Advertisement
Commentary Free access | 10.1172/JCI139239
1Jonas Children’s Vision Care and Bernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory,
2Columbia Stem Cell Initiative,
3Department of Ophthalmology,
4Department of Pathology,
5Department of Cell Biology,
6Department of Biomedical Engineering, and
7Institute of Human Nutrition, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
8Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, New York–Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Address correspondence to: Stephen H. Tsang, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 635 West 165th Street, Box 212, New York, New York 10032, USA. Phone: 212.342.1189; Email: sht2@columbia.edu.
Authorship note: SMC and JR contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Caruso, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Jonas Children’s Vision Care and Bernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory,
2Columbia Stem Cell Initiative,
3Department of Ophthalmology,
4Department of Pathology,
5Department of Cell Biology,
6Department of Biomedical Engineering, and
7Institute of Human Nutrition, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
8Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, New York–Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Address correspondence to: Stephen H. Tsang, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 635 West 165th Street, Box 212, New York, New York 10032, USA. Phone: 212.342.1189; Email: sht2@columbia.edu.
Authorship note: SMC and JR contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by Ryu, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Jonas Children’s Vision Care and Bernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory,
2Columbia Stem Cell Initiative,
3Department of Ophthalmology,
4Department of Pathology,
5Department of Cell Biology,
6Department of Biomedical Engineering, and
7Institute of Human Nutrition, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
8Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, New York–Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Address correspondence to: Stephen H. Tsang, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 635 West 165th Street, Box 212, New York, New York 10032, USA. Phone: 212.342.1189; Email: sht2@columbia.edu.
Authorship note: SMC and JR contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by
Quinn, P.
in:
JCI
|
PubMed
|
Google Scholar
|
1Jonas Children’s Vision Care and Bernard and Shirlee Brown Glaucoma Research Laboratory,
2Columbia Stem Cell Initiative,
3Department of Ophthalmology,
4Department of Pathology,
5Department of Cell Biology,
6Department of Biomedical Engineering, and
7Institute of Human Nutrition, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
8Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, New York–Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Address correspondence to: Stephen H. Tsang, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 635 West 165th Street, Box 212, New York, New York 10032, USA. Phone: 212.342.1189; Email: sht2@columbia.edu.
Authorship note: SMC and JR contributed equally to this work.
Find articles by
Tsang, S.
in:
JCI
|
PubMed
|
Google Scholar
|
Authorship note: SMC and JR contributed equally to this work.
Published July 13, 2020 - More info
Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a genetically heterogenous group of eye diseases in which initial degeneration of rods triggers secondary degeneration of cones, leading to significant loss of daylight, color, and high-acuity vision. Gene complementation with adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors is one strategy to treat RP. Its implementation faces substantial challenges, however; for example, the tremendous number of loci with causal mutations. Gene therapy targeting secondary cone degeneration is an alternative approach that could provide a much-needed generic treatment for many patients with RP. Here, we show that microglia are required for the upregulation of potentially neurotoxic inflammatory factors during cone degeneration in RP, creating conditions that might contribute to cone dysfunction and death. To ameliorate the effects of such factors, we used AAV vectors to express isoforms of the antiinflammatory cytokine transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β). AAV-mediated delivery of TGF-β1 rescued degenerating cones in 3 mouse models of RP carrying different pathogenic mutations. Treatment with TGF-β1 protected vision, as measured by 2 behavioral assays, and could be pharmacologically disrupted by either depleting microglia or blocking the TGF-β receptors. Our results suggest that TGF-β1 may be broadly beneficial for patients with cone degeneration, and potentially other forms of neurodegeneration, through a pathway dependent upon microglia.
Sean K. Wang, Yunlu Xue, Constance L. Cepko
Retinitis pigmentosa (RP), the most common form of rod-cone dystrophy, is caused by greater than 3100 mutations in more than 71 genes, many of which are preferentially expressed in rod photoreceptors. Cone death generally follows rod loss regardless of the underlying pathogenic mutation. Preventing the secondary loss of cone photoreceptors would preserve central visual acuity and substantially improve patients’ quality of life. In this issue of the JCI, Wang et al. demonstrate that adeno-associated virus–mediated overexpression of TGF-β1 promoted cone survival and function in 3 distinct RP models with rod-specific mutations. TGF-β1 induces microglia to metabolically tune from a glycolytic phenotype (M1) to an oxidative phenotype (M2), which associates with neuroprotection and the antiinflammatory ecosystem. Consolidating the results of this study with our current understanding of how TGF-β1 regulates microglia polarization, we highlight cell-specific metabolome reprogramming as a promising non–gene-specific therapeutic avenue for inherited retinal degenerations.
Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a blinding disorder that can be caused by any one of over 3100 mutations in more than 71 genes (1). In RP, many of these genes exhibit rod-specific expression and, when mutated, initiate the same biphasic rod-cone progressive pathology — a wave of rod death that drives a second, partially overlapping, wave of cone death (2). Clinically, the gradual loss of rods corresponds to symptoms such as impaired night vision and peripheral vision loss. This is followed by the secondary loss of cones, which leads to the more devastating loss of day vision (2). Unexpectedly, patients with mutations in different RP genes display first-order decay, suggesting that the rate of vision loss is independent of the nature of the causative RP gene (3).
The best hope for a cure lies in a genetic therapy that can either repair the mutation, supplement the affected gene, or both. Unfortunately, these precision medicine strategies require that the therapeutic components (such as guide RNA [gRNA] with repair template or cDNA supplement) be custom designed, engineered, tested, and FDA approved for each mutation or gene — a nearly impossible undertaking given the plethora of mutations known to contribute to RP (3). A more widely implementable therapeutic strategy would be to target the pathways underlying secondary cone loss, which is common to many of these genetically heterogeneous forms of RP.
Mutations in genes encoding for subunits of the rod-specific enzyme cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) phosphodiesterase 6 (PDE6), are responsible for approximately 72,000 cases of RP worldwide each year (4). The Cepko laboratory has pioneered the use of Pde6 models to examine metabolic coupling and cell nonautonomous degeneration of cones in RP (5). The PDE6βRD1/RD1 mouse carries homozygous mutations in a gene encoding the β subunit of rod photoreceptor cGMP PDE6β. Rod PDE6 is a heterotetramer composed of 2 inhibitory subunits (PDE6γ) and 2 catalytic subunits (PDE6 and PDE6β) that act to hydrolyze cGMP for the closure of the cyclic nucleotide–gated (CNG) channels (4, 6). In Pde6 mutants, rod death has been attributed to toxicity from high levels of free cGMP directly or the secondary high Ca2+ influx through the CNG channels when free cGMP is elevated. Elucidation of pathways responsible for cell nonautonomous degeneration of cones has emerged as a major topic of interest in light of the potential for such pathways to serve as therapeutic targets.
In this issue of the JCI, Wang et al. explore the role of microglia in secondary cone degeneration by using FDA-approved adeno-associated virus (AAV) serotype 8 to deliver TGF-β, a major antineuroinflammatory cytokine that inhibits microglial activation, to the cones of 3 preclinical RP models harboring rod-specific genetic defects (7). The authors achieved sustained, cone-specific overexpression of the 3 TGF-β isoforms (TGF-β1, TGF-β2, TGF-β3) with the AAV8–human red opsin (1–3). Notably, only TGF-β1, precisely, but not TGF-β2 or TGF-β3, coding AAV8 inhibited the secondary death of cones and nearly tripled the cone number in PDE6βRD1/RD1 mice and improved visual function in PDE6βRD10/RD10 mice at 2 months of age. The anatomical rescue effects were further corroborated in a third more slowly degenerating RP mouse model, Rho–/–. However, when the researchers depleted all M1 and M2 microglia in untreated PDE6βRD1/RD1 mice, cone survival failed to improve. Conversely, microglia depletion nullified AAV8–TGF-β1–mediated cone rescue, indicating the importance of precision reprogramming microglia in facilitating TGF-β1 therapeutic efficacy.
The neuroprotective contributions of microglia can be understood in terms of their metabolic tuning in many degenerative disorders (8). The resting metabolic state of M0 homeostatic microglia is oxidative phosphorylation. However, under stress, a shift from oxidative phosphorylation to aerobic glycolysis induces the M1 microglia phenotype through activation of the TAM (TYRO3, AXL, and MERTK) receptor tyrosine kinase signaling pathway (9). This metabolic switch is associated with the chronic release of neurotoxic inflammatory factors, which may underlie tissue damage and photoreceptor death. More recently, TGF-β1 has been found to precisely suppress glycolytic M1 programming while promoting oxidative M2 microglia polarization (10, 11). Interestingly, M2 polarization is known to promote neuroprotection and antiinflammatory response, which is abrogated with diminished TGF-β1. Altogether, these findings suggest that secondary cone loss is mediated by a pathological upregulation of glycolytic processes in M1 microglia, which can be countered by reestablishing M2 oxidative metabolism. Wang et al. demonstrate that AAV-mediated supplementation of TGF-β1 can counteract some aspects of neurodegenerative disorders in preclinical Pde6b and Rho models, thereby suggesting the therapeutic potential of precisely reprogramming glycolytic M1 to oxidative M2 microglia (7).
Cell type–specific metabolic reprogramming can rejuvenate aerobic glycolytic balance within the eye and rescue vision. Importantly, Wang and colleagues elegantly validate the therapeutic feasibility of using AAVs (7). AAVs have become the most widely used vector in FDA trials due to their low immunogenicity and cytotoxicity, and the ability of their serotype to be engineered for cell type–specific targeting (1). As such, they represent the ideal gene delivery vehicle to mediate metabolomic reprogramming in microglia as well as other retinal cells. As proposed by the Hurley hypothesis, different retinal cells are metabolically coupled (12), and thus how these dynamics are disrupted in dystrophic retinas may pose another critical direction for cone preservation (Table 1).
Recently, the photoreceptors and retinal pigmented epithelial cells have been identified as other cell types that suffer from dysregulation of glycolytic and oxidative phase-shifting during RP progression. In healthy retinas, rods take up glucose from the retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) and convert it to lactate via aerobic glycolysis, even in the presence of oxygen. Much like microglia, young RPE prefers an oxidative metabolic state and uses the generated lactate as a substrate for oxidative phosphorylation and a suppressor for RPE-specific glucose consumption. In contrast, in PDE6 dystrophies, the lactate production decreases as rods die, stagnating NAD+ consumption in the RPE. The resultant accumulation of NAD+ stimulates glycolysis in the RPE, which depletes all the available glucose from the choriocapillaris as an energy source. As the delicate mutualism between oxidative and glycolytic tissue processes fails, cones begin to die from malnutrition (5). These findings suggest that boosting aerobic glycolysis in dystrophic photoreceptors might counter photoreceptor death from RP-induced metabolic imbalance. Clinicians can apply the AAV vector delivery implemented by Wang et al. to drive diseased photoreceptors toward enhancing aerobic glycolysis (Table 1). Genetically ablating inhibitors of aerobic glycolysis, either Tsc1 (13) or Sirt6 (14), increase the number of photoreceptors in RP retinas (13–15). SIRT6 is a master promoter of aerobic glycolysis via the rate-limiting enzymes for glycolysis and GLUT1-mediated glucose transport. Future studies directed toward precision metabolome reprogramming may substantially advance the development of a gene agnostic therapy for neurodegenerative disorders.
We are grateful to James B. Hurley and Anthony T. Moore for insightful comments. Jonas Children’s Vision Care is supported by NIH grants 5P30CA013696, U01 EY030580, U54OD020351, R24 EY028758, R24EY027285, 5P30EY019007, R01EY018213, R01EY024698, and R01EY026682, New York State (SDHDOH01-C32590GG-3450000), the Foundation Fighting Blindness New York Regional Research Center Grant (PPA-1218-0751-COLU), Nancy and Kobi Karp, the Crowley Family Funds, the Rosenbaum Family Foundation, Alcon Research Institute, the Gebroe Family Foundation, the Research to Prevent Blindness (RPB) Physician-Scientist Award, and unrestricted funds from RPB.
Address correspondence to: Stephen H. Tsang, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 635 West 165th Street, Box 212, New York, New York 10032, USA. Phone: 212.342.1189; Email: sht2@columbia.edu.
Conflict of interest: SHT has received financial benefits from Spark Therapeutics and research funding and support from Abeona Therapeutics Inc. SHT has a patent titled “Anabolic Enhancers for Ameliorating Neurodegeneration: WO2017201425” (2017).
Copyright: © 2020, American Society for Clinical Investigation.
Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2020;130(8):3971–3973. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI139239.
See the related article at Microglia modulation by TGF-β1 protects cones in mouse models of retinal degeneration.