Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

ArticleCell biology Free access | 10.1172/JCI21022

Kinase suppressor of Ras-1 protects intestinal epithelium from cytokine-mediated apoptosis during inflammation

Fang Yan,1 Sutha K. John,1 Guinn Wilson,1 David S. Jones,1 M. Kay Washington,2 and D. Brent Polk1,3

1Department of Pediatrics, 2Department of Pathology, and 3Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Address correspondence to: D. Brent Polk, Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, S4322 Medical Center North, 21st and Garland Avenues, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2576, USA. Phone: (615) 322-7449; Fax: (615) 343-8915; E-mail: d-brent.polk@vanderbilt.edu.

Find articles by Yan, F. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Pediatrics, 2Department of Pathology, and 3Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Address correspondence to: D. Brent Polk, Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, S4322 Medical Center North, 21st and Garland Avenues, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2576, USA. Phone: (615) 322-7449; Fax: (615) 343-8915; E-mail: d-brent.polk@vanderbilt.edu.

Find articles by John, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Pediatrics, 2Department of Pathology, and 3Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Address correspondence to: D. Brent Polk, Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, S4322 Medical Center North, 21st and Garland Avenues, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2576, USA. Phone: (615) 322-7449; Fax: (615) 343-8915; E-mail: d-brent.polk@vanderbilt.edu.

Find articles by Wilson, G. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Pediatrics, 2Department of Pathology, and 3Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Address correspondence to: D. Brent Polk, Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, S4322 Medical Center North, 21st and Garland Avenues, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2576, USA. Phone: (615) 322-7449; Fax: (615) 343-8915; E-mail: d-brent.polk@vanderbilt.edu.

Find articles by Jones, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Pediatrics, 2Department of Pathology, and 3Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Address correspondence to: D. Brent Polk, Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, S4322 Medical Center North, 21st and Garland Avenues, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2576, USA. Phone: (615) 322-7449; Fax: (615) 343-8915; E-mail: d-brent.polk@vanderbilt.edu.

Find articles by Washington, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Department of Pediatrics, 2Department of Pathology, and 3Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Address correspondence to: D. Brent Polk, Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, S4322 Medical Center North, 21st and Garland Avenues, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2576, USA. Phone: (615) 322-7449; Fax: (615) 343-8915; E-mail: d-brent.polk@vanderbilt.edu.

Find articles by Polk, D. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Published November 1, 2004 - More info

Published in Volume 114, Issue 9 on November 1, 2004
J Clin Invest. 2004;114(9):1272–1280. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI21022.
© 2004 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published November 1, 2004 - Version history
Received: January 8, 2004; Accepted: August 10, 2004
View PDF
Abstract

TNF plays a pathogenic role in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), which are characterized by altered cytokine production and increased intestinal epithelial cell apoptosis. In vitro studies suggest that kinase suppressor of Ras-1 (KSR1) is an essential regulatory kinase for TNF-stimulated survival pathways in intestinal epithelial cell lines. Here we use a KSR1-deficient mouse model to study the role of KSR1 in regulating intestinal cell fate during cytokine-mediated inflammation. We show that KSR1 and its target signaling pathways are activated in inflamed colon mucosa. Loss of KSR1 increases susceptibility to chronic colitis and TNF-induced apoptosis in the intestinal epithelial cell. Furthermore, disruption of KSR1 expression enhances TNF-induced apoptosis in mouse colon epithelial cells and is associated with a failure to activate antiapoptotic signals including Raf-1/MEK/ERK, NF-κB, and Akt/protein kinase B. These effects are reversed by WT, but not kinase-inactive, KSR1. We conclude that KSR1 has an essential protective role in the intestinal epithelial cell during inflammation through activation of cell survival pathways.

Introduction

The homeostatic balance between proliferation and apoptosis is essential for the intestinal epithelium to function as a physiological and structural barrier. Disruption of this balance leads to villus atrophy, epithelial hyperplasia, loss of normal absorptive function, and an increased risk of tumorigenesis. Evidence from a number of different animal and human studies suggests that inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), including ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease, are the consequence of abnormal immune responses to pathogenic or nonpathogenic organisms or other environmental stimuli that disrupt this mucosal barrier with increased epithelial apoptosis (1). Altered local cytokine production appears to be critical for inducing pathologically increased rates of epithelial cell turnover in active inflammation (2). Among the cytokines altered in IBD, TNF is a key mediator in the pathogenesis of a number of gastrointestinal diseases with altered mucosal repair, including NSAID enteropathy (1), Helicobacter pylori gastritis (1), celiac disease (3), HIV enteropathy (4), graft-versus-host disease (5), and necrotizing enterocolitis (6).

TNF interacts with 2 receptors, TNFR1 and TNFR2, to initiate distinctive cellular responses. Pathological concentrations of TNF inhibit intestinal epithelial cell wound closure and proliferation through TNFR1 (7, 8), whereas activation of TNFR2 by lower TNF concentrations leads to increased intestinal cell proliferation and migration (7–9). Activation of TNFR1 or TNFR2 induces either apoptosis or cell survival, depending upon the balance between anti- and proapoptotic pathways (10, 11). TNF-regulated antiapoptotic pathways include extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK)/MAPK (12), NF-κB (12), and Akt/protein kinase B (PKB) (13), whereas proapoptotic TNF-initiated signals include p38 and stress-activated protein kinase (SAPK)/JNK (13–15).

The molecular switches determining the balance between proapoptotic and antiapoptotic TNF signals are not well characterized but include Ras (16) and Raf-1 (17). Additionally, kinase suppressor of Ras-1 (KSR1) regulates TNF-activated antiapoptotic signals in intestinal epithelial cells (12, 13, 18). KSR1, a 97-kDa protein previously identified as a ceramide-activated proline-directed Ser/Thr kinase (19, 20), is highly conserved from humans to Drosophila and Caenorhabditis elegans (21, 22).

Disruption of KSR1 expression or kinase activity blocks activation of ERK1/2 MAPK, NF-κB, and Akt/PKB, increasing apoptosis in TNF-treated intestinal cells (12, 13). KSR1 functions as both a scaffolding molecule for Raf-1/MEK/ERK and a cell type–dependent kinase for Raf-1 (18, 23, 24). Interestingly, the KSR1-deficient mouse is grossly normal, but displays defects in ERK kinase signaling, T cell activation, skin development (25), and Ras-dependent tumor formation (26). We therefore hypothesized that KSR1 functions to protect intestinal epithelial cells from cytokine-induced apoptosis in vivo. To test this hypothesis, we examined the regulation of signal transduction pathways and apoptosis in intestinal mucosa of the KSR1-deficient mouse and in a mouse model of IBD.

Results

Loss of KSR1 enhances TNF-induced apoptosis in colonic epithelial cells in vivo. We have reported that KSR1 regulates TNF-mediated colon cell survival in vitro (12, 13). To determine whether KSR1 functions as an antiapoptotic molecule in vivo, we treated KSR1–/– mice with TNF and measured apoptosis. After a 4-hour treatment, TNF-induced colon epithelial cell apoptosis was increased up to 3-fold in the KSR1–/– mice compared with WT mice (Figure 1, A and B). Also, basal apoptosis was increased in KSR1–/– mouse colon epithelial (MCE) cells. To further characterize the apoptotic cells, we performed immunohistochemistry using anti–active caspase-3 antibody. Activated caspase-3 staining was increased in TNF-treated KSR1–/– mice within 4 hours, and was limited to the epithelial cell layer (Figure 1C), a pattern identical to the findings with the apoptosis assay. Immunohistochemistry and Western blot analysis showed KSR1 expression throughout the intestine and colon (Figure 1D), with the predominant localization in the epithelial cells (Figure 1E). As expected, no KSR1 was detected in the KSR1–/– mouse tissue sections. Taken together, these data indicate that TNF regulates intestinal cell fate in vivo through KSR1.

TNF induces apoptosis in KSR1–/– mouse colon epithelium in vivo. Mice wereFigure 1

TNF induces apoptosis in KSR1–/– mouse colon epithelium in vivo. Mice were injected with TNF or PBS for the indicated times. Paraffin-embedded colon tissues were studied for apoptosis using ISOL staining. (A) Apoptotic nuclei labeled with peroxidase were visualized using DIC microscopy. Arrowheads indicate ISOL-labeled apoptotic nuclei. (B) The number of apoptotic nuclei found per 100 colonic glands. (C) Caspase-3 activity was determined by immunohistochemistry using anti–active caspase-3 antibody. Arrowheads indicate examples of caspase-3–positive cells detected by peroxidase. KSR1 expression in the gastrointestinal tract was determined by Western blot analysis of mucosal lysates (D) and immunohistochemistry (E). The arrow in E points to the transitional section of KSR1 expression in IL-10+/–KSR1+/– mouse colon. d, distal; p, proximal; SI, small intestine; Cec, cecum; C, colon. The data shown here are representative of 5 different experiments. Magnification, ×40.

TNF activation of antiapoptotic signals requires KSR1. Because KSR1 mediates TNF-stimulated cell survival pathways in colon cell lines, we studied the in vivo role of KSR1 in these pathways. Protein activation in colon mucosal lysates was determined by Western blot analysis or immunohistochemistry. TNF stimulated activation of ERK1/2 MAPK and Akt/PKB, degradation of inhibitor of κB–α (IκBα), and NF-κB nuclear translocation in KSR1+/+, but not in KSR1–/– mice (Figure 2, A and B). TNF increased in vivo expression of the NF-κB target cIAP2 (12) in colon epithelial cells of WT mice, but not KSR1-deficient mice (Figure 2C).

Loss of KSR1 in colon epithelium inhibits TNF-stimulated cell survival signFigure 2

Loss of KSR1 in colon epithelium inhibits TNF-stimulated cell survival signals in vivo. KSR1+/+ or KSR1–/– mice were injected with TNF or PBS for the indicated times. Total colon mucosal lysates were collected for Western blot analysis with anti-KSR1, anti–P-ERK1/2, anti–P-IκBα, anti–P-Akt, and anti-ERK1/2 antibodies (A). P, phosphorylation. Paraffin-embedded colon tissues were immunostained with anti–NF-κB p65 subunit (B) or cIAP2 (C), labeled with peroxidase, and visualized using DIC microscopy (magnification, ×40). Arrows indicate nuclear localization of NF-κB (B) and cIAP2-positive cells (C). Shown is 1 representative of 5 mice in each treatment group.

To further determine the regulatory role of KSR1 in TNF signaling, we generated conditionally immortalized MCE cell lines null for KSR1 (KSR1–/– MCE cells). Compared with young adult mouse colon cells expressing endogenous KSR1 (12, 18, 27), KSR1–/– MCE cells underwent apoptosis upon TNF treatment (Figure 3A), and the percentage of apoptotic cells increased as the period of TNF treatment increased (Figure 3B). The percentage of cells undergoing apoptosis at a given time plateaued after 16 hours, primarily because of overall cell loss (shown by comparison of DAPI-positive nuclei at 24 hours in Figure 3A). TNF failed to stimulate antiapoptotic signals, such as ERK1/2 MAPK, Akt/PKB, and IκBα degradation, in KSR1–/– MCE cells (Figure 3C). Consistent with our report that KSR1 is not required for EGF activation of ERK1/2 MAPK in intestinal epithelial cells (18), EGF initiation of ERK1/2 MAPK activation in KSR1–/– MCE cells was similar to its action in young adult mouse KSR1+/+ colon cells (Figure 3C). Next, we transiently expressed either WT or kinase inactive (KI) KSR1 in KSR1–/– MCE cells prior to TNF treatment. Expression of WT KSR1, but not KI KSR1, restored TNF activation of ERK1/2 MAPK, Akt/PKB, and degradation of IκBα (Figure 3D). Interestingly, the coimmunoprecipitation assay showed that KI KSR1 and WT KSR1 interacted with similar proteins in MCE cells, including Raf-1 and MEK1/2 (Figure 3E). These data indicate that the KI KSR1 dominant-negative effect on Raf-1/MEK/ERK activation in mammalian cells is likely due to disruption of kinase activity, not altered Raf-1 or MEK binding capacity. Thus, we interpret these and previous findings to support KSR1 kinase activity as a positive regulator of TNF-initiated antiapoptotic signals determining intestinal epithelial cell fate.

KSR1 regulates TNF-induced survival responses in MCE cell lines. (A) KSR1–/Figure 3

KSR1 regulates TNF-induced survival responses in MCE cell lines. (A) KSR1–/– MCE cells were treated with TNF for 24 hours and fixed for TUNEL and DAPI staining. Apoptotic cell nuclei in TUNEL staining were labeled with FITC (indicated by arrowheads) and visualized using fluorescence microscopy (magnification, ×40). (B) The percentage of cells undergoing apoptosis following TNF treatment for the indicated times is shown from a representative experiment. KSR1–/– MCE cells (C) or KSR1–/– MCE cells transiently transfected with WT KSR1 or KI KSR1 (D) were treated with TNF or EGF, and cellular lysates were prepared for Western blot analysis with the indicated antibodies. KSR1 and its coprecipitated proteins from KSR1–/– MCE cells transiently transfected with vector, WT KSR1 or KI KSR1 were separated by SDS-PAGE and stained with colloidal blue. Raf-1 and MEK bound to KSR1 was determined by Western blot analysis with anti–Raf-1 or anti-MEK1/2 antibodies (E). Shown are representative data from 3 separate experiments.

KSR1 is activated in inflamed colon mucosa. IL-10–deficient (IL-10–/–) mice spontaneously develop IBD by 12 weeks of age with increased TNF and IFN-γ production early in the inflammatory process (28). Therefore, we used this model to determine the phosphorylation and activation state of KSR1 during intestinal inflammation. The colon appeared normal in 8-week-old BALB/c IL-10+/+ and IL-10–/– mice but showed severe inflammation in 12-week-old IL-10–/– mice (Figure 4A). Inflamed IL-10–/– mucosa showed increased activation of ERK1/2, p38 MAPK, Akt/PKB, and IκBα phosphorylation compared with 8-week-old IL-10–/– and BALB/c WT mice (Figure 4B). KSR1 and Raf-1 were recovered by immunoprecipitation from mucosal homogenates and the phosphorylation state was determined by anti–phospho-Ser and anti–phospho-Thr antibodies. KSR1 recovered from inflamed IL-10–/– colon showed increased Thr but unchanged Ser phosphorylation (Figure 4C). Tyrosine phosphorylation of KSR1 was not detected in inflamed or noninflamed colonic mucosa, consistent with observations in cell culture (18) (data not shown). Interestingly, Raf-1 Thr phosphorylation was increased only in inflamed IL-10–/– mucosa (Figure 4D). Similarly, in a 2-step in vitro kinase assay (18), only the KSR1 from inflamed mucosa stimulated Raf-1 Thr phosphorylation and kinase activity toward MEK1 (Figure 4E). Because both KSR1 kinase activity and scaffolding function have been shown to be regulated by phosphorylation (19, 29, 30), we wondered whether phosphorylation is required for KSR1’s kinase activity. KSR1 recovered from inflamed IL-10–/– mucosa was divided and either subjected to phosphatase treatment or not, and then tested for kinase activity toward Raf-1 in activating MEK1. Following dephosphorylation, including loss of both phospho-Thr and phospho-Ser, KSR1 was unable to stimulate Raf-1 kinase activity (Figure 4F). These findings indicate that KSR1 Thr phosphorylation level and kinase activity are increased in inflamed mouse mucosa and that kinase activity is regulated by protein phosphorylation.

KSR1 is activated in inflamed colon mucosa. (A) H&E staining of paraffin-emFigure 4

KSR1 is activated in inflamed colon mucosa. (A) H&E staining of paraffin-embedded colon tissues prepared from IL-10+/+ (BALB/c) or IL-10–/– mice before developing overt signs of colitis (8-week-old mice) or with rectal prolapse (12-week-old mice) showing characteristic epithelial ulceration (magnification, ×20). (B) Colon mucosal lysates were prepared from the respective mice for Western blot analysis with indicated antibodies. KSR1 (C, E, and F) or Raf-1 (D) was immunoprecipitated from colon mucosal lysates using anti-KSR1 or anti–Raf-1 antibodies, respectively, and subjected to Western blot analysis to detect phosphorylation levels using anti–P-Thr or anti–P-Ser antibodies. Using a 2-stage in vitro kinase assay (E and F), immunoprecipitated KSR1 was incubated first with recombinant Raf-1, and then Raf-1 was incubated with KI MEK1 as substrate as detailed in Methods. Phosphorylation of Raf-1 or MEK1 was determined using anti–P-Thr or anti–P-MEK1/2 antibodies, respectively. Immunoprecipitated KSR1 was treated with calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (PTase) prior to incubation with Raf-1 (F), as indicated. The results shown here are from 2 representatives of 5 mice. WBA, Western blot analysis.

Loss of KSR1 enhances susceptibility to colon inflammation. As shown above, KSR1 kinase activity is increased during inflammation and the loss of KSR1 enhances TNF-induced apoptosis in colon epithelial cells. Because of increased TNF production during the early phase of colonic inflammation (28), the IL-10–/– mouse is ideal to study the role of KSR1 during this process. We crossed IL-10–/– mice (expressed on a BALB/c background more than 10 generations) with KSR1–/– mice (expressed on a 129/SvEv background more than 10 generations) to test the hypothesis that colon epithelial cell apoptosis would be increased without KSR1. To control for issues of genetic background combinations, we also crossed IL-10–/– mice with 129/SvEv (KSR1+/+) mice, or BALB/c (IL-10+/+) mice with KSR1–/– mice to obtain the same first-generation (F1) background mice with different heterozygous null genes (IL-10+/–KSR1+/+ or IL-10+/+KSR1+/–). Surprisingly, the resulting F1 IL-10+/–KSR1+/– mice developed IBD by 8 weeks of age (Figure 5), characterized by diarrhea and weight loss with an increased histological injury score (Table 1). Neither F1 IL-10+/–KSR1+/+ nor F1 IL-10+/+KSR1+/– mice at the same age showed symptoms of IBD or increased injury scores. Histologically, IL-10+/–KSR1+/– mice showed enterocyte loss, ulceration, crypt inflammation, infiltration of mononuclear and polymorphonuclear cells into lamina propria and mucosal hyperplasia (Figure 5A). Furthermore, apoptosis was significantly increased in IL-10+/–KSR1+/– colon compared with either age-matched IL-10+/–KSR1+/+ or IL-10+/+KSR1+/– mice (Figure 5, A and B). These results indicate that KSR1 regulates both anti-inflammatory and antiapoptotic signals in the mouse colon.

Loss of KSR1 increases colon inflammation. IL-10+/–KSR1+/–, IL-10+/–KSR1+/+Figure 5

Loss of KSR1 increases colon inflammation. IL-10+/–KSR1+/–, IL-10+/–KSR1+/+, or IL-10+/+KSR1+/– mice produced by first-generation crosses of IL-10–/– and KSR1–/–, IL-10–/– and 129/SvEv (KSR1+/+), or BALB/c (IL-10+/+) and KSR1–/– mice, respectively, as well as IL-10–/– (BALB/c) and KSR1–/– (129/SvEv) mice were sacrificed at 8 weeks of age. (A) H&E staining examples of mouse colons (magnification, ×20), and apoptosis detected using an ISOL kit as in Figure 1 are shown (1 representative of each group, 5 mice per group). Arrows represent ISOL-labeled apoptotic nuclei. Histological injury scores appear in Table 1. (B) The number of apoptotic nuclei found per 100 colonic glands is shown (*P < 0.001 compared with IL-10+/–KSR1+/– group).

Table 1

Colon injury scores for 8-week-old mice

KSR1 is not required for TNF-regulated endothelin expression in colonic mucosa endothelial cells. Intestinal endothelial cells are a primary target in radiation-induced intestinal injury, with endothelial cell apoptosis preceding epithelial cell death (31). Therefore, we studied the function of KSR1 in endothelial cells in the intestinal mucosa of mice exposed to TNF. In contrast to epithelial cells (see Figure 1C), there was no increase in endothelial cell caspase-3 activation between 1 hour and 24 hours after treatment (Figure 6A). Likewise, there was no increase in endothelial cell apoptosis during the first 24 hours after TNF treatment of either WT or KSR1–/– mice (Figure 6B). Cell culture studies indicate that NF-κB activation is a major antiapoptotic pathway regulated by KSR1 (12), and endothelin is a target of NF-κB signaling in endothelial cells (32). TNF stimulated NF-κB p65 subunit nuclear translocation (data not shown) and endothelin production in mucosal endothelial cells of both WT and KSR1–/– mice (Figure 6C). Thus, disruption of TNF-stimulated NF-κB activation in KSR1–/– mice does not extend to the intestinal endothelial cell compartment.

KSR1 is not required for TNF-regulated endothelin expression in intestinalFigure 6

KSR1 is not required for TNF-regulated endothelin expression in intestinal mucosa. Mice were treated with TNF as in Figure 1 and paraffin-embedded colon tissues were immunostained with CD31, an endothelial cell marker, active caspase-3 (A), ISOL (B), or the NF-κB–regulated endothelin (C). Positive-staining cells were labeled with peroxidase, developed with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrachloride (DAB) and visualized using DIC microscopy as in Figure 1. CD31, active caspase-3, ISOL, and endothelin immunoassay images were taken from the same areas of adjacent tissue sections. Arrowhead in A indicates active caspase-3–positive cells. Arrows in C indicate endothelin- and CD31-labeled cells. Shown is 1 representative of 5 mice for each treatment. Magnification, ×40.

Discussion

A number of disorders of the gastrointestinal tract, such as IBDs, are characterized by elevated TNF production and increased apoptosis that disrupt intestinal homeostasis and the integrity of the protective epithelial monolayer. Therefore, determining the signal transduction pathways regulating intestinal epithelial response to cytokines may identify novel regulatory proteins as therapeutic targets for treatment of IBD or other TNF-mediated intestinal disorders. Our previous studies suggest that KSR1 is a regulatory protein for TNF-mediated cell survival signaling pathways (12, 13, 18). Our aims here were to determine the in vivo role of KSR1 in cytokine-induced apoptosis and cell survival signaling in the intestinal epithelium during inflammation. Results in this paper show that in intestinal epithelial cells, KSR1 protects from cytokine-induced apoptotic injury and is required for TNF activation of cell survival signal transduction pathways, including ERK1/2 MAPK, Akt/PKB, and NF-κB. Thus, loss of KSR1 increases TNF-mediated apoptosis, which may lead to disruption of the defensive function of the epithelial monolayer and to enhanced mucosal inflammation. These studies provide unequivocal evidence that KSR1 activation exerts a protective role in colon mucosal inflammation and the first in vivo indication that mammalian KSR1 functions as a molecular cell survival switch.

KSR1 was originally identified as a ceramide-activated protein kinase prior to its discovery through loss-of-function genetic screening analyses of the biologic actions of Ras signaling pathways in C. elegans and Drosophila (19, 21, 22). Mechanisms of KSR1 action appear to include both a scaffolding role, linking downstream targets of the Ras/Raf-1/MEK/ERK MAPK signaling cassette, and a kinase role, directly phosphorylating and activating Raf-1 in this pathway. Evidence has been presented for both functions by a number of different laboratories using different systems (18, 23, 30, 33–35). The function of KSR1 as scaffold protein, kinase, or both appears to be cell and context dependent. For example, in intestinal epithelial cells, TNF activation of Raf-1/MEK/ERK MAPK requires KSR1 kinase activity, but EGF activation of the same pathway is KSR1 kinase–independent (ref. 18 and Figure 3A). However, it is clear that KSR1 expression is required for activation of this signal transduction pathway in other cells and tissues (23, 36).

Evidence from mice (25, 26), C. elegans (21, 36, 37), Drosophila (22, 23), and cell culture (12, 29, 38) indicates that KSR1 functions in normal growth, development, and differentiation. Furthermore, 2 recent reports suggest that KSR1 may be necessary for Ras-mediated tumorigenesis (26, 39). The present study provides evidence for an additional biological function of KSR1 as a molecular switch regulating the activation of cellular survival pathways. Treatment of KSR1–/– mice with TNF rapidly increases apoptosis in intestinal epithelial cells through failure to stimulate known antiapoptotic pathways, including NF-κB, Akt, and ERK1/2/MAPK (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The block in NF-κB activation shown in our results appears to be primarily epithelial, as TNF-induced NF-κB nuclear translocation and cIAP2 expression are lost in these cells, yet increased endothelial cell NF-κB activation and endothelin expression remain intact (Figure 6C).

The mechanism of NF-κB regulation by KSR1 in TNF-treated epithelium is unknown, but a recent in vivo report confirmed our observation, in cell culture studies that increased NF-κB activation is an essential cytokine-mediated intestinal cell survival response (12, 40). Activation of MEK1 and NF-κB are regulated by different domains on Raf-1 (41), therefore it is tempting to propose that NF-κB activation is downstream of Raf-1 in intestinal epithelial cells. The observation that in vivo Akt/PKB activation by TNF requires KSR1 appears novel, although not completely unexpected, as dominant-negative KSR1 expression blocked TNF-mediated Akt/PKB activation (13). Given the evidence that chronic inflammation enhances tumorigenesis (42) and that Raf-1 and Akt/PKB have been shown to be effective therapeutic targets in tumor models, it is attractive to speculate that inhibiting KSR1 might be a novel approach to tumor therapy by increasing susceptibility of tumor cells to cytokine-induced apoptosis.

KSR1 Thr phosphorylation state and kinase activity are increased in inflamed IL-10–/– mucosa (Figure 4), a disease characterized by an early increase in TNF and IFN-γ (28) that is reversed by TNF ablation (43). Neither the mechanism for increased Thr phosphorylation nor the role of phosphorylation in KSR1 kinase activity has been shown. Interestingly, TNF treatment of intestinal epithelial cells increases both Thr and Ser phosphorylation of KSR1 (18). Twelve sites of phosphorylation on KSR1 have been reported, including Ser sites regulated by MEK1/2 and C-TAK-1 (29, 30, 44). Dephosphorylation of Ser392 by protein phosphatase PP2A is a necessary step in KSR1 membrane translocation and Raf-1 activation (45). Our findings show that the phosphatase treatment of KSR1 endogenously phosphorylated on Thr/Ser sites ablates kinase activity (Figure 4F) and suggest that, similar to Raf-1, critical phosphorylation events regulate kinase function. Therefore, it will be important to determine the mechanism and role of phosphorylation on KSR1 kinase activity and to determine whether the lack of increased Ser phosphorylation during inflammation explains part of the increased apoptosis seen in epithelial cells in the IL-10–/– model of IBD.

The mechanism of increased injury and epithelial apoptosis in the KSR1+/–IL-10+/– mouse is unclear, but suggests a gene-dosing effect. Similar gene-dosing effects have also been found in the intestinal epithelium with the heterozygous loss of TNF-converting enzyme (TACE/ADAM17) which causes reduced EGF receptor function (46). Similarly, the decreased expression of intestinal KSR1 in the IL-10+/– background (Figure 1 and Figure 4) appears to exacerbate either potential cytokine or epithelial regulatory defects mediated by the partial loss of IL-10. We have previously shown that decreased levels of KSR1 generated by an antisense construct increase susceptibility to TNF-mediated apoptosis in intestinal epithelial cells (12). However, in the current studies we did not detect functional alterations in signal transduction pathways or cellular apoptosis of KSR1 or IL-10 haploinsufficient mice. Because alterations in these or other cellular programs likely exist, further studies to understand the potential role of gene dosing in disease pathogenesis are needed. The relevance for understanding the impact of gene dosage effects is emphasized by the recent finding that heterozygous carriers of inactivating nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-2 (NOD2) mutations are at 3-fold increased risk of developing Crohn disease (47).

In summary, this report shows that KSR1 functions in a protective role in the intestinal epithelium exposed to TNF through regulation of antiapoptotic signal transduction pathways. Likewise, increased kinase activity of KSR1 may have a protective role in colon epithelial cells exposed to cytokines during inflammation by promoting intestinal homeostasis, as partial loss of KSR1 expression increases epithelial ulceration and apoptosis. Interestingly, recent reports suggest this cytoprotective role may come at a cost to the organism by supporting Ras-mediated tumorigenesis (26, 39). Since patients and mice with chronic IBDs are predisposed to epithelial cancers, the role of KSR1 in this process warrants further investigation. KSR1-deficient mice and colon cell lines will provide new insights into understanding the mechanisms of the epithelial cell responses to inflammation, injury, and repair seen in IBD. These findings also suggest a need for exploration of targeted inhibition of KSR1 to promote epithelial apoptosis in tumorigenesis.

Methods

Mice and TNF injection. All animal experiments were performed according to protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Vanderbilt University. 129/SvEv and BALB/c background mice were obtained from Taconic Farms and Jackson Laboratories, respectively. KSR1–/– mice on a 129/SvEv background (26) were obtained from Richard Kolesnick (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA), and IL-10–/– mice on a BALB/c background were obtained from Donna Rennick (DNAX Research Inc.). PCR primers specific for KSR1 and IL-10 transgenes were used for genotyping (sequences available upon request). Male mice (8 weeks old or as indicated, 25–30 g) were anesthetized and then injected i.p. with TNF (104 U in PBS containing 2% FBS) or with PBS with 2% FBS alone in a total volume of 200 μl for the indicated times.

Cell line preparation, cell culture, and cellular transfection. The young adult mouse colon cells and derivation of conditionally immortalized transgenic cell lines using the H-2Kb–tsA58 mouse (ImmortoMouse; Charles River Laboratories International Inc.) were as previously described (7, 8, 27). Briefly, KSR1–/– mice were mated with the ImmortoMouse (8). KSR1–/– mice carrying the heat-labile SV40 gene were sacrificed and colon epithelium was prepared to derive KSR1–/– MCE cell lines as before (7, 8, 27).

Cell lines were maintained in RPMI 1640 media with 5% FBS and 5 U/ml of murine IFN-γ on collagen-coated plates and grown under permissive conditions at 33°C with 5% CO2 (7). Before all experiments, cells were transferred to 37°C (nonpermissive conditions) with 0.5% FBS, IFN-γ–free media overnight. KSR1–/–MCE cells were transfected with pCMV-Flag–WT KSR1 or pCMV-Flag–KI KSR1 (provided by Richard Kolesnick) using LIPOFECTAMINE reagent (Invitrogen Corp.) as previously described (18).

Tissue and cellular lysate preparations, immunoprecipitation, and Western blot analysis. The colonic mucosa was scraped into homogenization buffer and cells were lysed as previously described (48). Cellular lysates were prepared following treatment with 100 ng/ml murine TNF for 15 minutes (or as indicated) or 10 ng/ml EGF (a gift of Stanley Cohen, Vanderbilt University) for 5 minutes. Cells were treated with TNF (100 ng/ml for 15 minutes or as indicated) or EGF (10 ng/ml for 5 minutes, gift of Stanley Cohen), and then were scraped into cell lysis buffer as previously described (18).

Immunoprecipitation of KSR1 or Raf-1 from colonic mucosa lysates was performed using monoclonal anti-KSR1 (BD Biosciences) or anti–Raf-1 antibody (Upstate USA Inc.). To detect KSR1-interacting proteins in MCE cells, Flag-tagged KSR1 was immunoprecipitated from MCE cells expressing Flag–WT KSR1, Flag–KI KSR1, or vector alone using anti-Flag M2 affinity gel (Sigma-Aldrich), and washed with 0.3 M NaCl. Flag-KSR1 and its binding proteins were eluted from the gel with 300 ng/μl of 3xFlag peptide (Sigma-Aldrich), separated on SDS-PAGE, and visualized using the Colloidal Blue staining kit from Invitrogen Corp. Western blot analysis was performed using anti–phospho-Thr anti–phospho-Ser473 Akt anti-Akt anti–phospho-Tyr180/182 p38, anti–phospho-Ser32 IκBα, anti-IκBα, anti-MEK1/2 (Cell Signaling Technology Inc.), anti–phospho-Thr183/Tyr185 ERK1/2 MAPK (Promega Corp.), anti–phospho-Ser (P-Ser, Zymed Laboratories Inc.), anti-KSR1, and anti–Raf-1 antibodies.

Histological analysis and immunohistochemistry. Intestinal tissue was immersed in 10% neutral buffered formalin before sectioning. Paraffin-embedded tissue sections were stained with H&E for light microscopic examination and scoring. Scoring was performed by a single pathologist, blinded to treatment conditions, using an injury scoring system previously described by Kennedy et al. (49), with the total score ranging from 0 (no injury) to 15 (most severe injury).

Slides were immunostained with anti-KSR1, anti-cIAP2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.), anti-endothelin (Chemicon International Inc.), anti-CD31 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc.), or anti–active caspase-3 (BD Biosciences) antibodies using reagents provided in the VECTASTAIN ABC kit (Vector Laboratories Inc.) or the HistoMouse-SP kit (Zymed Laboratories Inc.). Slides were viewed by light or differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy.

Apoptosis assays. Apoptosis was detected in colon tissue slides with the ApopTag In Situ Oligo Ligation (ISOL) kit (Intergen Co.) using T4 DNA ligase following the manufacturer’s guidelines, or by anti–active caspase-3 staining. Apoptosis in cell lines was determined using ApopTag In Situ Apoptosis Detection kits (TUNEL method, Intergen Co.) and DAPI staining. The slides were observed by DIC or fluorescence microscopy with relative apoptotic cells determined by counting apoptotic cells in at least 100 colonic glands, or by counting 500 cells in culture.

2-stage in vitro KSR1 kinase assay. We modified our 2-stage in vitro kinase assay (18) for mouse tissue samples. Immunoprecipitated KSR1 with or without dephosphorylation using 10 U calf intestinal alkaline phosphatase (CIAP, Promega Corp.) was washed with kinase buffer prior to incubation with 2 U recombinant Raf-1 (Upstate USA Inc.) in 30 μl kinase buffer with 150 μM ATP at 30°C for 30 minutes. KSR1 was precipitated by centrifugation, and then the Raf-1 remaining in the supernatant was incubated with 0.5 μg KI MEK1 (Upstate USA Inc.) in 30 μl kinase buffer with 150 μM ATP at 30°C for 30 minutes. MEK1 activation was detected by Western blot analysis with anti–phospho-Ser217/221 MEK1/2 or anti-MEK1/2 (Cell Signaling Technology Inc.) antibodies. Raf-1 kinase activity in colon mucosal homogenates was determined by incubating immunoprecipitated Raf-1 with KI MEK1 in the kinase buffer. MEK1 activation was detected as described above.

Statistical analysis. The statistical significance of the differences between mean values was determined using paired Student’s t test analysis. The level of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. The number of apoptotic cells in 100 colonic glands is presented as the mean ± SD.

Acknowledgments

We thank Richard Kolesnick (Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center) for KSR1–/– mice, Robert Whitehead (Vanderbilt University) for helping us to generate the KSR1–/– MCE cell line, Ronald Emeson and Mark Frey (Vanderbilt University) for manuscript suggestions, and the Vanderbilt University Medical Center Imaging Core Research Laboratory (grant CA-68485). This work was supported by NIH grants DK-56008 (to D.B. Polk) and DK-58404 (Vanderbilt University Digestive Disease Research Center).

Footnotes

See the related Commentary beginning on page 1233.

Nonstandard abbreviations used: DIC, differential interference contrast; ERK, extracellular signal–regulated kinase; IκB, inhibitor of κB; IBD, inflammatory bowel disease; ISOL, in situ oligo ligation; KI, kinase inactive; KSR1, kinase suppressor of Ras-1; MCE, mouse colon epithelial; PKB, protein kinase B.Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

References
  1. Sartor, R.B. 2002. Mucosal immunology and mechanisms of gastrointestinal inflammation. In Sleisenger & Fordtran’s gastrointestinal and liver disease: pathophysiology, diagnosis, management. M. Feldman, L.S. Friedman, and M.H. Sleisenger, editors. W.B. Saunders Co. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 21–51.
  2. Podolsky, DK. Inflammatory bowel disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002. 347:417-429.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  3. Nilsen, EM, et al. Gluten induces an intestinal cytokine response strongly dominated by interferon gamma in patients with celiac disease. Gastroenterology. 1998. 115:551-563.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  4. Schmitz, H, et al. Supernatants of HIV-infected immune cells affect the barrier function of human HT-29/B6 intestinal epithelial cells. AIDS. 2002. 16:983-991.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  5. Brown, GR, et al. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitor ameliorates murine intestinal graft-versus-host disease. Gastroenterology. 1999. 116:593-601.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  6. Hsueh, W, Caplan, MS, Tan, X, MacKendrick, W, Gonzalez-Crussi, F. Necrotizing enterocolitis of the newborn: pathogenetic concepts in perspective. Pediatr. Dev. Pathol. 1998. 1:2-16.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  7. Kaiser, GC, Polk, DB. Tumor necrosis factor α regulates proliferation in a mouse intestinal cell line. Gastroenterology. 1997. 112:1231-1240.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  8. Corredor, J, et al. Tumor necrosis factor regulates intestinal epithelial cell migration by receptor-dependent mechanisms. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2003. 284:C953-C961.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  9. Mizoguchi, E, et al. Role of tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 (TNFR2) in colonic epithelial hyperplasia and chronic intestinal inflammation in mice. Gastroenterology. 2002. 122:134-144.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  10. Baker, SJ, Reddy, EP. Transducers of life and death: TNF receptor superfamily and associated proteins. Oncogene. 1996. 12:1-9.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  11. Warzocha, K, Salles, G. The tumor necrosis factor signaling complex: choosing a path toward cell death or cell proliferation. Leuk. Lymphoma. 1998. 29:81-92.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  12. Yan, F, John, SK, Polk, DB. Kinase suppressor of Ras determines survival of intestinal cells exposed to tumor necrosis factor. Cancer Res. 2001. 61:8668-8675.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  13. Yan, F, Polk, DB. Probiotic bacterium prevents cytokine-induced apoptosis in intestinal epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2002. 277:50959-50965.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  14. Davis, RJ. Signal transduction by the JNK group of MAP kinases. Cell. 2000. 103:239-252.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  15. Xia, Z, Dickens, M, Rainegeaud, J, Davis, RJ, Greenberg, ME. Opposing effects of ERK and JNK-p38 Map kinases on apoptosis. Science. 1995. 270:1326-1331.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  16. Downward, J. Ras signalling and apoptosis. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1998. 8:49-54.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  17. Troppmair, J, Rapp, UR. Raf and the road to cell survival: a tale of bad spells, ring bearers and detours. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2003. 66:1341-1345.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  18. Yan, F, Polk, DB. Kinase suppressor of Ras is necessary for tumor necrosis factor α activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase in intestinal epithelial cells. Cancer Res. 2001. 61:963-969.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  19. Joseph, CK, Byun, H-S, Bittman, R, Kolesnick, RN. Substrate recognition by ceramide-activated protein kinase: evidence that kinase activity is proline-directed. J. Biol. Chem. 1993. 268:20002-20006.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  20. Zhang, Y, et al. Kinase suppressor of Ras is ceramide-activated protein kinase. Cell. 1997. 89:63-72.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  21. Kornfeld, K, Hom, DB, Horvitz, HR. The ksr-1 gene encodes a novel protein kinase involved in Ras-mediated signaling in C. elegans. Cell. 1995. 83:903-913.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  22. Therrien, M, et al. KSR, a novel protein kinase required for RAS signal transduction. Cell. 1995. 83:879-888.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  23. Roy, F, Laberge, G, Douziech, M, Ferland-McCollough, D, Therrien, M. KSR is a scaffold required for activation of the ERK/MAPK module. Genes Dev. 2002. 16:427-438.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  24. Xing, HR, Kolesnick, R. Kinase suppressor of Ras signals through Thr269 of c-Raf-1. J. Biol. Chem. 2001. 276:9733-9741.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  25. Nguyen, A, et al. Kinase suppressor of Ras (KSR) is a scaffold which facilitates mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2002. 22:3035-3045.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  26. Lozano, J, et al. Deficiency of kinase suppressor of Ras1 prevents oncogenic Ras signaling in mice. Cancer Res. 2003. 63:4232-4238.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  27. Whitehead, RH, VanEeden, PE, Noble, MD, Ataliotis, P, Jat, PS. Establishment of conditionally immortalized epithelial cell lines from both colon and small intestine of adult H-2Kb-tsA58 transgenic mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1993. 90:587-591.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  28. Berg, DJ, et al. Enterocolitis and colon cancer in interleukin-10-deficient mice are associated with aberrant cytokine production and CD4+ TH1-like responses. J. Clin. Invest. 1996. 98:1010-1020.
    View this article via: JCI PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  29. Cacace, AM, et al. Identification of constitutive and Ras-inducible phosphorylation sites of KSR: implications for 14-3-3 binding, mitogen-activated protein kinase binding, and KSR overexpression. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999. 19:229-240.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  30. Muller, J, Ory, S, Copeland, T, Piwnica-Worms, H, Morrison, DK. C-TAK1 regulates Ras signaling by phosphorylating the MAPK scaffold, KSR1. Mol. Cell. 2001. 8:983-993.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  31. Paris, F, et al. Endothelial apoptosis as the primary lesion initiating intestinal radiation damage in mice. Science. 2001. 293:293-297.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  32. Ishizuka, T, Takamizawa-Matsumoto, M, Suzuki, K, Kurita, A. Endothelin-1 enhances vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expression in tumor necrosis factor α-stimulated vascular endothelial cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1999. 369:237-245.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  33. Xing, HR, Lozano, J, Kolesnick, R. Epidermal growth factor treatment enhances the kinase activity of kinase suppressor of Ras. J. Biol. Chem. 2000. 275:17276-17280.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  34. Wang, X, Studzinski, GP. Kinase suppressor of RAS (KSR) amplifies the differentiation signal provided by low concentrations 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. J. Cell. Physiol. 2004. 198:333-342.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  35. Yu, W, Fantl, WJ, Harrowe, G, Williams, LT. Regulation of the MAP kinase pathway by mammalian Ksr through direct interaction with MEK and ERK. Curr. Biol. 1997. 8:56-64.
    View this article via: CrossRef Google Scholar
  36. Ohmachi, M, et al. C. elegans ksr-1 and ksr-2 have both unique and redundant functions and are required for MPK-1 ERK phosphorylation. Curr. Biol. 2002. 12:427-433.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  37. Sundaram, M, Han, M. The C. elegans ksr-1 gene encodes a novel Raf-related kinase involved in Ras-mediated signal transduction. Cell. 1995. 83:889-901.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  38. Muller, J, Cacace, AM, Lyons, WE, McGill, CB, Morrison, DK. Identification of B-KSR1, a novel brain-specific isoform of KSR1 that functions in neuronal signaling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000. 20:5529-5539.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  39. Xing, HR, et al. Pharmacologic inactivation of kinase suppressor of ras-1 abrogates Ras-mediated pancreatic cancer. Nat. Med. 2003. 9:1267-1268.
    View this article via: CrossRef Google Scholar
  40. Chen, LW, et al. The two faces of IKK and NF-κB inhibition: prevention of systemic inflammation but increased local injury following intestinal ischemia-reperfusion. Nat. Med. 2003. 9:575-581.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  41. Pearson, G, Bumeister, R, Henry, DO, Cobb, MH, White, MA. Uncoupling Raf1 from MEK1/2 impairs only a subset of cellular responses to Raf activation. J. Biol. Chem. 2000. 275:37303-37306.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  42. van Kempen, LC, Coussens, LM. MMP9 potentiates pulmonary metastasis formation. Cancer Cell. 2002. 2:251-252.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  43. Myers, KJ, et al. Antisense oligonucleotide blockade of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in two murine models of colitis. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2003. 304:411-424.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  44. Volle, DJ, et al. Phosphorylation of the kinase suppressor of Ras by associated kinases. Biochemistry. 1999. 38:5130-5137.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  45. Ory, S, Zhou, M, Conrads, TP, Veenstra, TD, Morrison, DK. Protein phosphatase 2A positively regulates Ras signaling by dephosphorylating KSR1 and Raf-1 on critical 14-3-3 binding sites. Curr. Biol. 2003. 13:1356-1364.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  46. Sunnarborg, SW, et al. Tumor necrosis factor-α converting enzyme (TACE) regulates epidermal growth factor receptor ligand availability. J. Biol. Chem. 2002. 277:12838-12845.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  47. Cuthbert, AP, et al. The contribution of NOD2 gene mutations to the risk and site of disease in inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology. 2002. 122:867-874.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  48. Polk, DB. Ontogenic regulation of PLCγ1 activity and expression in the rat small intestine. Gastroenterology. 1994. 107:109-116.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  49. Kennedy, RJ, et al. Interleukin 10-deficient colitis: new similarities to human inflammatory bowel disease. Br. J. Surg. 2000. 87:1346-1351.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
Version history
  • Version 1 (November 1, 2004): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts