Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
OMA1 mediates local and global stress responses against protein misfolding in CHCHD10 mitochondrial myopathy
Mario K. Shammas, … , Joanna Poulton, Derek P. Narendra
Mario K. Shammas, … , Joanna Poulton, Derek P. Narendra
Published June 14, 2022
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2022;132(14):e157504. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI157504.
View: Text | PDF
Research Article Cell biology Genetics Article has an altmetric score of 1

OMA1 mediates local and global stress responses against protein misfolding in CHCHD10 mitochondrial myopathy

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Mitochondrial stress triggers a response in the cell’s mitochondria and nucleus, but how these stress responses are coordinated in vivo is poorly understood. Here, we characterize a family with myopathy caused by a dominant p.G58R mutation in the mitochondrial protein CHCHD10. To understand the disease etiology, we developed a knockin (KI) mouse model and found that mutant CHCHD10 aggregated in affected tissues, applying a toxic protein stress to the inner mitochondrial membrane. Unexpectedly, the survival of CHCHD10-KI mice depended on a protective stress response mediated by the mitochondrial metalloendopeptidase OMA1. The OMA1 stress response acted both locally within mitochondria, causing mitochondrial fragmentation, and signaled outside the mitochondria, activating the integrated stress response through cleavage of DAP3-binding cell death enhancer 1 (DELE1). We additionally identified an isoform switch in the terminal complex of the electron transport chain as a component of this response. Our results demonstrate that OMA1 was critical for neonatal survival conditionally in the setting of inner mitochondrial membrane stress, coordinating local and global stress responses to reshape the mitochondrial network and proteome.

Authors

Mario K. Shammas, Xiaoping Huang, Beverly P. Wu, Evelyn Fessler, Insung Y. Song, Nicholas P. Randolph, Yan Li, Christopher K.E. Bleck, Danielle A. Springer, Carl Fratter, Ines A. Barbosa, Andrew F. Powers, Pedro M. Quirós, Carlos Lopez-Otin, Lucas T. Jae, Joanna Poulton, Derek P. Narendra

×

Figure 10

Transcriptomic analyses of the ISR in C10-mutant mice.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Transcriptomic analyses of the ISR in C10-mutant mice.
(A) Microarray da...
(A) Microarray data on hearts from 14-week-old C10G58R versus C10WT mice and 20-week-old C10S59L versus C10WT mice, all on the OMA1+/– background. Each column represents a mouse, and q values represent genome-wide significance. *q < 0.05. (B) Microarray data for 33-week-old C10G58R mouse hearts on the OMA1+/– background treated with either a nontargeting control ASO or an OMA1 ASO. Each column represents a mouse, and q values represent genome-wide significance. *q < 0.01. (C) GSEA of reactome pathways for the listed comparisons. Pathways shown are all the pathways with a q value of less than 0.025 in the C10G58R OMA1 ASO versus control ASO comparison. (D) Effect of OMA1 ASO on the expression of G58R DEGs identified in the comparison from A. See also Supplemental Figure 13 and Supplemental data sets 3 and 4.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts

Posted by 2 X users
42 readers on Mendeley
See more details