The physiological impact of ultradian temporal feeding patterns remains a major unanswered question in nutritional science. We have employed automated and nasogastric feeding to address this question in male rodents and human volunteers. While grazing and meal-feeding reduced food intake in parallel (compared to ad libitum-fed rodents), body length and tibial epiphysial plate width were maintained in meal-fed rodents via the action of ghrelin and its receptor, GHS-R. Grazing and meal-feeding initially suppressed elevated pre-prandial ghrelin levels in rats, followed by either a sustained elevation in ghrelin in grazing rats or pre-prandial ghrelin surges in meal-fed rats. Episodic growth hormone (GH) secretion was largely unaffected in grazing rats, but meal-feeding tripled GH secretion, with burst height augmented and two additional bursts of GH per day. Continuous nasogastric infusion of enteral feed in humans failed to suppress circulating ghrelin, producing continuously elevated circulating GH with minimal rhythmicity. In contrast, bolus enteral infusion elicited post-prandial ghrelin troughs accompanied by reduced circulating GH, with enhanced ultradian rhythmicity. Taken together, our data imply that the contemporary shift from regular meals to snacking behaviour may be detrimental to optimal skeletal growth outcomes by sustaining circulating GH at levels associated with undernourishment and diminishing GH pulsatility.
Amanda K.E. Hornsby, Richard C. Brown, Thomas W. Tilston, Harry A. Smith, Alfonso Moreno-Cabañas, Bradley Arms-Williams, Anna L. Hopkins, Katie D. Taylor, Simran K.R. Rogaly, Lois H.M. Wells, Jamie J. Walker, Jeffrey S. Davies, Yuxiang Sun, Jeffrey M. Zigman, James A. Betts, Timothy Wells
Usage data is cumulative from April 2025 through May 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 1,327 | 0 |
312 | 0 | |
Supplemental data | 48 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 23 | 0 |
Totals | 1,710 | 0 |
Total Views | 1,710 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.