Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • The cGAS-STING pathway: DNA sensing in health and disease (Jun 2026)
    • Neurodegeneration (Mar 2026)
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Androgen receptor functions as transcriptional repressor of cancer-associated fibroblast activation
Andrea Clocchiatti, Soumitra Ghosh, Maria-Giuseppina Procopio, Luigi Mazzeo, Pino Bordignon, Paola Ostano, Sandro Goruppi, Giulia Bottoni, Atul Katarkar, Mitchell Levesque, Peter Kölblinger, Reinhard Dummer, Victor Neel, Berna C. Özdemir, G. Paolo Dotto
Andrea Clocchiatti, Soumitra Ghosh, Maria-Giuseppina Procopio, Luigi Mazzeo, Pino Bordignon, Paola Ostano, Sandro Goruppi, Giulia Bottoni, Atul Katarkar, Mitchell Levesque, Peter Kölblinger, Reinhard Dummer, Victor Neel, Berna C. Özdemir, G. Paolo Dotto
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Dermatology Oncology

Androgen receptor functions as transcriptional repressor of cancer-associated fibroblast activation

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The aging-associated increase of cancer risk is linked with stromal fibroblast senescence and concomitant cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF) activation. Surprisingly little is known about the role of androgen receptor (AR) signaling in this context. We have found downmodulated AR expression in dermal fibroblasts underlying premalignant skin cancer lesions (actinic keratoses and dysplastic nevi) as well as in CAFs from the 3 major skin cancer types, squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), basal cell carcinomas, and melanomas. Functionally, decreased AR expression in primary human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) from multiple individuals induced early steps of CAF activation, and in an orthotopic skin cancer model, AR loss in HDFs enhanced tumorigenicity of SCC and melanoma cells. Forming a complex, AR converged with CSL/RBP-Jκ in transcriptional repression of key CAF effector genes. AR and CSL were positive determinants of each other’s expression, with BET inhibitors, which counteract the effects of decreased CSL, restoring AR expression and activity in CAFs. Increased AR expression in these cells overcame the consequences of CSL loss and was by itself sufficient to block the growth and tumor-enhancing effects of CAFs on neighboring cancer cells. As such, the findings establish AR as a target for stroma-focused cancer chemoprevention and treatment.

Authors

Andrea Clocchiatti, Soumitra Ghosh, Maria-Giuseppina Procopio, Luigi Mazzeo, Pino Bordignon, Paola Ostano, Sandro Goruppi, Giulia Bottoni, Atul Katarkar, Mitchell Levesque, Peter Kölblinger, Reinhard Dummer, Victor Neel, Berna C. Özdemir, G. Paolo Dotto

×

Figure 10

AR and CSL physically interact in primary HDFs.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
AR and CSL physically interact in primary HDFs.
(A) Proximity ligation a...
(A) Proximity ligation assays (PLAs) with antibodies against AR and CSL of 2 HDF strains with or without CSL gene silencing as specificity control. Red fluorescence puncta resulting from the juxtaposition of anti-AR and anti-CSL antibodies were visualized by confocal microscopy with concomitant DAPI nuclear staining. Shown are representative images and quantification of number of puncta per cell. Scale bar: 10 μm. Values of PLA puncta for each individual cell are indicated with mean ± SD. n(cell measurements per condition) = 35; ***P < 0.005, 2-tailed unpaired t test. (B) PLAs with antibodies against AR and CSL in 3 HDF strains in the absence or presence of the AR agonist DHT (10 nM, 24 hours). Scale bar: 10 μm. Values of PLA puncta for each individual cell are indicated with mean ± SD. n(HDF strains) = 3, n(CAF strains) = 3; ***P < 0.005, 2-tailed unpaired t test. Additional PLAs carried out in HDFs versus CAFs are shown in Supplemental Figure 10. (C) Reciprocal coimmunoprecipitation assays of CSL and AR association. HDF total cell extracts were immunoprecipitated with anti-AR or anti-CSL rabbit polyclonal antibodies or nonimmune IgG (mock). Immunoblotting was carried out with anti-AR or anti-CSL mouse monoclonal antibodies. (D) Total cell extracts of 2 HDF strains and WI38 lung fibroblasts were processed for RNA immunoprecipitation with anti-CSL antibodies versus nonimmune IgGs. Immunoprecipitated RNAs were analyzed by RT-qPCR with specific primers for HOTAIR lncRNA, SRA lncRNA, H19 lncRNA, and GAPDH mRNA. Results are expressed as fold enrichment in immunoprecipitates with anti-CSL antibodies versus nonimmune IgG (dashed line), and values for each HDF strain are indicated as dots with mean ± SD. n(fibroblast strains) = 3; ***P < 0.005, 2-tailed unpaired t test.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts