Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • The cGAS-STING pathway: DNA sensing in health and disease (Jun 2026)
    • Neurodegeneration (Mar 2026)
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Selective disruption of RORγt-CBFβ interaction by IMU-935 prevents RORγt-dependent Th17 autoimmunity but not thymocyte development
Hongmin Wu, Xiancai Zhong, Ning Ma, Zhiheng He, Guanpeng Wang, Geming Lu, Yate-Ching Yuan, Wencan Zhang, Yun Shi, Nagarajan Vaidehi, Evelyn Peelen, Tanja Wulff, Christian Gege, Hella Kohlhof, Daniel Vitt, Yousang Gwack, Ichiro Taniuchi, Hai-Hui Xue, Zuoming Sun
Hongmin Wu, Xiancai Zhong, Ning Ma, Zhiheng He, Guanpeng Wang, Geming Lu, Yate-Ching Yuan, Wencan Zhang, Yun Shi, Nagarajan Vaidehi, Evelyn Peelen, Tanja Wulff, Christian Gege, Hella Kohlhof, Daniel Vitt, Yousang Gwack, Ichiro Taniuchi, Hai-Hui Xue, Zuoming Sun
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Autoimmunity Immunology

Selective disruption of RORγt-CBFβ interaction by IMU-935 prevents RORγt-dependent Th17 autoimmunity but not thymocyte development

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

RORγt is a key transcription factor regulating both Th17 differentiation and thymocyte development. Although Th17 cells drive autoimmune diseases, inhibiting RORγt to treat autoimmunity also disrupts thymocyte development and can cause lethal thymic lymphoma. We identified a previously unreported RORγt cofactor, CBFβ, and a highly selective RORγt inhibitor, IMU-935, that preferentially disrupt the RORγt-CBFβ interaction in Th17 cells but not thymocytes. This interaction is essential for RORγt function; mice with a RORγt mutant unable to bind CBFβ had impaired Th17 differentiation, were resistant to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), and had defective thymocyte development. IMU-935 inhibited Th17 differentiation and reduced EAE severity without affecting thymocyte development by selectively targeting the RORγt-CBFβ interaction in Th17 cells but not in thymocytes. This differential effect arose because different concentrations of IMU-935 were required to disrupt the interaction in Th17 cells versus thymocytes, due to varying levels of RUNX1 that compete with RORγt for CBFβ binding. This study reveals an unreported mechanism for RORγt regulation and a selective RORγt inhibitor that prevents Th17-driven autoimmunity without the risk of lethal lymphoma from thymocyte disruption.

Authors

Hongmin Wu, Xiancai Zhong, Ning Ma, Zhiheng He, Guanpeng Wang, Geming Lu, Yate-Ching Yuan, Wencan Zhang, Yun Shi, Nagarajan Vaidehi, Evelyn Peelen, Tanja Wulff, Christian Gege, Hella Kohlhof, Daniel Vitt, Yousang Gwack, Ichiro Taniuchi, Hai-Hui Xue, Zuoming Sun

×

Figure 4

IMU-935 does not affect thymocyte development and survival.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
IMU-935 does not affect thymocyte development and survival.
(A and B) Fl...
(A and B) Flow cytometric analysis of CD4+ and CD8+ thymocytes ex vivo developed for 3 days from sorted RORγt–/– CD4–CD8– or WT CD4–CD8– in the presence of different concentrations of IMU-935 (A) (n = 2–4/group, from 4 experiments) or RORγt modulators (B) (1 μM; n = 4/group, from 4 experiments). Percentages of CD4+ plus CD4+CD8+ T cells among live Thy1.2+ thymocytes are shown. (C and D) Percentages of live cells among CD4+CD8+ thymocytes relative to the vehicle control different times after culture in the presence of indicated concentrations of IMU-935 (C) or RORγt modulators (D) (1 μM; n = 3/group, from 1 experiment). Thymocytes from RORγt–/– mice were used as a control. (E) Picture and cellularity of the thymus from mice (n = 8–9/group; n = 8 for vehicle and IMU-935 groups, and n = 9 for Cpd-1 and cintirorgon groups) treated with vehicle or indicated RORγt inhibitors or cintirorgon (100 mg/kg orally, twice daily) for 28 days. (F) H&E staining (scale bar: 500 μm) of the thymus from mice treated as described in E. M, medullar; C, cortex. Bottom: The ratio of the medullary/cortical region. (G) Flow cytometric analysis of CD4 and CD8 in the thymocytes from mice treated as described in E. (H) TUNEL staining (top; scale bar: 500 μm) and percentage of TUNEL-positive apoptotic cells in thymus obtained from mouse treated as described in E. Bottom right: The qRT-PCR analysis of Bcl2l1 mRNA. (I) Number of alive, human CD4+CD8+ thymocytes cultured in the presence of indicated RORγt inhibitors (1 μM) for 24 hours (thymocytes collected from 1 donor, n = 3 replicates/group). Data were assessed by 1-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s post hoc test (A–H) or 2-tailed Student’s t test (I). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts