Most scientists learn how to review papers by being thrown into the deep end of the pool: here’s a paper, write a review. Perhaps this is not the best way to keep an enterprise afloat. But what should be included in a review? What should the tone of a review be? Here I want to outline the specifics of what we at the JCI are looking for in a referee report.
Ushma S. Neill
Title and authors | Publication | Year |
---|---|---|
[How to: write a review].
Kolb-Wetterau C, Dávidová P, Kohnen T |
2024 | |
Scientific Publishing in Biomedicine: A Brief History of Scientific Journals.
Ghasemi A, Mirmiran P, Kashfi K, Bahadoran Z |
International Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism | 2022 |
How to create a scientific masterpiece: an update for 2019
Ushma S. Neill |
Journal of Clinical Investigation | 2019 |
Editors' Perspectives on Enhancing Manuscript Quality and Editorial Decisions Through Peer Review and Reviewer Development
Kristin K Janke, Andrew S Bzowyckyj, Andrew P Traynor |
American journal of pharmaceutical education | 2017 |