Advertisement
Commentary Free access | 10.1172/JCI131023
Monash Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Metabolism, Diabetes and Obesity Program, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Address correspondence to: Zane B. Andrews, Monash University, Rm F215, Building 13F, 26 Innovation Walk, Clayton, Victoria 3800 Australia. Phone: 61.3.9905.8165, 61416.929.263. Email: zane.andrews@monash.edu.
Find articles by Andrews, Z. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
Published August 19, 2019 - More info
Acyl-ghrelin administration increases food intake, body weight, and blood glucose. In contrast, mice lacking ghrelin or ghrelin receptors (GHSRs) exhibit life-threatening hypoglycemia during starvation-like conditions, but do not consistently exhibit overt metabolic phenotypes when given ad libitum food access. These results, and findings of ghrelin resistance in obese states, imply nutritional state dependence of ghrelin’s metabolic actions. Here, we hypothesized that liver-enriched antimicrobial peptide-2 (LEAP2), a recently characterized endogenous GHSR antagonist, blunts ghrelin action during obese states and postprandially. To test this hypothesis, we determined changes in plasma LEAP2 and acyl-ghrelin due to fasting, eating, obesity, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG), oral glucose administration, and type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) using humans and/or mice. Our results suggest that plasma LEAP2 is regulated by metabolic status: its levels increased with body mass and blood glucose and decreased with fasting, RYGB, and in postprandial states following VSG. These changes were mostly opposite of those of acyl-ghrelin. Furthermore, using electrophysiology, we showed that LEAP2 both hyperpolarizes and prevents acyl-ghrelin from activating arcuate NPY neurons. We predict that the plasma LEAP2/acyl-ghrelin molar ratio may be a key determinant modulating acyl-ghrelin activity in response to body mass, feeding status, and blood glucose.
Bharath K. Mani, Nancy Puzziferri, Zhenyan He, Juan A. Rodriguez, Sherri Osborne-Lawrence, Nathan P. Metzger, Navpreet Chhina, Bruce Gaylinn, Michael O. Thorner, E. Louise Thomas, Jimmy D. Bell, Kevin W. Williams, Anthony P. Goldstone, Jeffrey M. Zigman
Ghrelin is a key signal driving energy seeking and storage in order to reverse energy deficit. In line with this view, the metabolic status of an organism predicts sensitivity to ghrelin, with fasting increasing and obesity decreasing ghrelin sensitivity. However, the mechanism responsible for controlling this sensitivity is unknown. In this issue of the JCI, Mani and colleagues show that plasma levels of plasma liver-enriched antimicrobial peptide-2 (LEAP2), a recently identified hormone that antagonizes the ghrelin receptor, are inversely correlated with those of plasma acyl-ghrelin under conditions of both energy deficit and energy surplus in mice and humans. Their results show that a fall in plasma LEAP2 during energy deficit facilitates the actions of acyl-ghrelin, whereas increased LEAP2 in obesity suppresses the actions of acyl-ghrelin. This important discovery helps reshape our understanding of ghrelin function and may provide a new approach to aiding weight maintenance after diet-induced weight loss.
The hormone ghrelin was discovered in 1999 by Kojima and colleagues (1). In the plasma, ghrelin undergoes acylation by the enzyme ghrelin-O-acyltransferase (GOAT), and the acylated form binds the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR) with high affinity (2). Shortly after its discovery, ghrelin was given the popular moniker “the hunger hormone” because it stimulated food intake by acting on neuropeptide Y (NPY) neurons in the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus (ARC) (3), the majority of which express GHSR. This led many researchers to hypothesize that they could treat obesity by suppressing or reducing ghrelin. However, while there were studies to support this hypothesis, an equal number refuted it (4–10). In the ensuing years, without a clear consensus on ghrelin function, interest in pursuing it as an antiobesity target diminished.
A clue to understanding ghrelin function came from early studies that demonstrated plasma ghrelin concentrations were sensitive to metabolic state. For example, plasma ghrelin is dramatically increased in fasted conditions and reduced in obese patients (11). Indeed, increased plasma ghrelin following fasting or calorie restriction (CR) suggested an important role for ghrelin under conditions of energy deficit (12). A number of studies show that ghrelin mediates the beneficial effect of CR on blood glucose (13), neuroprotection (14), neurogenesis (15), and mood regulation (16). It is now generally accepted that ghrelin acts as a starvation signal (2), evolved to promote survival by maximizing energy storage, energy seeking, and behaviors that facilitate energy seeking during times of metabolic need. This is further reinforced by the emergence of diet-induced ghrelin resistance, in which positive energy balance (obesity) reduces ghrelin action in the brain (11, 12, 17–22). Thus, the fundamental consideration for understanding ghrelin function is that metabolic state affects sensitivity, such that ghrelin actions are heightened during energy deficit and attenuated in the setting of energy surplus, as in obesity. However, the key question in the field prevails: what is the physiological mechanism or mechanisms responsible for controlling this metabolic sensitivity?
A potential answer to this important question was reported in 2018, when the Kaplan lab used an unbiased RNA-sequencing approach and discovered that liver-enriched antimicrobial peptide-2 (LEAP2) mRNA was elevated in the stomach remnant and reduced in the duodenum after vertical sleeve gastrectomy (23). Subsequent characterization of LEAP2 revealed that it was a potent and selective antagonist of GHSR. In vivo studies demonstrated that LEAP2 blocked ghrelin-induced food intake and that virally mediated overexpression of LEAP2 impaired blood glucose maintenance during severe CR, similarly to what is seen in genetic models of ghrelin or GOAT deletion/ablation (4, 13). Moreover, neutralizing antibodies to LEAP2 boosted ghrelin-induced growth hormone release, presumably by increasing endogenous acyl-ghrelin function. Thus, Kaplan and colleagues had serendipitously discovered a potential mechanism underlying the effect of metabolic state on ghrelin sensitivity. In this issue, Mani and colleagues took the next step to elucidate the role of LEAP2 in linking ghrelin’s action to metabolic state (24). The authors tested the hypotheses that LEAP2 was a metabolic hormone regulated by body mass, feeding, and blood glucose and that it works in concert with acyl-ghrelin to regulate the activity of GHSR in different metabolic states.
The authors first sought to firmly validate an ELISA method to measure plasma LEAP2. Next, they performed a number of analyses to understand the relationship between plasma acyl-ghrelin and LEAP2. They demonstrated that, in mice with diet-induced obesity (DIO), LEAP2 was elevated and positively correlated with fat mass, whereas DIO decreased plasma ghrelin, leading to an increased LEAP2/acyl-ghrelin ratio (24). Thus, since LEAP2 prevents ghrelin-induced food intake (23), high-plasma LEAP2 during obesity may underlie the ghrelin resistance observed in DIO mice (17–19). Intriguingly, diet-induced weight loss in previously obese mice lowered plasma LEAP2 and the LEAP2/acyl-ghrelin ratio (24), which was consistent with previous studies showing that diet-induced weight loss reverses ghrelin resistance (19). Conversely, fasting, which increases ghrelin sensitivity (25), significantly reduced plasma LEAP2 and increased plasma ghrelin, such that the LEAP2/acyl-ghrelin ratio was significantly reduced.
An increase in blood glucose, as a signal of energy availability, suppresses ghrelin secretion and reduces plasma acyl-ghrelin (26), but the role for LEAP2 in this context was unknown. With this is mind, Mani et al. showed that acute oral glucose gavage increased plasma LEAP2 and decreased acyl-ghrelin within one hour in fasted mice (24), consistent with previous studies showing that glucose pretreatment blocks ghrelin-induced food intake (27). Plasma LEAP2 was positively correlated with blood glucose, whereas acyl-ghrelin was negatively correlated with blood glucose. Collectively, these studies in mice show that LEAP2 is regulated by metabolic state, in opposition to acyl-ghrelin, with higher concentrations in obese states and lower concentrations in fasted states. Using electrophysiological recordings of NPY neurons, Mani et al. demonstrated that LEAP2 acts as a powerful GHSR antagonist, blocking ghrelin-induced activation of NPY neurons and hyperpolarizing NPY neurons by disabling GHSR constitutive activity (24). This work clearly demonstrates that elevated LEAP2 is a key mechanism responsible for ghrelin resistance in obesity. Intriguingly, diet-induced weight loss restores ghrelin sensitivity, which promotes rebound weight gain in a ghrelin-dependent manner (19), suggesting that LEAP2 after weight loss may help to prevent rebound weight gain.
A strength of this manuscript is that Mani and colleagues demonstrated that their studies in mice also held true in humans, suggesting LEAP2 might play important roles in human conditions of metabolic dysfunction. Indeed, obesity in humans was associated with higher fasted LEAP2, lower fasted acyl-ghrelin, and thus a higher LEAP2/acyl-ghrelin ratio. LEAP2 also positively correlated with several clinical parameters of metabolic dysfunction, including BMI, body fat percentage, blood glucose, serum triglycerides, visceral adipose tissue volume, and liver lipid content (24), although there is no evidence to suggest a causal role for plasma LEAP2 in these processes. These results suggest that LEAP2 is a metabolic signal of energy surplus during a state of chronic obesity, but intriguingly, greater postprandial increases in LEAP2 were observed in individuals with higher BMI. This observation suggests that acute energy sensing in the obese state is functionally linked to LEAP2 secretion, an important area for future research. Finally, two types of bariatric surgery, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG), also affected plasma LEAP2. RYGB reduced plasma LEAP2 in the postprandial state 3 months after surgery and in the fasted state 2 years after surgery, whereas VSG lowered postprandial plasma LEAP2 compared with baseline (24).
Like most seminal studies, the work from Mani et al. provides more questions than answers, as it moves a field into a new direction. For example, what are the mechanisms regulating LEAP2 gene expression and secretion from the liver? Can this be modulated by environmental factors, such as macronutrient composition of the diet? Are there actions of LEAP2 that are independent of GHSR antagonism? Is desacyl-ghrelin regulated by LEAP2? Does genetic deletion of LEAP2 heighten ghrelin sensitivity and affect body weight during CR or DIO? Future studies are required to address these important questions. Nevertheless, this important contribution demonstrates that LEAP2 is a metabolic hormone of energy surplus that regulates plasma ghrelin and ghrelin’s action on NPY neurons. Thus, the fall in LEAP2 during negative energy balance removes GHSR antagonism, facilitating the action of acyl-ghrelin to increase food intake, growth hormone secretion and prevent severe hypoglycemia. Conversely, in the setting of obesity, the increase in LEAP2 limits acyl-ghrelin’s actions on food intake and blood glucose. More broadly, these studies help us realize that maintenance of energy homeostasis through metabolic feedback is far more complicated than previously appreciated, involving diverse humoral signatures of metabolic state. With this is mind, it’s not surprising that early studies looking to pursue ghrelin as an antiobesity therapy produced ambiguous and conflicting results.
Conflict of interest: The author has declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Copyright: © 2019, American Society for Clinical Investigation.
Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2019;129(9):3542–3544. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI131023.
See the related article at LEAP2 changes with body mass and food intake in humans and mice.