Advertisement
Research ArticleAutoimmunity Free access | 10.1172/JCI25221
1Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. 2Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital and Institute for Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Immunogenetics, Ulm, Germany. 3Children’s Hospital, Karlsruhe, Germany. 4Laboratory of Immunology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. 5Institute for Pathology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Address correspondence to: Stephan Ehl, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Freiburg, Mathildenstr. 1, 79106 Freiburg, Germany. Phone: 49-761-270-4301; Fax: 49-761-270-4481; E-mail: ehl@kikli.ukl.uni-freiburg.de.
Find articles by Ehl, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. 2Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital and Institute for Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Immunogenetics, Ulm, Germany. 3Children’s Hospital, Karlsruhe, Germany. 4Laboratory of Immunology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. 5Institute for Pathology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Address correspondence to: Stephan Ehl, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Freiburg, Mathildenstr. 1, 79106 Freiburg, Germany. Phone: 49-761-270-4301; Fax: 49-761-270-4481; E-mail: ehl@kikli.ukl.uni-freiburg.de.
Find articles by Schwarz, K. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. 2Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital and Institute for Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Immunogenetics, Ulm, Germany. 3Children’s Hospital, Karlsruhe, Germany. 4Laboratory of Immunology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. 5Institute for Pathology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Address correspondence to: Stephan Ehl, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Freiburg, Mathildenstr. 1, 79106 Freiburg, Germany. Phone: 49-761-270-4301; Fax: 49-761-270-4481; E-mail: ehl@kikli.ukl.uni-freiburg.de.
Find articles by Enders, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. 2Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital and Institute for Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Immunogenetics, Ulm, Germany. 3Children’s Hospital, Karlsruhe, Germany. 4Laboratory of Immunology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. 5Institute for Pathology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Address correspondence to: Stephan Ehl, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Freiburg, Mathildenstr. 1, 79106 Freiburg, Germany. Phone: 49-761-270-4301; Fax: 49-761-270-4481; E-mail: ehl@kikli.ukl.uni-freiburg.de.
Find articles by Duffner, U. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. 2Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital and Institute for Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Immunogenetics, Ulm, Germany. 3Children’s Hospital, Karlsruhe, Germany. 4Laboratory of Immunology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. 5Institute for Pathology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Address correspondence to: Stephan Ehl, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Freiburg, Mathildenstr. 1, 79106 Freiburg, Germany. Phone: 49-761-270-4301; Fax: 49-761-270-4481; E-mail: ehl@kikli.ukl.uni-freiburg.de.
Find articles by Pannicke, U. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. 2Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital and Institute for Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Immunogenetics, Ulm, Germany. 3Children’s Hospital, Karlsruhe, Germany. 4Laboratory of Immunology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. 5Institute for Pathology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Address correspondence to: Stephan Ehl, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Freiburg, Mathildenstr. 1, 79106 Freiburg, Germany. Phone: 49-761-270-4301; Fax: 49-761-270-4481; E-mail: ehl@kikli.ukl.uni-freiburg.de.
Find articles by Kühr, J. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. 2Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital and Institute for Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Immunogenetics, Ulm, Germany. 3Children’s Hospital, Karlsruhe, Germany. 4Laboratory of Immunology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. 5Institute for Pathology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Address correspondence to: Stephan Ehl, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Freiburg, Mathildenstr. 1, 79106 Freiburg, Germany. Phone: 49-761-270-4301; Fax: 49-761-270-4481; E-mail: ehl@kikli.ukl.uni-freiburg.de.
Find articles by Mascart, F. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. 2Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital and Institute for Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Immunogenetics, Ulm, Germany. 3Children’s Hospital, Karlsruhe, Germany. 4Laboratory of Immunology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. 5Institute for Pathology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Address correspondence to: Stephan Ehl, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Freiburg, Mathildenstr. 1, 79106 Freiburg, Germany. Phone: 49-761-270-4301; Fax: 49-761-270-4481; E-mail: ehl@kikli.ukl.uni-freiburg.de.
Find articles by Schmitt-Graeff, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. 2Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital and Institute for Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Immunogenetics, Ulm, Germany. 3Children’s Hospital, Karlsruhe, Germany. 4Laboratory of Immunology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. 5Institute for Pathology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Address correspondence to: Stephan Ehl, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Freiburg, Mathildenstr. 1, 79106 Freiburg, Germany. Phone: 49-761-270-4301; Fax: 49-761-270-4481; E-mail: ehl@kikli.ukl.uni-freiburg.de.
Find articles by Niemeyer, C. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. 2Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital and Institute for Clinical Transfusion Medicine and Immunogenetics, Ulm, Germany. 3Children’s Hospital, Karlsruhe, Germany. 4Laboratory of Immunology, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. 5Institute for Pathology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Address correspondence to: Stephan Ehl, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Freiburg, Mathildenstr. 1, 79106 Freiburg, Germany. Phone: 49-761-270-4301; Fax: 49-761-270-4481; E-mail: ehl@kikli.ukl.uni-freiburg.de.
Find articles by Fisch, P. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Published November 1, 2005 - More info
We describe here a patient with a clinical and molecular diagnosis of recombinase activating gene 1–deficient (RAG1-deficient) SCID, who produced specific antibodies despite minimal B cell numbers. Memory B cells were detected and antibodies were produced not only against some vaccines and infections, but also against autoantigens. The patient had severely reduced levels of oligoclonal T cells expressing the αβ TCR but surprisingly normal numbers of T cells expressing the γδ TCR. Analysis at a clonal level and TCR complementarity-determining region–3 spectratyping for γδ T cells revealed a diversified oligoclonal repertoire with predominance of cells expressing a γ4-δ3 TCR. Several γδ T cell clones displayed reactivity against CMV-infected cells. These observations are compatible with 2 non–mutually exclusive explanations for the γδ T cell predominance: a developmental advantage and infection-triggered, antigen-driven peripheral expansion. The patient carried the homozygous hypomorphic R561H RAG1 mutation leading to reduced V(D)J recombination but lacked all clinical features characteristic of Omenn syndrome. This report describes a new phenotype of RAG deficiency and shows that the ability to form specific antibodies does not exclude the diagnosis of SCID.
SCID is the common phenotypic presentation of a range of genetic disorders (1). Depending on the gene affected, patients present with complete absence of T and B cells or, in most cases, with the absence of T cells (2). In a few SCID patients, however, T cells remain detectable in peripheral blood, rendering the clinical diagnosis more difficult. These T cells may be due to either materno-fetal transfusion (2) or hypomorphic mutations that allow residual function of the affected protein and thus partial T and B cell differentiation.
An example of SCID patients with partial T cell differentiation are patients with Omenn syndrome (OS) (3), the majority of which have hypomorphic mutations in recombinase activating gene 1 (RAG1) or RAG2 (4, 5). In contrast to patients with complete loss-of-function mutations and complete lack of T and B cells, these patients retain partial V(D)J recombination activity and can generate a substantial number of oligoclonal T cells. However, they typically lack B cells, and despite the unexplained presence of high levels of IgE, no antigen-specific antibody responses can be detected. Another group of patients with missense mutations in the RAG1 or RAG2 genes does not show the typical clinical features of OS, including generalized eczema, lymphadenopathy, and hepatosplenomegaly (5). Also, these patients, designated as atypical SCID/OS patients, do not generate specific immune responses. Thus, despite the substantial phenotypic diversity among patients with RAG deficiency, the common immunological feature is the absence of antigen-specific immunity, which is the basis for the extreme susceptibility to infection and a key parameter for the clinical diagnosis of SCID.
Here we report a new SCID phenotype in a patient with a hypomorphic mutation in RAG1 that is clearly distinct from T–B–SCID (SCID characterized by an absence of both T and B lymphocytes) and OS. It includes normal immunoglobulin levels, specific antibody responses to some infectious agents and vaccine antigens, the production of autoantibodies, a predominance of γδ T cells, and the development of EBV-associated lymphoproliferation.
Case report. The patient is the second daughter of consanguinous Turkish parents. She presented first at the age of 4 months with prolonged varicella. The mother had developed varicella at the same time, and the protracted course in the child was ascribed to the lack of attenuating maternal antibodies. At the age of 7 months, the child was hospitalized with perforated otitis media, bronchopneumonia, and genital candida infection. There was initial improvement after intravenous antibiotic treatment, but over the next 3 months, there were 3 further hospitalizations for pneumonia and persistent oral and genital candida infections. At 10 months of age, the patient developed respiratory failure requiring intubation. Fluid from a bronchoalveolar lavage was positive for CMV. Coombs-positive anemia was detected as was severe neutropenia with predominance of myelocytes and lack of more mature granulocytic precursors in the bone marrow. There was lymphopenia with almost complete absence of CD4+ T cells, few CD8+ T cells, severely reduced numbers of B cells, and normal levels of NK cells (Table 1). The thymus was markedly reduced in size. However, there were normal to elevated levels of serum immunoglobulins. The patient was transferred to our service for further management.
Comparison of the clinical and immunological phenotypes of 3 patients with homozygous R561H RAG1 mutations
The girl stabilized following ganciclovir treatment, but subsequently developed patchy, ovaloid infiltrates in the lung (Figure 1A) and facial paralysis due to a sterile mastoiditis. Biopsies from both lesions showed dense polymorphic lymphoproliferation with areas of necrosis and pseudocystic degeneration. Medium- to large-sized CD20+ lymphoid cells (Figure 1B) with scattered CD15–CD30+ Reed-Sternberg–like cells expressed the EBV-encoded latent membrane protein (LMP) (Figure 1C). The same rearrangement was found in both lesions, demonstrating monoclonality (Figure 1D). An EBV PCR in peripheral blood revealed 22,000 copies/ml. Therapy with anti-CD20 mAb was initiated, which rapidly controlled EBV load and led to a significant decrease in pulmonary lymphoproliferation. The patient was placed on a preparative myeloablative regimen before receiving a bone marrow transplant from an EBV-positive, unrelated donor with a single mismatch at the C locus. Not unexpectedly, there was rapid expansion of donor CD8+ T cells, with subsequent complete elimination of the lymphoproliferative lesions. Six months after transplantation, the patient was at home, with normal lymphocyte counts and proliferative responses and an increasing proportion of naive T cells, indicating thymic regeneration.
Multifocal monoclonal EBV-induced lymphoproliferation. (A) CT scan of the lung demonstrating large ovaloid lesions. (B and C) Polymorphic lymphoproliferation of the lung consisting of CD20+ B cells that coexpressed EBV LMP-1. (D) Clonality analysis of lymphoproliferative lesions. IgH gene scan profiles from lung and mastoid biopsy DNA are shown.
Genetic analysis. Because of the low B cell count, genetic analysis focused on genes involved in V(D)J recombination. A homozygous G→A substitution at nucleotide 1806 of the RAG1 gene (reference sequence NM_000448) was found, leading to a R561H exchange. Both parents were heterozygous for this RAG1 mutation. The same homozygous mutations have been previously reported in 2 patients with RAG1 deficiency (4, 6). Table 1 summarizes the main clinical and immunological features of the 3 patients, illustrating the phenotypic variability of RAG1 deficiency.
Phenotype and function of the B cell compartment. To rule out the presence of maternal lymphocytes, short terminal repeat analysis was performed on sorted CD3+ and CD19+ cells (95% purity). The few detectable B and T cells (Table 1) were of patient origin (data not shown). Immunoglobulins of all major classes, including all 4 IgG subclasses, were present at normal to elevated levels (Table 1). Moreover, several specific antibodies could be demonstrated. Vaccine titers to diphtheria, but not to tetanus, were present after 3 vaccinations. High titers of IgG to varicella were detectable. Since the mother developed primary varicella at the same time as the patient, these were unlikely to be maternal antibodies. Furthermore, IgM and IgG to CMV were detectable (Table 1). CMV infection was well documented by clinical signs and PCR studies, excluding nonspecific responses induced by polyclonal B cell activation. The patient also developed a positive direct Coombs test, with high titers of anti-erythrocyte antibodies, and experienced severe neutropenia, which responded to the EBV-directed therapy with anti-CD20 antibodies. Consistent with specific antibody production, B cells expressing the memory marker CD27 could be detected among both IgM+ B cells and IgM– switched memory B cells (Figure 2). These findings of functional specific B cell immunity induced by vaccination, infection, and autoantigens were in obvious contrast to the SCID indicated by the clinical phenotype and the lymphocyte subset enumeration.
B cell phenotype. (A) Proportion of CD19+ B cells in the patient (Pt) and an age-matched control (Co) patient without immunological abnormalities. (B) Expression of IgD and the memory marker CD27 on CD19+ B cells.
Phenotype and function of the T cell compartment. T cell counts were also severely reduced, with the reduction in CD4+ T cell levels being more pronounced than that in CD8+ T cells (Figure 3). The proportion of “naive” CD4+ T cells coexpressing CD45RA and CD62L was very low, and a high percentage of CD8+ T cells expressed HLA-DR, indicating a highly activated T cell compartment. Interestingly, 66% of CD3+ T cells expressed the γδ T cell receptor and only 32% the αβ T cell receptor. Twenty percent of TCR αβ cells and 88% of γδ TCR cells were double negative for CD4 and CD8 expression. HLA-DR and CD45RA expression was similar between the 2 populations (Figure 3). T cell proliferation was absent to Tetanus antigen and reduced after stimulation with phytohemagglutinin (PHA) (21,661 vs. >40,000 cpm in controls) or anti-CD3 (16,960 vs. >34,000 cpm) but could be strongly induced by IL-2 stimulation (33,736 vs. >1,000 cpm). To analyze the proliferative capacity of various T cell populations separately, we used a flow-cytometric CFSE-based proliferation assay. Stimulation with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 beads or with PHA only induced proliferation among CD4+, but not among CD8+ T, cells (Figure 4). Among the dividing T cells, expression of the γδ TCR could not be demonstrated.
Predominance of activated γδ T cells. (A) TCR expression among CD3+ lymphocytes in the patient and a healthy control. (B) Expression of CD4 and CD8 among CD3+TCRαβ+ and CD3+TCRγδ+ T cells. (C) Expression of CD4 and CD45RA among CD3+TCRαβ+ and CD3+TCRγδ+ T cells. (D) Expression of CD4 and HLA-DR among CD3+TCRαβ+ and CD3+TCRγδ+ T cells.
T cell proliferative responses. PBMCs from the patient and a healthy control were labeled with the fluorescent dye CFSE and incubated in medium or stimulated with PHA or with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 beads. Five days later, cells were stained with anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 and analyzed by flow cytometry. CFSE dilution is plotted as an overlay of cells incubated in medium (dotted line) versus cells incubated with the indicated stimulus (bold line).
Analysis of T cell receptor diversity. To characterize the T cell repertoire of the patient, we first analyzed the expression of various Vβ chains. There was a significantly skewed repertoire, with preferential expression of Vβ9 and Vβ28 among CD8+ T cells (Figure 5A). The patient did not have a sufficient number of CD4+ T cells for this analysis. For a more detailed study of T cell receptor diversity, complementarity-determining region–3 (CDR3) spectratyping of some Vβ families was performed. Most of the 10 Vβ elements analyzed showed an oligoclonal skewing (Figure 5B). The analysis of some elements (Vβ11, -14, -15, -20) also revealed the presence of single peaks, demonstrating the existence of predominant clones expressing these particular Vβ chains. The presence of such predominant clones was confirmed by heteroduplex analysis (Figure 6).
T cell repertoire. (A) Vβ chain expression among CD8+ T cells as determined by flow cytometry. (B) CDR3 length profile of various Vβ populations as determined by immunoscope analysis. The relative intensity of the bands is plotted as a function of CDR3 size. Since the nomenclature of the used antibodies is based on Wei et al. (37), the corresponding IGMT nomenclature is also provided in order to correlate the cytometry data with spectratyping results.
Oligoclonal T cell expansions. Heteroduplex analysis of PCR products was performed by nondenaturing PAGE and visualized by ethidium bromide staining.
Analysis of Vγ and Vδ chain expression revealed that 76% of γδ T cells used the Vδ3 element and 89% used the Vγ4 element (Figure 7, A and C). CDR3 spectratyping was also established for γδ T cells and revealed an oligo- to polyclonal repertoire of cells using the Vδ1 and Vδ2 segments (Figure 7B). In contrast, among cells expressing the Vδ3 chain, there was a significantly restricted spectrum with a highly oligoclonal profile of cells using the Vδ3Jδ1 element (Figure 7B). Spectratyping analysis of the TCR γ chain was performed with primers for Vγ4, for the Vγ I subgroup (for detection of the functional genes Vγ2, -3, -4, -5, and -8), and subgroup II (specific for Vγ9). Elements of both subgroups were used in a highly restricted length profile (Figure 7D). The similar profile obtained with the Vγ4 and the Vγ subgroup I primer confirmed the preferential usage of the Vγ4 element as shown by flow cytometry.
γδ T cell repertoire analysis. (A) Vδ chain usage among total γδ TCR+CD3+ T cells. (B) CDR3 length profile of Vδ1–Vδ3 populations using Jδ1–Jδ3–specific primers as determined by immunoscope analysis. (C) Vγ chain usage among total γδ TCR+CD3+ T cells. (D) CDR3 length profile of Vγ populations using primers specific for Vγ4, VγIF (specific for subgroup I), and Vγ9 (specific for subgroup II).
To analyze the γδ T cell repertoire at a molecular level, γδ TCR+ PBLs were purified and cloned by limiting dilution. TCR γ and δ sequences were obtained from these clones and from the PCR products amplified for the spectratyping analysis. Vγ4 sequences were detected in 7/8 of the PCR products and 5/5 of the clone sequences (Figure 8), confirming the flow cytometry and spectratyping data. Although a predominant sequence was found, a polyclonal background could clearly be demonstrated, revealing a more diverse spectrum at the molecular level (Figure 8). Analysis of δ sequences revealed some complex junctional regions with 1 or 2 D elements, while 2 sequences lacked D elements. All 3 clones used the Vδ3 element, which was also predominantly expressed by peripheral γδ T cells.
V(D)J junction sequences of γδ T cells. The V(D)J segments identified are indicated in bold; N sequences are underlined. The number of times a sequence was found among PCR products and among clone sequences is given in parenthesis.
V δ2–γδ T cells show reactivity against CMV-infected fibroblasts. Since the patient had undergone several viral infections prior to the immunological analysis, it appeared possible that the configuration of the γδ T cell repertoire could have been influenced by these infections. In consideration of the observation that Vδ2neg γδ T cell clones from CMV-infected kidney transplant recipients display reactivity against CMV (7), we tested whether γδ T cells from our patient were able to recognize CMV-infected target cells. Thus, we incubated various Vδ2– γδ T cell clones from the patient and a healthy control with CMV-infected and uninfected human foreskin fibroblasts (HFFs). In addition, we examined 2 Vγ9–Vδ2 T cell clones from healthy controls. After 24 hours of coincubation with the target cells, TNF production was quantified in a biological assay using WEHI cells (43). Four of 5 clones from the patient produced significant amounts of TNF in response to CMV stimulation (Figure 9). CMV-specific TNF production was also found by Vδ2– γδ T cell clones from a healthy donor but — as expected — not by the 2 Vγ9–Vδ2 clones.
CMV reactivity of Vδ2– γδ T cell clones. Two Vγ9–Vδ2 and 3 Vδ2–Vγ9– clones from healthy controls as well as 6 γδ T cell clones using different combination of T cell receptors from the patient were tested for CMV reactivity. γδ TCR usage of the clones was analyzed with various antibodies. The clones were incubated with CMV-infected and uninfected fibroblasts, and TNF release was quantified in a bioassay on WEHI cells (43). *The antibody used for characterization of these clones reacts with all 3 γ chain proteins.
We document a new variant of SCID associated with a hypomorphic RAG1 mutation that includes normal levels of immunoglobulins, the ability to produce specific antibodies to infectious and self-antigens, and a predominance of γδ T cells.
Our patient fulfilled the clinical criteria for SCID, including failure to thrive, persistent candida infection, recurrent pneumonia, and severe infections with varicella-zoster virus (VZV), CMV, and EBV. There was also profound lymphopenia, with an almost complete absence of B cells and severely reduced numbers of T cells and a small thymus. However, normal to elevated levels of all immunoglobulin classes and specific IgM and IgG antibodies to some vaccine antigens and infectious agents indicated significant remaining B and T cell function, atypical for SCID. Antibody responses against diphtheria antigen, VZV, and CMV but not against tetanus and EBV suggested a restricted repertoire of B cell specificities. The production of specific antibodies to diphtheria vaccination, HSV-1 infection, and neutrophil autoantigens has previously been observed in a patient with atypical RAG1 SCID, who had maternal T cell engraftment but lacked host T cells (8). That patient carried the R559S mutation only 2 amino acids N-terminal from the R561H mutation exhibited by our patient. The data indicate that partial RAG1 function due to mutations in the RAG1/RAG2 interaction domain affects B cell differentiation and repertoire diversity but still allows development of some functional B cells. This is also supported by the finding of in-frame immunoglobulin rearrangements in bone marrow precursor B cells of a patient with an H481P RAG1 mutation and a T–B–SCID phenotype (9). The presence of autoantibodies in our and the previously reported patient could be due to impaired T cell regulation. However, it is also possible that this reflects the described role for RAG enzymes in the regulation of autoantibodies by receptor editing (10).
Patients with hypomorphic RAG mutations presenting with OS typically show a high number of circulating T cells with a highly restricted T cell repertoire (11–14). The predominance of few T cell receptor clonotypes is already detectable in the thymus, and a different distribution of clonotypes can be found in different tissues, suggesting that in OS, the oligoclonality of the T cell repertoire is due to both intrathymic restriction and peripheral expansion (12, 15). Among the few αβ TCR T cells detectable in our patient, CD8+ T cells predominated. TCR Vβ spectratyping and heteroduplex analysis revealed a reduced repertoire diversity, with oligoclonal T cell expansions similar to what has been described in OS, which shows that such T cell repertoire restrictions in RAG deficiency are not necessarily linked to development of the Omenn phenotype. Interestingly, the CD8+ T cells in our patient were completely refractory to mitogen stimulation in vitro. This may represent anergy in the context of severe EBV infection rather than an intrinsic T cell defect. In contrast, the few residual CD4+ T cells showed proliferation in vitro and were apparently sufficient to provide B cell help in vivo.
A striking feature in our patient was the predominance of T cells expressing the γδ T cell receptor. This has also been described in a few patients with OS (13, 15–17). One patient showed expression of Vδ1 in 35% of T cells, while expression of the more commonly used Vγ9 and Vδ2 chains was not detected. These Vδ1-expressing cells could also be found in the epidermis and in the gut (13). A second patient preferentially used the Vγ3 and Vγ4, but not Vγ9, genes (16). Lack of the Vγ9 Vδ2 T cell subset usually predominant in peripheral blood (18, 19) was also observed in our patient, whose main γδ T cell population expressed Vγ4 Vδ3. What could be the reason for the γδ T cell predominance in these patients? It is unlikely that limited RAG activity predominantly affects the generation of functional T cell receptors in αβ as compared with γδ T cells. However, the limited T cell receptor repertoire generated with a dysfunctional recombination machinery may have consequences for T cell development. A comparison of thymic and peripheral T cell receptor sequences showed that the skewed T cell repertoire in OS is partially shaped by intrathymic restriction (15). With respect to αβ versus γδ T cell development, this could imply that the more stringent intrathymic maturational restriction for αβ T cells could account for the predominance of γδ T cells in patients with recombination defects. Moreover, since the repertoire of γδ T cells, in particular in nonlymphoid tissues, is often oligoclonal (20, 21), a limited number of successful recombination events may be sufficient to generate an apparently normal γδ T cell repertoire. The γδ T cell repertoire may also be influenced by the severe reduction in the number of αβ T cells. TCR α–deficient mice, which completely lack αβ T cells, show normal numbers of γδ T cells (22) that expand significantly more after exposure to environmental antigens than in mice with a normal αβ T cell compartment (23).
Apart from these developmental considerations, there is significant evidence that extrinsic and environmental factors further shape the peripheral γδ T cell repertoire (24). Expansion of γδ T cells has been observed in the context of various viral infections, including EBV and CMV (25–27). In particular, a recent report has shown that Vδ2– γδ T cell clones show reactivity against CMV-infected cells (7). We could also document a response to CMV-infected cells in 4/5 clones from our patient, which could reflect an important impact of CMV on the γδ T cell predominance. It remains open whether this reactivity is directed against a viral antigen or a virally induced cellular antigen such as a stress protein (24). The fact that 2/3 Vδ2–, but not 2/2 Vγ9–Vδ2, clones from healthy controls with unknown CMV status also responded to CMV-infected cells supports the idea of a predetermined specificity (28, 29) of a significant proportion of human Vδ2– γδ T cells for conserved noninfectious antigens. We found a more restricted variability of δ3 versus δ1 and δ2 elements and a seemingly monoclonal usage of the Vγ4 element by spectratyping, suggesting selection by antigens such as those induced by CMV infection. However, the dominance of the Vγ4 and Vδ3 elements is seen in a clearly oligoclonal background of γδ T cells. Even among Vγ4 T cells, significant sequence heterogeneity could be demonstrated at the molecular level, revealing development of a γδ T cell repertoire with significant diversity. Overall, the results of the γδ T cell repertoire analysis in our patient are compatible both with a developmental advantage and with infectious or autoantigen-driven peripheral expansion as 2 non–mutually exclusive explanations for the γδ T cell predominance.
Two RAG1-deficient patients were previously reported to carry the same homozygous R561H mutation (4, 6). This mutation lies within a region of RAG1 that mediates interaction with RAG2 (30) and decreases efficiency of interaction by about 80%, leading to a residual recombination activity of roughly 25% (4). Lymphocyte subset enumeration in the 3 patients was similar, with an almost complete absence of B cells, a reduced number of T cells, and a normal level of NK cells, likely reflecting the consequences of impaired V(D)J recombination for lymphocyte development (Table 1). The clinical and functional immunological phenotype, however, was different and characteristic in all 3 patients. Patient OS2 presented with OS including erythroderma, lymphoproliferation, as well as elevated levels of IgE and eosinophilia. IgA and IgM were absent, and the level of IgG was low at the age of 2 months and likely represented transferred maternal antibody. Specific antibodies were absent (31, 32). Patient P27 presented with pharyngeal and genital ulcers, a phenotype frequently associated with Artemis mutations (33). Features of OS were absent, but this patient showed production of immunoglobulins including autoantibodies. Our patient presented with severe herpes virus infections, also produced immunoglobulins and autoantibodies, and showed a characteristic predominance of γδ T cells. It remains speculative to what extent modifying genes including autoantigens and/or environmental factors such as infections (34) influenced the phenotypic expression of the immunodeficiency. However, it seems reasonable to assume that in patients with a rudimentary specific immune system — presumably including absence of regulatory cells — exposure to autoantigens or persistent infections leaves “footprints” that determine the distinct clinical and immunologic phenotype. Autoantibody production, activation of oligoclonal T cells and a Th2-type immune response, and γδ T cell predominance could represent such footprints, triggered by antigen and clinically manifest due to lack of regulation.
This and other recent reports on genetic defects of the V(D)J recombination machinery (5, 6, 35, 36) paradigmatically illustrate the large phenotypic variability of patients with primary immunodeficiencies, which is determined by both genetic and environmental factors. The type of mutation is an important determinant whether RAG-deficient patients present with T–B–SCID (null mutations) or with OS/atypical SCID/SCID with γδ T cell predominance (hypomorphic mutations). Genetic heterogeneity is demonstrated by the recent description of an Omenn phenotype in a patient with a hypomorphic mutation in Artemis (35). In addition, we recently diagnosed SCID with γδ T cell predominance, autoantibodies, and EBV-induced lymphoproliferation strikingly similar to those in the patient reported here in a patient with a hypomorphic mutation in ligase IV, another enzyme involved in V(D)J recombination (A. Enders, unpublished observations). Finally, the impact of further genetic modifiers and/or environmental factors, infections in particular, is well illustrated by the 3 distinct phenotypes of the patients with homozygous R561H mutations described in this report. Unfortunately, since the clinical diagnosis is usually made in a child with a history of severe infections, it is frequently impossible to separate defects in immune development from the phenotypic consequences of impaired antimicrobial defense and defects in immune regulation. A better understanding of the contribution of genetic versus environmental factors will therefore probably depend on the study of mice with equivalent missense mutations. From a clinical viewpoint, however, awareness of the phenotypic variability is instrumental for the life-saving early identification of such patients.
Immunophenotyping. Informed consent for the performed studies was obtained from the patient’s family, in accordance with the guidelines of the ethics committee of the University of Freiburg. Lymphocyte phenotyping was performed with 4-color flow cytometry using antibodies from BD Biosciences — Pharmingen. TCR Vβ staining was performed using a panel of antibodies obtained from Immunotech, Beckman Coulter. The nomenclature of these antibodies is based on Wei et al. (37). For TCR Vγ and Vδ staining, we used indirect fluorescence with the mAbs anti–TCR Vδ1 (clone R9.12), anti–TCR Vδ2 (clone IMMU 389), anti–TCR Vδ3 (clone D3P11.5B), and anti–TCR Vγ9 (clone IMMU 360; all from Immunotech, Beckman Coulter); anti–TCR Vγ4 (clone 94) and anti–TCR Vγ5 (clone 56-3; both kindly provided by Marc Bonneville, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, U463, Nantes, France); anti–TCR Vγ8 (clone R4-5) and anti–TCR Vγ2, -3, and -4 (clone 23D12; both kindly provided by Dieter Kabelitz, Institute of Immunology, University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany). T cell proliferation was quantified using a standard [3H]thymidine incorporation and a CFSE proliferation assay. For this, 5 × 106 PBMCs were labeled with the fluorescent dye CFSE (Invitrogen Corp.) for 10 minutes and washed twice with ice-cold PBS. CFSE-labeled PBMCs (2.5 × 105) in a volume of 200 μl Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium 10% FCS were stimulated either with phytohemagglutinin (1.25 μg/ml) or with anti-CD3/anti-CD28 beads (Dynal Biotech) at 37°C. Control cells were cultivated in medium alone. On day 6, the cells were harvested; washed; surface stained with anti-CD3, anti-CD4, and anti-CD8 or anti-CD3 and anti–γδ TCR antibodies; and analyzed by flow cytometry on a BD FACSort using CellQuest Pro software version 4.0.2.
T cell CDR3 spectratyping. TCR CDR3 spectratyping was performed as previously described by Pannetier, Kourilsky, et al. for the analysis of the TCR β chain (38, 39). The primers for spectratyping of the TCR γ and TCR δ chains were newly designed: the PCR (30 cycles) for analysis of the TCR δ chain was performed using the forward primers TRDV1F (5′-ATGCAAAAAGTGGTCGCTATT-3′), TRDV2F (5′-ATACCGAGAAAAGGACATCTATG-3′), TRDV3F (5′-GTACCGGATAAGGCCAGATTA-3′), TRDV4F (5′-ATGACCAGCAAAATGCAACAG-3′), TRDV5F (5′-ACCCTGCTGAAGGTCCTACAT-3′), and TRDV6F (5′-CCCTGCATTATTGATAGCCAT-3′) and the reverse primer TRDCB (5′- GTAGAATTCCTTCACCAGACAAG-3′), followed by run-off analysis (3 cycles) using the fluorescent primers Jδ1, Jδ2, and Jδ3, as published in the BIOMED-2 protocol (40). The PCR (30 cycles) for analysis of the TCR γ chain was performed using the forward primers TRGV1F (5′-GGAAGGCCCCACAGCRTCTT-3′), TRGV4F (5′-ATGACTCCTACACCTCCAGC-3′), and TRGV9F (5′-CGGCACTGTCAGAAAGGAATC-3′) and the reverse primer TRGCB (5′-CAAGAAGACAAAGGTATGTTCCAG-3′), followed by run-off analysis (3 cycles) with the fluorescent oligonucleotide TRGCRO (5′-CTTCTGGAGYTTTGTTTCAGC-3′). All primers were chosen according the sequences and primers in the ImMunoGeneTics database (http://imgt.cines.fr/textes/IMGTrepertoire). The primers TRDV4F–6F and the primer TRVG9F were the same as published in the BIOMED-2 protocol (40). Heteroduplex analysis was performed according to published protocols (41).
Derivation and characterization ofγδ T cell clones. TCR γδ+ PBLs of the patient were purified by magnetic beads (γδ T cell isolation kit; Miltenyi Biotec). The clones were derived by limiting dilution using feeder cells, PHA, and IL-2 and expanded as previously described (42). The phenotype and V regions of the γδ TCR expressed by the clones were analyzed by flow cytometry using the mAbs described above and confirmed by TCR γ and δ spectratyping. RNA was extracted from the clones for sequence analysis of the TCR γ and δ chains.
Analysis of CMV reactivity ofγδ T cell clones. CMV suspensions produced with the clinical strain TB40/E and HFFs were kindly provided by C. Sinzger, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. Subconfluent monolayers of HFF cells were incubated with CMV suspension at an MOI of 1 for 1 hour and cultured for 5 days at 37°C. Thawed γδ T cell clones that had been cultured in the presence of allogeneic feeder cells and 50 IU/ml IL-2 were incubated (2 × 103 cells/well) with CMV-infected or noninfected HFFs (2 × 105 cells/well) in a flat-bottom 96-well plate at 37°C for 6 hours. TNF released into the supernatant was quantified in a bioassay using WEHI cells as described previously (43).
Histology and molecular analysis of clonality. Biopsy samples were fixed in 4% buffered formalin, paraffin-embedded, cut at 4 μm, and stained immunohistochemically following heat-mediated antigen retrieval. The primary antibodies were obtained from DakoCytomation and included CD20 (clone L26), CD3 (clone F7.2.38), CD4 (clone MT310), CD8 (clone C8/144B), CD21 (clone 1F8), CD30 (clone Ber-H2), CD79a (clone JCB117), Ki 67 (clone MIB-1), BCL2 oncoprotein (clone 124), BCL6 protein (clone PG-B6p), and EBV LMP (clone CS.1-4). Visualization of the antibodies was obtained using the ChemMate Detection Kit, AP/RED (DakoCytomation). IgH gene configuration in lymphoproliferative lesions was assesses by multiplex PCR from DNA isolated from biopsy specimen using a previously described method (44).
Genetic analysis. The molecular analyses of the RAG genes were performed as published previously (45).
We thank C. Sinzger for providing CMV suspensions and HFF cells. We are grateful to Peter Bader, Children’s Hospital, Frankfurt University, Germany, for data on chimerism and to Olaf Moske, Department of Radiology, Freiburg University, Germany, for providing the CT scan. We thank Daniela Bukatz, Ingrid Janz, Sylvia Kock, and Annette Schult for excellent technical assistance. This work was supported by the German Research Foundation grant SFB620: Immunodeficiency: clinical and animal models (projects A4 [S. Ehl] and Z2 [P. Fisch]).
Nonstandard abbreviations used: CDR3, complementarity-determining region–3; HFF, human foreskin fibroblast; OS, Omenn syndrome; PHA, phytohemagglutinin; RAG1; recombinase activating gene 1.
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.