Usage Information

Immunologic Studies in von Willebrand's Disease: EVIDENCE THAT THE ANTIHEMOPHILIC FACTOR (AHF) PRODUCED AFTER TRANSFUSIONS LACKS AN ANTIGEN ASSOCIATED WITH NORMAL AHF AND THE INACTIVE MATERIAL PRODUCED BY PATIENTS WITH CLASSIC HEMOPHILIA
Bruce Bennett, Oscar D. Ratnoff, Jack Levin
Bruce Bennett, Oscar D. Ratnoff, Jack Levin
View: Text | PDF

Immunologic Studies in von Willebrand's Disease: EVIDENCE THAT THE ANTIHEMOPHILIC FACTOR (AHF) PRODUCED AFTER TRANSFUSIONS LACKS AN ANTIGEN ASSOCIATED WITH NORMAL AHF AND THE INACTIVE MATERIAL PRODUCED BY PATIENTS WITH CLASSIC HEMOPHILIA

Abstract

Antihemophilic globulin (AHF, factor VIII) levels were measured by a standard coagulation assay and by an immunological technique before and serially after infusion of fresh frozen plasma or cryoprecipitate into patients with von Willebrand's disease. Initial levels of AHF, measured both as procoagulant and as antigen, were low. Immediately after transfusions, the rise in levels of AHF-like antigen was compatible with the quantity of antigen present in the infused plasma or cryoprecipitate. Thereafter, levels of antigen declined rapidly and reached preinfusion values in approximately 24 hr. In contrast, procoagulant activity remained elevated, and sometimes continued to rise, for longer periods of time. One possible explanation of this finding is that the AHF molecule produced by patients with von Willebrand's disease, in response to transfusion of as yet unidentified factors, lacks the antigenic site associated with the normal AHF molecule or the inactive molecule produced by patients with hemophilia A.

Authors

Bruce Bennett, Oscar D. Ratnoff, Jack Levin

×

Usage data is cumulative from July 2025 through July 2026.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 234 6
PDF 108 9
Scanned page 296 1
Citation downloads 129 0
Totals 767 16
Total Views 783
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement