Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • The cGAS-STING pathway: DNA sensing in health and disease (Jun 2026)
    • Neurodegeneration (Mar 2026)
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Journal stats
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
The ability of LCRMP-1 to promote cancer invasion by enhancing filopodia formation is antagonized by CRMP-1
Szu-Hua Pan, Yu-Chih Chao, Pei-Fang Hung, Hsuan-Yu Chen, Shuenn-Chen Yang, Yih-Leong Chang, Chen-Tu Wu, Cheng-Chi Chang, Wen-Lung Wang, Wing-Kai Chan, Yi-Ying Wu, Ting-Fang Che, Lu-Kai Wang, Chien-Yu Lin, Yung-Chie Lee, Min-Liang Kuo, Chau-Hwang Lee, Jeremy J.W. Chen, Tse-Ming Hong, Pan-Chyr Yang
Szu-Hua Pan, Yu-Chih Chao, Pei-Fang Hung, Hsuan-Yu Chen, Shuenn-Chen Yang, Yih-Leong Chang, Chen-Tu Wu, Cheng-Chi Chang, Wen-Lung Wang, Wing-Kai Chan, Yi-Ying Wu, Ting-Fang Che, Lu-Kai Wang, Chien-Yu Lin, Yung-Chie Lee, Min-Liang Kuo, Chau-Hwang Lee, Jeremy J.W. Chen, Tse-Ming Hong, Pan-Chyr Yang
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Oncology

The ability of LCRMP-1 to promote cancer invasion by enhancing filopodia formation is antagonized by CRMP-1

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Metastasis is a predominant cause of death in patients with cancer. It is a complex multistep process that needs to be better understood if we are to develop new approaches to managing tumor metastasis. Tumor cell invasion of the local stroma is suppressed by collapsin response mediator protein-1 (CRMP-1). Recently, we identified a long isoform of CRMP-1 (LCRMP-1), expression of which correlates with cancer cell invasiveness and poor clinical outcome in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we report that LCRMP-1 overexpression in noninvasive human cell lines enhanced filopodia formation, cancer cell migration, and invasion via stabilization of actin. This effect required a highly conserved N-terminal region of LCRMP-1 as well as the WASP family verprolin-homologous protein-1/actin nucleation pathway (WAVE-1/actin nucleation pathway). Furthermore, LCRMP-1 appeared to act downstream of Cdc42, a Rho family protein known to be involved in actin rearrangement. In addition, LCRMP-1 associated with CRMP-1, which downregulated cancer cell metastasis by interrupting the association of LCRMP-1 and WAVE-1. Finally, we found that high-level expression of LCRMP-1 and low-level expression of CRMP-1 were associated with lymph node metastasis and poor survival in patients with NSCLC. In sum, we show that LCRMP-1 and CRMP-1 have opposing functions in regulating cancer cell invasion and metastasis and propose that this pathway may serve as a potential anticancer target.

Authors

Szu-Hua Pan, Yu-Chih Chao, Pei-Fang Hung, Hsuan-Yu Chen, Shuenn-Chen Yang, Yih-Leong Chang, Chen-Tu Wu, Cheng-Chi Chang, Wen-Lung Wang, Wing-Kai Chan, Yi-Ying Wu, Ting-Fang Che, Lu-Kai Wang, Chien-Yu Lin, Yung-Chie Lee, Min-Liang Kuo, Chau-Hwang Lee, Jeremy J.W. Chen, Tse-Ming Hong, Pan-Chyr Yang

×

Figure 6

Reciprocal regulation of cancer invasion by LCRMP-1 and CRMP-1.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Reciprocal regulation of cancer invasion by LCRMP-1 and CRMP-1.
(A) Less...
(A) Less-invasive CL1-0 cells, which typically express endogenous CRMP-1 but not LCRMP-1, were transfected with different amounts of pCMV-Tag 2A–LCRMP-1. Protein levels were confirmed by immunoblotting. Equal amounts of pEGFP were cotransfected into the cells as a control of transfection efficiency. Percentage of GFP-transfected cells was quantified from immunofluorescence. Invasiveness was measured by modified Boyden chamber invasion assay (n = 3) (left). The identical experiment, except for plasmid transfected (pCMV-Tag 2A-CRMP-1), performed in highly invasive CL1-5 cells, which endogenously express LCRMP-1 but not CRMP-1 (right). (B) Effects of LCRMP-1 and CRMP-1 on morphology in CL1-0 or CL1-5. Cells were transfected with pEGFP, pEGFP-LCRMP-1, or pEGFP-CRMP-1. Actin was visualized with rhodamine-conjugated phalloidin. Number of filopodia per cell was calculated (n = 20 cells per group). (C) pEGFP-LCRMP-1 or pEGFP were cotransfected with pDsRed-CRMP-1 into CL1-0 cells to detect localization of exogenous LCRMP-1 and CRMP-1 in interphase, metaphase, and telophase (n = 20 cells per group). Arrowheads indicate the place in which only GFP-LCRMP-1 was present. (D and E) Lysates of CL1-0 cells cotransfected with (D) Flag-tagged LCRMP-1 and Myc-tagged CRMP-1 and lysates of (E) H522 cells (15 mg) were immunoprecipitated for (D) Flag-tagged LCRMP-1 and (E) endogenous LCRMP-1. Presence of (D) exogenous or (E) endogenous LCRMP-1 and CRMP-1 was analyzed by immunoblotting. Arrows indicate CRMP-1 and LCRMP-1 proteins (numbers indicate the kDa of each examined protein; “#16-2” refers to the clone number of anti–CRMP-1 antibody). (F) HA-tagged CRMP-1 proteins were produced by in vitro transcription/translation and pulled down with GST–LCRMP-1 proteins. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, and P values were calculated by 2-sided Student’s t test (n = 3 experiments). Original magnification, ×1,000 (B and C); ×4,000 (C, insets).

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts