Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
HIF-2α expression and metabolic signaling require ACSS2 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma
Zachary A. Bacigalupa, … , W. Kimryn Rathmell, Jeffrey C. Rathmell
Zachary A. Bacigalupa, … , W. Kimryn Rathmell, Jeffrey C. Rathmell
Published June 17, 2024
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2024;134(12):e164249. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI164249.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cell biology Metabolism Article has an altmetric score of 8

HIF-2α expression and metabolic signaling require ACSS2 in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is an aggressive cancer driven by VHL loss and aberrant HIF-2α signaling. Identifying means to regulate HIF-2α thus has potential therapeutic benefit. Acetyl-CoA synthetase 2 (ACSS2) converts acetate to acetyl-CoA and is associated with poor patient prognosis in ccRCC. Here we tested the effects of ACSS2 on HIF-2α and cancer cell metabolism and growth in ccRCC models and clinical samples. ACSS2 inhibition reduced HIF-2α levels and suppressed ccRCC cell line growth in vitro, in vivo, and in cultures of primary ccRCC patient tumors. This treatment reduced glycolytic signaling, cholesterol metabolism, and mitochondrial integrity, all of which are consistent with loss of HIF-2α. Mechanistically, ACSS2 inhibition decreased chromatin accessibility and HIF-2α expression and stability. While HIF-2α protein levels are widely regulated through pVHL-dependent proteolytic degradation, we identify a potential pVHL-independent pathway of degradation via the E3 ligase MUL1. We show that MUL1 can directly interact with HIF-2α and that overexpression of MUL1 decreased HIF-2α levels in a manner partially dependent on ACSS2. These findings identify multiple mechanisms to regulate HIF-2α stability and ACSS2 inhibition as a strategy to complement HIF-2α–targeted therapies and deplete pathogenically stabilized HIF-2α.

Authors

Zachary A. Bacigalupa, Emily N. Arner, Logan M. Vlach, Melissa M. Wolf, Whitney A. Brown, Evan S. Krystofiak, Xiang Ye, Rachel A. Hongo, Madelyn Landis, Edith K. Amason, Kathryn E. Beckermann, W. Kimryn Rathmell, Jeffrey C. Rathmell

×

Figure 2

ACSS2 is essential for ccRCC growth and proliferation.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
ACSS2 is essential for ccRCC growth and proliferation.
(A and B) Bar gra...
(A and B) Bar graph quantification of 3 independent replicates of crystal violet growth assay performed in HKC cells (A) or 786-O cells (B). Statistical significance was determined using Tukey’s multiple-comparison test (**P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001). (C and D) Box-and-whisker plots showing the absorbance values detected at OD450nm of BrdU ELISA assays performed on HKC cells (C) or 786-O cells (D) treated for 24 hours (left) or 48 hours (right) with DMSO or 1 μM, 5 μM, or 10 μM ACSS2i (n = 4). Statistical significance was determined using Bonferroni’s multiple-comparison test (**P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001). (E) Bar graph quantification of crystal violet staining from 3 independent experiments using 786-O pTRIPZ control or pTRIPZ shACSS2 cells left untreated or treated with 2 μg/mL doxycycline for 48 hours stained with crystal violet. Statistical significance was determined using an unpaired, 2-tailed t test (*P < 0.05). (F) Box-and-whisker plots showing absorbance values detected at OD450nm of BrdU ELISA assays performed on 786-O pTRIPZ control or 786-O pTRIPZ shACSS2 cells treated with 2 μg/mL doxycycline for 24 hours (n = 4). Two-tailed paired t test was used to assess statistical significance (*P < 0.05). See also Supplemental Figure 1.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts

Posted by 12 X users
9 readers on Mendeley
See more details