Bacterial multiplication associated with virus infections is related to defects in in situ bactericidal (phagocytic) mechanisms of the lung. To determine whether the phagocytic defect was in bacterial ingestion and/or intracellular digestion, mice were infected with a sublethal dose of aerosolized Sendai virus and challenged 7 days later with a finely dispersed aerosol of Staphylococcus aureus. Groups of uninfected and virus-infected mice were sacrificed at 0, 6, 12, and 24 h after challenge, the lungs were perfused with formalin in situ, and the intra- or extracellular location of the bacteria was determined histologically. At 0 h, 49% and 51% of the staphylococci had an intracellular location in virus and nonvirus-infected lungs, respectively. With time, decreasing numbers of staphylococci were observed within the phagocytic cells of nonvirus-infected lungs, mostly as single organisms or in small clusters of less than four. In contrast, in focal area of virus-infected lungs, increasing numbers of phagocytic cells showed clumps of more than 25 bacteria/cell. These data demonstrate that virus-infected suppression of pulmonary antibacterial activity against S. aureus is related primarily to defects in intracellular processing mechanisms.
G J Jakab, G M Green
Usage data is cumulative from December 2023 through December 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 150 | 0 |
56 | 21 | |
Figure | 0 | 6 |
Scanned page | 241 | 8 |
Citation downloads | 40 | 0 |
Totals | 487 | 35 |
Total Views | 522 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.