Gas-liquid chromatography (GLC) was used to study normal serum and serum from patients with septicemia caused by a variety of bacteria and by Candida albicans. The gas chromatograms of seven sera from six patients with septicemia due to C. albicans were found to be significantly and reproducibly different from those of normal sera. Chromatograms of serum from 19 bacteremic patients were indistinguishable from normals. The major peaks present in chromatograms of normal sera were identified by GLC and mass spectroscopy as the methyl esters of palmitic, oleic, linoleic, and stearic acids. In addition to these peaks, serum from patients with candidemia contained abnormal peaks that were also present in cultures of C. albicans grown in normal serum and in washed C. albicans harvested from cultures in yeast nitrogen base broth. Chromatograms from 11 cases of mucosal candidates differed little from normal and were easily distinguished from those of fungemia patients. Chromatograms of serum from two of four patients with deep-invasive candidiasis were indistinguishable from those of fungemia and reverted to normal after infections were eradicated.
Geraldine G. Miller, Michael W. Witwer, Abraham I. Braude, Charles E. Davis
Usage data is cumulative from August 2023 through August 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 146 | 0 |
81 | 18 | |
Scanned page | 198 | 11 |
Citation downloads | 31 | 0 |
Totals | 456 | 29 |
Total Views | 485 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.