Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a leading cause of global liver-related mortality. Bacterial infection, especially in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, commonly triggers ACLF and is difficult to treat with antibiotics. Therefore, finding alternative strategies for preventing and managing bacterial infection is an urgent priority. Here, we observed that patients with bacterial infection and decompensated cirrhosis, as well as ACLF mice, exhibited lower fecal panose levels than uninfected controls. Megamonas funiformis, with 4α-glucanosyltransferase (4αGT) as a key enzyme for panose production, was identified as a potential panose producer. Animal experiments demonstrated that panose efficiently reduced liver injury and extended survival in ACLF mice by mitigating bacterial infection. Further results revealed that panose enhanced resistance to bacterial infection by inhibiting oxidative stress–induced gut barrier disruption, thereby limiting bacterial dissemination. Mechanistically, panose interacted with the solute carrier family 7 member 11 (SLC7A11, also known as xCT) protein to boost antioxidant glutathione levels in intestinal epithelial cells. These findings highlight panose’s potential in preventing bacterial infection, offering a valuable insight into mitigating ACLF progression.
Jiaxin Li, Shihao Xie, Meiling Chen, Changze Hong, Yuqi Chen, Fengyuan Lyu, Niexin Tang, Tianqi Chen, Lingyan Zhao, Weihao Zou, Hongjuan Peng, Jingna Bao, Peng Gu, Bernd Schnabl, Jinjun Chen, Peng Chen
Usage data is cumulative from August 2025 through August 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 2,396 | 696 |
| 709 | 267 | |
| Figure | 1,107 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 693 | 234 |
| Citation downloads | 290 | 0 |
| Totals | 5,195 | 1,197 |
| Total Views | 6,392 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.