The requested figure was not found.
Advertisement
Erratum Free access | 10.1172/JCI72968
Find articles by Al-aidaroos, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Find articles by Yuen, H. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Find articles by Guo, K. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Find articles by Zhang, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Find articles by Chung, T. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Find articles by Chng, W. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Find articles by Zeng, Q. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Published October 1, 2013 - More info
Metastasis-associated phosphatase of regenerating liver-3 (PRL-3) has pleiotropic effects in driving cancer progression, yet the signaling mechanisms of PRL-3 are still not fully understood. Here, we provide evidence for PRL-3–induced hyperactivation of EGFR and its downstream signaling cascades in multiple human cancer cell lines. Mechanistically, PRL-3–induced activation of EGFR was attributed primarily to transcriptional downregulation of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B), an inhibitory phosphatase for EGFR. Functionally, PRL-3–induced hyperactivation of EGFR correlated with increased cell growth, promigratory characteristics, and tumorigenicity. Moreover, PRL-3 induced cellular addiction to EGFR signaling, as evidenced by the pronounced reversion of these oncogenic attributes upon EGFR-specific inhibition. Of clinical significance, we verified elevated PRL-3 expression as a predictive marker for favorable therapeutic response in a heterogeneous colorectal cancer (CRC) patient cohort treated with the clinically approved anti-EGFR antibody cetuximab. The identification of PRL-3–driven EGFR hyperactivation and consequential addiction to EGFR signaling opens new avenues for inhibiting PRL-3–driven cancer progression. We propose that elevated PRL-3 expression is an important clinical predictive biomarker for favorable anti-EGFR cancer therapy.
Abdul Qader Omer Al-aidaroos, Hiu Fung Yuen, Ke Guo, Shu Dong Zhang, Tae-Hoon Chung, Wee Joo Chng, Qi Zeng
Original citation: J Clin Invest. 2013;123(8):3459–3471. doi:10.1172/JCI66824.
Citation for this erratum: J Clin Invest. 2013;123(10):4540. doi:10.1172/JCI72968.
In Figure 7, C and D, the term AG-1478 was written incorrectly. The correctly labeled figure parts are below.
The JCI regrets the error.