Advertisement
Research ArticleImmunologyTherapeutics Free access | 10.1172/JCI125456
1Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
2Rutgers Institute for Translational Medicine and Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Hampshire, USA.
3Department of Medicine, and Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Address correspondence to: James C. Paulson, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Road, MB202, La Jolla, California 92037, USA. Phone: 858.784.9634; Email: jpaulson@scripps.edu.
Find articles by Duan, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
2Rutgers Institute for Translational Medicine and Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Hampshire, USA.
3Department of Medicine, and Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Address correspondence to: James C. Paulson, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Road, MB202, La Jolla, California 92037, USA. Phone: 858.784.9634; Email: jpaulson@scripps.edu.
Find articles by Koziol-White, C. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
1Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
2Rutgers Institute for Translational Medicine and Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Hampshire, USA.
3Department of Medicine, and Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Address correspondence to: James C. Paulson, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Road, MB202, La Jolla, California 92037, USA. Phone: 858.784.9634; Email: jpaulson@scripps.edu.
Find articles by Jester, W. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
2Rutgers Institute for Translational Medicine and Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Hampshire, USA.
3Department of Medicine, and Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Address correspondence to: James C. Paulson, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Road, MB202, La Jolla, California 92037, USA. Phone: 858.784.9634; Email: jpaulson@scripps.edu.
Find articles by Smith, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
2Rutgers Institute for Translational Medicine and Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Hampshire, USA.
3Department of Medicine, and Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Address correspondence to: James C. Paulson, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Road, MB202, La Jolla, California 92037, USA. Phone: 858.784.9634; Email: jpaulson@scripps.edu.
Find articles by Nycholat, C. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
2Rutgers Institute for Translational Medicine and Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Hampshire, USA.
3Department of Medicine, and Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Address correspondence to: James C. Paulson, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Road, MB202, La Jolla, California 92037, USA. Phone: 858.784.9634; Email: jpaulson@scripps.edu.
Find articles by Macauley, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
1Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
2Rutgers Institute for Translational Medicine and Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Hampshire, USA.
3Department of Medicine, and Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Address correspondence to: James C. Paulson, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Road, MB202, La Jolla, California 92037, USA. Phone: 858.784.9634; Email: jpaulson@scripps.edu.
Find articles by Panettieri, R. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California, USA.
2Rutgers Institute for Translational Medicine and Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Hampshire, USA.
3Department of Medicine, and Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Address correspondence to: James C. Paulson, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Road, MB202, La Jolla, California 92037, USA. Phone: 858.784.9634; Email: jpaulson@scripps.edu.
Find articles by Paulson, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar |
Published January 15, 2019 - More info
IgE-mediated activation of mast cells is a hallmark of an anaphylactic reaction to allergen. In this issue of the JCI, Duan et al. describe an approach for suppressing IgE-dependent mast cell activation, thereby suppressing anaphylaxis. Specifically, the authors show that delivery of liposomes containing both the specific antigen recognized by the mast cell–bound IgE and a high-affinity glycan ligand of the inhibitory receptor CD33 (CD33L) to targeted mast cells inhibits antigen-induced, FcεRI-dependent spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk) phosphorylation and downstream protein tyrosine kinase (PTK) phosphorylation, Ca++ flux, and β-hexosaminidase release (i.e., degranulation). However, this strategy only worked if both the antigen (reactive with the mast cell–bound IgE) and CD33L were on the same liposome. This approach promises to rapidly reduce IgE-dependent mast cell activation in response to challenge with offending allergens.
Stephen J. Galli
Allergen immunotherapy for patients with allergies begins with weekly escalating doses of allergen under medical supervision to monitor and treat IgE mast cell–mediated anaphylaxis. There is currently no treatment to safely desensitize mast cells to enable robust allergen immunotherapy with therapeutic levels of allergen. Here, we demonstrated that liposomal nanoparticles bearing an allergen and a high-affinity glycan ligand of the inhibitory receptor CD33 profoundly suppressed IgE-mediated activation of mast cells, prevented anaphylaxis in Tg mice with mast cells expressing human CD33, and desensitized mice to subsequent allergen challenge for several days. We showed that high levels of CD33 were consistently expressed on human skin mast cells and that the antigenic liposomes with CD33 ligand prevented IgE-mediated bronchoconstriction in slices of human lung. The results demonstrated the potential of exploiting CD33 to desensitize mast cells to provide a therapeutic window for administering allergen immunotherapy without triggering anaphylaxis.
Type I hypersensitivity, or allergy, is a major public health concern worldwide (1). In the US, food allergy alone affects 15 million Americans (2, 3), and at least 1.6% of the population has experienced anaphylaxis (4). Mast cells play a key role in allergy and anaphylaxis through expression of the high-affinity IgE receptor (FcεRI), which strongly binds allergen-specific IgE. Allergen crosslinking of the IgE-FcεRI complex triggers mast cell exocytosis of preformed granules and release of additional newly synthesized mediators (5–8). Individuals with allergies typically manage their conditions by avoiding the allergens, by targeting the mediators released by mast cells, or by alleviating symptoms using an antihistamine or corticosteroid upon accidental exposure (9). A therapeutic option approved to treat severe allergic asthma is omalizumab (Xolair), an anti-IgE antibody that reduces circulating levels of IgEs and blocks circulating IgE from binding to the FcεRI receptor. However, while this drug reduces sensitivity over time, patients receiving omalizumab can remain sensitive to allergens long after allergen-specific IgE is cleared from the serum as a result of the slow turnover of mast cells and long half-life of FcεRI-IgE complexes (10, 11). The only option for developing sustained tolerance is allergen immunotherapy, which, given the risk of anaphylaxis, requires months to years of administration of allergen in escalating graded doses under medical supervision (12). Even though allergen immunotherapy is sometimes effective in producing sustained unresponsiveness to allergens, most patients withdraw because of the prolonged regimen or because of adverse symptoms, including anaphylaxis, during treatment, before reaching a therapeutic dose (12). Clearly, a method for introducing a therapeutic amount of allergen into a sensitized individual without the risk of anaphylaxis would be a major breakthrough in allergen immunotherapy (12–14).
Mast cells express a number of inhibitory receptors bearing immunoreceptor tyrosine–based inhibitory motifs (ITIMs), which can recruit tyrosine phosphatases and interrupt the kinase-driven signaling cascades, preventing mast cell degranulation and cytokine production (9, 14, 15). A promising approach to inhibit mast cell activation involves strategies that ligate inhibitory receptors to the IgE-FcεRI complex. For example, bispecific antibodies that bind IgE and an inhibitory receptor (FcγRIIb or CD300a) effectively reduced mast cell activation induced by subsequent allergen challenges in mouse models of anaphylaxis (16–19). A variation of this strategy involves a chimeric fusion protein that fuses allergen (Fel d 1 or Ara h 2 [Ah2]) to a single chain antibody targeting the FcγRIIb receptor, which can block mast cell activation in mouse models of anaphylaxis (20, 21).
Several members of the inhibitory sialic acid–binding immunoglobulin-like lectins (Siglec) family have also been reported to be expressed on human mast cells and include CD33 (Siglec-3) on human lung mast cells (22) and Siglec-5, -6, and -8 on CD34+ cell–derived mast cells (23). Since all of these Siglecs contain ITIMs in their cytoplasmic domain (24, 25), they represent alternatives for the use of inhibitory receptors to suppress mast cell degranulation. With the goal of recruiting Siglecs to the FcεRI receptor on mast cells, we recognized that a nanoparticle platform we developed for the suppression of B cell activation might be adapted to mast cells. For B cells, liposomal nanoparticles that displayed both an antigen and a high-affinity ligand for a B cell Siglec (CD22 or Siglec-G) strongly suppressed B cell activation by recruiting the Siglec to the immunological synapse with the B cell receptor. Furthermore, it induced an apoptotic signal that eliminated the antigen-specific B cells from the B cell repertoire, leading to immunological tolerance of the mouse to subsequent antigen challenge (26–29).
We reasoned that antigenic liposomes bearing an allergen and glycan ligand of a mast cell–inhibitory Siglec might similarly result in recruitment to the IgE-FcεRI complex and suppress mast cell degranulation (Figure 1A). Here, we show that antigenic liposomes containing a high-affinity ligand for human CD33 prevent antigen-mediated degranulation of human mast cells. In Tg mice expressing CD33 on mast cells, antigenic liposomes with CD33 ligand (CD33L) profoundly suppressed IgE-mediated mast cell activation in passive cutaneous and passive systemic models of anaphylaxis. Moreover, these animals are completely protected from anaphylaxis induced by subsequent antigen challenges as a result of reduced antigen-specific IgE on mast cells and accelerated clearance of antigen-specific IgE from the blood. Thus, the inhibitory properties of human CD33 can be exploited to desensitize mast cells, offering new treatment strategies for allergen immunotherapy.
Display of CD33L on antigenic liposomes suppresses IgE-dependent degranulation of LAD2 cells. (A) Schematic representation of an antigenic liposome (TNP-LP, left) or an antigenic liposome displaying human CD33 ligands (TNP-LP-CD33L, right). (B) Antibody staining of various Siglecs (Sig-) on LAD2 cells analyzed by flow cytometry. (C) Flow cytometric analysis of binding of fluorescent liposomes with or without CD33L (20 μM) to LAD2 cells pretreated with isotype control or anti-CD33 (clone WM53). (D) Calcium flux of LAD2 cells induced by addition (arrow) of TNP-LP or TNP-LP-CD33 (2.5 μM) or PBS (1 μl). Graph shows quantification of the AUC of calcium flux induced by 2.5 μM TNP-LP or TNP-LP-CD33L. Results were combined from 2 independent experiments. (E) Degranulation induced by TNP-LP or TNP-LP-CD33L as measured by the percentage of β-hex release (n = 3 per condition; values are plotted as the mean ± SD). (F) Degranulation induced by TNP-LP (30 μM), TNP-LP-CD33L (30 μM), or a mixture of TNP-LP and LP-CD33L (30 μM each). (G) Degranulation induced by TNP-LP or TNP-LP-CD33L (30 μM) in the presence of LP-CD33L (10 μM). Control cells received buffer only. (H) Degranulation induced by TNP-LP or TNP-LP-CD33L (30 μM) in the presence of isotype or anti-CD33 (clone WM53, 1 μg/ml). (I) Degranulation induced by Ah2-LP or Ah2-LP-CD33L (30 μM), with final Ah2 at 750 ng/ml using LAD2 cells sensitized with atopic plasma reactive to peanut (PlasmaLab). (J) Degranulation induced by OVA-LP or OVA-LP-CD33L (30 μM), with the final OVA dose at 1.5 μg/ml using LAD2 cells sensitized with human anti–OVA-IgE. Results in E–J are representative of 3 independent experiments. ***P < 0.001 and ****P < 0.0001, by 2-tailed Student’s t test (D and E) and 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (F–J). α, anti; Max, maximum.
CD33 ligands displayed on antigenic liposomes suppress IgE-dependent degranulation of mast cells. To test the nanoparticle platform for suppressing mast cell activation, we used the human LAD2 mast cell line, which expresses CD33 and several other human Siglecs (Figure 1B). For liposomal nanoparticles formulated to display both antigen and CD33L, we selected trinitrophenol (TNP) as the antigen and a CD33L comprising a sialic acid analog with substituents on the sialic acid at the C-9 and C-5 positions that binds to CD33 with high affinity and selectivity (30). CD33L and TNP were covalently coupled to PEGylated lipid–1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (PEG-DSPE) (Supplemental Figure 1, A and B; supplemental material available online with this article; https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI125456DS1). Liposomes with TNP only (TNP-LP), CD33L only (LP-CD33L), or both (TNP-LP-CD33L) were prepared by mixing all lipids prior to hydration and extrusion through controlled pore membranes (26, 30).
Liposomes with CD33L containing Alexa Fluor 647–conjugated (AF647-conjugated) lipid (Supplemental Figure 1C) bound strongly to CD33 expressed on Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, but not to cells expressing CD33 without the conserved arginine (R119A) required for ligand binding (Supplemental Figure 1, D and E), or to CHO cells expressing various murine Siglecs (Supplemental Figure 1F). We observed that liposomes with CD33L bound strongly to LAD2 cells and that binding was blocked with CD33-blocking antibodies (Figure 1C and Supplemental Figure 1, G and H).
To evaluate the impact of the CD33L on antigen-induced mast cell activation, we sensitized LAD2 cells with anti–TNP-IgE. Using calcium flux as a measure of activation, TNP-LP induced strong activation, and addition of the CD33 ligand TNP-LP-CD33L strongly suppressed activation (Figure 1D). Similarly, we found that TNP-LP strongly induced degranulation of LAD2 cells, as measured by the release of β-hexosaminidase (β-hex), which was suppressed when CD33L was present (Figure 1E).
To further assess the importance of presenting the antigen and CD33L on the same liposome, we compared TNP-LP, TNP-LP-CD33L, and a mixture of TNP-LP and liposomes containing only CD33L (LP-CD33L). While CD33L strongly suppressed degranulation when TNP and CD33L were presented on the same liposome (TNP-LP-CD33L), it had no significant inhibition of degranulation when present on separate liposomes (LP-CD33L) (Figure 1F). Furthermore, pretreatment of LAD2 cells with LP-CD33L had no impact on degranulation induced by TNP-LP, but promoted degranulation by TNP-LP-CD33L, negating the inhibitory impact of CD33L on the same liposome (Figure 1G). Likewise, pretreatment of LAD2 cells with anti-CD33 antibodies neither enhanced nor inhibited degranulation induced by TNP-LP, but promoted degranulation by TNP-LP-CD33L (Figure 1H and Supplemental Figure 2, A–C). These results suggest that prior addition of anti-CD33 or LP-CD33L ligates and sequesters CD33 and prevents its recruitment to the IgE-FcεRI complex by TNP-LP-CD33L, preventing the suppression of activation and degranulation by CD33L.
To test the generality to common food allergens, the major peanut allergen Ah2 and OVA were coupled to PEGylated lipid (26, 28). Because of the formulation, a density of 0.1 mole percentage of either PEGylated protein allergen was formulated into liposomes as Ah2-LP or OVA-LP with or without CD33L. Unlike TNP-LP, Ah2-LP and OVA-LP were able to induce maximum 15%–17% degranulation using LAD2 cells sensitized with atopic human serum from peanut-sensitized patients (PlasmaLab) or anti–OVA-IgE (clone 11B6), respectively. We attribute the lower extent of degranulation to reduced allergen cross-linking due to the lower density of the antigen compared with 0.4% TNP-PEG-DSPE. However, in both cases, degranulation was strongly suppressed if the CD33L was copresented with the antigen (Ah2-LP-CD33L or OVA-LP-CD33L) (Figure 1, I and J). Pretreatment of LAD2 cells using anti-CD33 antibodies neither enhanced nor inhibited degranulation induced by OVA-LP, but permitted degranulation induced by OVA-LP-CD33L, suggesting that anti-CD33 blocks recruitment of CD33 to the anti–OVA-IgE–FcεRI complex. (Supplemental Figure 2D).
We next asked whether treatment with TNP-LP-CD33L desensitized LAD2 cells to subsequent antigen challenge. LAD2 cells sensitized with anti–TNP-IgE were pretreated with buffer control or TNP-LP-CD33L for 1 hour, followed by washing and challenge with TNP-BSA (Biosearch Technologies). Cells pretreated with buffer alone showed a strong induction of degranulation, while those pretreated with TNP-LP-CD33L were completely desensitized to challenge by TNP-BSA (Supplemental Figure 3A).
To determine whether desensitization was antigen specific, we sensitized LAD2 cells with both anti–TNP-IgE and anti–OVA-IgE. The cells were first treated with buffer or TNP-LP-CD33L and then challenged with soluble OVA. Pretreatment with TNP-LP-CD33L partially inhibited degranulation induced by OVA (Supplemental Figure 3B), suggesting that desensitization was at least partially antigen specific (31). Using cells sensitized with both anti–TNP-IgE and anti–OVA-IgE, we assessed the amount of these IgEs remaining on the surface of mast cells using fluorescent TNP-LP (AF488) and OVA-LP (AF647) following treatment of the cells with TNP-LP, TNP-LP-CD33L, or LP-CD33L. We found that prior treatment of cells with TNP-LP or TNP-LP-CD33L abolished binding of TNP-LP (AF488) but had no impact on binding of OVA-LP (AF647) (Supplemental Figure 3C). Also, prior treatment with LP-CD33L had no impact on binding of either TNP-LP or OVA-LP. The results show that exposure to an antigenic (TNP) liposome either blocked or caused endocytosis of the respective IgE-FcεRI complex but had no effect of the surface presentation of an IgE to another antigen (32, 33).
Tg mice with mast cells expressing functional human CD33. In order to evaluate the impact of antigenic nanoparticles with CD33L in mouse models of anaphylaxis, we developed a Rosa26-Stopfl/fl-CD33–Tg mouse. cDNA encoding full-length human CD33 (GenBank: BC028152.1) was inserted into the Rosa26 locus through homologous recombination in PRX embryonic stem (ES) cells from a C57BL/6N background (34). The translation of CD33 under the CAG promoter was controlled by a Stopfl/fl cassette placed upstream of CD33, and translation could be monitored by a frt-flanked IRES-EGFP cassette placed downstream of CD33 (Supplemental Figure 4A). Insertion of the transgene into the Rosa26 locus was confirmed by both Southern blotting and PCR (Supplemental Figure 4, B and C). Mice with germline transmission of the Rosa26-Stopfl/fl-CD33 gene were maintained on a C57BL/6 background. To express CD33 on mast cells, the Rosa26-Stopfl/fl-CD33–Tg mice were crossed with Mcpt5-Cre mice (35, 36). Mice bearing the Mcpt5-Cre+/–R26-CD33+ genotype are referred to hereafter as CD33-Tg mice. Unless otherwise stated, Mcpt5-Cre–R26-CD33+ littermates were used as controls (control-Tg mice).
To characterize the expression of CD33, we analyzed peritoneal cells by flow cytometry. Compared with peritoneal mast cells from C57BL/6J mice, control-Tg mice showed no expression of the transgene as evidenced by the lack of GFP expression, but 90% of the mast cells from CD33-Tg mice were GFP+ (Figure 2, A and B). We found that control-Tg and CD33-Tg mice had similar mast cell numbers compared with the numbers detected in C57BL/6J mice (Figure 2C). Consistent with GFP expression, CD33 was expressed on peritoneal mast cells from CD33-Tg mice but not on other cell types from CD33-Tg mice or on any cells from control-Tg mice (Figure 2D). In contrast to human mast cells, which express several human Siglecs, peritoneal mast cells and bone marrow–derived mast cells (BMMCs) from C57BL/6J mice did not express detectable murine CD33 or any other murine Siglec (Supplemental Figure 4, D and E). Fluorescent liposomes with CD33L bound strongly to peritoneal mast cells from CD33-Tg mice but did not bind to mast cells from control-Tg mice (Figure 2E).
Tg mice with mast cells expressing functional human CD33. (A) Flow cytometric analysis of GFP expression on representative peritoneal mast cells harvested from C57BL/6J, control-Tg (Mcpt5-Cre–Rosa26-Stopfl/fl-CD33+), and CD33-Tg (Mcpt5-Cre+/–Rosa26-Stopfl/fl-CD33+) mice. Mast cells were defined as PI–CD45+c-Kit+. Baseline GFP signal was determined by mast cells from C57BL/6J mice. (B) Quantification of the percentage of GFP+ peritoneal mast cells from mice of the 3 genotypes. Tg mice bearing 1 or 2 copies of CD33 were used. Both male and female mice 8 weeks or older were analyzed, with no difference observed. (C) Numbers of peritoneal mast cells from the same mice of the 3 genotypes as in B. (A–C) Results were compiled from 6 experiments. (D) Staining of peritoneal cells harvested from control-Tg or CD33-Tg mice with anti-CD33 (clone WM53) or isotype control, as analyzed by flow cytometry. (E) Binding of fluorescent liposome, with or without CD33L (20 μM), to peritoneal mast cells (c-Kit+FcεRI+CD45+). (F) Degranulation of CD33+ BMMCs induced by TNP-LP or TNP-LP-CD33L. (G) Cytokine induction of CD33+ BMMCs following treatment with TNP-LP (40 μM), TNP-LP-CD33L (40 μM), LP-CD33L (40 μM), or a mixture of TNP-LP and LP-CD33L (40 μM each). Supernatant from the unstimulated cells was subtracted as a background. (H) Degranulation of CD33+ BMMCs induced by TNP-LP or TNP-LP-CD33L (30 μM) in the presence of anti-CD33 (2 μg/ml). (I and J) Cytokine production of CD33+ BMMCs induced by TNP-LP or TNP-LP-CD33L (40 μM) in the presence of anti-CD33 (10 μg/ml). Supernatant from untreated cells was subtracted as a background. Results shown are representative of 3 (D–G) or 2 (H–J) independent experiments. (F–J) Values are plotted as the mean ± SD (n = 3 per condition). ***P < 0.001 and ****P < 0.0001, by 2-tailed Student’s t test (F) and 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (C and G–J).
To determine whether CD33 was functional in murine mast cells, BMMCs from CD33-Tg mice were prepared with IL-3–conditioned media (37). After 4 weeks of culturing, more than 90% of the cells were c-Kit+FcεRI+ and 20%–50% were CD33+GFP+ (Supplemental Figure 4F). These cells were then sorted to obtain 100% GFP+ BMMCs for in vitro experiments. Fluorescent liposomes with CD33L bound to GFP+ BMMCs but did not bind to GFP– BMMCs (Supplemental Figure 4, G and H).
In BMMCs sensitized with anti–TNP-IgE, we observed that TNP-LP strongly induced degranulation, but with copresentation of the CD33L (TNP-LP-CD33L), we found that degranulation was profoundly suppressed (Figure 2F). Similarly, induced release and production of TNF-α, IL-4, IL-6, and IL-13 by TNP-LP were strongly suppressed by copresentation of CD33L (Figure 2G). In contrast, CD33 on separate liposomes (LP-CD33L) did not enhance or inhibit TNP-LP–induced cytokine production (Figure 2G). Likewise, monoclonal anti-CD33 antibodies (clones P67.6 and WM53) neither caused cytokine production by themselves nor inhibited TNP-LP–induced degranulation or cytokine production, but rather permitted the induction of degranulation and cytokine production by TNP-LP-CD33L, abrogating the suppression mediated by CD33L (Figure 2, H–J). These results show that human CD33 functions as an inhibitory receptor on murine mast cells in a manner similar to that observed with human LAD2 cells (Figure 1).
Recruitment of CD33 suppresses IgE/FcεRI signaling. Antigen-mediated aggregation of IgE-FcεRI stabilizes the IgE-FcεRI complex in lipid rafts with Src kinases that initiate the signaling cascade (38). The immunoreceptor tyrosine–based activation motifs (ITAMs) in the cytoplasmic tails of the FcεRI receptor, when phosphorylated by Src kinases, recruit splenic tyrosine kinase (Syk), which leads to the phosphorylation of downstream kinases (7). To assess the role of CD33 recruitment on the signaling cascade, we performed Western blot analysis of selected kinases that result in degranulation (PLCγ-1 and PLCγ-2) and cytokine production (MEK, ERK, JNK, and AKT) (7, 39, 40). Indeed, we found that TNP-LP strongly induced Syk phosphorylation using LAD2 cells or CD33+ murine BMMCs sensitized with anti–TNP-IgEs. Recruitment of CD33 (TNP-LP-CD33L) resulted in a partial reduction of Syk phosphorylation in LAD2 cells (Figure 3, A and B) and CD33+ BMMCs (Figure 3C), which led to a profound reduction in phosphorylation of downstream kinases. LP-CD33L did not induce phosphorylation of any kinases in either LAD2 cells (Figure 3B) or BMMCs (Figure 3C), demonstrating that ligation of CD33 alone did not initiate or suppress signaling.
Recruitment of CD33 suppresses IgE/FcεRI signaling. (A) Phosphorylation of Syk, PLCγ1, MEK, and ERK in LAD2 cells after a 3-, 10-, or 30-minute stimulation using TNP-LP or TNP-LP-CD33L (2 μM), as evaluated by Western blotting. (B) Phosphorylation of Syk and ERK in LAD2 cells after a 10-minute stimulation using TNP-LP, TNP-LP-CD33L, or LP-CD33L (2 μM), as evaluated by Western blotting. (C) Phosphorylation of Syk, PLCγ1, PLCγ2, JNK, AKT, and ERK in CD33+ BMMCs cells after a 10-minute stimulation with TNP-LP, TNP-LP-CD33L, or LP-CD33L (2 μM), as evaluated by Western blotting. (A–C) Total Syk and ERK were used as loading controls. (D–F) Proposed mechanisms of IgE/FcεRI signaling induced by antigenic liposomes and recruitment of CD33 by CD33L. (D) TNP-LP stabilizes the anti–TNP-IgE–FcεRI complex in lipid rafts with Src kinases that initiate the FcεRI signaling cascade. We propose that CD33 has no basal impact on signaling, because it is not constitutively localized in the same microdomain with FcεRI. (E) TNP-LP-CD33L recruits CD33 to the anti–TNP-IgE–FcεRI immunological synapse. Our results suggest that the cytoplasmic ITIMs of CD33 were phosphorylated by Src kinases and then recruited tyrosine phosphatases such as Shp-1, which dephosphorylated Syk, and other kinases. (F) Proposed model showing that monoclonal anti-CD33 antibodies (or LP-CD33L) block recruitment of CD33 to the IgE-FcεRI complex and enable mast cell degranulation induced by TNP-LP-CD33L.
The results suggest that CD33 and FcεRI are not colocalized in the same membrane microdomain and that CD33 does not constitutively suppress FcεRI signaling (Figure 3D). We propose that when CD33 is recruited to the lipid rafts of the IgE-FcεRI complex by CD33L on antigenic liposomes, the cytoplasmic ITIMs of CD33 are phosphorylated by local Src kinases, resulting in the recruitment of tyrosine phosphatases such as Shp-1 (41, 42), which dephosphorylate kinases involved in the FcεRI signaling cascade (Figure 3E). Monoclonal anti-CD33 antibodies (or LP-CD33L) block the recruitment of CD33 to IgE-FcεRI, thereby enabling TNP-LP-CD33L–induced mast cell activation (Figure 1, F–H, and Figure 3F).
Suppression of IgE-mediated anaphylaxis. To determine whether antigenic liposomes with CD33L could suppress mast cell activation in vivo, we used a passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (PCA) model. Mice were sensitized in 1 ear with anti–TNP-IgE, while the other ear received a PBS mock injection. The next day, the mice were given liposomes in Evans blue dye (Figure 4A). In mice with mast cells that do not express CD33 (control-Tg and Mcpt5-Cre–R26-CD33+ mice), both TNP-LP and TNP-LP-CD33L induced vascular leakage in ears sensitized with anti–TNP-IgE (Figure 4, B and C). In contrast, in mice with mast cells expressing CD33 (CD33-Tg and Mcpt5-Cre+/–R26-CD33+ mice), TNP-LP induced vascular leakage in ears sensitized with anti–TNP-IgE, but TNP-LP formulated with CD33L (TNP-LP-CD33L) produced no significant vascular leakage in anti–TNP-IgE–sensitized ears (Figure 4, D and E). The results demonstrate that local mast cell activation is prevented when CD33L is codisplayed with antigen.
Suppression of IgE-mediated anaphylaxis. Display of CD33L on antigenic liposomes suppresses PCA and PSA in CD33-Tg mice (Mcpt5-Cre+/–Rosa26-Stopfl/fl-CD33+), but not in control-Tg mice (Mcpt5-Cre– Rosa26-Stopfl/fl-CD33+). Mice bearing 1 or 2 copies of the CD33 transgene were used. In I, Mcpt5-Cre+/– mice expressing human CD33 (CD33-Tg) were crossed with Ptpn6fl/fl mice to yield mice with mast cells expressing CD33 and no Shp-1 (CD33-Tg/Shp-1–KO). (A) Injection scheme for the PCA model. The genotypes of the mice were determined by PCR after the experiments. (B) Representative images of vascular leakage induced by TNP-LP or TNP-LP-CD33L (50 μg) in control-Tg mice. (C) Quantification of local mast cell activation (absorbance at 650 nm) induced by TNP-LP (50 μg, n = 14) or TNP-LP-CD33L (50 μg, n = 28) in control-Tg mice. (D) Representative images of vascular leakage induced by TNP-LP or TNP-LP-CD33L (50 μg) in CD33-Tg mice. (E) Quantification of local mast cell activation (absorbance at 650 nm) induced by TNP-LP (50 μg, n = 21) or TNP-LP-CD33L (50 μg, n =27) in CD33-Tg mice. (F) Injection scheme for the PSA model. (G–I) Decrease in rectal temperature induced by TNP-LP or TNP-LP-CD33L (150 μg) in control-Tg mice (G), CD33-Tg mice (H), and CD33-Tg mice lacking Shp-1 (I) that were sensitized with 10 μg anti–TNP-IgE. (G–I) Values are plotted as the mean ± SEM at the indicated time points. Data are from 1 experiment (G and I) or were compiled from 3 (H) or 9 sets of experiments (C and E). ***P < 0.001 and ****P < 0.0001, by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (C and E), repeated-measures (RM) 2-way ANOVA (G and H), and RM 2-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (I).
We used a passive systemic anaphylaxis (PSA) model to assess global mast cell activation. Mice were sensitized with anti–TNP-IgE, and the next day baseline rectal temperatures were measured, and mice were treated with liposomes (Figure 4F). We observed that TNP-LP strongly induced a decrease in rectal temperature that was dependent on the amount of anti–TNP-IgE given in the sensitization step and the dose of TNP-LP in the challenge step (Supplemental Figure 5, A and B). Mice remained sensitized to TNP-LP if the challenge was delayed for 7 days (Supplemental Figure 5C).
The impact of the CD33 ligand was minimal in mice with no expression of CD33 (control-Tg mice), since both TNP-LP and TNP-LP-CD33L induced a similar degree of systemic anaphylaxis (Figure 4G). In CD33-Tg mice, TNP-LP induced a degree of anaphylaxis similar to that seen in control-Tg mice (Supplemental Figure 5D). In contrast, TNP-LP-CD33L did not trigger systemic anaphylaxis in CD33-Tg mice (Figure 4H and Supplemental Figure 5E), demonstrating potent CD33L-mediated suppression of mast cell degranulation and anaphylaxis.
To investigate whether the tyrosine phosphatase Shp-1 is involved in CD33/CD33L-mediated inhibition of mast cell degranulation, CD33-Tg (Mcpt5-Cre+/–R26-CD33+) mice were mated with Ptpn6fl/fl mice (43). Since Ptpn6fl/fl mice produce no Shp-1 if cells express Cre recombinase, breeding Ptpn6fl/fl mice with CD33-Tg mice results in deletion of Shp-1 only in mast cells (CD33-Tg SHP-1–KO mice). As seen in Figure 4I, while TNP-LP-CD33L produced no anaphylaxis in CD33-Tg mice, it induced a level of anaphylaxis in the CD33-Tg Shp-1–KO mice that was similar to that induced in the control-Tg mice that expressed no CD33 (Figure 4I). These results suggest that Shp-1 plays a key role in CD33-mediated inhibition of mast cell degranulation (Figure 3E).
Antigenic liposomes with CD33 ligand desensitize mice to antigen challenge. We next assessed whether antigenic liposomes with CD33L could prevent anaphylaxis upon subsequent antigen challenge in the PSA model. Initial experiments varying the dose of TNP-LP-CD33L and time of antigen challenge demonstrated that profound desensitization could be achieved (Supplemental Figure 6, A and B). Optimal desensitization could be achieved with a single dose of TNP-LP-CD33L (containing 450 μg lipids and 600 pmol TNP) (Figure 5A). Treatment of TNP-LP-CD33L was well tolerated, without a significant decrease in rectal temperature, and subsequent challenges with TNP-LP caused no anaphylaxis, including challenge 24 hours later with a high dose of antigen (1% TNP-LP) that caused death in 7 of 9 untreated mice (Figure 5B).
Antigenic liposomes with CD33L desensitize CD33-Tg mice to antigen challenge. (A) Injection scheme for desensitization to TNP. CD33-Tg mice were used in the TNP-LP-CD33L–treated group (red). Both CD33-Tg and control-Tg mice were used in the 2 untreated groups (black, gray). (B) Changes in rectal temperature induced by treatment or the challenges indicated in A. (C) Injection scheme to determine antigen specificity of desensitization. CD33-Tg mice were used in the OVA-LP-CD33L–treated group (red circles and squares). Both CD33-Tg and control-Tg mice were used in the untreated group (gray circles and squares). (D) Rectal temperature induced by the treatment or challenge illustrated in C. (B and D) Values are plotted as the mean ± SEM. (E) Injection scheme used to evaluate the impact of TNP-LP-CD33L on mast cell frequency and anti–TNP-IgE on mast cells. Control mice received 200 μl PBS. (F) Frequencies of mast cells from peritoneal fluid from mice treated in E. Mast cell frequencies were determined by c-Kit+CD45+PI– cells. (G) In vitro binding of fluorescent TNP-LP (20 μM) to peritoneal mast cells harvested from mice treated as illustrated in C. (H) MFI of fluorescent TNP-LP binding to peritoneal mast cells quantified in G. The background was determined using untreated cells from a naive mouse. (I) Serum anti–TNP-IgE quantified prior to and 6 hours and 24 hours after treatment with TNP-LP-CD33L (450 μg) using CD33-Tg mice sensitized with 10 μg anti–TNP-IgE. Control mice received 200 μl PBS. Data in B were compiled from 2 experiments. Data are representative of 2 (F–H) or 3 (I) independent experiments. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, and ****P < 0.0001, by RM 2-way ANOVA (B), RM 2-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (D), and unpaired, 2-tailed Student’s t test (F–I).
We next assessed the ability of antigenic liposomes with CD33L to desensitize mice to a common egg allergen, OVA (Gal d 2) (44) (Supplemental Figure 6C). In mice sensitized with anti–OVA-IgE, treatment with OVA-LP-CD33L (containing 150 μg lipid and 9 μg OVA) did not cause significant anaphylaxis, and subsequent challenges with OVA-LP 5.5 hours later or 5 mg OVA at 24 hours caused no anaphylaxis (Supplemental Figure 6D). The results demonstrate that treatment with antigenic liposomes with CD33L desensitizes mice to subsequent antigen challenge.
To determine whether the desensitization is antigen specific in vivo, mice sensitized with both anti–TNP-IgE and anti–OVA-IgE were treated with OVA-LP-CD33L, and after resting for 5.5 hours, the mice were challenged with either OVA-LP or TNP-LP (Figure 5C). We observed that treatment with OVA-LP-CD33L produced no anaphylaxis (Figure 5D, left). Upon subsequent challenge with OVA-LP, the treated mice had no significant anaphylaxis relative to the untreated controls, whereas challenge with TNP-LP induced anaphylaxis in both the untreated and treated mice (Figure 5D, right). While the degree of anaphylaxis was milder in the treated mice, the difference was not statistically significant. These results suggest that desensitization caused by antigenic liposomes with CD33L is antigen specific.
To investigate the mechanism of desensitization, anti–TNP-IgE–sensitized CD33-Tg mice were treated with 450 μg TNP-LP-CD33L or PBS. Six hours after treatment, peritoneal cells were collected and then incubated with fluorescent TNP-LP, and mast cells were analyzed by flow cytometry (Figure 5E). We observed that mast cell frequencies in the peritoneum were similar in PBS- and TNP-LP-CD33L–treated mice (Figure 5F). TNP-LP strongly bound to mast cells harvested from PBS-treated mice but did not bind significantly to mast cells harvested from TNP-LP-CD33L–treated mice (Figure 5, G and H). The results are consistent with results for LAD2 cells (Supplemental Figure 3C), which showed that TNP-LP-CD33L either causes endocytosis of the anti–TNP-IgE–FcεRI complex (32, 33) or remains bound to the complex on the mast cell surface, blocking binding of TNP-LP.
Since mice are passively sensitized with anti–TNP-IgE intravenously in the PSA model, we reasoned that the antigenic liposomes (TNP-LP-CD33L) might also bind the serum anti–TNP-IgE and alter its circulatory half-life. To assess this, we measured the serum levels of anti–TNP-IgE in PBS- and TNP-LP-CD33L–treated animals over time. In the PBS-treated animals, the serum half-life of anti–TNP-IgE was 6 hours, which was consistent with the reported half-life of infused IgE (45). In contrast, TNP-LP-CD33L accelerated the clearance of serum anti–TNP-IgE (Figure 5I). Thus, TNP-LP-CD33L has a direct impact on removing or blocking anti–TNP-IgE immobilized on mast cells and accelerates clearance of anti–TNP-IgE from the blood, precluding the resensitization of mast cells.
CD33 is expressed on human skin and lung mast cells and inhibits IgE-mediated airway bronchoconstriction. In view of the potent activity of CD33 in the suppression of mast cell activation in the murine models, we sought to extend the relevance to human mast cells. CD33 expression has been previously demonstrated on cultured human CD34+ or cord blood–derived mast cells (23, 46), gastrointestinal mast cells (47), healthy/neoplastic bone marrow mast cells, and lung mast cells (22, 48). We performed flow cytometry to evaluate the expression of CD33 and other Siglecs on human mast cells isolated from surgically derived samples of discarded human breast, foreskin, facial, and abdominal skin from 10 individuals. Consistently high expression levels of CD33 and Siglec-6, -7, and -8 were detected on human skin and low levels of CD22 and Siglec-5 in skin from all samples (Figure 6, A and B).
CD33 is expressed on human mast cells and inhibits IgE-mediated human airway bronchoconstriction. (A) Flow cytometric analysis of mast cells isolated from discarded human skin (c-KithiFcεRI+ gated on PI–CD45+CD3–CD19–CD56– cells) (left) and overlay of isotype control and anti-CD33 staining of gated mast cells (right). (B) MFI of antibody staining of Siglecs on mast cells isolated from skin that was discarded following surgical procedures (n = 1 to 10 donors). (C) Time course of the percentage of bronchoconstriction of hPCLSs. Lung slices were sensitized with human IgE (4 mg/ml, gray) or anti–TNP-IgE (10 μg/ml, black and red) with recombinant human SCF (200 ng/ml, R&D Systems) overnight. Slices were challenged with anti–human IgE (20 μg/ml, gray), TNP-LP (50 μM, black), or TNP-LP-CD33L (50 μM, red) over a 10-minute period. The airway luminal area over time was compared with the baseline luminal area and expressed as the percentage of bronchoconstriction. Values represent the mean ± SEM. (D) AUC induced by the indicated treatments. AUC values below 0 are plotted as 0. (E) Percentage of bronchoconstriction induced by the indicated agents at 10 minutes. (F) Following stimulation with the indicated reagents, the percentage of bronchoconstriction induced by CCh (0.1 mM) was measured. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01, by 1-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (D–F). Gating of skin mast cells in A is representative of the 10 donors. Data in C–F were compiled from 5 or 9 lung slices from 2 donors.
We next assessed whether endogenous CD33 expression levels were sufficient for TNP-LP-CD33L to inhibit IgE-FcεRI–dependent mast cell–mediated bronchoconstriction in human precision-cut lung slices (hPCLSs) ex vivo (49). As a positive control, we found that anti-IgE induced strong bronchoconstriction of slices sensitized with human IgE, and TNP-LP induced similar levels of bronchoconstriction in slices sensitized with anti–TNP-IgE. Strikingly, TNP-LP-CD33L suppressed bronchoconstriction to baseline levels (Figure 6, C–E) but had no effect on bronchoconstriction induced by subsequent addition of carbachol (CCh) (Figure 6F), demonstrating that the tissues remained capable of constriction. Collectively, these data demonstrate that endogenous levels of CD33 are sufficient to inhibit IgE-dependent activation of lung mast cells.
Mast cells play a central role in IgE-mediated allergic responses (5, 7–9, 15), leading to life-threatening anaphylaxis in 2% to 5% of the US population in their lifetime (3, 4). Currently, there are no approved drugs that directly target mast cells for desensitization of allergic responses. A temporary acute method of desensitization called rapid desensitization is used for patients with allergies to life-saving medicines and involves a gradual increase in allergen doses over 3 to 4 hours to achieve a therapeutic dose (50). Allergen immunotherapy is used to induce prolonged antigen unresponsiveness and involves weekly subcutaneous or sublingual administration of allergen under medical supervision to monitor signs of anaphylaxis, with a slow increase of the dose to a plateau level that is continued for several years. The goal is to attain unresponsiveness to antigen by inducing Tregs and/or anti–allergen IgG4 to sequester antigen (12). For standard allergen immunotherapy, the prolonged treatment regimen under medical supervision for anaphylaxis is accompanied by poor patient compliance, and sensitivity often returns after the regular dosing of antigen ends (12). Reducing serum IgE levels with omaluzimab shows promise for accelerating the dose escalation in allergen immunotherapy (51, 52). One strategy to reduce the risk of anaphylaxis during allergen immunotherapy is to introduce allergens under the cover of small-molecule inhibitors targeting kinases involved in FcεRI signaling (53–56). However, it remains to be seen whether kinase inhibitors are as efficacious and well tolerated in the primary treatment of allergies (14).
Here, we show that liposomes displaying both allergen and ligands for CD33 prevent the activation of IgE-sensitized mast cells and desensitize them to subsequent activation, while at the same time accelerating the clearance of circulating anti–allergen IgE and thus preventing resensitization. The result is a complete protection from anaphylaxis upon subsequent allergen challenge over several days. The direct effect on mast cells results from recruitment of CD33 to the IgE-FcεRI complex comprising the microdomain with activated Src kinases, resulting in a profound suppression of downstream signaling pathways that result in degranulation and cytokine expression. Ligation of CD33 with 3 different clones of anti-CD33 or with liposomes containing CD33L alone has no effect on the degranulation of cytokine expression, underscoring the importance of CD33L being codisplayed with allergen on the liposome for recruitment of CD33 to the receptor complex. In addition to suppressing signaling by the antigen codisplayed on the liposome, the mast cells are desensitized to subsequent antigen exposure. One possible mechanism was that the IgE–FcεRI-α chain was shed from the cell surface (57). Using LAD2 cells sensitized with AF555-labeled anti–TNP-IgE, we observed that TNP-LP or TNP-LP-CD33L (AF647) strongly bound to the LAD2 cells (Supplemental Figure 7, A and B) but did not decrease the AF555 signal detected from these cells (Supplemental Figure 7, C and D). Therefore, we attribute the lack of antigen responsiveness to endocytosis of the IgE-FcεRI complex (32, 33), blockage of antigen binding to residual anti–allergen IgE on the mast cell surface, or a combination of both.
The in vitro desensitization using LAD2 cells was predominantly antigen specific, while the in vivo desensitization was antigen specific. The discrepancy could be due to the amount of antigen-specific IgE per mast cell (33). LAD2 cells were cultured in the absence of IgEs, hence its FcεRI receptors were unoccupied. Therefore, anti–TNP-IgE (AF555) was able to label LAD2 cells in vitro (Supplemental Figure 7, C and D). By contrast, FcεRIs from peritoneal mast cells are already occupied with endogenous IgEs, and we were unable to directly detect anti–TNP-IgE (AF555, 5 μg) labeling of peritoneal mast cells when it was injected intravenously (data not shown).
Since mast cells are not depleted by these antigenic liposomes, it is presumed that they will eventually generate new FcεRI receptors and could be resensitized. However, because the antigenic liposomes also accelerate clearance of the antigen-specific IgE, there is no antibody in circulation for resensitizing the cells, and this accounts at least in part for the prolonged period of desensitization, lasting 2–3 days, particularly in this passively sensitized model, in which there is no replacement of the depleted antibody. It will be of interest to determine how long it takes for mast cells to become resensitized in immunized animals that will replace depleted IgE over time. In this regard, an anti-IgE analogous to omaluzimab (Xolair) could be used to deplete newly synthesized IgE to prevent resensitization.
Although human CD33 is abundantly expressed on most myeloid cells, including monocytes, DCs, eosinophils, macrophages, mast cells, and basophils, its role in the regulation of cell signaling is poorly understood (58). In a recent report evaluating the role of CD33 in myeloid cells of mice with a humanized immune system, genetic ablation of human CD33 was found to have minimal impact on innate immune functions (59). However, we show here that the inhibitory function of CD33 is highly context dependent. Expression of human CD33 in mast cells from CD33-Tg mice did not alter mast cell survival or the degree of anaphylaxis relative to control-Tg mice. Moreover, ligation of CD33 with anti-CD33 antibodies or liposomes with CD33L has little or no effect on allergen-induced mast cell activation. However, when CD33 is ligated to the IgE-FcεRI receptor complex, it potently suppresses FcεRI signaling. Thus, for basophils that express both CD33 and the FcεRI receptor, we would expect antigenic liposomes with CD33L to suppress IgE-mediated activation and degranulation to a degree equivalent to that seen with mast cells. However, for other myeloid cells that express CD33, we reason that antigenic liposomes with CD33L would have little impact, since, in the absence of an IgE-FcεRI receptor complex that recognizes the antigen, they would effectively be “seen” as liposomes that contain ligand only, which we found to have no inhibitory effect on mast cells.
Previous efforts to exploit inhibitory receptors for the suppression of IgE-mediated mast cell activation have involved the use of chimeric proteins to recruit inhibitory receptors to the IgE-FcεRI complex (14, 15). One general approach uses bispecific antibodies that ligate either IgE or the FcεRI and an inhibitory receptor (e.g., FcγRIIb or CD300a) (16–19). Here, the objective was to constitutively suppress the mast cell response by coupling the inhibitory receptor to the IgE-FcεRI complex. Another approach is to couple an allergen (e.g., cat allergen Fel d 1, peanut allergen Ara h 2, or TNP) to an antibody fragment or antibody that binds to an inhibitory receptor (e.g., FcγRIIb or allergin-1) (20, 21, 60). Although some of these constructs have shown promise in murine models, translation to humans would require uniform expression of the inhibitor on the targeted cells and limited expression on other cell types that could be the basis for off-target effects. In this regard, the FcγRIIb receptor is expressed on human intestinal mast cells but not on skin mast cells (61), and, conversely, the CD300a receptor is widely expressed on both myeloid and lymphoid cells (62). Therefore, the biodistribution of these novel biotherapeutics should be carefully studied.
In addition to CD33, human mast cells also express several other ITIM-containing Siglecs, including Siglec-6, -7, -8, and -9 (Figure 6B). Evidence to date suggests that other members of the Siglec family can also regulate mast cell responses. Indeed, antibody-mediated cross-linking of Siglec-7 and Siglec-9 to FcεRI has been shown to suppress IgE-mediated mast cell degranulation (63, 64). Likewise, antibody-mediated ligation of Siglec-8 or antibody-mediated ligation of Siglec-8 to the FcεRI receptor suppressed FcεRI-mediated calcium flux and mast cell degranulation (65). Thus, in principle, ligands for other Siglecs could substitute for CD33L in the antigenic liposomal nanoparticle platform for the suppression of mast cell–mediated anaphylaxis, making the family of Siglecs attractive targets for the development of therapeutics to treat allergies.
Mice. All mice were on a C57BL/6 genetic background. Rosa26-Stopfl/fl-CD33 mice were generated by subcloning cDNA encoding full-length CD33 (OriGene, catalog SC122608, sequence identical to that of GenBank BC028152.1) into the AscI site of a CTV targeting vector (Addgene, plasmid 15912). Electroporation of the targeting construct into PRX ES cells (C57BL/6N background), blastocyst injections, and chimera breeding with C57BL/6J albino mice (The Jackson Laboratory, stock no. 000058) were performed according to standard protocols (66). Insertion of the targeted vector into the Rosa26 locus was confirmed by Southern blot analysis of ES cells as previously described (34). The Rosa26-Stopfl/fl-CD33 mice were genotyped by PCR using digested tail samples. A common forward primer located in the 5′ homology region (5′-GAGCTGCAGTGGAGTAGGCG-3′) was used. The WT Rosa26 locus was identified using a reverse primer (5′-TGCTGCATAAAACCCCAGAT-3′), with a band of 370 bp. Tg mice were detected using a reverse primer located in the CAG promoter (5′-GGGCGTACTTGGCATATGAT-3′), with a band of 566 bp. Mcpt5-Cre mice were genotyped by PCR (5′-ACAGTGGTATTCCCGGGGAGTGT-3′ and 5′-GTCAGTGCGTTCAAAGGCCA-3′) as previously described (67). C57BL/6J mice were ordered from the Scripps Rodent Breeding colony. Ptpn6fl/fl mice (stock no. 008336) were genotyped by PCR according to The Jackson Laboratory’s protocol.
Antigen and sugar-lipid conjugation. The high-affinity human CD33 ligand CD33L was attached to PEG-DSPE by coupling the C5- and C9-modified trisaccharide to NHS-PEG2000-DSPE (NOF) using the conditions illustrated in Supplemental Figure 1A (30). TNP-PEG-DSPE was synthesized by coupling TNP-ε-aminocaproyl-OSu (T-1030, Biosearch Technology) to NHS-PEG2000-DSPE as illustrated in Supplemental Figure 1B. OVA and Ah2 were coupled to PEG2000-DSPE as previously described (26, 28, 29).
Liposomes. All liposomes were composed of a 57:38:5 molar ratio of distearoyl phosphatidylcholine (DSPC) (Avanti Polar Lipids), cholesterol (Sigma-Aldrich), and polyethylene glycol-distearoyl phosphoethanolamine (PEG2000-DSPE, NOF; PEG-DSPE). When antigen-PEG-DSPE or CD33L-PEG-DSPE is included in the formulation, there is a proportionate reduction in PEG-DSPE, such that PEG-DSPE is kept at 5% of the total volume. To make TNP-LP, 0.1%, 0.4%, or 1% of TNP-PEG-DSPE was added to the lipid mixture. To make LP-CD33L, 3% CD33L-PEG-DSPE was added to the lipid mixture. To copresent TNP and CD33L (TNP-LP-CD33L) on the same liposomes, both TNP-PEG-DSPE (0.1% or 0.4%) and CD33L-PEG-DSPE (3%) were added to the lipid mixture. To make fluorescently labeled liposomes, 0.1% AF647-PEG-DSPE or AF488-PEG-DSPE was added to the lipid mixture.
To assemble the liposomes, DSPC, cholesterol, and PEG-DSPE (dissolved in chloroform) were mixed, evaporated with nitrogen, and suspended in 200 μl DMSO. TNP-PEG-DSPE and/or CD33L-PEG-DSPE (DMSO stocks, stored at –20°C) were then added and lyophilized. The dried lipids were hydrated with PBS. For OVA-LP and Ah2-LP, OVA-PEG-DSPE and Ah2-PEG-DSPE were added to PBS-hydrated lipids. The mixtures were then sonicated for 5 × 30 seconds. Liposomes were passed through 800-nm, 200-nm, and 100-nm controlled pore membranes (Nuclepore, Sigma-Aldrich) 20 times per membrane using an extruder (Avanti Polar Lipids, 610023) at room temperature (RT). Liposomes were stored at 4°C to 7°C in the dark for up to 6 months.
For in vitro experiments, the quantity of liposomes used was based on the final concentration of total molar lipids of liposomes. Liposomes containing 0.1% TNP-PEG-DSPE with or without 3% CD33L-PEG-DSPE were used in Figure 1, D and F; Figures 3–6; Supplemental Figure 3; and Supplemental Figures 5–7. Liposomes containing 0.4% TNP-PEG-DSPE with or without 3% CD33L-PEG-DSPE were used in Figure 1, E, G, and H; Figure 2, F–J; and Supplemental Figure 2. Liposomes containing 3% CD33L-PEG-DSPE with or without 0.1% AF647-PEG-DSPE were used in Figure 1, C, F, and G; Figure 2, E and G; Figure 3, B and C; Supplemental Figure 1; and Supplemental Figure 3C, and Supplemental Figure 4, G and H. Liposomes containing 0.1% Ah2-PEG-DSPE with or without 3% CD33-PEG-DSPE were used in Figure 1I. Liposomes containing 0.1% OVA-PEG-DSPE with or without 3% CD33-PEG-DSPE, with or without 0.1% AF647-PEG-DSPE, were used in Figure 1J; Figure 5D; Supplemental Figure 2D; Supplemental Figure 3C; and Supplemental Figure 6D. Liposomes containing 1% TNP-PEG-DSPE were used in Figure 5B and Supplemental Figure 6B.
LAD2 and BMMC cell culture. The human LAD2 mast cell line (from Arnold Kirshenbaum, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [NIAID], NIH) was cultured using StemPro-34 SFM (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 2 mM l-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 10 mM HEPES, and 50 μΜ β-mercaptoethanol (37). To culture BMMCs, femurs from CD33-Tg mice were flushed with RPMI-1640 and cultured in media (RPMI 1640, 10% FBS, 2 mM l-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 10 mM HEPES, and 50 μΜ β-mercaptoethanol) supplemented with IL-3–conditioned media harvested from WEHI-3B cells for 3 to 4 weeks (37). Maturation of BMMCs was determined by flow cytometry using c-Kit and FcεRI double-positive staining. For in vitro assays, GFP+ BMMCs were sorted busing a FACSAria (BD Biosciences), and sorted cells were expanded in IL-3–conditioned media. All BMMCs were used within 6 weeks of culturing.
Human CD33 CHO cells. Full-length human CD33 was amplified from cDNA (OriGene, catalog SC122608) and subcloned into a pcDNA5/FRT/V5-His vector using the Nhe I and Age I site. The R (CGG)119 A (GCG) mutation in the variable region of CD33 was obtained using primers (5′-ATACTTCTTTGCGATGGAGAGAGGAAG-3′) and (5′-GAACCATTATCCCTCCTC-3′) and standard cloning techniques (Q5 mutagenesis, New England BioLabs). Flp-in CHO cells (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific) were then transfected with WT or R119A CD33 containing the pcDNA5/FRT/V5-His vector with pOG44 using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific), selected with hygromycin B (500 μg/ml, Roche), and cultured in DMEM-F12 (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin.
Flow cytometry. All antibodies are listed in Supplemental Table 1. Cells (<2 × 106cells/condition) were stained with antibody cocktails in FACS buffer (HBSS supplemented with 2 mM EDTA and 0.1% BSA) on ice for at least 20 minutes in the dark. Cells were then washed with FACS buffer and suspended in FACS buffer containing 0.5 μg/ml propidium iodide (PI). All data were acquired using the BD LSR II (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with Flowjo software (version 9.3.3).
Liposome-binding assay. LAD2 cells, BMMCs, CHO cells (5 × 104 to 1 × 105 cells/condition), or peritoneal cells (<2 × 106 cells/mouse) were incubated with the indicated liposomes (20 μM final liposome concentration, 37°C, 30–60 min) in media (RPMI 1640 plus 10% FBS). Cells were washed, stained with antibodies in FACS buffer if needed, and analyzed using the BD LSR II. In Figure 1C and Supplemental Figure 1, G and H, LAD2 cells were first treated with isotype control or anti-CD33 antibody (4 μg/ml in 50 μl media, 37°C, 60 min). Liposomes (40 μM, in 50 μl media) were then directly added to the cells in the presence of antibodies (37°C, 60 min). In Supplemental Figure 3C, LAD2 cells sensitized with anti–TNP-IgE and anti–OVA-IgE (clones MEB38, PMP68, and EC1, each at 500 ng/ml, overnight) were first incubated with TNP-LP, TNP-LP-CD33L, or LP-CD33L (100 μl, 20 μM, 37°C, 60 min), and TNP-LP and OVA-LP (AF488 or AF647 labeled, 100 μl, 40 μM) were then directly added to the cells (37°C, 30 min).
IgE. Murine anti–TNP-IgE (clone MEB38) was purchased from BioLegend. Murine anti–OVA-IgE (clone EC1) was purchased from Chondrex, and clone PMP68 was purchased from Bio-Rad. Human anti–OVA IgE (clone 11B6) was provided by Scott A. Smith (Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA).
Calcium flux. LAD2 cells, sensitized with anti–TNP-IgE (1 μg/ml, overnight), were washed with PBS and incubated in RPMI medium containing 1%FBS, 10 mM HEPES, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, and 1 μM indo-1 (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 15 × 106 cells/ml for 30 minutes in a 37°C water bath. After incubation, cells were washed with the same buffer without indo-1 and suspended in HBSS containing 1% FBS, 1 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM CaCl2 at 2 × 106 cells/ml. Cells were stored on ice, and an aliquot (400 μl) was warmed (37°C, 5 min) prior to calcium flux initiation. Cells were stimulated with TNP-LP or TNP-LP-CD33L at a final total liposome concentration of 2.5 μM, and indo-1 fluorescence (violet versus blue) was monitored by flow cytometry for 3 minutes at 37°C. The addition of liposomes took place 10 seconds after starting the acquisition. Data were analyzed, and the AUC were calculated with FlowJo software (version 9.3.3) using the kinetics functions. The signal generated from cells that received 1 μl PBS was used to determine the level of background staining for the assay.
Degranulation. LAD2 cells (104 cells/well) or sorted GFP+ BMMCs (3 × 104 cells/well) cultured from CD33-Tg mice were sensitized with anti–TNP-IgE (1 μg/ml in 100 μl culture media overnight) in Figure 1, E–H; Figure 2, F and H; and Supplemental Figure 2, A–C. The next day, cells were washed and stimulated with the indicated liposomes in HEPES buffer (HBBS supplemented with 20 mM HEPES, 0.2 mg/ml CaCl2, 0.2 mg/ml MgSO4, and 0.4 mg/ml BSA) for 30 to 60 minutes at 37°C. Degranulation was measured as the release of β-hex, which was quantified by the digestion of its substrate 4-nitrophenyl-N-acetyle-β-glucosaminide (PNAG) (0.35 mg/ml in PBS supplemented with 8 mg/ml sodium citrate, 0.35 mg/ml, pH 4.5). The percentage of degranulation (percentage of β-hex) was determined by dividing the β-hex activity in the supernatant by that from the cell pellet (37). Cells receiving buffer only were used to determine the background for each experiment, which was less than 10%.
In Figure 1F, 30 μM TNP-LP and 30 μM LP-CD33L were premixed in HEPES buffer and then directly added to the LAD2 cells. In Figure 1G, the LAD2 cells were first treated with buffer or 20 μM LP-CD33L (in 50 μl, 37°C, 1 h) and then stimulated with 50 μl HEPES buffer containing 60 μM TNP-LP or TNP-LP-CD33L. In Figure 1H and Figure 2H, cells were first treated with isotype control or anti-CD33 (WM53 at 2 or 4 μg/ml, in 50 μl, 37°C, 1 h) and then stimulated with 50 μl HEPES buffer containing 60 μM TNP-LP or TNP-LP-CD33L in the presence of the antibodies. In Figure 1I, LAD2 cells were sensitized with 1:5 diluted plasma from a peanut-allergic patient (Plasma Lab, patient no. 22132, final anti–peanut IgE >20 kU/l). In Figure 1J, LAD2 cells were sensitized with human anti–OVA-IgE (clone 11B6, 1 μg/ml, overnight). In Supplemental Figure 3, A and B, LAD2 cells sensitized with anti-TNP and anti–OVA-IgE were first treated with buffer containing 5 μM TNP-LP-CD33L or buffer alone (100 μl, 37°C, 1 h) and then washed with 100 μl HEPES buffer and stimulated with TNP31BSA (Biosearch) or OVA (Worthington, 100 μl, 37°C, 1 h). Degranulation induced by 5 μM TNP-LP-CD33L was determined by different aliquots of the cells run in parallel. In Supplemental Figure 2, A–C, LAD2 cells were treated with different clones of anti-CD33 antibodies at different concentrations (in 50 μl HEPES buffer, 37°C, 1 h). TNP-LP or TNP-LP-CD33L (10 μM in 50 μl HEPES buffer) was then added to the cells in the presence of antibodies. In Supplemental Figure 2D, LAD2 cells sensitized with anti–OVA-IgE were first treated with antibodies (4 μg/ml in 50 μl, 37°C, 1 h). OVA-LP or OVA-LP-CD33L (60 μM in 50 μl) was then added to the cells in the presence of antibodies.
Peritoneal cells. After mice were euthanized by CO2 overdose, the outer skin was cut open and pulled back. The inner skin was gently lifted by forceps, and 5 ml PBS was injected into the peritoneum using a 25-gauge needle. After gentle massages, the peritoneum was placed on top of a 50-ml tube. The inner skin was then cut open with scissors. Collected cells were transferred to 15-ml tubes, pelleted (300 g, 5 min), and counted by a hemocytometer. Dead cells were excluded by trypan blue (Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Mast cell numbers in Figure 2C were determined by multiplying the total number of cells by the percentages of cells that were c-Kit+ within the PI–CD45+ gate as determined by flow cytometry.
Cytokine ELISA. Cytokines were measured as previously described (37) with some modifications. BMMCs were sensitized overnight with 1 μg/ml anti–TNP-IgE in IL-3–conditioned media. The next day, the cells were washed and stimulated with the indicated reagents in culturing media without IL-3 for 5 to 6 hours at 37°C (105 cells/100 μl). After centrifugation (300 g, 5 min), the supernatants were collected. TNF-α, IL-4, IL-6 (BioLegend), and IL-13 (R&D Systems) were measured by ELISA. All capturing and detection antibodies were used at 2 to 2.5 μg/ml. All ELISAs were developed using TMB Peroxidase Substrate (75 μl/well; Rockland) and quenched with 2 M H2SO4 (75 μl/well), and A450 was measured using a plate reader (Synergy H1, BioTek). In Figure 2, I and J, BMMCs were first incubated with isotype control or anti-CD33 (10 μg/ml, 37°C, 1 h). TNP-LP or TNP-LP-CD33 (final total liposome concentration at 40 μM) was added to the BMMCs in the presence of antibodies and then incubated (37°C, 5 h).
Western blot analysis. LAD2 cells or sorted GFP+ BMMCs cultured from CD33-Tg mice were sensitized overnight in culturing media containing 1 μg/ml anti–TNP-IgE. LAD2 cells or BMMCs (3 × 106 cells/condition) were washed and then stimulated with the indicated reagents (final liposome concentration of 2 μM in 500 μl culture media at 37°C) using culture media. Cells were quenched with 4°C PBS, pelleted (15,800 g, 13 s), and lysed (4°C, 30 min) in 160 μl lysis buffer (9803S, Cell Signaling Technology). Cell debris was removed by centrifugation (15, 800 g, 10 min, 4°C). LDS Sample Buffer (50 μl/sample; Bolt) and DTT (20 μl/sample, 2.5 M) were added to the cleared lysate (150 μl each) and denatured (90°C, 10 min). Whole-cell lysates (5–10 μl/lane) were run on 4% to 12% Bis-Tris Gels (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific; 150 Volts, 90 min) and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. Antibodies are listed in Supplemental Table 2. Amersham ECL detection reagent and Hyperfilm (GE Healthcare) were used to develop the images.
PCA. One ear was given 25 μl PBS as a mock injection, and the other ear was given 125 ng anti–TNP-IgE (in 25 μl PBS) intradermally using insulin syringes (29G1/2, U-100, Comfort Point). The next day, 50 μg TNP-LP or TNP-LP-CD33L (200 μl of 0.33 mM liposomes) was delivered via the lateral tail vein in PBS containing 1% Evans blue dye (w/v, Chem-Impex). All mice were euthanized 60 minutes after injection. Ears were excised in small pieces, dissolved in 500 μl dimethylformamide (DMF), and shaken (>500 rpm) overnight at 37°C. A constant volume of 200 μl cleared DMF was used to measure Evans blue dye incorporation, and A650 was measured using a Synergy H1 plate reader (BioTek Instruments).
PSA. Mice were sensitized with anti-TNP or anti–OVA-IgE through tail-vein injections. The next day, after baseline rectal temperatures were measured, the indicated liposome (in 200 μl PBS/mouse) was injected via the tail vein, and systemic anaphylaxis was quantified by measuring the decrease in rectal temperature (RET-3 and BAT-12, PhysiTemp Instruments).
Dose of IgE. In Figure 4, G–I; Figure 5, B and I; Supplemental Figure 5, A, C, and D; and Supplemental Figure 6B, mice were sensitized with 10 μg anti–NP-IgE. In Figure 5D, mice were sensitized with 2 μg anti–TNP-IgE and 10 μg anti–OVA-IgE (5 μg EC1 and 5 μg PMP68). In Figure 5, E–H, mice were sensitized with 5 μg anti–TNP-IgE. In Supplemental Figure 5E, mice were sensitized with 2 μg anti–TNP-IgE. In Supplemental Figure 6D, mice were sensitized with 20 μg anti–OVA-IgE (10 μg EC1 and 10 μg PMP68).
Liposome dose. In Figure 4, G–I, and Supplemental Figure 5E, mice were given 150 μg TNP-LP or TNP-LP-CD33L (200 μl of 1 mM liposome). In Figure 5, B and F–I, mice were treated with 450 μg TNP-LP-CD33L (200μl of 3 mM). In Supplemental Figure 6B, mice were treated with 1 or 2 injections of TNP-LP-CD33L (200 μl of 1.25 mM liposomes each). In Figure 5B and Supplemental Figure 6B, mice were challenged with 50 μg of 0.1%TNP-LP and/or 50 μg 1%TNP-LP (200 μl of 0.33 mM liposomes). In Figure 5C and Supplemental Figure 6D, mice were given 159 μg OVA-LP or OVA-LP-CD33L (200 μl of 1 mM liposomes containing 150 μg lipid and 9 μg OVA-PEG-DSPE) or 150 μg TNP-LP (200 μl of 1 mM liposomes).
Quantification of circulating anti–TNP-IgE. The amount of anti–TNP-IgE in the serum was determined by ELISA. Microplates (Greiner Bio-One, 655081) were coated with TNP31BSA (Biosearch Technology, 10 μg/ml in 50 μl PBS/well, overnight). The next day, the plates were washed 5 times with PBS-T (PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20, v/v), blocked with PBS containing 1% BSA (w/v, >2 h, RT), and then washed 5 times with PBS-T. Mice were bled prior to treatment and 6 and 24 hours after treatment. Serially diluted serum (diluted at 1:5, 1:15, and 1:45 in PBS containing 1% BSA) was loaded onto plates (4°C, overnight). Serially diluted anti–TNP-IgE antibodies were loaded as standards. The next day, after the plates were washed 5 times with PBS-T, the plates were incubated with biotin anti–mouse IgE (clone RME-1, at 2 μg/ml in 50 μl, RT, >1 h), and streptavidin-HRP (BioLegend, 405210; 1 μg/ml, >30 min, RT). Plates were then washed 5 times with PBS-T. All ELISAs were developed using TMB Peroxidase Substrate (75 μl/well; Rockland and quenched with 2M H2SO4 (75 μl/well), and A450 was measured using a Synergy H1 plate reader (BioTek).
Human skin mast cells. Discarded skin tissues (abdominal skin, face and breast skin, and foreskin) from healthy donors who had undergone plastic surgery were cut into small pieces (~5 mm) and soaked in RPMI 1640 supplemented with penicillin-streptomycin with 5 U/ml Dispase II (Roche) at 4°C overnight. The next day, the tissues were warmed up to 37°C for 2 hours and transferred to RPMI 1640 supplemented with Collagenase IV (2.5 mg/ml; Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and DNase I (0.5 mg/ml, Roche) for 45 minutes at 37°C with constant shaking. Disaggregated cells were then filtered through 70-μm nylon cell strainers and cultured in StemPro-34 (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific) overnight, followed by flow cytometric analysis. All Siglec antibodies and isotype controls were PE labeled and used at 2 μg/ml. Human mast cells were defined as PI–CD45+CD19–CD3–CD56–FcεRI+c-Kithi. More than 800 events were collected within the mast cell gate.
Human airway bronchoconstriction assay. Precision cuts of human lung slices and airway constriction assays were conducted as previously described (49). In brief, lung slices were sensitized with either human IgE (Calbiochem, 401152; 4 mg/ml overnight) or anti–TNP-IgE (clone MEB38, BioLegend; 10 μg/ml overnight) in the presence of 200 ng/ml recombinant human SCF (R&D Systems). After baseline images were taken, tissues were stimulated with anti–human IgE (Sigma-Alrich, I6284) or 50 μM TNP-LP or TNP-LP-CD33L. Serial images were taken every 30 seconds for 10 minutes. Following cross-linking, the slices were tested for viability by measuring contraction induced by CCh (10–4 M; Sigma-Aldrich, C4382). Data are plotted as the percentage of bronchoconstriction time course after addition of anti–IgE or liposomes (Figure 6C). The AUC (Figure 6D) was intergraded using GraphPad Prism (xy analysis) software (GraphPad Software), and values of less than 0 are plotted as 0.
Statistics. Statistical significance was determined using GraphPad Prism (version 6.0f). A P value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. In Figure 5B and Supplemental Figure 6, B and D, when mice died from anaphylaxis, the last rectal temperature taken prior to death was used for statistical analysis.
Study approval. All animal experiments were performed in accordance with protocols approved by the IACUC of The Scripps Research Institute.
SD, MSM, and JCP designed the experiments, analyzed the data, and interpreted the results. SD performed the majority of the experiments. CJKW, WFJ, and RAP designed and performed the human lung bronchoconstriction assay. CMN and MSM provided reagents for liposome formulation. SD and JCP wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. All authors participated in editing the manuscript.
We thank Sergey Kupriyanov and Greg Martin (The Scripps Research Institute) for their assistance with generation of the Rosa26-Stopfl/fl-CD33 mice; Bruce Bochner (Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA); Zhou Zhu (Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island) for insightful discussions and providing the Mcpt5-Cre and Ptpn6fl/fl mice; Changchun Xiao and Jovan Shepherd (The Scripps Research Institute) for providing the CTV targeting vector and performing Southern blot analyses; Dean Metcalfe, Arnold Kirshenbaum, and Yun Bai (NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA) for providing LAD2 cells; Mike Kulis and Wesley Burks (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA) for providing purified Ah2; Scott Smith (Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA) for providing anti–OVA–human IgE (clone 11B6); Wendy Havran and Kevin Ramirez (The Scripps Research Institute); Ross Rudolph (Scripps Clinic, San Diego, California, USA) for obtaining and providing the discarded human skin samples; and Joana Juan for assistance and Jill Waalen (The Scripps Research Institute) for advice on statistical analysis. This work was supported by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI), NIH (P01HL107151), the NIAID, NIH (U19AI136443), and the Department of Defense (W81XWH-16-1-0303).
Address correspondence to: James C. Paulson, 10550 N. Torrey Pines Road, MB202, La Jolla, California 92037, USA. Phone: 858.784.9634; Email: jpaulson@scripps.edu.
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
License: Copyright 2019, American Society for Clinical Investigation.
Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2019;129(3):1387–1401.https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI125456.
See the related Commentary at Recruiting CD33 on mast cells to inhibit IgE-mediated mast cell–dependent anaphylaxis.