To evaluate the roles of iatrogenic hypoglycemia and diabetes per se in the pathogenesis of defective hormonal counterregulation against hypoglycemia in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), nondiabetic, and spontaneously diabetic BB/Wor rats were studied using a euglycemic/hypoglycemic clamp. In nondiabetic rats, recurrent (4 wk) insulin-induced hypoglycemia (mean daily glucose, MDG, 59 mg/dl) dramatically reduced glucagon and epinephrine responses by 84 and 94%, respectively, to a standardized glucose fall from 110 to 50 mg/dl. These deficits persisted for > 4 d after restoring normoglycemia, and were specific for hypoglycemia, with normal glucagon and epinephrine responses to arginine and hypovolemia, respectively. After 4 wk of normoglycemia, hormonal counterregulation increased, with the epinephrine, but not the glucagon response reaching control values. In diabetic BB rats (MDG 245 mg/dl with intermittent hypoglycemia), glucagon and epinephrine counterregulation were reduced by 86 and 90%, respectively. Chronic iatrogenic hypoglycemia (MDG 52 mg/dl) further suppressed counterregulation. Prospective elimination of hypoglycemia (MDG 432 mg/dl) improved, but did not normalize hormonal counterregulation. In diabetic rats, the glucagon defect appeared to be specific for hypoglycemia, whereas deficient epinephrine secretion also occurred during hypovolemia. We concluded that both recurrent hypoglycemia and the diabetic state independently lead to defective hormonal counterregulation. These data suggest that in IDDM iatrogenic hypoglycemia magnifies preexisting counterregulatory defects, thereby increasing the risk of severe hypoglycemia.
A M Powell, R S Sherwin, G I Shulman
Usage data is cumulative from January 2024 through January 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 163 | 6 |
59 | 37 | |
Scanned page | 307 | 7 |
Citation downloads | 51 | 0 |
Totals | 580 | 50 |
Total Views | 630 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.