Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Emerging therapeutic strategies in breast cancer (Oct 2026)
    • The cGAS-STING pathway: DNA sensing in health and disease (Jun 2026)
    • Neurodegeneration (Mar 2026)
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles
  • Search Articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

The Mechanics of Esophageal Muscle Contraction. EVIDENCE OF AN INOTROPIC EFFECT OF GASTRIN
Sidney Cohen, Fe Green
Sidney Cohen, Fe Green
View: Text | PDF
Research Article

The Mechanics of Esophageal Muscle Contraction. EVIDENCE OF AN INOTROPIC EFFECT OF GASTRIN

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

To compare the mechanical properties of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and esophageal circular smooth muscle, force-velocity determinations were made under various physiological conditions. Isotonic and isometric recordings of opossum circular muscle were used to obtain the velocity of shortening and force, respectively, during alterations in: (a) initial muscle length (preload), (b) afterload, (c) calcium concentration, and (d) gastrin I. Muscle contraction was elicited to the neurogenic response at the termination of electrical stimulation. A change in preload (muscle length) altered the peak force (Po) developed during an afterloaded contraction, but had only a minor effect on the maximum velocity of shortening (V max). At the length of optimal tension development, Lo, (preload, 1.5 g), the LES muscle had a V max of 6.1±0.2 mm/s and a Po of 17.7±0.7 g. The esophageal muscle at its Lo (preload, 2.0 g) had a V max of 6.3±0.5 mm/s and a Po of 18.1±1.2 g. A decrease in calcium from 2.5 mM to 1.0 mM significantly reduced the V max and Po of all muscle, but an increase in calcium to 5.0 mM increased these parameters only minimally. At a calcium of 1.0 mM, gastrin I increased both V max and Po of all muscle. This inotropic effect of gastrin I occurred at lower concentrations in LES muscle than in muscle from the upper esophagus. The power (force × velocity) and work (force × muscle shortening) of esophageal and LES muscle were calculated from these data. Both the work and power generated during esophageal and LES muscle contraction were determined by: (a) the initial muscle length as produced by the preload, (b) the afterload against which the muscle was contracting, and (c) the contractility of inotropism of the muscle, that is, the force-velocity curve on which the muscle was operating.

Authors

Sidney Cohen, Fe Green

×

Usage data is cumulative from November 2025 through November 2026.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 389 30
PDF 255 9
Scanned page 1,182 0
Citation downloads 244 0
Totals 2,070 39
Total Views 2,109
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts