Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Versatile humanized niche model enables study of normal and malignant human hematopoiesis
Ander Abarrategi, … , Ghulam Mufti, Dominique Bonnet
Ander Abarrategi, … , Ghulam Mufti, Dominique Bonnet
Published January 9, 2017
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2017;127(2):543-548. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI89364.
View: Text | PDF
Brief Report Hematology Article has an altmetric score of 10

Versatile humanized niche model enables study of normal and malignant human hematopoiesis

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The BM niche comprises a tightly controlled microenvironment formed by specific tissue and cells that regulates the behavior of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Here, we have provided a 3D model that is tunable in different BM niche components and useful, both in vitro and in vivo, for studying the maintenance of normal and malignant hematopoiesis. Using scaffolds, we tested the capacity of different stromal cell types to support human HSCs. Scaffolds coated with human mesenchymal stromal cells (hMSCs) proved to be superior in terms of HSC engraftment and long-term maintenance when implanted in vivo. Moreover, we found that hMSC-coated scaffolds can be modulated to form humanized bone tissue, which was also able to support human HSC engraftment. Importantly, hMSC-coated humanized scaffolds were able to support the growth of leukemia patient cells in vivo, including the growth of samples that would not engraft the BM of immunodeficient mice. These results demonstrate that an s.c. implantation approach in a 3D carrier scaffold seeded with stromal cells is an effective in vivo niche model for studying human hematopoiesis. The various niche components of this model can be changed depending on the context to improve the engraftment of nonengrafting acute myeloid leukemia (AML) samples.

Authors

Ander Abarrategi, Katie Foster, Ashley Hamilton, Syed A. Mian, Diana Passaro, John Gribben, Ghulam Mufti, Dominique Bonnet

×

Figure 1

UCB-derived HSPC engraftment in s.c. scaffolds.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
UCB-derived HSPC engraftment in s.c. scaffolds.
(A and B) Comparative as...
(A and B) Comparative assay using a single hMSC donor and multiple UCB donors. Each point represents 1 mouse seeded with 6 scaffolds. For each UCB donor, 3 to 8 mice were transplanted. (A) hCD45 scaffold-engraftment level. D1-D5: different UCB Donors. (B) Lineage distribution of engrafted cells. (C and D) A comparative assay using a single UCB donor and multiple hMSC donors. Each point represents 1 mouse seeded with 6 scaffolds. For each hMSC donor, 3 to 6 mice were transplanted. (C) hCD45 scaffold–engraftment levels. For comparative purposes, the engraftment levels in BM of i.v.-injected mice are provided. Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons was applied. *P < 0.05. (D) Lineage distribution of engrafted cells. (E) Gross morphology of harvested scaffold. (F) microCT study of a harvested scaffold. The scaffold is mainly soft tissue, with sporadic calcification spots. (G) Immunofluorescence image showing hCD45 cells in the scaffold and (H) osterix-positive (OSX+) and osterix-negative human stroma cells. (I) Schematic of preparation and implantation of bone-forming scaffolds. (J) Whole-mouse microCT showing the s.c. ossicle formation. (K) Gross morphology of the harvested ossicle. (L) microCT study of a harvested ossicle. (M and N) Immunofluorescence images showing (M) human vimentin+ (hVIM) mesenchymal cells and adipocytes and mature neovascularized (endomucin+, End) BM. (N) Trabecular bone formed inside ossicles. Dotted line shows delimited trabecular bone area. hVIM+/Osx+ cells are osteocytes or osteoblasts in the bone surface areas. (O) hCD45+ engraftment levels in the ossicle model tested with multiple UCB donors. Each point represents 1 mouse with 2 scaffolds. For each UCB donor, 2 to 4 mice were transplanted. Scale bars: 1 mm (E, F, K, and L); 20 μm (G, H and N); 50 μm (M). All data were harvested at 12 weeks after implantation.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts

Posted by 8 X users
Referenced in 2 patents
144 readers on Mendeley
See more details