Exposure to traumatic stress is common in the general population. Variation in the brain’s molecular encoding of stress potentially contributes to the heterogeneous clinical outcomes in response to traumatic experiences. For instance, only a minority of those exposed to trauma will develop post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Risk for PTSD is at least partially heritable, with a growing number of genetic factors identified through GWAS. A major limitation of genetic studies is that they capture only the genetic component of risk, whereas PTSD by definition requires an environmental traumatic exposure. Furthermore, the extent, timing, and type of trauma affects susceptibility. Here, we discuss the molecular mechanisms of PTSD risk together with gene × environment interactions, with a focus on how either might inform genetic screening for individuals at high risk for disease, reveal biological mechanisms that might one day yield novel therapeutics, and impact best clinical practices even today. To close, we discuss the interaction of trauma with sex, gender, and race, with a focus on the implications for treatment. Altogether, we suggest that predicting, preventing, and treating PTSD will require integrating both genotypic and environmental information.
Carina Seah, Anne Elizabeth Sidamon-Eristoff, Laura M. Huckins, Kristen J. Brennand
Usage data is cumulative from November 2025 through November 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 3,004 | 414 |
| 467 | 35 | |
| Figure | 272 | 0 |
| Citation downloads | 330 | 0 |
| Totals | 4,073 | 449 |
| Total Views | 4,522 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.