Although insulin is extremely potent in regulating glucose transport in insulin-sensitive tissues, all tissues are capable of taking up glucose by facilitated diffusion by means of a noninsulin-mediated glucose uptake (NIMGU) system. Several reports have estimated that in the postabsorptive state the majority of glucose disposal occurs via a NIMGU mechanism. However, these estimates have been either derived or extrapolated in normal humans. In the present study we have directly measured NIMGU rates in 11 normal (C) and 7 Type II noninsulin-dependent diabetic subjects (NIDDM; mean +/- SE fasting serum glucose, 249 +/- 24 mg/dl). To accomplish this, the serum glucose was clamped at a desired level during a period of insulin deficiency induced by a somatostatin infusion (SRIF, 550 micrograms/h). With a concomitant [3-3H]glucose infusion, we could isotopically quantitate glucose disposal rates (Rd) during basal (basal insulin present) and insulin-deficient (SRIF) conditions. With this approach we found that (a) basal Rd was greater in NIDDM than in C, 274 +/- 31 vs. 150 +/- 7 mg/min, due to elevated hepatic glucose output, (b) NIMGU composes 75 +/- 5% of basal Rd in C and 71 +/- 4% in NIDDM, (c) NIDDMS have absolute basal NIMGU rates that are twice that of C (195 +/- 23 vs. 113 +/- 8 mg/min, P less than 0.05), (d) when C were studied under conditions of insulin deficiency (SRIF infusion) and at a serum glucose level comparable to that of the NIDDM group (250 mg/dl), their rates of NIMGU were the same as that of the NIDDM group (186 +/- 19 vs. 195 +/- 23 mg/min; NS). We conclude that (a) in the postabsorptive state, NIMGU is the major pathway for glucose disposal for both C and NIDDM; (b) for a given glucose level the efficiency of NIMGU (NIMGU divided by serum glucose level) is equal in C and NIDDM, but since basal Rd is elevated in NIDDMs their absolute basal rates of NIMGU are higher; and (c) elevated basal rates of NIMGU in NIDDM may play a role in the pathogenesis of the late complications of diabetes.
A D Baron, O G Kolterman, J Bell, L J Mandarino, J M Olefsky
Usage data is cumulative from February 2024 through February 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 205 | 2 |
62 | 24 | |
Scanned page | 210 | 2 |
Citation downloads | 40 | 0 |
Totals | 517 | 28 |
Total Views | 545 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.