Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • The cGAS-STING pathway: DNA sensing in health and disease (Jun 2026)
    • Neurodegeneration (Mar 2026)
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
T antigen–specific CD8+ T cells associate with PD-1 blockade response in virus-positive Merkel cell carcinoma
Ulla Kring Hansen, Candice D. Church, Ana Micaela Carnaz Simões, Marcus Svensson Frej, Amalie Kai Bentzen, Siri A. Tvingsholm, Jürgen C. Becker, Steven P. Fling, Nirasha Ramchurren, Suzanne L. Topalian, Paul T. Nghiem, Sine Reker Hadrup
Ulla Kring Hansen, Candice D. Church, Ana Micaela Carnaz Simões, Marcus Svensson Frej, Amalie Kai Bentzen, Siri A. Tvingsholm, Jürgen C. Becker, Steven P. Fling, Nirasha Ramchurren, Suzanne L. Topalian, Paul T. Nghiem, Sine Reker Hadrup
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Immunology Oncology

T antigen–specific CD8+ T cells associate with PD-1 blockade response in virus-positive Merkel cell carcinoma

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a highly immunogenic skin cancer primarily induced by Merkel cell polyomavirus, which is driven by the expression of the oncogenic T antigens (T-Ags). Blockade of the programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) pathway has shown remarkable response rates, but evidence for therapy-associated T-Ag–specific immune response and therapeutic strategies for the nonresponding fraction are both limited. We tracked T-Ag–reactive CD8+ T cells in peripheral blood of 26 MCC patients under anti-PD1 therapy, using DNA-barcoded pMHC multimers, displaying all peptides from the predicted HLA ligandome of the oncoproteins, covering 33 class I haplotypes. We observed a broad T cell recognition of T-Ags, including identification of 20 T-Ag–derived epitopes we believe to be novel. Broadening of the T-Ag recognition profile and increased T cell frequencies during therapy were strongly associated with clinical response and prolonged progression-free survival. T-Ag–specific T cells could be further boosted and expanded directly from peripheral blood using artificial antigen-presenting scaffolds, even in patients with no detectable T-Ag–specific T cells. These T cells provided strong tumor-rejection capacity while retaining a favorable phenotype for adoptive cell transfer. These findings demonstrate that T-Ag–specific T cells are associated with the clinical outcome to PD-1 blockade and that Ag-presenting scaffolds can be used to boost such responses.

Authors

Ulla Kring Hansen, Candice D. Church, Ana Micaela Carnaz Simões, Marcus Svensson Frej, Amalie Kai Bentzen, Siri A. Tvingsholm, Jürgen C. Becker, Steven P. Fling, Nirasha Ramchurren, Suzanne L. Topalian, Paul T. Nghiem, Sine Reker Hadrup

×

Figure 4

Individual marker expression before and after ICI therapy initiation.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Individual marker expression before and after ICI therapy initiation.
(A...
(A and B) Expression of phenotypic markers before (A) and after ICI therapy initiation (B) for responders (blue) CD8+ T cells with T-Ag recognition (blue filled), with VP1+CEF recognition (gray filled) or unspecific bulk cells (open circle, blue outline); and nonresponders (red) CD8+ T cells with T-Ag–recognition (red filled), VP1+CEF recognition (gray filled), or unspecific bulk cells (open circle, red outline). *P < 0.05, Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s correction. CM, central memory. (C) CD39 expression on T-Ag– or VP1+CEF-specific cells divided into the 3 time points tested: prior to ICI (0 weeks) and 3 weeks and 12 weeks after ICI initiation. Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s correction. (D) Ki67 expression on T-Ag– or VP1+CEF-specific cells divided into the 3 time points tested. Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s correction. (E) Percentage of double-positive for CD39 and Ki67 of T-Ag–specific, VP1+CEF-specific, or unspecific CD8+ T cells divided into the 3 time points tested. Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s correction. All bars display the median and upper quartile. Ctrl, control.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts