Diabetes is associated with defective β cell function and altered β cell mass. The mechanisms regulating β cell mass and its adaptation to insulin resistance are unknown. It is unclear whether compensatory β cell hyperplasia is achieved via proliferation of existing β cells or neogenesis from progenitor cells embedded in duct epithelia. We have used transgenic mice expressing a mutant form of the forkhead-O1 transcription factor (FoxO1) in both pancreatic ductal and endocrine β cells to assess the contribution of these 2 compartments to islet expansion. We show that the mutant FoxO1 transgene prevents β cell replication in 2 models of β cell hyperplasia, 1 due to peripheral insulin resistance (Insulin receptor transgenic knockouts) and 1 due to ectopic local expression of IGF2 (Elastase-IGF2 transgenics), without affecting insulin secretion. In contrast, we failed to detect a specific effect of the FoxO1 transgene on the number of periductal β cells. We propose that β cell compensation to insulin resistance is a proliferative response of existing β cells to growth factor signaling and requires FoxO1 nuclear exclusion.
Haruka Okamoto, Marta Letizia Hribal, Hua V. Lin, William R. Bennett, ndrew Ward,, Domenico Accili
Usage data is cumulative from December 2023 through December 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 479 | 62 |
511 | 34 | |
Figure | 258 | 6 |
Table | 83 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 46 | 0 |
Totals | 1,377 | 102 |
Total Views | 1,479 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.