle arrest is another protective mechanism TECs employ to conserve energy during sepsis. By halting replication, cells avoid death due to ATP depletion. Markers of cell-cycle arrest, such as TIMP-2 and IGFBP7, have been identified as potential predictors of sepsis-induced AKI, underscoring the importance of this mechanism in human sepsis (58). TECs may also initiate paracrine signaling to neighboring cells to limit cell death, albeit at the expense of reabsorptive function (41).

Primary immune-mediated injury to tubular epithelium. Acute interstitial nephritis (AIN) is a form of AKI characterized by an idiosyncratic delayed hypersensitivity immune reaction that directly, and often selectively, injures TECs. In contrast to ischemic, sepsis-induced, and toxic AKI where tubular injury drives secondary inflammation, inflammation is the primary driver of injury in AIN. The immune response is initiated by antigen-reactive T cells exposed to exogenous antigens processed by TECs or endogenous nephritogenic antigens (59) (Figure 1). In over 75% of cases of biopsy-proven AIN, a drug serves as the inciting antigen, with infection-associated antigens (5%–10%) and autoimmune responses to endogenous proteins (10%–15%) accounting for most of the remainder.

Multiple mechanisms have been identified by which inciting antigens elicit a cell-mediated immune response, including molecular mimicry, serving as a hapten bridge to modify the immunogenicity of native kidney proteins, and toxic injury to the tubulointerstitium producing nephritogenic neoantigens (60–62). Resident peritubular mononuclear phagocytic cells (dendritic cells and macrophages) or injured TECs then function as antigen presenting cells (APCs), expressing antigenic components as peptides located on their surface MHC II molecules (63, 64). Activated APCs can migrate through the kidney lymphatic vessels to regional draining lymph nodes where they present the target antigen to naive T cells, which clonally expand to generate an activated T cell repertoire, including effector T cells that enter the circulation to home back to the kidney. The critical importance of these activated T cells in the pathogenesis of AIN is underscored by the clinical prevalence of AIN in patients taking immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to activate T cell responses to tumor antigens in the treatment of some cancers (65). ICIs can either promote the development of AIN in response to previously tolerated drugs (e.g., NSAIDs and H2 blockers) or induce de novo AIN in the absence of other known drug precipitants, potentially as an autoimmune response to endogenous antigens (66). Tubulitis, characteristic of severe AIN, is a focal lesion where inflammatory cellular infiltrates penetrate the tubular basement membrane with injury to the basolateral surface of adjacent TECs, and likely relies on the presence of target antigen on the TEC itself.

Effector T cells produce injury through two main mechanisms: the release of inflammatory cytokines to facilitate downstream immune responses and direct cell-mediated cytotoxicity via secreted proteases (67–69). One subset of effector T cells, designated Th9, produce IL-9, which leads to differentiation, survival, and tissue accumulation of mast cells in the tubulointerstitium (70, 71). Additionally, these effector T cells mediate recruitment of eosinophils and can activate B cells to produce IgE, which further enhances immune cell recruitment (72). Mast cells appear to be a critical source of TNF-α in allergic diseases, and urinary IL-9 and TNF-α are simultaneously elevated in human AIN (73–75). In the permissive environment of cytokines released from effector T cells and injured parenchymal cells, mast cells and eosinophils release proteases, leukotrienes, superoxides, and peroxidases to additionally perpetuate tissue injury (76, 77). Eosinophils also release major basic protein and eosinophilic cationic protein, which may have additional inflammatory actions (76). CXCL9, a chemokine released by many immune and nonimmune cells in response to IFN-γ, is an even more specific urinary marker for AIN than TNF-α and IL-9 (78). CXCL9 promotes lymphocyte recruitment at sites of inflammation through binding to its receptor CXCR3 and has a role in promoting kidney tubulointerstitial inflammation (78).

Shared pathophysiology and response to injury

Secondary immune-mediated injury. Irrespective of the initial driver of tubular cell injury, there are preserved responses by the surviving tubular, endothelial, and interstitial cells that shape the trajectory of injury and subsequent repair responses. Immediately following injury, resident macrophages serve as a first line of defense against a robust immune response by cloaking sites of damage to prevent excessive immune cell recruitment and inflammatory cascades (79). In IRI mouse models, early injury of PTECs results in transcriptional upregulation of proinflammatory signaling pathways (e.g., ADAM17 and amphiregulin) which result in release of proinflammatory mediators (e.g., TNF-α, MCP-1, IL-6, IL-8, IL-34, and CXCL16) from injured TECs and ECs, overwhelming the resident mononuclear phagocytic cell-protective response (80–85). This leads to the infiltration of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) and monocyte-derived proinflammatory macrophages, as well as lesser numbers of CXCR6+ T cells, to surround the injured tubules within the first 24 hours after injury (80, 86–90). B and T cells continue to infiltrate the kidney after AKI and contribute to ongoing inflammation in complex and subset-specific ways (91–95). CD4+ T cells are particularly important mediators of secondary immune-mediated injury, with Th1 and Th2 subsets exerting differential effects (93, 96, 97).

The tissue immune response is also important in animal models and humans with nephrotoxic tubular injury. For example, in the setting of bone marrow dyscrasias, activation of the STAT1 pathway during TEC metabolism of free light chains (FLCs) induces release of proinflammatory molecules IL-1β and TGF-β (98). Metabolism of monoclonal FLCs can also generate sufficient hydrogen peroxide to activate intracellular redox-sensitive signaling pathways, ultimately leading to cell death (99–102). In animal models of cisplatin-induced AKI, CXCL16 knockout inhibited infiltration of macrophages and T cells into the kidneys, reduced TEC apoptosis, and improved markers of kidney function (103). In oxalate nephropathy, oxalate crystals activate the NOD-like receptor family, pyrin domain containing 3 inflammasome (NALP3, NLRP3, or cryopyrin), resulting in release of IL-1β, macrophage infiltration, and progressive kidney failure (104). In an animal model of aristolochic acid nephropathy, macrophage-specific knockout of IRF4, a known regulator of macrophage migration and phenotype, led to reduced kidney macrophage infiltration following aristolochic acid administration and protection from injury (105).

In this early phase after injury, DAMP release by dying cells results in proinflammatory activation of recruited and resident immune cells, leading to further injury through release of ROS and caspase activation, which facilitates death of sublethally injured TECs. Prevention of this initial PMN and monocyte-derived macrophage infiltration and proinflammatory activation decreases the degree of injury and kidney function decline in animal models (90, 106–111). Proinflammatory M1 macrophages, induced by exposure to IFN-y, LPS, TNF-α, and IL-6 and expressing high levels of inducible nitric oxide synthase 2, IL-12, IL-23, and Ly-6C, appear to be the dominant macrophage phenotype in this initial injury-promoting phase (90).

Mitochondrial dysfunction. The loss of healthy mitochondria in PTECs likely accelerates ATP depletion, cellular injury, and fibrosis development after AKI (112, 113). The dependence on mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation for ATP generation makes PTECs highly oxygen dependent. Insufficient oxygen delivery in the setting of AKI can cause mitochondrial dysfunction, ROS overproduction, and inflammation (114) and may also contribute to cell-cycle arrest (115). Furthermore, release of mitochondrial DNA by injured cells can induce TLR-dependent immune responses and kidney injury progression (116, 117).

Cell-cycle arrest/senescence. After injury, PTECs with DNA damage often undergo cell-cycle arrest at G2/M, which may be protective against genomic instability (118, 119). In several mouse models of acute injury, DNA damage activates a cell-autonomous DNA damage response that is normally protective against kidney function impairment and fibrosis (120). However, prolongation of cell-cycle arrest can lead to cellular senescence, considered an accelerated aging phenotype, that has been linked to a profibrotic secretory phenotype leading to kidney fibrosis (121–123). The earliest onset of cellular senescence occurs within 2 to 3 days after AKI and is reported to be mediated by epithelial TLRs and IL-1 receptors on TECs, with autocrine and paracrine spreading of senescent cells to the surrounding epithelium (124, 125). Therapeutic targeting of senescent cells after AKI has resulted in conflicting results to date (126, 127).

Cell death. Depending on the severity of initial injury and the degree of recruitment and activation of the innate immune response, multiple types of tubular cell death can occur. Apoptosis is a coordinated deconstruction and clearance of cellular components that typically minimizes plasma membrane rupture and thus limits DAMP release and the secondary inflammatory response (24). In contrast, necrotic cell death, regulated or unregulated, results in plasma membrane disruption and extensive release of DAMPs (24). DAMPs serve as strong activators of the innate immune system and drive continued tissue inflammation and injury in a process known as necroinflammation (24). Classical DAMPs are detected by multiligand receptors, such as the receptor for advanced glycosylation end products, NOD-like receptors, RIG-I-like receptors, and TLRs, and activate expression of multiple proteins, such as IL-6, TNF-α, and TGF-β, which serve as chemokines for continued recruitment of immune cells to the site of injury (41, 128). DAMP signaling activates the effectors of the innate immune system that are recruited to the site of injury, such as PMNs and macrophages, but simultaneously stimulates survival pathways in the injured TECs, such as autophagy (129). This aids in clearance of damaged intracellular organelles after injury to promote cell survival, but, when unchecked, may further stimulate ROS generation and lead to cell death instead.

The types of PCD that constitute necroinflammation have received increased attention in recent years in the setting of AKI. Necroptosis, mediated by the RIPK3/MLKL necrosome complex, results in permeabilization of the cell membrane and cell death. RIPK3 and MLKL are upregulated in PTECs after IRI, leading to increased NLRP3 inflammasome activation and IL-1β secretion from proinflammatory macrophages, which in turn increases necrosome formation in PTECs to generate an uncontrolled inflammatory loop (130). Inhibiting necroptosis improved renal outcomes in several animal AKI models (131, 132). Mitochondrial damage also resulted in release of ROS, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), and cardiolipin, which activated the NLRP3 inflammasome, upregulated IL-1β and IL-18, and sustained chronic inflammasome activation after AKI (133).

Other modes of PCD have also been implicated in AKI. Ferroptosis, driven by oxidative stress and iron-dependent phospholipid peroxidation, manifests as a loss of cell membrane integrity and blebbing, shrinking mitochondrial cristae, and increased mitochondrial bilayer density. Ferroptosis may mediate TEC death in rhabdomyolysis-associated AKI, where accumulated myoglobin in the kidney is metabolized to release large amounts of iron (134, 135). Ferroptosis may also occur after various nephrotoxin exposures and after IRI, particularly in the reperfusion phase, which includes excessive ROS production, cascade-amplified inflammatory reactions, and ferritinophagy (136–139) (Figure 2).

Pyroptosis, activated by inflammation-related caspases that cleave gasdermin, can be induced in some types of AKI. Cleaved gasdermin translocates to the membrane and creates pores that permit massive release of intracellular contents into the extracellular space. Increased expression of pyroptosis-triggering caspases was found after IRI and cisplatin-induced AKI, but this pathway may be most consequential in sepsis-induced AKI (140–143) (Figure 2). In animal models, LPS administration can activate the caspase-1/IL-1β pathway during AKI to initiate pyroptosis, and inhibition of pyroptosis is protective in animal models of septic shock (142, 143).

Kidney recovery

While secondary proinflammatory immune responses contribute to the overall degree of cellular injury in AKI, the subsequent coordinated spatiotemporal transition of this immune response is also critical to successful tubular repair (Figure 3). After the wave of proinflammatory M1 macrophage and PMN infiltration into the kidney in the first 24 hours after injury, PMNs egress and macrophages transition to an alternatively activated, proreparative phenotype beginning by day 2 (80, 87, 89, 90, 144). In murine models of IRI, expression of arginase-1 by transitioning macrophages in response to CSF-2 expressed by tubular cells was required for maximal TEC proliferation, which underlies kidney repair after injury (144, 145). CSF-1, the principal macrophage growth and survival factor, is released by surviving TECs to enable macrophage survival during the transition to a reparative phenotype and also promotes proreparative effects through direct autocrine and paracrine action on TECs (87, 146, 147). Macrophage-derived IL-22, retinoic acid receptor ligands, and Wnt/β-catenin signaling also play a role in stimulating repair and regeneration of TECs after ischemic injury (148–151). With successful repair after injury, infiltrated macrophages either egress or undergo apoptosis, whereas more severe or unresolved injury results in macrophage persistence adjacent to injured tubules with transition to a profibrotic phenotype that promotes the activation of interstitial myofibroblasts (152–154). Resident macrophages are additionally critical in the late phases of repair, where they act as scavengers of apoptotic cells and regulate kidney-infiltrating T cells (155–157).

Resolution of AKI.Figure 3

Resolution of AKI. Immediately following injury, dying cells form casts in the tubular lumen in association with Tamm-Horsfall protein while surviving TECs recruit proinflammatory macrophages and lymphocytes to the tubulointerstitium. (Left) With successful repair and recovery after AKI, casts are cleared and proinflammatory macrophages shift to a proreparative phenotype that promotes TEC proliferation and dampens the immune response, allowing TECs to redifferentiate and restore tubule architecture and function. A small subset of Pax2+ tubular progenitors also contribute to regeneration of necrotic epithelial regions (199). (Right) If injury to a particular tubule or region is severe or sustained, the local immune response is amplified with enhanced recruitment of proinflammatory T cells and B cells into the interstitium and persistence of proinflammatory macrophage populations. This can lead to tubular cell G2/M arrest and adoption of a senescence-associated secretory phenotype with release of inflammatory cytokines, growth factors, proteases, and immune modulators that recruit additional proinflammatory macrophages and lymphocytes that sustain the local inflammatory response and can lead to secondary injury to adjacent tubules. This persistent inflammatory milieu promotes prolymphangiogenic signaling, ongoing TEC injury, profibrotic signaling, and progressive impairment of GFR.

Beyond the well-known proinflammatory and tissue-damaging roles of lymphocytes in AKI, subsets of T cells are recognized to play an antiinflammatory role assisting in recovery after AKI. Foxp3+CD4+ Tregs and TCR+CD4–CD8– double-negative (DN) T cells are two such subsets, with expansion of Treg or DN T cell populations promoting kidney recovery after AKI and Treg depletion aggravating dysfunction (158–161). Similarly, while B cells and plasma cells contribute to inflammation after AKI through production of immunoglobulins and subsequent engagement of cellular immunity and potential recruitment of the complement system, a subset of regulatory B cells produce IL-10 and are antiinflammatory in other disease models, and may be protective after AKI (91, 162, 163). Finally, the ECs of the repairing kidney may substantially contribute to kidney recovery after AKI through regulating inflammatory responses or by providing proreparative signals (164–167).

After ATI, brisk replication by surviving TECs replaces lost TECs and restores tubular architecture (168, 169). The replacement of lost TECs involves both cell-autonomous survival responses and reversal of the proinflammatory innate immune response. During the initial injury phase, surviving TECs shed their brush border and downregulate transporter expression. These dedifferentiated cells, often KIM-1+ and Sox9+, acquire a proliferative phenotype and constitute the bulk of cells that undergo division to replace the lost TECs (169–171). In proliferating PTECs, the transcription factor Foxm1 was induced early in injury following epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) stimulation and was required for epithelial proliferation in vitro, suggesting that EGFR/FOXM1-dependent signaling is required for PTEC proliferative repair (172). Sox9 deactivation after epithelial repair was also required to prevent WNT pathway–induced fibroproliferative effects and chronic injury (173). It is well established that tubular epithelium has a limited regenerative potential after cellular loss, which may impact the degree of repair that is possible in cases of severe injury or in older individuals (174, 175).

KIM-1 expression has been used as an injury marker in AKI, as it is highly upregulated on the surface of injured kidney TECs. KIM-1–expressing PTECs in animal models and cell-line studies acquire attributes of semiprofessional phagocytes, with the specific ability to recognize apoptotic cell-surface–specific epitopes (176). KIM-1 is also suggested to facilitate an important immunomodulatory role of PTECs through involvement in antigen presentation facilitated by MHC I and II, leading to the suppression of CD4+ T cell activation and an increase in Treg recruitment (177). Thus, upregulation of KIM-1 is likely to be an important component of the injured PTEC survival response.

AKI to CKD transition

Even a single AKI episode is associated with an increased risk of CKD (178, 179). In humans and animal models, an episode of AKI due to TEC injury often leads to unresolved injury of some tubules, even when markers of GFR return to baseline values, a risk that increases with age (180, 181). While exact mechanisms underlying the AKI-to-CKD transition remain incompletely understood, crosstalk between these chronically injured, or failed-repair, tubules and the immune system appears to play a prominent role (84, 182). The largest molecular reference atlas of the human kidney to date (including >400,000 cells or nuclei from 35 reference tissue donors and 36 AKI and CKD tissue donors) demonstrated several tissue myeloid and lymphoid immune cell populations in accordance with previous kidney atlas studies (183–186). Mutually exclusive niches enriched in either myeloid or T cells were identified, with myeloid-rich neighborhoods associated with “adaptive” TEC states and T cell–rich neighborhoods associated with “degenerative” TEC states (183). In patients with AKI, T cell and neutrophil numbers negatively correlate with recovery of estimated GFR (84). Animal studies suggest that macrophages persisting beyond the initial repair phase may promote the development of a neutrophil and T cell–mediated proinflammatory environment contributing to progressive tubule damage. In a study comparing mice subjected to unilateral IRI with either contralateral nephrectomy (where tubule repair predominates) or contralateral kidney intact (where tubule atrophy predominates), kidneys undergoing atrophy had more macrophages with higher expression of homing chemokines, correlating with a second wave of proinflammatory neutrophil and T cell recruitment and increased tubular injury (84). When PMNs and T cells were depleted after day 5, the late tubule atrophy response was reduced.

While successful kidney recovery after AKI is marked by rapid proliferation of many sublethally injured TECs, some injured TECs instead undergo cell-cycle arrest in the G2 phase and maintain persistently lower expression of solute and solvent transporters (187). In these TECs, specific transcriptional programs (Snai1, Twist1) promote TGF-β1 induction of cell-cycle arrest (187). G2/M cell-cycle arrest both limits cellular repair and regenerative potential and leads to the development of a pathologic secretome that promotes a proinflammatory and profibrotic environment (121, 187). This is thought to be particularly relevant in severe as compared to moderate ATI, and its physiologic purpose is incompletely understood (121).

VCAM-1–expressing PTECs, identified as “failed repair” or “late injured” PTECs, also express a proinflammatory and profibrotic phenotype predictive of tubular atrophy (83, 84, 188, 189). As a marker of atrophic and CKD transitioning tubules, VCAM-1 demonstrates a later onset of expression compared with other common tubule injury markers such as KIM-1 (21, 84, 188). VCAM-1 expression is induced through NF-κB–dependent TNF-α and IL-1β signaling and mediates increased immune cell adhesion to TECs to promote further tubular injury (190). This may underlie the formation of tertiary lymphoid tissues, ectopic lymphoid structures that portend a poor renal outcome and are prominent near injured PTECs in models of AKI in aging (83, 191).

Growth of lymphatic vessels within the kidney, or lymphangiogenesis, has been associated with numerous forms of kidney disease, including AKI, and is strongly associated with interstitial fibrosis in CKD (192, 193). The strongest prolymphangiogenic signaling molecules, VEGF-C and -D, are secreted by renal TECs and macrophages after AKI (194). Recent single-cell RNA-Seq (scRNA-Seq) data in IRI and cisplatin-induced injury mouse models suggest that lymphatic ECs may actively shape the immune response to AKI (195). Renal lymphatic ECs demonstrated changes in expression of lymphangiogenic signaling pathways, major histocompatibility complex genes, and genes involved in T cell differentiation, antigen presentation, and cytokine signaling (195). The role of the lymphatics and lymphangiogenesis in promoting and/or sustaining tubulointerstitial disease remains incompletely explored with conflicting published data, highlighting the need to increase the research focus on this aspect of the immune response in kidney injury and repair.

Future directions

Despite a vast body of research, the management of TEC injury in AKI has remained virtually unchanged for decades, and options for disease-modifying therapies are nonexistent. One challenge to the successful targeting of AKI therapies is in the timing of delivery. Numerous therapies delivered prior to AKI have shown promise in animal settings; however, their translation to clinical practice has proven difficult. Using a functional biomarker such as creatinine to define AKI imposes a delay in the diagnosis of AKI and makes the clinical application of a treatment that is intended to be delivered concurrent with AKI clinically impractical. A second factor underlying the lack of successful translation of findings from preclinical studies to clinical therapies is the use of simplified laboratory models of AKI in healthy young animals under controlled conditions, when clinical AKI typically occurs in older patients with complex medical histories and exposures. Furthermore, while they are an irreplaceable tool in scientific discovery, the best-matched animal models have an immune repertoire and responses that differ from humans in potentially important ways (196–198).

The recent advent of both dissociated and spatially resolved single cellular modalities allowing for the robust, specific interrogation of proteomic, transcriptomic, epigenomic, and metabolomic features of human kidney biopsies holds enormous potential for discovery. Integration of the vast amount of such data, which is quickly becoming accessible, will lead to improved insights into the molecular patterns being activated in human TEC injury states and thus allow us to move away from simplistic classifications of AKI as “pre-renal” and “ATI” and instead group kidney injury responses mechanistically based on cellular responses and trajectories. Such data integration is a goal of the Kidney Precision Medicine Project (KPMP), an ambitious, multi-year project funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), which pools expertise and resources across many institutions to harness this new frontier of discovery toward advancing our knowledge and treatment options for AKI.

Acknowledgments

MLB is supported by American Diabetes Association Postdoctoral Fellow grant 7-24-PDF-63. LGC is supported by grants from the NIDDK and KPMP, including DK126815, DK93771, and DK133768.

Address correspondence to: Megan L. Baker or Lloyd G. Cantley, P.O. Box 208029, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA. Email: megan.baker@yale.edu (MLB); Email: lloyd.cantley@yale.edu (LGC).

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: LGC is an advisor for Pfizer’s CardioRenal group and for a new start-up, Dropshot, that is pursuing postcardiopulmonary bypass AKI studies in pig models.

Copyright: © 2025, Baker et al. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2025;135(6):e188358. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI188358.

References
  1. Xu K, et al. Unique transcriptional programs identify subtypes of AKI. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28(6):1729–1740.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  2. Hultstrom M, et al. Comparison of acute kidney injury of different etiology reveals in-common mechanisms of tissue damage. Physiol Genomics. 2018;50(3):127–141.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Bufkin KB, et al. Review of the limitations of current biomarkers in acute kidney injury clinical practices. SAGE Open Med. 2024;12:20503121241228446.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  4. Brezis M, et al. Renal ischemia: a new perspective. Kidney Int. 1984;26(4):375–383.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  5. O’Connor PM. Renal oxygen delivery: matching delivery to metabolic demand. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2006;33(10):961–967.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  6. Bhargava P, Schnellmann RG. Mitochondrial energetics in the kidney. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017;13(10):629–646.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  7. Guder WG, Ross BD. Enzyme distribution along the nephron. Kidney Int. 1984;26(2):101–111.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  8. Kang HM, et al. Defective fatty acid oxidation in renal tubular epithelial cells has a key role in kidney fibrosis development. Nat Med. 2015;21(1):37–46.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Schaub JA, et al. Proximal tubular oxidative metabolism in acute kidney injury and the transition to CKD. Kidney360. 2021;2(2):355–364.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  10. Koyner JL, et al. Adjudication of etiology of acute kidney injury: experience from the TRIBE-AKI multi-center study. BMC Nephrol. 2014;15:105.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Menshikh A, et al. Capillary rarefaction is more closely associated with CKD progression after cisplatin, rhabdomyolysis, and ischemia-reperfusion-induced AKI than renal fibrosis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2019;317(5):F1383–F1397.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  12. Gaupp C, et al. Reconfiguration and loss of peritubular capillaries in chronic kidney disease. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):19660.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Kwiatkowska E, et al. Renal microcirculation injury as the main cause of ischemic acute kidney injury development. Biology (Basel). 2023;12(2):327.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  14. Liu J, et al. Molecular characterization of the transition from acute to chronic kidney injury following ischemia/reperfusion. JCI Insight. 2017;2(18):e94716.
    View this article via: JCI Insight CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  15. Zhou J, et al. Unified mouse and human kidney single-cell expression atlas reveal commonalities and differences in disease states. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023;34(11):1843–1862.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  16. Basile DP, et al. Pathophysiology of acute kidney injury. Compr Physiol. 2012;2(2):1303–1353.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  17. Bonventre JV. Molecular response to cytotoxic injury: role of inflammation, MAP kinases, and endoplasmic reticulum stress response. Semin Nephrol. 2003;23(5):439–448.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  18. Linkermann A, et al. Regulated cell death in AKI. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(12):2689–2701.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Shin NS, et al. Characterization of temporospatial distribution of renal tubular casts by nephron tracking after ischemia-reperfusion injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2022;322(3):F322–F334.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Venkatachalam MA, et al. Ischemic damage and repair in the rat proximal tubule: differences among the S1, S2, and S3 segments. Kidney Int. 1978;14(1):31–49.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  21. Bordoni L, et al. Longitudinal tracking of acute kidney injury reveals injury propagation along the nephron. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):4407.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  22. Bugarski M, et al. Multiphoton imaging reveals axial differences in metabolic autofluorescence signals along the kidney proximal tubule. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2018;315(6):F1613–F1625.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  23. Ruegg CE, Mandel LJ. Bulk isolation of renal PCT and PST. II. Differential responses to anoxia or hypoxia. Am J Physiol. 1990;259(1 pt 2):F176–F185.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  24. Sanz AB, et al. Regulated cell death pathways in kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2023;19(5):281–299.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  25. Ying Y, et al. Targeted deletion of p53 in the proximal tubule prevents ischemic renal injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(12):2707–2716.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  26. Barnett LMA, Cummings BS. Nephrotoxicity and renal pathophysiology: a contemporary perspective. Toxicol Sci. 2018;164(2):379–390.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Tanner GA, Sophasan S. Kidney pressures after temporary renal artery occlusion in the rat. Am J Physiol. 1976;230(4):1173–1181.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  28. Donohoe JF, et al. Tubular leakage and obstruction after renal ischemia: structural-functional correlations. Kidney Int. 1978;13(3):208–222.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Noiri E, et al. Pathophysiology of renal tubular obstruction: therapeutic role of synthetic RGD peptides in acute renal failure. Kidney Int. 1995;48(5):1375–1385.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Yang L, et al. KIM-1-mediated phagocytosis reduces acute injury to the kidney. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(4):1620–1636.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  31. Kwiatkowska E, et al. The mechanism of drug nephrotoxicity and the methods for preventing kidney damage. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(11):6109.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  32. Krishnan N, et al. Toxic nephropathies of the tubulointerstitium: core curriculum 2024. Am J Kidney Dis. 2024;83(5):659–676.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  33. Petejova N, et al. Acute toxic kidney injury. Ren Fail. 2019;41(1):576–594.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  34. Leptak C, Stockbridge NL. Qualification Determination Letter: DDTBMQ000014. FDA; 2018. https://bioporto.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/2018-Biomarker-Qualification-Determination-Letter.pdf.
  35. Ma D, et al. Inhibition of ferroptosis attenuates acute kidney injury in rats with severe acute pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2021;66(2):483–492.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Anders HJ. Necroptosis in acute kidney injury. Nephron. 2018;139(4):342–348.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  37. Zarbock A, et al. Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: consensus report of the 28th Acute Disease Quality Initiative workgroup. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2023;19(6):401–417.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  38. Mehta RL, et al. Sepsis as a cause and consequence of acute kidney injury: program to improve care in acute renal disease. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(2):241–248.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  39. Peerapornratana S, et al. Acute kidney injury from sepsis: current concepts, epidemiology, pathophysiology, prevention and treatment. Kidney Int. 2019;96(5):1083–1099.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  40. Rosen S, Heyman SN. Difficulties in understanding human “acute tubular necrosis”: limited data and flawed animal models. Kidney Int. 2001;60(4):1220–1224.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Gomez H, et al. A unified theory of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury: inflammation, microcirculatory dysfunction, bioenergetics, and the tubular cell adaptation to injury. Shock. 2014;41(1):3–11.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  42. Hotchkiss RS, Karl IE. The pathophysiology and treatment of sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(2):138–150.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  43. Emlet DR, et al. Sepsis-associated AKI: epithelial cell dysfunction. Semin Nephrol. 2015;35(1):85–95.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  44. Kawai C, et al. Circulating extracellular histones are clinically relevant mediators of multiple organ injury. Am J Pathol. 2016;186(4):829–843.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  45. Dellepiane S, et al. Detrimental cross-talk between sepsis and acute kidney injury: new pathogenic mechanisms, early biomarkers and targeted therapies. Crit Care. 2016;20:61.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  46. Kalakeche R, et al. Endotoxin uptake by S1 proximal tubular segment causes oxidative stress in the downstream S2 segment. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22(8):1505–1516.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  47. El-Achkar TM, et al. Sepsis induces changes in the expression and distribution of Toll-like receptor 4 in the rat kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2006;290(5):F1034–F1043.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  48. Post EH, et al. Renal perfusion in sepsis: from macro- to microcirculation. Kidney Int. 2017;91(1):45–60.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  49. Holthoff JH, et al. Resveratrol improves renal microcirculation, protects the tubular epithelium, and prolongs survival in a mouse model of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2012;81(4):370–378.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  50. De Backer D, et al. Microcirculatory alterations: potential mechanisms and implications for therapy. Ann Intensive Care. 2011;1(1):27.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  51. Verma SK, Molitoris BA. Renal endothelial injury and microvascular dysfunction in acute kidney injury. Semin Nephrol. 2015;35(1):96–107.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  52. Wu X, et al. The role of ICAM-1 in endotoxin-induced acute renal failure. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2007;293(4):F1262–F1271.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  53. Wu L, et al. Peritubular capillary dysfunction and renal tubular epithelial cell stress following lipopolysaccharide administration in mice. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2007;292(1):F261–F268.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  54. Goddard CM, et al. Prolonged leukocyte transit time in coronary microcirculation of endotoxemic pigs. Am J Physiol. 1995;269(4 pt 2):H1389–H1397.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  55. Gomez H, et al. Metabolic reprogramming and tolerance during sepsis-induced AKI. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017;13(3):143–151.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  56. Singer M, et al. Multiorgan failure is an adaptive, endocrine-mediated, metabolic response to overwhelming systemic inflammation. Lancet. 2004;364(9433):545–548.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  57. Waltz P, et al. Sepsis results in an altered renal metabolic and osmolyte profile. J Surg Res. 2016;202(1):8–12.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  58. Kashani K, et al. Discovery and validation of cell cycle arrest biomarkers in human acute kidney injury. Crit Care. 2013;17(1):R25.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  59. Wilson CB. Nephritogenic tubulointerstitial antigens. Kidney Int. 1991;39(3):501–517.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  60. Border WA, et al. Antitubular basement-membrane antibodies in methicillin-associated interstitial nephritis. N Engl J Med. 1974;291(8):381–384.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  61. Mayrer AR, et al. Immunopathogenesis of chronic pyelonephritis. Am J Med. 1983;75(1b):59–70.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  62. Sherlock JE. Interstitial nephritis in rats produced by E. coli in adjuvant: immunological findings. Clin Exp Immunol. 1977;30(1):154–159.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  63. Ferenbach D, Hughes J. Macrophages and dendritic cells: what is the difference? Kidney Int. 2008;74(1):5–7.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  64. Raghavan R, Eknoyan G. Acute interstitial nephritis - a reappraisal and update. Clin Nephrol. 2014;82(3):149–162.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  65. Cortazar FB, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated AKI: a multicenter study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;31(2):435–446.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  66. Herrmann SM, Perazella MA. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and immune-related adverse renal events. Kidney Int Rep. 2020;5(8):1139–1148.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  67. Mann R, et al. Effector T cell differentiation in experimental interstitial nephritis. I. The development and modulation of effector lymphocyte maturation by I-J+ regulatory T cells. J Immunol. 1987;138(12):4200–4208.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  68. Neilson EG. Pathogenesis and therapy of interstitial nephritis. Kidney Int. 1989;35(5):1257–1270.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  69. McCluskey RT, Bhan AK. Cell-mediated mechanisms in renal diseases. Kidney Int Suppl. 1982;11:S6–12.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  70. Godfraind C, et al. Intraepithelial infiltration by mast cells with both connective tissue-type and mucosal-type characteristics in gut, trachea, and kidneys of IL-9 transgenic mice. J Immunol. 1998;160(8):3989–3996.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  71. Ciprandi G, et al. Serum interleukin-9 levels are associated with clinical severity in children with atopic dermatitis. Pediatr Dermatol. 2013;30(2):222–225.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  72. Zand L, et al. The role of type I hypersensitivity reaction and IgE-mediated mast cell activation in acute interstitial nephritis. Clin Nephrol. 2015;84(3):138–144.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  73. Kim YS, et al. Mast cells play a key role in the development of late airway hyperresponsiveness through TNF-alpha in a murine model of asthma. Eur J Immunol. 2007;37(4):1107–1115.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  74. Gordon JR, Galli SJ. Mast cells as a source of both preformed and immunologically inducible TNF-alpha/cachectin. Nature. 1990;346(6281):274–276.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  75. Moledina DG, et al. Urine TNF-α and IL-9 for clinical diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis. JCI Insight. 2019;4(10):e127456.
    View this article via: JCI Insight CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  76. Gleich GJ, Loegering DA. Immunobiology of eosinophils. Annu Rev Immunol. 1984;2:429–459.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  77. Spry CJ. Synthesis and secretion of eosinophil granule substances. Immunol Today. 1985;6(11):332–335.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  78. Moledina DG, et al. Identification and validation of urinary CXCL9 as a biomarker for diagnosis of acute interstitial nephritis. J Clin Invest. 2023;133(13):e168950.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  79. Uderhardt S, et al. Resident macrophages cloak tissue microlesions to prevent neutrophil-driven inflammatory damage. Cell. 2019;177(3):541–555.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  80. Kefaloyianni E, et al. ADAM17 substrate release in proximal tubule drives kidney fibrosis. JCI Insight. 2016;1(13):e87023.
    View this article via: JCI Insight CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  81. Dong X, et al. Resident dendritic cells are the predominant TNF-secreting cell in early renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Kidney Int. 2007;71(7):619–628.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  82. Sato Y, et al. CD153/CD30 signaling promotes age-dependent tertiary lymphoid tissue expansion and kidney injury. J Clin Invest. 2022;132(2):e146071.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  83. Yoshikawa T, et al. Tertiary lymphoid tissues are microenvironments with intensive interactions between immune cells and proinflammatory parenchymal cells in aged kidneys. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023;34(10):1687–1708.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  84. Xu L, et al. Immune-mediated tubule atrophy promotes acute kidney injury to chronic kidney disease transition. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):4892.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  85. Baek JH, et al. IL-34 mediates acute kidney injury and worsens subsequent chronic kidney disease. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(8):3198–3214.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  86. Xu L, et al. Tubular GM-CSF promotes late MCP-1/CCR2-mediated fibrosis and inflammation after ischemia/reperfusion injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;30(10):1825–1840.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  87. Zhang MZ, et al. CSF-1 signaling mediates recovery from acute kidney injury. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(12):4519–4532.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  88. Hull TD, et al. Heme oxygenase-1 regulates myeloid cell trafficking in AKI. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(9):2139–2151.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  89. Li L, et al. The chemokine receptors CCR2 and CX3CR1 mediate monocyte/macrophage trafficking in kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury. Kidney Int. 2008;74(12):1526–1537.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  90. Lee S, et al. Distinct macrophage phenotypes contribute to kidney injury and repair. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22(2):317–326.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  91. Jang HR, et al. B cells limit repair after ischemic acute kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21(4):654–665.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  92. Ascon M, et al. Renal ischemia-reperfusion leads to long term infiltration of activated and effector-memory T lymphocytes. Kidney Int. 2009;75(5):526–535.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  93. Burne MJ, et al. Identification of the CD4(+) T cell as a major pathogenic factor in ischemic acute renal failure. J Clin Invest. 2001;108(9):1283–1290.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  94. Awad AS, et al. Selective sphingosine 1-phosphate 1 receptor activation reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury in mouse kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2006;290(6):F1516–F1524.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  95. Wang S, et al. Decreased renal ischemia-reperfusion injury by IL-16 inactivation. Kidney Int. 2008;73(3):318–326.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  96. Day YJ, et al. Renal ischemia-reperfusion injury and adenosine 2A receptor-mediated tissue protection: the role of CD4+ T cells and IFN-gamma. J Immunol. 2006;176(5):3108–3114.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  97. Yokota N, et al. Contrasting roles for STAT4 and STAT6 signal transduction pathways in murine renal ischemia-reperfusion injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2003;285(2):F319–F325.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  98. Ying WZ, et al. Immunoglobulin light chains generate proinflammatory and profibrotic kidney injury. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(7):2792–2806.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  99. Wang PX, Sanders PW. Immunoglobulin light chains generate hydrogen peroxide. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007;18(4):1239–1245.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  100. Ying WZ, et al. Pivotal role of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 in monoclonal free light chain-mediated apoptosis. Am J Pathol. 2012;180(1):41–47.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  101. Ying WZ, et al. Immunoglobulin light chains activate nuclear factor-κB in renal epithelial cells through a Src-dependent mechanism. Blood. 2011;117(4):1301–1307.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  102. Basnayake K, et al. Immunoglobulin light chains activate tubular epithelial cells through redox signaling. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21(7):1165–1173.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  103. Liang H, et al. CXCL16 regulates cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury. Oncotarget. 2016;7(22):31652–31662.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  104. Ermer T, et al. Oxalate, inflammasome, and progression of kidney disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2016;25(4):363–371.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  105. Sasaki K, et al. Macrophage interferon regulatory factor 4 deletion ameliorates aristolochic acid nephropathy via reduced migration and increased apoptosis. JCI Insight. 2022;7(4):e150723.
    View this article via: JCI Insight CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  106. Kelly KJ, et al. Intercellular adhesion molecule-1-deficient mice are protected against ischemic renal injury. J Clin Invest. 1996;97(4):1056–1063.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  107. Savransky V, et al. Role of the T-cell receptor in kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury. Kidney Int. 2006;69(2):233–238.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  108. Li L, Okusa MD. Blocking the immune response in ischemic acute kidney injury: the role of adenosine 2A agonists. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol. 2006;2(8):432–444.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  109. Miura M, et al. Neutralization of Gro alpha and macrophage inflammatory protein-2 attenuates renal ischemia/reperfusion injury. Am J Pathol. 2001;159(6):2137–2145.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  110. Day YJ, et al. Renal ischemia-reperfusion injury and adenosine 2A receptor-mediated tissue protection: role of macrophages. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2005;288(4):F722–F731.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  111. Jo SK, et al. Macrophages contribute to the initiation of ischaemic acute renal failure in rats. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006;21(5):1231–1239.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  112. Perry HM, et al. Dynamin-related protein 1 deficiency promotes recovery from AKI. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;29(1):194–206.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  113. Wei Q, et al. MicroRNA-668 represses MTP18 to preserve mitochondrial dynamics in ischemic acute kidney injury. J Clin Invest. 2018;128(12):5448–5464.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  114. Honda T, et al. The role of oxidative stress and hypoxia in renal disease. Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2019;38(4):414–426.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  115. Liu T, et al. MicroRNA-493 targets STMN-1 and promotes hypoxia-induced epithelial cell cycle arrest in G2/M and renal fibrosis. FASEB J. 2019;33(2):1565–1577.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  116. Chung KW, et al. Mitochondrial damage and activation of the STING pathway lead to renal inflammation and fibrosis. Cell Metab. 2019;30(4):784–799.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  117. Maekawa H, et al. Mitochondrial damage causes inflammation via cGAS-STING signaling in acute kidney injury. Cell Rep. 2019;29(5):1261–1273.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  118. Koyano T, et al. The p21 dependent G2 arrest of the cell cycle in epithelial tubular cells links to the early stage of renal fibrosis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):12059.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  119. Matos DA, et al. ATR protects the genome against R loops through a MUS81-triggered feedback loop. Mol Cell. 2020;77(3):514–527.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  120. Kishi S, et al. Proximal tubule ATR regulates DNA repair to prevent maladaptive renal injury responses. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(11):4797–4816.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  121. Yang L, et al. Epithelial cell cycle arrest in G2/M mediates kidney fibrosis after injury. Nat Med. 2010;16(5):535–143.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  122. Ferenbach DA, Bonventre JV. Mechanisms of maladaptive repair after AKI leading to accelerated kidney ageing and CKD. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2015;11(5):264–276.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  123. Canaud G, et al. Cyclin G1 and TASCC regulate kidney epithelial cell G2-M arrest and fibrotic maladaptive repair. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11(476):eaav4754.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  124. Jin H, et al. Epithelial innate immunity mediates tubular cell senescence after kidney injury. JCI Insight. 2019;4(2):e125490.
    View this article via: JCI Insight CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  125. Lemos DR, et al. Interleukin-1β activates a MYC-dependent metabolic switch in kidney stromal cells necessary for progressive tubulointerstitial fibrosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;29(6):1690–1705.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  126. Wolstein JM, et al. INK4a knockout mice exhibit increased fibrosis under normal conditions and in response to unilateral ureteral obstruction. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010;299(6):F1486–F1495.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  127. Luo C, et al. Wnt9a promotes renal fibrosis by accelerating cellular senescence in tubular epithelial cells. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;29(4):1238–1256.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  128. Donato R. RAGE: a single receptor for several ligands and different cellular responses: the case of certain S100 proteins. Curr Mol Med. 2007;7(8):711–724.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  129. Tang D, et al. PAMPs and DAMPs: signal 0s that spur autophagy and immunity. Immunol Rev. 2012;249(1):158–175.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  130. Chen H, et al. RIPK3-MLKL-mediated necroinflammation contributes to AKI progression to CKD. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(9):878.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  131. Martin-Sanchez D, et al. TWEAK and RIPK1 mediate a second wave of cell death during AKI. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(16):4182–4187.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  132. Hsu WH, et al. Compound K inhibits priming and mitochondria-associated activating signals of NLRP3 inflammasome in renal tubulointerstitial lesions. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020;35(1):74–85.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  133. Szeto HH, et al. Mitochondria protection after acute ischemia prevents prolonged upregulation of IL-1β and IL-18 and arrests CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28(5):1437–1449.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  134. Qiao O, et al. Ferroptosis in acute kidney injury following crush syndrome: A novel target for treatment. J Adv Res. 2023;54:211–222.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  135. Martines AM, et al. Iron metabolism in the pathogenesis of iron-induced kidney injury. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2013;9(7):385–398.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  136. Eleftheriadis T, et al. Cell death patterns due to warm ischemia or reperfusion in renal tubular epithelial cells originating from human, mouse, or the native hibernator hamster. Biology (Basel). 2018;7(4):48.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  137. Tang LJ, et al. Ferroptosis occurs in phase of reperfusion but not ischemia in rat heart following ischemia or ischemia/reperfusion. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2021;394(2):401–410.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  138. Linkermann A, et al. Synchronized renal tubular cell death involves ferroptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(47):16836–16841.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  139. Li J, et al. Emerging significance and therapeutic targets of ferroptosis: a potential avenue for human kidney diseases. Cell Death Dis. 2023;14(9):628.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  140. Miao N, et al. The cleavage of gasdermin D by caspase-11 promotes tubular epithelial cell pyroptosis and urinary IL-18 excretion in acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2019;96(5):1105–1120.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  141. Yang JR, et al. Ischemia-reperfusion induces renal tubule pyroptosis via the CHOP-caspase-11 pathway. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2014;306(1):F75–F84.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  142. Yang CC, et al. Sialic acid rescues repurified lipopolysaccharide-induced acute renal failure via inhibiting TLR4/PKC/gp91-mediated endoplasmic reticulum stress, apoptosis, autophagy, and pyroptosis signaling. Toxicol Sci. 2014;141(1):155–165.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  143. Wang Z, et al. Zebrafish GSDMEb cleavage-gated pyroptosis drives septic acute kidney injury in vivo. J Immunol. 2020;204(7):1929–1942.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  144. Huen SC, et al. GM-CSF promotes macrophage alternative activation after renal ischemia/reperfusion injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(6):1334–1345.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  145. Shin NS, et al. Arginase-1 is required for macrophage-mediated renal tubule regeneration. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022;33(6):1077–1086.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  146. Menke J, et al. CSF-1 signals directly to renal tubular epithelial cells to mediate repair in mice. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(8):2330–2342.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  147. Wang Y, et al. Proximal tubule-derived colony stimulating factor-1 mediates polarization of renal macrophages and dendritic cells, and recovery in acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2015;88(6):1274–1282.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  148. Lin SL, et al. Macrophage Wnt7b is critical for kidney repair and regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(9):4194–4199.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  149. Kulkarni OP, et al. Toll-like receptor 4-induced IL-22 accelerates kidney regeneration. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(5):978–989.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  150. Xu MJ, et al. IL-22 ameliorates renal ischemia-reperfusion injury by targeting proximal tubule epithelium. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(5):967–977.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  151. Chiba T, et al. Retinoic acid signaling coordinates macrophage-dependent injury and repair after AKI. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(2):495–508.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  152. Duffield JS. Cellular and molecular mechanisms in kidney fibrosis. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(6):2299–2306.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  153. Kim MG, et al. The role of M2 macrophages in the progression of chronic kidney disease following acute kidney injury. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0143961.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  154. Lin SL, et al. Bone marrow Ly6Chigh monocytes are selectively recruited to injured kidney and differentiate into functionally distinct populations. J Immunol. 2009;183(10):6733–6743.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  155. Park JG, et al. Kidney residency of VISTA-positive macrophages accelerates repair from ischemic injury. Kidney Int. 2020;97(5):980–994.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  156. Kim MG, et al. Depletion of kidney CD11c+ F4/80+ cells impairs the recovery process in ischaemia/reperfusion-induced acute kidney injury. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25(9):2908–2921.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  157. Puranik AS, et al. Kidney-resident macrophages promote a proangiogenic environment in the normal and chronically ischemic mouse kidney. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):13948.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  158. Kinsey GR, et al. Regulatory T cells suppress innate immunity in kidney ischemia-reperfusion injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(8):1744–1753.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  159. Kim MG, et al. IL-2/anti-IL-2 complex attenuates renal ischemia-reperfusion injury through expansion of regulatory T cells. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24(10):1529–1536.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  160. Gandolfo MT, et al. Foxp3+ regulatory T cells participate in repair of ischemic acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2009;76(7):717–729.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  161. Lee K, et al. Double-negative T cells have a reparative role after experimental severe ischemic acute kidney injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2024;326(6):F942–F956.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  162. Matsushita T, et al. Regulatory B cells inhibit EAE initiation in mice while other B cells promote disease progression. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(10):3420–3430.
    View this article via: JCI PubMed Google Scholar
  163. Renner B, et al. B cell subsets contribute to renal injury and renal protection after ischemia/reperfusion. J Immunol. 2010;185(7):4393–4400.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  164. Kapitsinou PP, et al. Endothelial HIF-2 mediates protection and recovery from ischemic kidney injury. J Clin Invest. 2014;124(6):2396–2409.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  165. Perry HM, et al. Endothelial sphingosine 1‑phosphate receptor‑1 mediates protection and recovery from acute kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(11):3383–3393.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  166. Kida Y, et al. Endothelial sirtuin 1 inactivation enhances capillary rarefaction and fibrosis following kidney injury through Notch activation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2016;478(3):1074–1079.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  167. Vasko R, et al. Endothelial sirtuin 1 deficiency perpetrates nephrosclerosis through downregulation of matrix metalloproteinase-14: relevance to fibrosis of vascular senescence. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(2):276–291.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  168. Duffield JS, et al. Restoration of tubular epithelial cells during repair of the postischemic kidney occurs independently of bone marrow-derived stem cells. J Clin Invest. 2005;115(7):1743–1755.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  169. Humphreys BD, et al. Intrinsic epithelial cells repair the kidney after injury. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2(3):284–291.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  170. Chang-Panesso M, Humphreys BD. Cellular plasticity in kidney injury and repair. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2017;13(1):39–46.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  171. Kumar S, et al. Sox9 activation highlights a cellular pathway of renal repair in the acutely injured mammalian kidney. Cell Rep. 2015;12(8):1325–1338.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  172. Chang-Panesso M, et al. FOXM1 drives proximal tubule proliferation during repair from acute ischemic kidney injury. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(12):5501–5517.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  173. Aggarwal S, et al. SOX9 switch links regeneration to fibrosis at the single-cell level in mammalian kidneys. Science. 2024;383(6685):eadd6371.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  174. Takaori K, et al. Severity and frequency of proximal tubule injury determines renal prognosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27(8):2393–2406.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  175. Schmitt R, et al. Zag expression during aging suppresses proliferation after kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19(12):2375–2383.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  176. Ichimura T, et al. Kidney injury molecule-1 is a phosphatidylserine receptor that confers a phagocytic phenotype on epithelial cells. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(5):1657–1668.
    View this article via: JCI CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  177. Brooks CR, et al. KIM-1-/TIM-1-mediated phagocytosis links ATG5-/ULK1-dependent clearance of apoptotic cells to antigen presentation. EMBO J. 2015;34(19):2441–2464.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  178. Coca SG, et al. Chronic kidney disease after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kidney Int. 2012;81(5):442–448.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  179. Chawla LS, Kimmel PL. Acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease: an integrated clinical syndrome. Kidney Int. 2012;82(5):516–524.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  180. Ishani A, et al. Acute kidney injury increases risk of ESRD among elderly. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(1):223–228.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  181. Schmitt R, Cantley LG. The impact of aging on kidney repair. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2008;294(6):F1265–F1272.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  182. Muto Y, et al. Single cell transcriptional and chromatin accessibility profiling redefine cellular heterogeneity in the adult human kidney. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):2190.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  183. Lake BB, et al. An atlas of healthy and injured cell states and niches in the human kidney. Nature. 2023;619(7970):585–594.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  184. Hansen J, et al. A reference tissue atlas for the human kidney. Sci Adv. 2022;8(23):eabn4965.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  185. Singh N, et al. Development of a 2-dimensional atlas of the human kidney with imaging mass cytometry. JCI Insight. 2019;4(12):e129477.
    View this article via: JCI Insight CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  186. Stewart BJ, et al. Spatiotemporal immune zonation of the human kidney. Science. 2019;365(6460):1461–1466.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  187. Lovisa S, et al. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition induces cell cycle arrest and parenchymal damage in renal fibrosis. Nat Med. 2015;21(9):998–1009.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  188. Kirita Y, et al. Cell profiling of mouse acute kidney injury reveals conserved cellular responses to injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(27):15874–15883.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  189. Gerhardt LMS, et al. Single-nuclear transcriptomics reveals diversity of proximal tubule cell states in a dynamic response to acute kidney injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(27):e2026684118.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  190. Melchinger I, et al. VCAM-1 mediates proximal tubule-immune cell cross talk in failed tubule recovery during AKI-to-CKD transition. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2024;327(4):F610–F622.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  191. Sato Y, et al. The roles of tertiary lymphoid structures in chronic diseases. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2023;19(8):525–537.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  192. Baker ML, Cantley LG. The lymphatic system in kidney disease. Kidney360. 2023;4(6):e841–e850.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  193. Donnan MD, et al. The lymphatics in kidney health and disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2021;17(10):655–675.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  194. Zarjou A, et al. Dynamic signature of lymphangiogenesis during acute kidney injury and chronic kidney disease. Lab Invest. 2019;99(9):1376–1388.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  195. Creed HA, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing identifies response of renal lymphatic endothelial cells to acute kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2023;35(5):549–565.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  196. Zschaler J, et al. Differences in innate immune response between man and mouse. Crit Rev Immunol. 2014;34(5):433–454.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  197. Masopust D, et al. Of mice, dirty mice, and men: using mice to understand human immunology. J Immunol. 2017;199(2):383–388.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  198. Mestas J, Hughes CC. Of mice and not men: differences between mouse and human immunology. J Immunol. 2004;172(5):2731–2738.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
  199. Lazzeri E, et al. Endocycle-related tubular cell hypertrophy and progenitor proliferation recover renal function after acute kidney injury. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1344.
    View this article via: CrossRef PubMed Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (March 17, 2025): Electronic publication

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

Article has an altmetric score of 44
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Inciting mechanisms of cellular injury
  • Shared pathophysiology and response to injury
  • Kidney recovery
  • AKI to CKD transition
  • Future directions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts

Picked up by 4 news outlets
Blogged by 1
Posted by 20 X users
Referenced by 4 Bluesky users
7 readers on Mendeley
See more details