Advertisement
Research ArticleBone biology Free access | 10.1172/JCI22900
1Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom. 2Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, and the Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Instituto Universitario de Oncologia, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain. 4Medical Research Council (MRC), Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 5Center for Metabolic Bone Disease and Molecular Research, Shriners Hospitals for Children, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Rajesh V. Thakker, Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1865-857501; Fax: 44-1865-857502; E-mail: rajesh.thakker@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Find articles by Kennedy, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom. 2Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, and the Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Instituto Universitario de Oncologia, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain. 4Medical Research Council (MRC), Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 5Center for Metabolic Bone Disease and Molecular Research, Shriners Hospitals for Children, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Rajesh V. Thakker, Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1865-857501; Fax: 44-1865-857502; E-mail: rajesh.thakker@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Find articles by Inada, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom. 2Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, and the Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Instituto Universitario de Oncologia, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain. 4Medical Research Council (MRC), Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 5Center for Metabolic Bone Disease and Molecular Research, Shriners Hospitals for Children, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Rajesh V. Thakker, Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1865-857501; Fax: 44-1865-857502; E-mail: rajesh.thakker@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Find articles by Krane, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom. 2Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, and the Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Instituto Universitario de Oncologia, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain. 4Medical Research Council (MRC), Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 5Center for Metabolic Bone Disease and Molecular Research, Shriners Hospitals for Children, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Rajesh V. Thakker, Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1865-857501; Fax: 44-1865-857502; E-mail: rajesh.thakker@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Find articles by Christie, P. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom. 2Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, and the Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Instituto Universitario de Oncologia, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain. 4Medical Research Council (MRC), Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 5Center for Metabolic Bone Disease and Molecular Research, Shriners Hospitals for Children, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Rajesh V. Thakker, Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1865-857501; Fax: 44-1865-857502; E-mail: rajesh.thakker@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Find articles by Harding, B. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom. 2Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, and the Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Instituto Universitario de Oncologia, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain. 4Medical Research Council (MRC), Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 5Center for Metabolic Bone Disease and Molecular Research, Shriners Hospitals for Children, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Rajesh V. Thakker, Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1865-857501; Fax: 44-1865-857502; E-mail: rajesh.thakker@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Find articles by López-Otín, C. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom. 2Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, and the Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Instituto Universitario de Oncologia, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain. 4Medical Research Council (MRC), Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 5Center for Metabolic Bone Disease and Molecular Research, Shriners Hospitals for Children, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Rajesh V. Thakker, Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1865-857501; Fax: 44-1865-857502; E-mail: rajesh.thakker@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Find articles by Sánchez, L. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom. 2Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, and the Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Instituto Universitario de Oncologia, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain. 4Medical Research Council (MRC), Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 5Center for Metabolic Bone Disease and Molecular Research, Shriners Hospitals for Children, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Rajesh V. Thakker, Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1865-857501; Fax: 44-1865-857502; E-mail: rajesh.thakker@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Find articles by Pannett, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom. 2Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, and the Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Instituto Universitario de Oncologia, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain. 4Medical Research Council (MRC), Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 5Center for Metabolic Bone Disease and Molecular Research, Shriners Hospitals for Children, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Rajesh V. Thakker, Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1865-857501; Fax: 44-1865-857502; E-mail: rajesh.thakker@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Find articles by Dearlove, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom. 2Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, and the Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Instituto Universitario de Oncologia, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain. 4Medical Research Council (MRC), Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 5Center for Metabolic Bone Disease and Molecular Research, Shriners Hospitals for Children, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Rajesh V. Thakker, Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1865-857501; Fax: 44-1865-857502; E-mail: rajesh.thakker@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Find articles by Hartley, C. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom. 2Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, and the Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Instituto Universitario de Oncologia, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain. 4Medical Research Council (MRC), Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 5Center for Metabolic Bone Disease and Molecular Research, Shriners Hospitals for Children, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Rajesh V. Thakker, Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1865-857501; Fax: 44-1865-857502; E-mail: rajesh.thakker@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Find articles by Byrne, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom. 2Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, and the Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Instituto Universitario de Oncologia, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain. 4Medical Research Council (MRC), Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 5Center for Metabolic Bone Disease and Molecular Research, Shriners Hospitals for Children, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Rajesh V. Thakker, Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1865-857501; Fax: 44-1865-857502; E-mail: rajesh.thakker@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Find articles by Reed, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom. 2Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, and the Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Instituto Universitario de Oncologia, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain. 4Medical Research Council (MRC), Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 5Center for Metabolic Bone Disease and Molecular Research, Shriners Hospitals for Children, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Rajesh V. Thakker, Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1865-857501; Fax: 44-1865-857502; E-mail: rajesh.thakker@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Find articles by Nesbit, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom. 2Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, and the Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Instituto Universitario de Oncologia, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain. 4Medical Research Council (MRC), Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 5Center for Metabolic Bone Disease and Molecular Research, Shriners Hospitals for Children, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Rajesh V. Thakker, Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1865-857501; Fax: 44-1865-857502; E-mail: rajesh.thakker@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Find articles by Whyte, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
1Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom. 2Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, and the Center for Immunology and Inflammatory Diseases, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3Departamento de Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Instituto Universitario de Oncologia, Universidad de Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain. 4Medical Research Council (MRC), Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 5Center for Metabolic Bone Disease and Molecular Research, Shriners Hospitals for Children, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Address correspondence to: Rajesh V. Thakker, Academic Endocrine Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism (OCDEM), Churchill Hospital, Oxford OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-1865-857501; Fax: 44-1865-857502; E-mail: rajesh.thakker@ndm.ox.ac.uk.
Find articles by Thakker, R. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar
Published October 3, 2005 - More info
MMPs, which degrade components of the ECM, have roles in embryonic development, tissue repair, cancer, arthritis, and cardiovascular disease. We show that a missense mutation of MMP13 causes the Missouri type of human spondyloepimetaphyseal dysplasia (SEMDMO), an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by defective growth and modeling of vertebrae and long bones. Genome-wide linkage analysis mapped SEMDMO to a 17-cM region on chromosome 11q14.3–23.2 that contains a cluster of 9 MMP genes. Among these, MMP13 represented the best candidate for SEMDMO, since it preferentially degrades collagen type II, abnormalities of which cause skeletal dysplasias that include Strudwick type SEMD. DNA sequence analysis revealed a missense mutation, F56S, that substituted an evolutionarily conserved phenylalanine residue for a serine in the proregion domain of MMP13. We predicted, by modeling MMP13 structure, that this F56S mutation would result in a hydrophobic cavity with misfolding, autoactivation, and degradation of mutant protein intracellularly. Expression of wild-type and mutant MMP13s in human embryonic kidney cells confirmed abnormal intracellular autoactivation and autodegradation of F56S MMP13 such that only enzymatically inactive, small fragments were secreted. Thus, the F56S mutation results in deficiency of MMP13, which leads to the human skeletal developmental anomaly of SEMDMO.
Genetic disorders of bone (skeletal dysplasias) may have a variety of biochemical and molecular mechanisms, and the previous radiological classification, although useful for a diagnostic approach, is being supplemented by a molecular classification (1, 2). This is illustrated by the spondyloepimetaphyseal dysplasias (SEMDs), which are a heterogenous group of skeletal diseases featuring defective growth and modeling of the spine and long bones (1–5). The SEMDs often arise sporadically, but distinctive heritable forms with autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, or X-linked transmission have been reported (5, 6). The pattern and severity of metaphyseal and epiphyseal involvement varies among and within affected SEMD kindreds, and some manifest additional features such as hypotrichosis or joint laxity (6–8). Biochemical markers of skeletal homeostasis are typically normal in patients with SEMDs and yield no clues about the etiologies (1, 2). However, radiological and histopathological studies have indicated that the SEMDs likely reflect fundamental disturbances in growth plate development (5, 9). Indeed, studies of kindreds have identified genetic defects in 3 autosomal SEMDs: the dominant Strudwick type, the recessive Pakistani type, and recessive matrilin 3 deficiency (3, 4, 10). Strudwick type SEMD is due to missense mutations of the type II collagen (COL2A1) gene, located on chromosome 12q12–13 (3), and these result in abnormal posttranslational modification of the α-1(II) collagen chains (3). Pakistani type SEMD is due to a mutation of the ATP sulfurylase/APS kinase 2 gene (ATPSK2), located on chromosome 10q23–34, and this mutation likely impairs posttranslational sulfation of cartilage ECM, causing defects in maturation and growth plate function (4). The matrilin 3 gene is located on chromosome 2p24–25, and homozygosity for a missense mutation caused SEMD in a consanguineous Arab family (10). Matrilin 3 is one of a family of 4 oligomeric ECM proteins, and disruption of possible interactions with other proteins, such as collagen types II and IX, may destabilize the ECM structure (10). However, it is important to note that mutations in these genes may cause skeletal disorders other than the SEMDs (1, 2). For example, COL2A1 mutations cause at least 8 type II collagenopathies (1–3), including spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia (SED) congenita, SED Namaqualand type, mild SED with premature onset arthrosis, Stickler dysplasia type I, spondyloperipheral dysplasia, Kniest dysplasia, hypochondrogenesis, and achondrogenesis II; and matrilin 3 mutations cause forms of multiple epiphyseal dysplasia (10). Mutations in these genes do not cause the autosomal dominant Missouri type of SEMD (SEMDMO) (11) (Figure 1).
Radiographic abnormalities of SEMDMO. The thoracolumbar spine and left knee of patients IV.7 and IV.8 (Figure 2) at age 3.8 years are shown. (A) Pear-shaped vertebrae, with greatest vertical height anteriorly as well as bulbous anterior superior-inferior contours that are more pronounced in the lumbar region in patient IV.7. Disc spaces are increased posteriorly in both patients. These pear-shaped vertebrae in early childhood evolve to mild platyspondyly with irregular superior and inferior margins in adults. (B) The left knees of patients IV.7 and IV.8 show femoral bowing, metaphyseal flaring and irregularity, and widened growth plates. The epiphyses are small and flat, and those of patient IV.7 have slightly irregular margins. There is rhizomelic shortening in patient IV.8. These findings of rhizomelic shortening, femoral bowing, and metaphyseal flaring and irregularity, with widened growth plates (physes), are consistent with those in SEMD.
SEMDMO, whose clinical and radiographic features were reported in 1993 (5), is characterized by moderate to severe metaphyseal changes, mild epiphyseal involvement, and pear-shaped vertebrae in childhood (Figure 1), with rhizomelic shortening especially of the lower limbs and genu varum deformities secondary to bowing of the femora, tibiae, or both (5). Importantly, the unusual pear-shaped vertebrae of growth in childhood are distinctive but not severe when compared with other SEMDs (1). The modeling defects improve spontaneously by early adolescence, yet affected individuals remain shorter than unaffected siblings. Additionally, bowing deformities predispose to osteoarthritis, especially of the knees (5). The molecular defect causing SEMDMOwas initially investigated, in 1997, by genetic linkage studies using polymorphisms associated with 12 candidate genes, including COL2A1, COL9A1, COL9A2, COL9A3, COL10A1, COL11A1, COL11A2, PSACH, FGFR3, CRTL1, CMP, and PTHRP (11). Recombination between the disease and intragenic polymorphisms or significantly negative log10 of odds (LOD) scores (<2.0) excluded these as the causative gene for SEMDMO. To elucidate the etiology and pathogenesis of SEMDMO, we performed a genome-wide linkage study and mapped SEMDMO to chromosome 11q14.3–23.2. DNA sequence analysis of a candidate gene encoding MMP13 identified a mutation in its proregion domain. This mutation leads to intracellular autoactivation and degradation of the mutant proenzyme, which is likely to be misfolded, with the resulting MMP13 deficiency causing SEMDMO.
Chromosomal localization of SEMDMO and identification of MMP13 mutation. To delineate the chromosomal location of SEMDMO, we undertook a genome-wide search using leukocyte DNA from the 32 living individuals (Figure 2) of the kindred in whom SEMDMOhad been inherited as an autosomal dominant disorder in 4 generations (5, 11). We used PCR together with fluorescently labeled primers to detect 382 microsatellite polymorphisms arranged in chromosome-specific sets, with an average intermarker distance of 10 cM (12). This yielded a peak LOD score of 4.62, at 0% recombination, between D11S898 and SEMDMO (Table 1). In addition, an analysis of individual recombinants localized SEMDMOtelomeric to D11S4175 and centromeric to D11S908 (Figure 2). Hence, SEMDMO mapped to chromosome 11q22. To refine the critical region, 9 additional polymorphic microsatellite loci were investigated. This revealed peak LOD scores of greater than 3 between SEMDMOand 4 loci (D11S1333, D11S1339, D11S927, and D11S4206; Table 1), confirming the SEMDMO location at 11q14.3–23.2. An analysis of recombinants indicated that SEMDMOwas located between D11S1358 and D11S4206 (data not shown), which span an interval of approximately 20 Mb (Figure 3). The ENSEMBL database (http://www.ensembl.org) revealed this interval to contain approximately 160 genes (145 confirmed transcripts and 15 predicted transcripts) that included a cluster of 9 genes encoding for MMPs. MMPs belong to a family of zinc metalloendopeptidases, comprising more than 20 members, that degrade components of the ECM (13, 14). The MMPs clustered on chromosome 11q22.3 include MMP7 (matrilysin), MMP20 (enamelysin), MMP8, MMP1, MMP12 (macrophage elastase), MMP13 (collagenase 3), MMP10 (stromelysin 2), MMP3 (stromelysin 1), and MMP27 (unknown function) (Figure 3). We considered MMP13 (15, 16) the best candidate for SEMDMO, as it preferentially degrades collagen type II (17), abnormalities of which result in Strudwick type SEMD (1–3, 7). In addition, MMP13 is specifically expressed in the hypertrophic chondrocytes and osteoblasts of fetal bones, in remodeling bone postnatally, and in joints affected with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis (17, 18). These combined features supported our hypothesis that an MMP13 abnormality caused SEMDMO, and we undertook DNA sequence analysis of the MMP13 gene (Figure 4), which consists of 10 exons that span 12.5 kb of genomic DNA (19). Our analysis revealed a missense mutation, Phe56Ser (F56S) (Figure 5), that involved the proregion domain of MMP13 (Figure 4). The mutation was confirmed by MspI restriction endonuclease analysis and demonstrated to cosegregate with SEMDMO (Figures 2 and 5) and to be absent in 110 alleles of 55 unrelated normal individuals, thereby indicating that it was not a functionally neutral polymorphism. Furthermore, the F56 residue is evolutionarily conserved in other MMP13s (Figure 3) and in human MMP1, MMP2, MMP7, MMP8, MMP20, and MMP27, thereby further indicating that the F56S abnormality is likely to be functionally significant.
Pedigree of family segregating for SEMDMO and chromosome 11q loci. SEMDMO is segregating in the affected individuals II.7 and III.14 with the haplotype [6,3,6,8,5,5,12,2], defined by the loci: 11cen — D11S314 — D11S937 — D11S901 — D11S4175 — D11S898 — D11S908 — D11S925 — D11S4151 — 11qter. However, recombinants between SEMDMO and the centromeric loci D11S314, D11S937, D11S901, and D11S4175 are observed in individuals II.1, II.3, III.4, III.9, IV.4, IV.5, and IV.8, thereby locating SEMDMO telomeric to D11S4175. The recombinants observed between SEMDMO and the telomeric loci D11S4151, D11S925, and D11S908 in the affected individuals II.4, III.7, III.9, IV.6, IV.7, and IV.8, locate SEMDMO centromeric to D11S908. These combined observations locate SEMDMO in the vicinity of D11S898. The location of MMP13, 1.69 Mb telomeric to D11S898 (Figure 3), is indicated by the arrow. The presence, in each individual, of the wild-type F56 or the mutant S56 is represented by + and –, respectively. The pedigree has been revised from the original description (5, 11) to indicate those family members who yielded information for the localization of SEMDMO. Squares, males; circles, females; open symbols, unaffected individuals; filled symbols, affected individuals; (?), uncertain SEMDMO phenotype; black bars, affected haplotypes; white bars, unaffected haplotypes. The paternal haplotypes are on the left, and the maternal haplotypes are on the right. Deduced haplotypes are within brackets.
Schematic representation of chromosome 11 with Giemsa bands, showing the positions of 8 polymorphic loci from 11q14.3–23.2 that helped define the location of SEMDMO. (A) The locus order was derived from consensus maps (http://www.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/mapview?chr=11; http://www.broad.mit.edu/tools/data/data-human.html). Recombinants between SEMDMO and the centromeric loci D11S4175 and D11S1358 and the telomeric loci D11S4206 and D11S908 (Figure 2 and Table 1) located SEMDMO to an approximate 17-cM (equivalent to a 20-Mbp) interval on chromosome 11q14.3–23.2. Within this interval, SEMDMO cosegregated with 6 loci (Table 1), and 4 of these (D11S1333, D11S898, D11S1339, and D11S927) revealed peak LOD scores greater than +3 at 0% recombination. This 20-Mbp interval contains 160 genes (http://www.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/mapview?chr=11) that include a cluster of 9 genes encoding MMPs, located at 11q22.3. These are MMP1, -3, -7, -8, -10, -12, -13, -20, and -27. The MMP13 gene, which is also referred to as collagenase 3, harbored a missense mutation, F56S (Figure 4), in the SEMDMO kindred (Figure 2). PTH, parathyroid hormone; MEN1, multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. (B) The human F56 residue (asterisk) is evolutionarily conserved in the MMP13 of mammals, amphibia, and teleost fish (http://www.broad.mit.edu/tools/data/data-human.html). (C) The MMP13 F56 residue (asterisk) is also conserved in other members of the MMP family (e.g., MMP-1, -3, -7, -8, -10, -12, -13, -20, and -27) in humans and similarly in mouse, rat, horse, rabbit, and cow (data not shown) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gquery/gquery.fcgi?term=mmp13). Thus, the F56S mutation in the SEMDMO kindred likely represents a significant change.
Schematic representation of the genomic structure of the MMP13 gene illustrating locations of the SEMDMO mutation and protein domains. The 1,413-bp MMP13 coding region yields a 471–amino acid preproenzyme. The signal sequence consists of 19 amino acids that are removed on processing and are not present in the secreted proenzyme (15, 16). The pro- and catalytic domains comprise 84 and 166 amino acids, respectively. The catalytic domain has a zinc-binding motif (HEXXHXXGXXH) that contains 3 histidine residues that bind the catalytic zinc ion at the active site (15, 16, 19, 36). The proregion contains a cysteine residue (Cys77) that ligates this catalytic zinc ion to maintain the latency of proMMP13. An 11–amino acid proline-rich linker peptide (hinge domain) connects the catalytic domain and hemopexin domain, which consists of 191 amino acids. The position of the T→C transition at nucleotide 252 of exon 2, detected in the SEMDMO kindred (Figure 2) and found to result in the F56S mutation (Figure 5) in the proregion, is shown. The shading or hatching of each protein domain indicates its exonic origins.
Detection of mutation in exon 2 by restriction enzyme analysis. (A) DNA sequence analysis of the affected female III.7 revealed a T→C transition at codon 56. The wild-type sequence at codon 56 is TTC encoding a phenylalanine (Phe, F) residue, whereas the mutant (Mu) is TCC encoding for a serine (Ser, S) residue. This missense mutation resulted in the gain of an MspI restriction site (C/CGGC), which facilitated its detection in the family with SEMDMO (B). (C) The restriction enzyme map of the PCR products shows that the wild-type DNA sequence results in a 269-bp product, whereas the mutant, which has one MspI site, is associated with cleaved PCR products of 118 bp and 151 bp. Analysis of the SEMDMO family (Figure 2) revealed that the affected members (II.4, III.7, III.9, IV.6, and IV.7; shown [filled symbols]) were heterozygous for the F56S mutation and that the unaffected members (II.5, III.5, III.6, III.10, and III.11; shown [open symbols]) were homozygous for the wild-type sequence. Standard size markers (S), in the form of a 100-bp ladder, are shown. Cosegregation of this mutation with the disease in the family (Figure 2), in conjunction with its absence in 110 alleles from 55 normal individuals (N1 and N2 are shown) indicates that it is not a common DNA sequence polymorphism.
Analysis of expressed wild-type and mutant F56S MMP13. Substitution of the hydrophobic F56 with the hydrophilic S56 in the mutated MMP13 of the SEMDMO patients is predicted to destabilize the folded structure of the protein intracellularly (20, 21). Misfolded F56S proMMP13 could then lead to aberrations in intracellular transport and autoactivation and retention and/or degradation in the ER (22). We investigated some of these possibilities by expressing, in human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) cells, wild-type or mutant F56S MMP13 cDNAs, which had been subcloned into pcDNA3.1 with or without a C-terminal MycHis tag (Figure 6). The expected molecular mass of expressed proMMP13 protein (including the MycHis tag of approximately 5 kDa) is approximately 60 kDa; removal of the prodomain would result in an active form with molecular mass of approximately 45 kDa (20). In vitro translation (IVT) (23) of wild-type and F56S proMMP13 cDNAs showed similar protein products (Figure 6A). Conditioned medium from HEK293 cells transiently transfected with wild-type or F56S were used for Western blot analysis, which revealed the secretion of full-length untagged or MycHis-tagged wild-type MMP13 but only trace amounts (or none) of full-length untagged or MycHis-tagged F56S proMMP13 (Figure 6, B–D). Instead, degraded misfolded protein fragments of approximately 25–30 kDa of the mutant protein were secreted. These results were found to be the same using 3 different anti-MMP13 antibodies (Figure 6). The F56S is thus abnormally secreted as well as activated and degraded intracellularly.
Analysis of expression of wild-type and F56S MMP13 cDNAs in transfected HEK293 cells. (A) IVT of MMP13 cDNAs. A product of similar molecular mass, approximately 65 kDa, was produced with either wild-type or mutant F56S MMP13 cDNA as template. (B) Western blot analysis of secretion of expressed wild-type and mutant F56S cDNAs in HEK293 cells. Full-length untagged and or Myc-tagged wild-type MMP13 were secreted into conditioned medium, whereas only fragments of F56S MMP13 of low molecular mass were secreted. (C) As in B, but anti-prodomain antibody was used. (D) As in B, but anti-hinge domain antibody was used. In C and D, autodegraded recombinant MMP13 was used as standard. NT, no transfection; Myc, MycHis-tag; Vec, vector only; Bl, blank lane; Std, human MMP13 standard, autoactivated and partially degraded.
We investigated further mechanisms that might account for these findings. Among the most likely possibilities are: a misfolding of F56S MMP13 in the ER such that the orderly progression to the Golgi apparatus and secretion does not take place, but instead the protein is dislocated to the cytosol and degraded in proteasomes (24, 25); or a delayed secretion of the misfolded protein that is susceptible to intra- or extracellular autoactivation (26) and autodegradation. To resolve these issues, we first cultured transfected HEK293 cells in the presence of the proteasome inhibitor lactacystin (10 μM) (27, 28). No alteration of the pattern of intracellular F56S MMP13 was observed by Western blotting (data not shown), thereby suggesting that proteasomes were not involved in processing of the mutant protein. We next used monensin, a disruptor of the Golgi apparatus (29), to block secretion. We found that monensin abolished the secretion of full-length wild-type proMMP13 as well as the low-molecular-mass degradation fragments of F56S MMP13 (Figure 7A). In cell lysates from F56S MMP13 transfectants in the presence of monensin, low levels of full-length proMMP13 protein were seen, as well as more abundant low-molecular-mass fragments. In contrast, in cell lysates from cultured wild-type MMP13 transfectants, only low levels of proMMP13 were found. These results are consistent with the idea that F56S MMP13 is autoactivated and degraded within the ER/Golgi and not in proteasomes, as is the case for other misfolded mutant human proteins, such as α1-antitrypsin Z (28). Moreover, these experiments indicate that F56S MMP13 is degraded intracellularly rather than extracellularly.
Analysis of expression of wild-type and mutant MMP13 cDNAs. All constructs have Myc tags. (A) Effects of monensin on secretion of WT and F56S MMP13. (B) Effects of E204A mutation. Two separate transfectants of F56S/E204A MMP13 are shown. (C) Activation of WT MMP13, with APMA, results in autodegradation and generation of lower-molecular-mass fragments. (D) Activation of WT MMP13 and E204A MMP13 are compared as in C. E204A MMP13 is not activated by APMA. (E) Secretion and autodegradation of mutant C77S MMP13. MMP13 mutants F56S and C77S are degraded to low-molecular-mass fragments. (F) Comparison of stable and transient transfectants. Protein products encoded by transient (HEK293T) and stable (HEK293) transfectants of WT and mutant F56S MMP13 cDNAs behaved similarly. (G) Transient cotransfection of Flag-tagged WT MMP13 cDNA into HEK293 cells stably expressing untagged WT or mutant F56S MMP13. Flag-tagged WT proMMP13 is normally secreted when expressed in cells stably transfected with empty vector or untagged WT MMP13 but is partially autoactivated and degraded (arrows) when expressed in cells stably expressing F56S MMP13. (H) Secretion and autodegradation of mutant F56S, F55T, and F222S MMP13. Transient transfection of F56S and F55T MMP13 cDNAs showed abundant low-molecular-mass fragments but no proenzyme. Transfection with F222S MMP13 cDNA revealed full-length proenzyme and low-abundance low-molecular-mass fragments (arrow). Results in all panels are based on experiments using conditioned medium unless otherwise stated.
In order to determine whether F56S MMP13 is degraded primarily because of delayed secretion and then partial cleavage by some other intracellular proteinase, we constructed catalytically inactive MMP13 mutants. The glutamic acid residue (E) in the sequence (HEXXGH) of the zinc-binding domain (Figure 4) is critical for catalysis by metalloproteinases, and E→A mutants of other MMPs are catalytically inactive (30, 31). We therefore constructed 2 new MMP13 mutants, E204A and the compound F56S/E204A, in pcDNA3.1 and transfected them into HEK293 cells. Both the E204A MMP13 and the compound F56S/E204A MMP13 were expressed at levels similar to those of wild-type E204 MMP13 and were normally secreted (Figure 7B). Thus, mutation of the catalytically active E204 residue to A204 abolished the intracellular autoactivation and autodegradation that resulted from the F56S mutation. The effects of p-aminophenyl mercuric acetate (APMA), which has been shown to activate several MMPs (13, 32), were also assessed. Incubation with APMA resulted in activation of wild-type MMP13 with subsequent autodegradation to fragments of lower molecular mass; APMA did not affect the molecular mass of E204A MMP13 or that of the compound mutant F56S/E204A MMP13 (Figure 7, C and D). These studies, which utilized the epithelial renal cell line HEK293, were confirmed using the transformed human chondrocyte line T/C-28a4 (33) (data not shown). These results demonstrate that the SEMDMO F56S MMP13 is autoactivated and autodegraded intracellularly. Indeed, the catalytically inactive E204A mutant can be envisaged as “rescuing” the abnormal intracellular degradation of the SEMDMO-associated F56S mutant MMP13. Moreover, abnormal secretion and degradation of F56S MMP13 are likely due to misfolding in the cell that interferes with maintenance of the inactive proMMP13, rather than the misfolding interfering with the secretion itself. This is further supported by our experiments with mutant C77S MMP13 (Figure 7E). Studies of MMPs other than MMP13 (32, 34) have shown that within the prodomain, a cysteine residue downstream from the conserved residues orthologous to F55 and F56 in MMP13 folds over to bind to the catalytic zinc (Figure 4) to form a “cysteine switch,” essential for keeping proMMPs inactive prior to secretion (35). Indeed, the C77 residue of MMP13 is included in the sequence PRCGV, which is designated as the “cysteine-switch box,” a feature common to MMPs and ADAM (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase) proteinases (34, 35). We therefore constructed the C77S mutant MMP13 for transfection into HEK293 cells. The resultant autoactivation and secretion of autocatalytic fragments was observed in a pattern indistinguishable from that of the SEMDMO mutant F56S MMP13 (Figure 7E) and consistent with a cysteine-switch box role for this motif in MMP13.
Coexpression of wild-type and mutant F56S MMP13, using stable and transient transfectants. SEMDMO patients are heterozygotes and have both wild-type and mutant F56S copies of MMP13 (Figures 2 and 5). To investigate the dominant nature of the mutant F56S MMP13, we first established stable transfectants of wild-type and mutant F56S MMP13 constructs in HEK293 cells. The stable and transient transfectants behaved similarly (Figure 7F). Full-length wild-type MMP13 was present in conditioned medium, but only low-molecular-mass fragments of F56S MMP13 were detected. In addition, proMMP13 in the medium from the stable transfectants of wild-type MMP13 was activatable by APMA (data not shown) in a manner similar to that observed from the transient transfectants (Figure 7, C and D). To explain the dominant effects of the S56 mutation, we postulated that the activated mutant MMP13 allele product before it was completely degraded could intracellularly activate the wild-type allele proMMP13 product and lead to degradation and decreased secretion of potentially activatable proMMP13. To investigate this, we transiently transfected a C-terminal Flag-tagged wild-type proMMP13 construct that could be activated by APMA into HEK293 cells, which had been stably transfected with empty-vector, wild-type, or F56S MMP13 cDNA (Figure 7G). Full-length wild-type MMP13, identified with the anti-Flag antibody, was present in cell lysates and conditioned medium from empty vector or wild-type MMP13 clones. In contrast, low-molecular-mass fragments of wild-type MMP13 were detected with anti-Flag antibody only in conditioned medium and cell lysates from the stable clones that expressed F56S MMP13. The lower-molecular-mass fragments secreted from cells stably transfected with the F56S MMP13 construct were retained intracellularly in the presence of monensin. These results indicate that the wild-type Flag-tagged MMP13 is activated by autoactivated F56S MMP13 within the cell, presumably in the ER/Golgi. In heterozygotes, this would result in decreased levels of secreted proMMP13 that could be active in extracellular proteolysis. We therefore suggest that in vivo, in individuals with SEMDMO, within the cell the activated product of the mutant proMMP13 allele, before it is extensively degraded, activates the product of the wild-type allele. This would then result in lower levels of secreted wild-type MMP13 than predicted on the basis of haploinsufficiency alone and therefore account for the dominant nature of the SEMDMO mutation.
These considerations assume, based on the proteolytic assays described, that the proMMP13 activated within the cell is degraded to fragments that no longer have collagenolytic or nonspecific proteinase (gelatinase) activity. Indeed, this was confirmed by measuring proteolytic activity of secreted proteins (Figure 8). Conditioned medium from stable transfectants was concentrated, and proteolytic activity was measured in collagenase and gelatinase assays using native type I collagen or denatured type I collagen (gelatin) as substrates. There was abundant collagenase and gelatinase activity in the conditioned medium from wild-type MMP13 stable transfectants, but neither collagenase nor gelatinase activity was detected in the conditioned medium from F56S MMP13 stable transfectants (Figure 8). Similar results were obtained using type II collagen as substrate (data not shown). These results are consistent with the idea that the decreased extracellular proteolytic activity is the consequence of the F56S mutation.
Assay for proteolytic activity of expressed, secreted wild-type and mutant F56S MMP13. Conditioned medium from HEK293 cells that had been stably transfected with either WT or mutant MMP13 (Figure 7, F and G) was used as source of enzyme. Type I collagen or gelatin was substrate, and following incubation, proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE. Collagen β and γ components are not shown in this stained gel. Conditions for each lane are indicated. 0, no conditioned medium added; WT, wild-type MMP13; Mu, F56S MMP13; APMA, 1 mM APMA; Collagen, type I collagen; Gelatin, heated (denatured) type I collagen. WT MMP13 activated with APMA completely digested type I collagen to characteristic three-quarter fragments (Aα1(I) and Aα2(I)) and one-quarter fragments. The fragment Bα1(I) is shown; at this concentration of acrylamide, the Bα2(I) fragment migrated off the gel. Activated wild-type MMP13 also completely digested type I gelatin, but low-molecular-mass fragments of F56S MMP13 secreted into conditioned medium digested neither collagen nor gelatin.
Structural analysis of MMP13 pro- and catalytic domains. To understand the mechanisms for the effects of the abnormal folding of proMMP13 on enzyme function, it would be necessary to obtain and compare the crystal structure of wild-type and mutant proMMP13. Although there are published data from studies using X-ray crystallography and NMR concerning the catalytic, hinge, and C-terminal domains of MMP13, the structure of the prodomain of MMP13 has not been reported (36). We therefore modeled the prodomain and catalytic domains of wild-type and mutant MMP13 using the available structures of proMMP2 (progelatinase A) and proMMP3 (prostromelysin-1), together with the sequences and other available structural features of MMP13 as templates (30, 36). Our analysis revealed that in wild-type MMP13, the F56 side chain lies buried in the interface between the prodomain and the catalytic domain (Figure 9A). At that location, F56 maintains aromatic contacts with F55 and F222, hydrophobic contacts with M52 and P223, and van der Waals interactions with D81. The loss of the bulky side chain of F56 in the mutant MMP13 would then generate a hydrophobic cavity (20, 21) that cannot be filled by the smaller, polar side chain of S56, thereby resulting in a more open and unstable structure (Figure 9B). Based on these considerations, we constructed F55T and F222S MMP13 mutant cDNAs to express in HEK293 cells. The F55T mutant behaved identically to F56S (Figure 7H) as predicted from the modeling (Figure 9), whereas the F222S mutation appeared to have weaker although definite effects on MMP13 stability (Figure 7H, arrow). Further validation of the model was obtained by constructing and expressing other proMMP13 mutants involving residues M52, D81, and P223 (Figure 9) (data not shown).
Proposed 3-dimensional model of the prodomain and catalytic domains of MMP13. (A) Wild-type MMP13. The F56 side chain lies buried in the interface between the prodomain (residues 20–103; Figure 4) and the catalytic domain (residues 104–270). (B) F56S MMP13. There is a more open structure with a cavity in this region.
Our studies have revealed that a missense mutation, F56S, of MMP13 causes SEMDMO (Figure 5). This mutation resulted in intracellular autodegradation such that only proteolytically inactive, low-molecular-mass fragments of F56S MMP13 were secreted (Figures 6 and 7). These secreted fragments of low molecular mass were demonstrated, using native or denatured collagens as substrates (Figure 8), to have no proteolytic activity. Moreover, our use of catalytically inactive mutants E204A and C77S (Figure 7) indicated that the abnormal secretion and degradation of the F56S MMP13 was likely to be due to intracellular misfolding of the mutant protein together with autoactivation. The glutamic acid residue (E) in the zinc-binding domain (Figure 4) of metallopeptidases participates in the mechanism of catalysis by promoting the attack of a water molecule on the carbonyl carbon of the substrate (31, 32, 36, 37). Substitution of an alanine (A) for this glutamic acid (E) in the wild-type or mutant MMP13 renders the protein catalytically inactive. The abnormal intracellular degradation and altered secretion of F56S MMP13 is thus “rescued” by the E204A mutation (Figure 7). The role of the C77 residue is equally important. During synthesis of wild-type MMP13, proper folding of the prodomain permits the C77 to bind to the catalytic zinc and prevent activation prior to secretion. In the mutant F56S MMP13, binding of C77 to the catalytic zinc does not take place, and degradation occurs within the ER/Golgi (Figure 7). The manner in which misfolding of F56S MMP13 may occur was further investigated by modeling the structure of the pro- and catalytic domains of MMP13 (Figure 9). This revealed that the F56S mutation responsible for SEMDMO is an interesting example of a “cavity-forming” mutation, whose relevance to the folding and stability of globular proteins has been previously described (20, 21). However, it is important to note that introduction of different substitutions for specific hydrophobic residues can have different effects on structural stability. For example, the structural stability of phage T4 lysozyme is dependent on its hydrophobic core, and introduction of substitutions of Ala for different hydrophobic residues decreases the protein stability to different extents (37, 38). Thus, although we have identified several important residues in the hydrophobic core of MMP13 that affect protein stability, it is possible that motifs in the MMP13 prodomain other than those in the hydrophobic core could also function in maintaining the latency of proMMP13. In order to resolve these issues, it will be necessary to obtain the crystal structure of the catalytically inactive E204A MMP13 as well as the compound mutant F56S/E204A MMP13.
The results of our study help to elucidate the role of the MMP13 missense mutation F56S in causing SEMDMO. The clinical and radiographic features of SEMDMO (Figure 1) and its childhood onset are consistent with abnormalities of human skeletal development and remodeling. Among the MMPs, MMP13 has been shown to have important roles in endochondral and intramembranous ossification during human fetal bone development. MMP13, expressed in hypertrophic chondrocytes and osteoblasts during embryonic ossification (17, 18, 39–41), can degrade collagen types I, II, III (17), and X (42), as well as noncollagenous proteins such as aggrecan (43). During endochondral ossification, chondrocytes proliferate and elaborate an ECM composed principally of collagen type II. As chondrocytes differentiate, they synthesize collagen X, and the cartilage matrix is calcified and eventually degraded. The loss of collagen at the hypertrophic zone in the growth plate is associated with increased MMP13 activity. This is followed by partial resorption of the calcified cartilage, leaving cartilaginous trabeculae on which osteoblasts elaborate woven bone that is subsequently resorbed and replaced by mature trabecular bone (18). Thus, MMP13 deficiency would prevent orderly ECM degradation in developing growth plates with accumulation of collagens type II and X, and disturbed endochondral ossification. Indeed, studies of Mmp13-null mice have revealed defects in growth plate cartilage with increased hypertrophic domains and delayed endochondral ossification during embryonic development (40, 41). The growth plate phenotype of the Mmp13-null mice persists into adult life and is consistent with that seen in patients with SEMDMO (5). However, in humans, the SEMDMO mutation is dominant (Figures 2 and 5), and this contrasts with the situation in heterozygous (Mmp13+/–) mice, which have normal growth plates (40, 41). Thus, haploinsufficiency of MMP13 alone cannot account for the phenotype of SEMDMO, and based on our studies that mimicked heterozygosity by coexpression of wild-type and mutant MMP13 (Figures 7 and 8), we propose that the F56S enzyme, before it is fully proteolytically degraded, activates and degrades, intracellularly, the MMP13 product of the wild-type allele and thereby exerts a dominant action. Thus, our results, which have elucidated the molecular defect for SEMDMO, provide support for an important role for MMP13 in skeletal development.
These findings indicate that SEMDMO, with regard to the rapidly emerging molecular-pathogenic classification of genetic disorders of the skeleton (2), belongs within group 3, which consists of defects in folding and degradation of macromolecules. Group 3 includes the Torg type osteolysis syndrome, caused by MMP2 mutations (44), and X-linked spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia tarda, caused by sedlin mutations (45). Thus, SEMDMO is the first heritable disorder associated with an MMP13 mutation, and it is likely that other MMP13 mutations could cause other allelic skeletal dysplasias featuring an SEMD phenotype and therefore analogous to type II collagenopathies (1, 2). Furthermore, the association of SEMDMO with a missense MMP13 mutation, and that of Torg syndrome with deactivating MMP2 mutations, shows that rare skeletal dysplasias can involve MMPs and that a search for such abnormalities would be worthwhile.
Genotyping and linkage analysis. Venous blood was obtained from the 32 living individuals (13 affected and 11 unaffected members and 8 unaffected spouses) of the SEMDMO kindred (Figure 1) following receipt of informed consent, using protocols approved by the research ethical committees of the Royal Postgraduate Medical School (London, United Kingdom); the Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals and University of Oxford; and Washington University School of Medicine. Leukocyte DNA was prepared using standard methods (12), and a genome-wide linkage analysis was performed using the Applied Biosystems Linkage Mapping Set (version 2.5) of 400 fluorescently labeled PCR primers to amplify polymorphic microsatellite loci spaced at an average intermarker distance of 10 cM, from the Généthon (http://www.genethon.fr) human linkage map (12). PCR was performed as previously described (46), and alleles were detected on a 5% denaturing polyacrylamide gel using an ABI PRISM 377XL DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems) (12, 23). Alleles were sized by GeneScan Analysis Software (version 2.1) and scored by Genotyper software (version 2.0) (Applied Biosystems). Two-point LOD scores were calculated using the MLINK program of the FASTLINK (version 4.0P) package (12, 46), accessed via the Genetic Linkage User Environment (GLUE) interface (MRC UK Human Genome Mapping Project Resource Centre). Allele frequencies were assumed to be equal, and the gene frequency and penetrance of SEMDMO were taken as 10–4 and 100%, respectively; varying these values had no significant effect on the linkage analysis. The locus order was derived from consensus maps (http://www.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/mapview?chr=11 and http://www.broad.mit.edu/tools/data/data-human.html).
DNA sequence analysis of MMP13. Ten pairs of MMP13-specific primers were designed based on the genomic sequence (NCBI Entrez Nucleotide database; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=Nucleotide) and used for PCR amplification of the 10 exons and 18 intron-exon boundaries, as previously described (23). One pair of genomic MMP13 primers (F [forward] and R [reverse]) were designed and used for each of the 10 MMP13 exons as follows: 1F 5′-GGCATCACCATTCAAGATGC-3′; 1R 5′-GGATTGGCAAGATACTCTACC-3′; 2F 5′-GGTGTCTTTTCTAGCGCTACC-3′; 2R 5′-GCCTATGATTTACCTGTAGG-3′; 3F 5′-AGAATTGTGAATTACACCCCTG-3′; 3R 5′-GTGCATCATTACCCTTAATTCC-3′; 4F 5′-CATACTAGTGTGTTCACTGTC-3′; 4R 5′-CCTGTGCTAAGTACTCCTGGATG-3′; 5F 5′-TACCTGGTCACTGGAATTCCC-3′; 5R 5′-ACCATAGAGAGACTGGATCCC-3′; 6F 5′-GCCTTTCACGACTACAGGTCC-3′; 6R 5′-GAATCTCAAGAGTACCTGTC-3′; 7F 5′-TGTTAGATTCTTCTGGCGCCTGC-3′; 7R 5′-CCTCTGTGGAAAGCTTACCTCTG-3′; 8F 5′-ATTTCACTCATTCCAGGTAG-3′; 8R 5′-ACAGATGGGTCAGTACCTAC-3′; 9F 5′-CCAGATGCTTTAAATGGACTG-3′; 9R 5′-GTTTTGAGGGGCTACAGAAGC-3′; 10F 5′-CTCTGAAATTGTCTTTATGC-3′; 10R 5′-ATTACCCCAAATGCTCTTCAGG-3′. DNA from an SEMDMO-affected individual (III.7; Figure 2) and from an unaffected unrelated subject was used, and the DNA sequences of the PCR products were determined as described (23), using a semiautomated system (ABI 373XL; Applied Biosystems). The DNA sequence abnormality was confirmed by MspI restriction enzyme analysis of genomic PCR products, obtained using MMP13 primers 2F and 2R (sequences given above), and resolved by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis (23). The DNA sequence abnormality was also demonstrated to cosegregate with the disorder and to be absent as a common sequence polymorphism in DNA obtained from 55 unrelated normal individuals (27 males and 28 females).
Expression of MMP13 cDNAs. A full-length MMP13 cDNA was generated using PCR and the I.M.A.G.E. (http://image.llnl.gov) clone 796237 as template and subcloned in frame into the EcoRI site of pcDNA3.1 and also the pcDNA3.1 MycHis vector (Invitrogen Corp.) (23). Parent HEK293 or the variant HEK293T cells, which do not endogenously express MMP13, were transfected using Lipofectamine Plus (Invitrogen Corp.) or FuGENE (Roche Diagnostics Corp.), with either wild-type MMP13 constructs containing C-terminal MycHis or Flag tags in pcDNA3.1 or a construct harboring the SEMDMO mutation that was introduced by the use of site-directed mutagenesis (QuikChange; Stratagene), as described previously (23). Forty-eight hours after transfection, the cells and supernatants were harvested. The cells were washed with PBS and lysates prepared by incubation in 0.5 ml lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8, 137 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4, 0.1% NP-40) plus Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche Diagnostics Corp.) for 15 minutes on ice, followed by centrifugation at 14,000 g and 4°C for 10 minutes. The cell lysates were spun through a Microcon YM-10 Centrifugal Filter Unit with a cut-off 10 kDa (Millipore), fractionated by 10% SDS-PAGE, and transferred to PVDF membranes (23). Western blot analyses were performed using antibodies against the tags or different MMP13 antibodies. The latter were as follows: a mouse monoclonal antibody (MAB181-15A12; EMD Biosciences) directed against the pro- and active forms of the human MMP13; a mouse monoclonal antibody (MAB13424; Chemicon International) directed against the catalytic domain of human MMP13 (Figure 4) that recognizes both latent (∼55 kDa) and active (∼45 kDa) MMP13; a rabbit polyclonal antibody (AB19057; Chemicon International) directed against the pro-peptide region that recognizes the latent (∼55 kDa) MMP13 precursor; and a rabbit polyclonal antibody (AB8114; Chemicon International) directed against the hinge region that recognizes latent (∼55 kDa) and active (∼45 kDa) MMP13. An appropriate secondary antibody, i.e., anti-mouse HRP (Bio-Rad Laboratories) was used at 1:3,000 and visualized with an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) kit (Amersham Biosciences) (23). IVT wild-type and mutant MMP13 were generated using the TnT Coupled Reticulocyte Lysate IVT System (Promega) as previously described (23).
Preparation of stable transfectants. Stable transfectants in the parent HEK293 cells were prepared after transfection of pcDNA3.1 alone (empty vector) or pcDNA3.1 encoding untagged wild-type or mutant F56S MMP13 cDNA. After transfection, the contents of each well from 6-well plates were transferred to 100-mm diameter dishes and cultured in the presence of 400 μg/ml G418 (Geneticin; Invitrogen Corp.). Approximately 10 neo-resistant clones/transfectants were identified and selected using the cylinder method, and cells were expanded to collect conditioned medium to use in proteolytic assays or for transient transfection with other constructs in pcDNA3.1. For double transfection, the stable clones were transiently transfected as described above using pcDNA3.1 containing empty vector, wild-type Flag-tagged MMP13, or mutant F56S Flag-tagged MMP13. Transfected cells were then cultured for 48 hours with or without monensin, conditioned medium was harvested, cells were washed with PBS, and lysates were prepared by incubation as described above in 0.5 ml lysis buffer. Conditioned medium and cell lysates were then analyzed by Western blotting with anti-Flag antibody.
Collagen proteolysis. Human proMMP13 cDNA in pcDNA 3.1 was stably transfected into HEK 293 cells that were then maintained in DMEM, 10% FCS. To obtain collagenase for these experiments, DMEM, 10% FCS was removed and replaced with DMEM containing 0.2% lactalbumin, and after incubation for 48 hours, medium was harvested and concentrated 20-fold using the Centricon YM-30 Concentrator (Millipore). Collagenase digestion was carried out at 20°C in collagenase buffer (0.1 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 5 mM CaCl2, 0.1 M NaCl, 0.25 M glucose) as previously described (47). Latent collagenase was activated by treatment with APMA, which was brought to a concentration of 1 mM at the beginning of the incubation. For gelatinase assays, collagen was heated for 30 minutes at 90°C and cooled to 4°C until used. Incubation with the MMP13 preparation was performed for 15 hours at 20°C in a thermocycler. The reaction was stopped by the addition of EDTA to a final concentration of 50 mM. Samples were stored at 4°C prior to analysis by SDS-PAGE. Digestion products were resolved by SDS-PAGE using 7.5% acrylamide without reduction and gels were stained with GelCode Blue Stain Reagent (Pierce Biotechnology Inc.).
Three-dimensional modeling. A 3-dimensional model of the prodomain with the catalytic domain of MMP13 was derived using the structure of MMP13 catalytic domain alone (Protein Data Bank ID [PDB-ID] 830C; http://www.rcsb.org/pdb) and the structures of prodomain plus catalytic domain of proMMP2 (PDB-ID 1CK7) and proMMP3 (PDB-ID 1SLM). We used the semiautomated modeling server SWISS-MODEL (http://expasy.org) (48). Briefly, the target sequence was threaded over the structure of the templates, built with ProMod II, and energy-minimized with Gromos 96 as described by Schwede et al. (48). The quality of the resulting model was verified automatically with WhatCheck (48) and manually with Deep View (http://expasy.org/spdbv). The interactions among the residues were derived with CSU and LPC software (http://bip.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/lpccsu) (49). Figure 9 was modeled with MOLMOL (http://hugin.ethz.ch/wuthrich/software/molmol/) and rendered with POV-Ray (http://www.povray.org).
We thank the Medical Research Council, UK (A.M. Kennedy, P.T. Christie, B. Harding, A.A.J. Pannett, A. Dearlove, C. Hartley, M.A. Nesbit, and R.V. Thakker), the Wellcome Trust (A.A.C. Reed and R.V. Thakker), the NIH (M. Inada and S.M. Krane), the European Union (C. López-Otín and L.M. Sánchez), and the Shriners Hospitals for Children, USA (M.P. Whyte) for support. We are grateful to William H. McAlister for characterizing the radiographic findings.
Ann M. Kennedy and Masaki Inada contributed equally to this work.
Nonstandard abbreviations used: APMA, p-aminophenyl mercuric acetate; COL2A1, type II collagen (gene); HEK293 cell, human embryonic kidney 293 cell; IVT, in vitro–translated/in vitro translation; LOD, log10 of odds; SED, spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia; SEMD, spondyloepimetaphyseal dysplasia, SEMDMO, SEMD, Missouri type.
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.