Usage Information
Abstract
In recent years the lysosomal cathepsins have been implicated as important agents in the physiological degradation of various cartilages. In the present study, the nature of cathepsin present in human articular cartilage was investigated by microtechniques and a possible role for cathepsins in the cartilage degradation observed in osteoarthritis was sought. The results of this study indicated that the hemoglobin and proteoglycan-digesting activity in the human cartilage observed is predominantly that of a cathepsin D-type enzyme. This cathepsin D-type enzyme activity was present in two to three times greater amounts in yellowish or ulcerated articular cartilage from patients with primary osteoarthritis than in control “normal” human cartilages. The human cathepsin D-type enzyme, as well as a highly purified cathepsin D from bovine uterus degraded proteoglycan subunit (PGS) maximally at pH 5. Both enzyme preparations were inactive on hemoglobin at pH 6-8, but degraded PGS considerably at neutral pH. The activity of the human cathepsin extract was not affected by reagents which inhibit or activate cathepsins A and B. Neutral proteases which are active on hemoglobin or are inhibited by diisopropylfluorophosphate (DFP) were not detected in these preparations, but contamination by another type of neutral protease cannot be excluded. Chloroquine inhibited the degradation of PGS at neutral pH by the human cartilage enzyme extract.
Authors
Asher I. Sapolsky, Roy D. Altman, J. Frederick Woessner, David S. Howell
Usage data is cumulative from July 2025 through July 2026.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 289 | 23 |
| 107 | 9 | |
| Figure | 0 | 7 |
| Scanned page | 597 | 18 |
| Citation downloads | 138 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,131 | 57 |
| Total Views | 1,188 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)