Advertisement
Editor's note
Open Access | 10.1172/JCI190119
Find articles by McNally, E. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Published February 17, 2025 - More info
BACKGROUND Previous epidemiologic studies of autoimmune diseases in the US have included a limited number of diseases or used metaanalyses that rely on different data collection methods and analyses for each disease.METHODS To estimate the prevalence of autoimmune diseases in the US, we used electronic health record data from 6 large medical systems in the US. We developed a software program using common methodology to compute the estimated prevalence of autoimmune diseases alone and in aggregate that can be readily used by other investigators to replicate or modify the analysis over time.RESULTS Our findings indicate that over 15 million people, or 4.6% of the US population, have been diagnosed with at least 1 autoimmune disease from January 1, 2011, to June 1, 2022, and 34% of those are diagnosed with more than 1 autoimmune disease. As expected, females (63% of those with autoimmune disease) were almost twice as likely as males to be diagnosed with an autoimmune disease. We identified the top 20 autoimmune diseases based on prevalence and according to sex and age.CONCLUSION Here, we provide, for what we believe to be the first time, a large-scale prevalence estimate of autoimmune disease in the US by sex and age.FUNDING Autoimmune Registry Inc., the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, the Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
Aaron H. Abend, Ingrid He, Neil Bahroos, Stratos Christianakis, Ashley B. Crew, Leanna M. Wise, Gloria P. Lipori, Xing He, Shawn N. Murphy, Christopher D. Herrick, Jagannadha Avasarala, Mark G. Weiner, Jacob S. Zelko, Erica Matute-Arcos, Mark Abajian, Philip R.O. Payne, Albert M. Lai, Heath A. Davis, Asher A. Hoberg, Chris E. Ortman, Amit D. Gode, Bradley W. Taylor, Kristen I. Osinski, Damian N. Di Florio, Noel R. Rose, Frederick W. Miller, George C. Tsokos, DeLisa Fairweather
In this issue of the JCI, we are pleased to publish work from Abend et al. describing the use electronic health records (EHR) information to estimate the prevalence of autoimmune disorders in the US (1). Autoimmunity contributes to a host of diseases affecting adults and children, and the broad array of clinical diagnoses linked to autoimmunity makes it challenging to consider autoimmune diseases in aggregate. Recent estimates from the UK are enabled by having a single public health care system (2). In the US, EHR data collated from representative health care systems is well positioned to guide questions like these. Diagnostic and billing codes, laboratory values, radiographic and histopathology findings, and care-related notes can be combined to follow health outcomes over time and yield new findings on nearly every aspect of clinical and even molecular medicine. EHRs can also be exploited to iteratively implement and assess outcomes as learning health systems. As large language models better incorporate this information, it is increasingly possible to blend these data with molecular features to gain disease insight. At the population level, EHR data can highlight rapidly shifting disease trends, as it did in the COVID-19 pandemic (3).
Abend and colleagues studied health data from six large US medical systems, amassing data covering more than 100 autoimmune conditions. In total, over 10 million lives were evaluated, and more than 581,000 individuals were identified as being affected by an autoimmune conditions, for a prevalence of 4.6% of the US population. For nearly 30% of the 105 conditions, there were few-to-no patients identified, leaving 74 conditions. Females were nearly twice as likely to be diagnosed with an autoimmune disorder, with rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis as the most common diagnoses.
The JCI was founded in 1924 to help the American Society of Clinical Investigation (ASCI) publish what its members considered “new” science, including defining human and animal physiology and pathophysiology. The ASCI now has a substantial component of its membership conducting investigation using large clinical datasets that have been assembled through sponsored research projects, public health efforts, and EHR data. In keeping with the Journal’s mission to meet the needs of the ASCI, we have expanded our former “Clinical Medicine” category to include both “Clinical Research and Public Health”. Reports in this category include first-in-human clinical trials, Phase 2 clinical trials, observational analyses, epidemiological studies, health disparities research, and outcomes and implementation research. Many larger human datasets are increasingly adding genomic, transcriptomic, metabolomic, and other molecular correlates. We expect the Clinical Research and Public Health manuscript category to feature papers that merge molecular data with clinical information, improve the validation of clinical data in EMRs; develop new tools to extract information, some of which have not yet been invented; and apply paradigms that have yet to be defined. The JCI remains keenly interested in new mechanistic insight on human disease. We recognize that this knowledge derives from many different types of research and clinical analyses, some of which will require experimental model systems and some that will not.
Conflict of interest: EMM has been or is a consultant to Amgen, AstraZeneca, Avidity Biosciences, Cytokinetics,
Copyright: © 2025, McNally. This is an open access article published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2025;135(4):e190119. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI190119.
See the related article at Estimation of prevalence of autoimmune diseases in the United States using electronic health record data.