BACKGROUND Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) frequently receive RBC units stored near the end of their permissible storage duration. We aimed to determine whether RBC storage duration influences recipient hematological, metabolic, and clinical chemistry parameters.METHODS In a randomized, prospective, double-blind trial, 24 adults with SCD receiving chronic transfusion therapy were assigned to receive three consecutive outpatient transfusions with RBCs stored for either ≤10 days (short-stored; n = 13) or ≥30 days (long-stored; n = 11). Blood samples were collected from transfused units and from recipients at predefined time points for metabolomics, cytokine, and clinical laboratory analyses. The primary outcomes included post-transfusion hemoglobin and RBC count increments, metabolic markers of oxidative stress, iron metabolism, inflammation, and renal function.RESULTS Transfusion of short-stored RBCs was associated with significantly higher circulating 2,3-bisphosphoglycerate levels for up to 2 weeks after transfusion. Nadir RBC counts and hemoglobin A levels were higher in recipients of short-stored RBCs. In contrast, recipients of long-stored RBCs had higher transferrin saturation and plasma iron levels, elevated markers of oxidative stress and renal dysfunction, and increased proinflammatory cytokines and immunomodulatory metabolites. Metabolomics revealed storage age–dependent alterations in glycolysis, purine, and sphingolipid metabolism. Cytokine profiles and hematologic parameters corroborated the metabolic findings, indicating improved post-transfusion metabolic and inflammatory status with short-stored RBCs.CONCLUSION Transfusion of short-stored RBCs yielded favorable metabolic and hematologic outcomes in adults with SCD, independent of immediate clinical endpoints.TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03704922FUNDING National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), NIH (K23HL136787, R01HL148151, R01HL146442, and R01HL149714).
Matthew S. Karafin, Abby L. Grier, Ross M. Fasano, Anton Ilich, David Wichlan, Ada Chang, Sonjile M. James, Hailly E. Butler, Oleg Kolupaev, Melissa C. Caughey, Daniel J. Stephenson, Julie A. Reisz, Nigel S. Key, Joshua J. Field, Jane A. Little, Steven L. Spitalnik, Angelo D’Alessandro
Usage data is cumulative from August 2025 through August 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 3,215 | 402 |
| 1,073 | 190 | |
| Figure | 816 | 0 |
| Supplemental data | 445 | 23 |
| Citation downloads | 238 | 0 |
| Totals | 5,787 | 615 |
| Total Views | 6,402 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.